Miranda vs. Arizona.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Christina Ascolillo.  Who was involved: Ernesto Miranda and the State of Arizona.  When:  Where: Phoenix, Arizona  Why: Arrested and charged.

Advertisements

Presented by Tim, and Brendan. Arizona V. Miranda.

 Amendment VI  In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district.

What would society look like if Eric Cartman was a police officer.

Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco

Do you know your civil rights?

By: Megan Devin Political Science December 4, 2014.

Warren Court. Warm-up Do you have rights when you are being arrested? What rights do you have?

Miranda v. Arizona.

BY: KATIE LOSINIECKI Miranda v. Arizona. Facts Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1966 for the kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old woman After being interrogated.

Miranda v. Arizona Background Information - Phoenix, Arizona Ernesto Miranda arrested for kidnapping and rape -Interrogated for 2 hrs and.

Miranda v Arizona Escobedo v Illinois By Austin Lallier.

Miranda vs. Arizona 1966.

Daniel Moody PD. 3 3/25/10 Miranda VS. Arizona 1966.

The Criminal Amendments: Rights of the Accused Trends Over Time

Miranda v. Arizona. Facts of the Case Police arrest Ernesto Miranda after the victim identifies him in lineup Police interrogate Miranda for two hours.

Call To Order Complete the following statement: You have the right to remain silent… And take out your homework!!!

Promptbook  During our last class, we discussed Marbury v. Madison and the idea of judicial review. This will be the topic of your essay assignment. 1.In.

Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.

Supreme Court Cases Criminal Rights 1960’s. Gideon vs. Wainwright 1963 state courts are required under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Ashley Nine March 25, 2010 Period 7.  Poor living immigrant from Mexico living in Arizona.  He was charged with rape and kidnapping.  He was arrested.

Unit 4 Lesson 8: Miranda v. Arizona

Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda 1966 Charged & convicted of kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery charges second trial, with his confession excluded.

Miranda v. Arizona GREYSON PETTUS PLS 211 MR. NOEL DECEMBER 2ND, 2015.

The Warren Court ( ). Wordsplash Create one sentence per term using some clue words from below. DUE PROCESS Lawlegal principles No citizen may.

The Warren Court ( ) Appointed by Eisenhower Liberal period in court’s history Protected Civil Liberties & First Amendment Rights Malapportionment.

Supreme Court Cases on Self Incrimination Sarah Claypoole.

By Colby Beighey Period 9. About Ernesto Miranda  Born on March 9, 1941  Grew up in Mesa, Arizona  His mother died  His father remarried  Did not.

Miranda V. Arizona By: Elise Kloppenburg. Facts of the Case Phoenix, Arizona 1963 Ernesto Miranda, 23 years old Arrested in his home Taken to the police.

The Warren Court and judicial activism “The biggest damn fool mistake I ever made”, Dwight D. Eisenhower on Earl Warren, quoted in 1977 Chief Justice,

 Dates: Debated: Feb. 28, March 1 and 2, 1966 Decided: June 13, 1966  Ruling: The prosecution could not use Miranda's confession as evidence in a criminal.

In the criminal justice system, the Supreme Court has the final say. In the 1960s, the dedicated Justices who heard these cases were members of an elite.

Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.

Miranda v. Arizona.

Marisa Hanning Emily Bendik Katie Kraeer

Miranda Rights.

Warm-up Has anyone tried to get you to confess to something you didn’t do? How did this happen? Have you ever confessed to something and then regretted.

Miranda Rights Reem K, Madeline R, Miranda G, Emily K, & Britney F

John F. Kennedy

Landmark Cases Mapp v. Ohio Tinker v. Des Moines Miranda v. Arizona

Texas v. Johnson(1989)Flag Burning, Freedom of Speech

Judicial Branch Famous Trials.

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Tori Roupe and Haley Leavines

Aim: What are the protections offered by the case of Miranda vs

Miranda v. Arizona (1966).

Important Court Cases of the 20th Century

The Warren Court By Rebecca Johnson.

Miranda v. Arizona (1966) U.S. Supreme Court Case Study Project

Liberalism vs. Conservatism

Miranda v. Arizona 1966.

Miranda v. Arizona (1966) The Warren Court.

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial.

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Presented By: Dashawn Currington & Adam Walker

Miranda v. Arizona 5th Amendment

Looking into the Important Cases in the Past

Ch. 3-2 The Fifth Amendment Right to Remain Silent

Fifth and Sixth Amendments

Miranda Rights You have the right to remain silent…

Defendants’ Rights Edgenuity Lessons 3.4 and 3.5.

7Y Main: pancakes Alternate: French Toast

by Marcos Cardona-7th period

Rights of the Accused Part 1

Miranda v. Arizona Matthew & Noah.

The Warren Court AP US History.

Marisa Hanning Emily Bendik Katie Kraeer

Do Now: a) Finish up Rights Movement Packet b) Earl Warren Background

By: Michaela Hull and Elena Butler

The 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments

Presentation transcript:

Miranda vs. Arizona

Background Ernesto Miranda’s case was about not being informed of his rights while being arrested for charges of kidnapping, rape and armed robbery charges. While he was being detained, he did not know that his confessions would be used against him in the court because he was not read his rights as he was facing 20-30 years in jail.

When did it happen? Miranda vs. Arizona happened in 1966. It was argued on February 28, March 1 and March 2 and it was decided on June 13, 1966.

Who was the chief justice? The chief justice during the MIranda vs Arizona case was Chief Justice Earl Warren

What was the case about? What happened? The case of Miranda vs. Arizona was ruled by the Supreme Court that detained criminal suspects, prior to police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. The case was about how Miranda was not informed of how his confession would be used in court since he was facing 20-30 years in jail.

What was the constitutional issue? The constitution issue was how the 5th amendment “compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself” meaning that the 5th amendment was violated in the case of Miranda vs Arizona.

What was the vote? The vote went 5-4 being written by Chief Justice Earl Warren that Miranda’s confession could not be used against him because he was failed to be informed of his rights.

What effect did the case have on the U.S. The effect that the case Miranda vs. Arizona had on the U.S. was that this case had laid down the requirement for detained criminals being told of their constitutional rights before their questioning by the police.

Art Component

MLA sources "The Supreme Court . Expanding Civil Rights . Landmark Cases . Miranda V. Arizona (1966) | PBS". Thirteen.Org, 2018, https://www.thirteen.org/wnet/supremecourt/rights/landmark_miranda.html. Accessed 3 Dec 2018. Pratap, Abhijeet. "Miranda V Arizona 1966 - Landmark Supreme Court Cases". Cheshnotes, 2018, https://www.cheshnotes.com/2016/11/miranda-v-arizona-1966-landmark-supreme-court-cases/. Accessed 3 Dec 2018. "Facts And Case Summary - Miranda V. Arizona". United States Courts, 2018, http://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/facts-and-case-summary-miranda-v-arizona. Accessed 3 Dec 2018. "Miranda V. Arizona (1966) - Bill Of Rights Institute". Bill Of Rights Institute, 2018, https://billofrightsinstitute.org/educate/educator-resources/lessons-plans/landmark-supreme-court-cases-elessons/miranda-v-arizona/. Accessed 3 Dec 2018. "April 18 Warren Court". Academic.Brooklyn.Cuny.Edu, 2018, http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/history/johnson/7418warren.htm. Accessed 3 Dec 2018. "What Was Decided In Miranda V. Arizona?". Thoughtco, 2018, https://www.thoughtco.com/miranda-v-arizona-104966. Accessed 3 Dec 2018.