Payam Moradi Young Researchers Club Azad University of Tafresh, Iran Eleventh International Conference on Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications (FSTA 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modellistica e Gestione dei Sistemi Ambientali A tool for multicriteria analysis: The Analytic Hierarchy Process Chiara Mocenni University of.
Advertisements

5/30/2014 Aosta, May 24th 2012 SESAMO: a decision support system for the Multi Criteria Analysis Fiorella GRASSO, Stefano MARAN (PP3) Project Final Meeting.
GIS APPLICATIONS IN SELECTION OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL SITES
Jesper H. Sørensen, Toshiaki Koike-Akino, and Philip Orlik 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings Rateless Feedback Codes.
Multi‑Criteria Decision Making
Barry Y. Miller GEOG 596A: HLZ Capstone Project Proposal, 26 September 2012.
Copyright, © Qiming Zhou GEOG3600. Geographical Information Systems GIS as Decision Support Tool.
FTP Biostatistics II Model parameter estimations: Confronting models with measurements.
Agricultural Feasibility Analysis in China: A GIS-based Spatial Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach Presenter: Fei Carnes Date: July 17, 2013.
By Joseph K. Berry W. M. Keck Scholar, University of Denver – August, An Overview of GIS-based Corridor.
An Introductory Overview to Multi Criteria Evaluation GEOG 5161: Research Design Professor Kenneth E. Foote Petra Norlund 2010.
1. Introduction 2 In this study, fuzzy logic (FL), multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) and maintenance management (MM) are integrated into one subject.
Routing in WSNs through analogies with electrostatics December 2005 L. Tzevelekas I. Stavrakakis.
Graph theory at work.  Examine the procedure utilized by snow plows in Iowa City  Systemize and minimize routes  Review mathematical concepts involved.
C++ Programming: Program Design Including Data Structures, Third Edition Chapter 21: Graphs.
Simulating Future Suburban Development in Connecticut Jason Parent, Daniel Civco, and James Hurd Center for Land Use Education and.
Using GIS to determinate a suitable areas for avalanche occurrences in the Presidential Range, New Hampshire, USA Silvia Petrova Objective Several factors.
Centrality and Prestige HCC Spring 2005 Wednesday, April 13, 2005 Aliseya Wright.
Multi Criteria Decision Modeling Preference Ranking The Analytical Hierarchy Process.
CS 128/ES Lecture 12b1 Intro to Spatial Analysis (mostly 2D)
Introduction to Management Science
1 Chapter 3 Methods of Analysis Copyright © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION
1 Multi-Criteria Decision Making MCDM Approaches.
MADM Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
Optimal Design of Timetables to maximize schedule reliability and minimize energy consumption, rolling stock and crew deployment.
1 Production APEC 3001 Summer 2007 Readings: Chapter 9 &Appendix in Frank.
Quantifying the availability and volume of the forest resides resource B.Hock, P.Nielsen, S.Grigolato, J.Firth, B.Moeller, T.Evanson Scion, Rotorua, New.
SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION
Presented by Johanna Lind and Anna Schurba Facility Location Planning using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Specialisation Seminar „Facility Location Planning“
1 Chapter 3 Methods of Analysis Copyright © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Mapping the future Converting storylines to maps Nasser Olwero GMP, Bangkok April
2007/10/17Kainan University Combining Grey Relation and TOPSIS Concepts for Selecting an Expatriate Host Country 以灰色關聯及 TOPSIS 觀念來選擇外派國家 Mei-Fang Chen.
Goal — The BP Routing Collaboration tool is a web-based.NET application consisting of server-based GIS and modeling components that identify the least.
Development of a Decision Aiding Framework For Energy Infrastructure Siting Ganesh Doluweera & Joule Bergerson Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment.
Lecture 9GEOG GIS for Physical Geography1 Outline: – Introduction – Multi-criteria evaluation (MCE) – Multi-objective land allocation (MOLA) – Examples.
School of Geography FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT School of Geography FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT GEOG5060 GIS and Environment Dr Steve Carver
Chapter 3 Sections 3.5 – 3.7. Vector Data Representation object-based “discrete objects”
1 1 Slide © 2004 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 17 Multicriteria Decisions n Goal Programming n Goal Programming: Formulation and Graphical Solution and.
MULTICRITERIAL REASONING of PRIORITIES1 THE PRINCIPLES OF MULTICRITERIAL REASONING OF THE DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES Buracas & Zvirblis
The Integration of Multi-Criteria Evaluation and Least Cost Path Analysis for Bicycle Facility Planning Greg Rybarczyk, M.S. Department of Geography University.
Models in GIS A model is a description of reality It may be: Dynamic orStatic Dynamic spatial models e.g., hydrologic flow Static spatial models (or point.
1 A Maximizing Set and Minimizing Set Based Fuzzy MCDM Approach for the Evaluation and Selection of the Distribution Centers Advisor:Prof. Chu, Ta-Chung.
Spatial Association Defining the relationship between two variables.
. 1 Transportation and Assignment Problems. . 2 Applications Physical analog of nodes Physical analog of arcs Flow Communication systems phone exchanges,
MAINTENANCE STRATEGY SELECTION BASED ON HYBRID AHP-GP MODEL SUZANA SAVIĆ GORAN JANAĆKOVIĆ MIOMIR STANKOVIĆ University of Niš, Faculty of Occupational Safety.
Decision map for spatial decision making Salem Chakhar in collaboration with Vincent Mousseau, Clara Pusceddu and Bernard Roy LAMSADE University of Paris.
Method of Hooke and Jeeves
Multi-Criteria Analysis - preference weighting. Defining weights for criteria Purpose: to express the importance of each criterion relative to other criteria.
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) ISL 2004 RiskCity Exercise: Spatial Multi Criteria Evaluation for Vulnerability.
BY WASIKE L ARNOLD F19/1669/2009 APPLICATION OF GEOSPATIAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE SELECTION OF A SUITABLE DAM SITE ON THE LOWER EWASO NYIRO RIVER.
Maximizing value and Minimizing base on Fuzzy TOPSIS model
Analyzing the Problem (SAW, WP, TOPSIS) Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Abdullah A.Al- khorayef S olving assignment-selection problems with verbal information Dr. Mohamed Z. Ramadan.
By: Beependra Singh Manika Bindal. Introduction Study Area& Objective To provide an unbiased suitable sites for waste disposal in and out Ooty.
Model Calibration and Weighting Avoid areas of… High Housing Density Far from Roads In or Near Sensitive Areas High Visual Exposure …what is “high” housing.
Solving the Euclidean Non-Uniform Steiner Tree Problem Using a Genetic Algorithm Ian Frommer, Dept. of Mathematics, US Coast Guard Academy Bruce Golden,
Example Apply hierarchical clustering with d min to below data where c=3. Nearest neighbor clustering d min d max will form elongated clusters!
Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System by Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making Norihiro Saikawa Department of Computer and Information.
ESTIMATING WEIGHT Course: Special Topics in Remote Sensing & GIS Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact: EXT:2257 RG712.
Oil Pipeline Optimal Route
CHAPTER 2: DC Circuit Analysis and AC Circuit Analysis
Multi-Criteria Decision Aiding with the Use of DECERNS WebSDSS
Finding Wind Turbine Locations in Northwest Lower Michigan
Optimal marketing strategy: A decision-making with ANP and TOPSIS
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)
MULTIDIMENSIONAL RANKING
Chapter 5 Transportation, Assignment, and Transshipment Problems
IME634: Management Decision Analysis
Chapter 6 Network Flow Models.
Presentation transcript:

Payam Moradi Young Researchers Club Azad University of Tafresh, Iran Eleventh International Conference on Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications (FSTA 2012) Using of Fuzzy AHP Based Multi Criteria Weighting Scheme for GIS Routine in National Iranian Gas

Outline INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY A. Finding Pipeline Routing Criteria B. Selection of Factors Affecting the Route in National Iranian Gas Engineering &development CompanyNational Iranian Gas Engineering &development Company C. Refinement of criteria D. Fuzzy TOPSIS model E. Assigning Weights to the Variables F. The FAHP and methodology G. Finding the Pipeline routing by using weighting RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The overall objective in selecting a petroleum pipeline route is choosing the shortest, most direct route is always a goal for capital expenditure reasons, but many important goals exist simultaneously in the route selection project and at times these goals may conflict. Geophysical, environmental, political, social, economic, and regulatory factors interact to define the route possibilities Pipeline alignment is an optimization between several factors such as social issues, environmental issues, and cost of the project and so on. 1- Introduction

A : Finding Pipeline Routing Criteria Establish the shortest possible route connecting originating, intermediate, and terminal locations; Avoid populated areas for public safety reasons Avoid hilly or rocky terrain; Avoid areas with steep slopes Avoid areas with high land cost Methodology :

Keep rail, road, river, and canal crossings to the bare minimum; Avoid a route running parallel to high-voltage transmission lines or DC circuits; Use an existing right-of-way, if possible; Avoid other obstacles, such as wells, houses, orchards, lakes, or ponds. Avoid unfavorable soil type Avoid reserved forest areas

B : Selection of Factors Affecting the Route in National Iranian Gas Engineering & development CompanyNational Iranian Gas Engineering & development Company The first step in a routing process is the selection of the factors affecting the pipeline route. Several spatial and non spatial factors affect the pipeline routing. 1 ) Operability : 2 ) Environmental Issues : 3 ) Economic :

C : Refinement of criteria TOPSIS method is based on choosing the best alternative, which has the shortest distance from the positive-ideal solution and the longest distance from the negative-ideal solution the concept is rational and comprehensible the computation involved is simple the concept allows objective weights to be incorporated into the similarity process

where D : Fuzzy TOPSIS model The Fuzzy MCDM can be concisely expressed in matrix format : Xij : is the performance rating of the alternative Ai : respect to the jth criterion Cj and wj : represents the weight of the jth criterion Cj : The normalized Fuzzy decision matrix denoted by R is shown below

the proposed Fuzzy TOPSIS procedure is then as follows : Step1: Decision matrix is normalized Step2: Weighted normalized decision matrix is formed The weighted Fuzzy normalized decision matrix is shown in

Step4: The distance of each alternative from PIS and NIS are Calculated : Step5: The closeness coefficient of each alternative is Calculated Step6: By comparing i CC values, the ranking of alternatives are determined. Step3: Positive ideal solution (PIS) and negative ideal solution (NIS) are determined

E : Assigning Weights to the Variables A weighting system has to be devised for weighing each of the map layers. The weighting system forms the backbone of the methodology.The weighted Layers are all summed up to form the suitability layer

F : The FAHP and methodology Step 1: The fuzzy synthetic extent value ( Si ) with respect to the criterion is defined in Step 2: The degree of possibility of This expression can be regularly written as given in = ==is defined in

Step3 : The degree possibility for a convex fuzzy number to be greater than k convex fuzzy numbers can be defined by Assume that is: Then the weight vector is given in

Step4 : Via normalization, the normalized weight vectors are given in Where W is non-fuzzy numbers StatementTFN Absolute (5/2,3,7/2) Very Strong (2,5/2,3) Fairly Strong (3/2,2,5/2) Week (1,3/2,2) Approximaly Equal (1/2,1,3/2) Equal (1,1,1)

G : Finding the Pipeline routing by using weighting Necessary steps in GIS include: Data Sources Data Input Acquiring topographic maps of the target Area Acquiring satellite imagery of the area Identification of factors affecting the route. Creating new layers for the analysis

Data Processing Assigning Weights to the Variables Raster Data Analysis Vector Data Analysis: Processing the data, weighting and Overlay Raster Data Analysis: Suitability layer, Cost distancing and Cost direction

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION