Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RNA aptamers as pathway-specific MAP kinase inhibitors
Advertisements

Activation of the Erythropoietin Receptor Is Not Required for Internalization of Bound Erythropoietin by Diana L. Beckman, Lilie L. Lin, Mary E. Quinones,
Teshome Mebatsion, Matthias König, Karl-Klaus Conzelmann  Cell 
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
The Protein Import Motor of Mitochondria
Marius K Lemberg, Bruno Martoglio  Molecular Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Laura Lancaster, Harry F. Noller  Molecular Cell 
Michael Kowarik, Stephanie Küng, Bruno Martoglio, Ari Helenius 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Fátima Gebauer, Marica Grskovic, Matthias W Hentze  Molecular Cell 
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Human mRNA Export Machinery Recruited to the 5′ End of mRNA
Benjamin P Callen, Keith E Shearwin, J.Barry Egan  Molecular Cell 
ClpX-Mediated Remodeling of Mu Transpososomes
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Maintaining the Ribosomal Reading Frame
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
Nascent Membrane and Secretory Proteins Differ in FRET-Detected Folding Far inside the Ribosome and in Their Exposure to Ribosomal Proteins  Cheryl A.
More Than One Glycan Is Needed for ER Glucosidase II to Allow Entry of Glycoproteins into the Calnexin/Calreticulin Cycle  Paola Deprez, Matthias Gautschi,
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Folding of CFTR Is Predominantly Cotranslational
Transcriptional Fidelity and Proofreading by RNA Polymerase II
Orientational Preferences of Neighboring Helices Can Drive ER Insertion of a Marginally Hydrophobic Transmembrane Helix  Karin Öjemalm, Katrin K. Halling,
Rachel L Winston, Joel M Gottesfeld  Chemistry & Biology 
SV40 VP2 and VP3 Insertion into ER Membranes Is Controlled by the Capsid Protein VP1: Implications for DNA Translocation out of the ER  Robert Daniels,
Role of Sec61α in the Regulated Transfer of the Ribosome–Nascent Chain Complex from the Signal Recognition Particle to the Translocation Channel  Weiqun.
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages (September 1998)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (May 1997)
Msp1 Is a Membrane Protein Dislocase for Tail-Anchored Proteins
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Protein Translocons Cell
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
The Mammalian RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Interacts with RNA to Suppress Transcription-Coupled 3′ End Formation  Syuzo Kaneko, James L. Manley 
Jens Herold, Raul Andino  Molecular Cell 
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Functional Link between the Mammalian Exosome and mRNA Decapping
Protein Translocation Is Mediated by Oligomers of the SecY Complex with One SecY Copy Forming the Channel  Andrew R. Osborne, Tom A. Rapoport  Cell  Volume.
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Brh2 Promotes a Template-Switching Reaction Enabling Recombinational Bypass of Lesions during DNA Synthesis  Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular.
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
The Zipper Model of Translational Control
Volume 85, Issue 3, Pages (May 1996)
Soo Jung Kim, Devarati Mitra, Jeffrey R. Salerno, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Jennifer Terrell, Susan Shih, Rebecca Dunn, Linda Hicke  Molecular Cell 
Nascent Membrane and Secretory Proteins Differ in FRET-Detected Folding Far inside the Ribosome and in Their Exposure to Ribosomal Proteins  Cheryl A.
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Hitoshi Nakatogawa, Koreaki Ito  Molecular Cell 
Sequence-Specific Alteration of the Ribosome–Membrane Junction Exposes Nascent Secretory Proteins to the Cytosol  Ramanujan S Hegde, Vishwanath R Lingappa 
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Proteasome-Mediated Degradation of p21 via N-Terminal Ubiquitinylation
Maria Spies, Stephen C. Kowalczykowski  Molecular Cell 
Cheryl A. Woolhead, Arthur E. Johnson, Harris D. Bernstein 
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Dual Function of the Voltage-Dependent Ca2+ Channel α2δ Subunit in Current Stimulation and Subunit Interaction  Christina A Gurnett, Michel De Waard,
A Minimal RNA Polymerase III Transcription System from Human Cells Reveals Positive and Negative Regulatory Roles for CK2  Ping Hu, Si Wu, Nouria Hernandez 
BiP Acts as a Molecular Ratchet during Posttranslational Transport of Prepro-α Factor across the ER Membrane  Kent E.S Matlack, Benjamin Misselwitz, Kathrin.
Empty Site Forms of the SRP54 and SRα GTPases Mediate Targeting of Ribosome– Nascent Chain Complexes to the Endoplasmic Reticulum  Peter J Rapiejko, Reid.
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Elva Dı́az, Suzanne R Pfeffer  Cell 
TRAM Regulates the Exposure of Nascent Secretory Proteins to the Cytosol during Translocation into the Endoplasmic Reticulum  Ramanujan S Hegde, Sabine.
Cotranslational Biogenesis of NF-κB p50 by the 26S Proteasome
Unassembled Ig Heavy Chains Do Not Cycle from BiP In Vivo but Require Light Chains to Trigger Their Release  Marc Vanhove, Young-Kwang Usherwood, Linda.
Cotranslational Folding Increases GFP Folding Yield
Molecular Mechanism of Drug-Dependent Ribosome Stalling
Presentation transcript:

Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 495-503 (October 1998) Forced Transmembrane Orientation of Hydrophilic Polypeptide Segments in Multispanning Membrane Proteins  Kazuhisa Ota, Masao Sakaguchi, Gunnar von Heijne, Naotaka Hamasaki, Katsuyoshi Mihara  Molecular Cell  Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 495-503 (October 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80149-5

Figure 1 TM8 Can Translocate the L7 Loop in the Absence of TM7 (A) Constructs used for assessing the function of TM8 in the translocation of the L7 loop. A segment encoding TM1 to TM8 of band 3 was fused with mature prolactin (1-8-PL). TM7 of 1-8-PL was replaced with a hydrophilic sequence (Thr-31 to Phe-80) from prolactin (1-8Δ7-PL). TM8 was deleted from this construct (1-6-PL). The L7 loop and TM8 were fused to mature prolactin (G8-PL). The hydrophilic sequence replacing TM7 and the N-glycosylation site are indicated by a closed box and an open circle, respectively. The reporter domain of mature prolactin in the carboxy-terminal portion is indicated by an open box (PL). (B) Constructs were expressed in a cell-free system in the presence of RM. After the translation reaction, membranes were precipitated by centrifugation through a cushion containing 0.5 M KCl and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Aliquots of the membrane precipitates were treated by endoglycosidase H (EndoH +). Translocation of the glycosylated loop was monitored by its N-glycosylation. The N-glycosylation efficiency (glc) is indicated. (C) Possible membrane topologies. Closed boxes indicate the hydrophilic sequence replacing TM7, and open boxes indicate the TM segments of band 3. (D) Hydrophobicity plots of the TM1-8 region of wild-type and TM7-exchanged constructs. Each sequence was analyzed by TopPred II using the default parameters (Claros and von Heijne 1994). The line at <H> = 1 indicates the standard cutoff value for predicting “certain” TM segments. Position 1 corresponds to Gly-376 of the band 3 protein, and the TMs are indicated by boxed numbers. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 495-503DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80149-5)

Figure 2 Forced Transmembrane Orientation of the Hydrophilic Segment in Model Proteins with Two Hydrophobic Nexo/Ccyt Segments (A) The H1 segment of E. coli leader peptidase and TM8 from band 3 were positioned as in the figure. N-glycosylation sites are shown by open circles. H1 and TM8 were separated by 100 or 200 hydrophilic residues from prolactin. (B) Constructs were expressed in vitro. After translation in the presence of RM (+), aliquots were treated by the proteinase K and/or EndoH. Proteinase K–resistant fragments are indicated by arrowheads. Aliquots were extracted under the alkali conditions and separated into membrane-bound (M) and soluble (S) fractions. (C) Possible topologies. Potential N-glycosylation sites accessible to the oligosaccharyl transferase in the lumen are indicated by open circles. (D) Transmembrane orientation of a hydrophilic segment induced by the SA-I of synaptotagmin 2. The N-terminal tail and the SA-I of synaptotagmin 2 were introduced instead of TM8 of band 3. N-glycosylation sites (indicated by circles) were positioned 17 residues before H1 and 29 residues before the synaptotagmin 2 transmembrane segment. Constructs were expressed in vitro in the absence (−) or presence (+) of RM. Aliquots were treated by proteinase K or EndoH. The diglycosylated form is indicated by two dots. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 495-503DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80149-5)

Figure 3 N-glycosylation Efficiency Depends on the Distance from H1 (A) Constructs used for glycosylation site scanning. N-glycosylation consensus sites were created in the indicated position (X residues from H1 segment) of H1-100-8 construct. (B) Constructs were expressed in vitro in the presence (+) or absence (−) of RM. (C) Quantitation of the data in (B). Molecular Cell 1998 2, 495-503DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80149-5)

Figure 4 Membrane Topology Assessed by Factor Xa Cleavage (A) Factor Xa sites (Ile-Glu-Gly-Arg) were created 12 residues after H1 (H1-Xa-N) or 10 residues before TM8 (H1-Xa-C) in the H1-100-8 construct. (B) After synthesis in vitro in the presence of RM, membranes were isolated and treated with factor Xa (8 μg/ml) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The di- and monoglycosylated forms are indicated by double and single dots, respectively. Proteolytic fragments are indicated by arrowheads. (C) Relative contents of mono- and diglycosylated forms before and after factor Xa cleavage. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 495-503DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80149-5)

Figure 5 TM3 Is Integrated by the SA-I Function of TM4 (A) Constructs used to assess the SA-I function of TM4. The region from TM1 to TM4 was fused to mature prolactin, and the L7 loop was introduced between the TM3 and TM4 segments (1-G4-PL). The N-glycosylation site was placed 3 or 13 residues from TM3 (3G and 13G, respectively). TM4 was deleted from 1-G4-PL (1-3G-PL). (B) Constructs were expressed in vitro in the absence (−) or presence (+) of RM. Aliquots were treated EndoH or proteinase K. (C) Topology of the constructs in the membrane. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 495-503DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80149-5)

Figure 6 H1-100-8 Does Not Jam the Translocon (A) Effect of prior insertion of membrane proteins on the translocation of preprolactin. mRNAs encoding synaptoagmin (Stg; lanes 2 and 6), full-length H1-100-8 (full; lanes 3 and 7), and truncated H1-100-8 (trun; lanes 4 and 8) were translated in the presence of limiting amounts of RM at 30°C for 20 min. As a mock reaction, the first translation was carried out without added mRNA (lanes 1 and 5). After the translation with the first mRNA, the reactions were diluted 4-fold with newly prepared translation mixture including preprolactin mRNA, and the mixtures were further incubated at 22°C for 90 min. Processed, mature prolactin is indicated by an arrow, and the di- and monoglycosylated products are indicated by double and single dots. (B) Relative processing efficiency of the secondary synthesized preprolactin. The processing efficiency is expressed as a ratio (%) to that obtained after the first mock reaction (lanes 1 and 5). The results shown in the figure represent the average of three experiments with standard deviations (error bars). The relative amounts of the glycosylated forms of Stg2, full-length H1-100-8, and truncated H1-100-8 in lanes 6–8 are 1.2, 1.9, and 1.0, respectively. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 495-503DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80149-5)

Figure 7 Models for Cotranslational Integration of Multispanning Membrane Proteins (A) A transmembrane segment not sufficiently hydrophobic to open the translocation channel by itself (a–b) is pulled across the translocon by the following Nexo/Ccyt SA-I (c–d). (B) A sufficiently hydrophobic Ncyt/Cexo SA-II segment opens the translocation channel and promotes translocation of the following portion of the chain (f–g). The next transmembrane segment stops translocation (St function, h). Molecular Cell 1998 2, 495-503DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80149-5)