DCM Demo – Model Specification, Inversion and 2nd Level Inference

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. Daunizeau Institute of Empirical Research in Economics, Zurich, Switzerland Brain and Spine Institute, Paris, France Bayesian inference.
Advertisements

Bayesian inference Lee Harrison York Neuroimaging Centre 01 / 05 / 2009.
Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London
Dynamic causal Modelling for evoked responses Stefan Kiebel Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging UCL.
Dynamic Causal Modelling for ERP/ERFs
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND SOURCE LOCALISATION
DCM for ERP/ERF A presentation for Methods for Dummies By Ashwini Oswal and Elizabeth Mallia.
Bayesian models for fMRI data
Dynamic Causal Modelling for ERP/ERFs Valentina Doria Georg Kaegi Methods for Dummies 19/03/2008.
What do you need to know about DCM for ERPs/ERFs to be able to use it?
DCM demo André Bastos and Martin Dietz Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging.
MEG/EEG Inverse problem and solutions In a Bayesian Framework EEG/MEG SPM course, Bruxelles, 2011 Jérémie Mattout Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre ? ?
Overview Contrast in fMRI v contrast in MEG 2D interpolation 1 st level 2 nd level Which buttons? Other clever things with SPM for MEG Things to bear in.
Directed Investigation Dice Differences Your Name.
The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? Karl Friston
General Linear Model & Classical Inference
GUIDE to The… D U M M I E S’ DCM Velia Cardin. Functional Specialization is a question of Where? Where in the brain is a certain cognitive/perceptual.
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM): Theory Demis Hassabis & Hanneke den Ouden Thanks to Klaas Enno Stephan Functional Imaging Lab Wellcome Dept. of Imaging.
Source localization for EEG and MEG Methods for Dummies 2006 FIL Bahador Bahrami.
Source localization MfD 2010, 17th Feb 2010
SENSOR LEVEL ANALYSIS AND SOURCE LOCALISATION in M/EEG METHODS FOR DUMMIES Mrudul Bhatt & Wenjun Bai.
Generative Models of M/EEG: Group inversion and MEG+EEG+fMRI multimodal integration Rik Henson (with much input from Karl Friston)
DCM for ERPs/EFPs Clare Palmer & Elina Jacobs Expert: Dimitris Pinotsis.
EEG/MEG Source Localisation SPM Course – Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging – Oct ? ? Jérémie Mattout, Christophe Phillips Jean Daunizeau Guillaume.
EEG/MEG source reconstruction
Contrasts & Inference - EEG & MEG Himn Sabir 1. Topics 1 st level analysis 2 nd level analysis Space-Time SPMs Time-frequency analysis Conclusion 2.
J. Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK UZH – Foundations of Human Social Behaviour, Zurich, Switzerland Dynamic Causal Modelling:
Dynamic Causal Modelling of Evoked Responses in EEG/MEG Wellcome Dept. of Imaging Neuroscience University College London Stefan Kiebel.
Input Single-state DCM Intrinsic (within- region) coupling Extrinsic (between- region) coupling Multi-state DCM with excitatory and inhibitory connections.
Dynamic Causal Modelling for EEG and MEG
EEG/MEG source reconstruction
Dynamic Causal Modelling Introduction SPM Course (fMRI), October 2015 Peter Zeidman Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London.
Ch. 5 Bayesian Treatment of Neuroimaging Data Will Penny and Karl Friston Ch. 5 Bayesian Treatment of Neuroimaging Data Will Penny and Karl Friston 18.
MfD EEG/MEG Source Localization 4 th Feb 2009 Maro Machizawa Himn Sabir Expert: Vladimir Litvak.
Dynamic Causal Model for evoked responses in MEG/EEG Rosalyn Moran.
Multimodal Brain Imaging Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College, London Guillaume Flandin, CEA, Paris Nelson Trujillo-Barreto, CNC,
Bayesian inference Lee Harrison York Neuroimaging Centre 23 / 10 / 2009.
Bayes for Beginners Anne-Catherine Huys M. Berk Mirza Methods for Dummies 20 th January 2016.
Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) A Practical Perspective Ollie Hulme Barrie Roulston Zeki lab.
1 Jean Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging 23 / 10 / 2009 EEG-MEG source reconstruction.
Bayesian Model Selection and Averaging SPM for MEG/EEG course Peter Zeidman 17 th May 2016, 16:15-17:00.
DCM for ERP/ERF: theory and practice Melanie Boly Based on slides from Chris Phillips, Klaas Stephan and Stefan Kiebel.
Mihály Bányai, Vaibhav Diwadkar and Péter Érdi
Principles of Dynamic Causal Modelling
5th March 2008 Andreina Mendez Stephanie Burnett
Dynamic Causal Modeling of Endogenous Fluctuations
DCM for ERP/ERF: theory and practice
The general linear model and Statistical Parametric Mapping
Neural mechanisms underlying repetition suppression in occipitotemporal cortex Michael Ewbank MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Effective Connectivity
Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM): Theory
M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization
Generative Models of M/EEG:
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging University College London
Dynamic Causal Model for evoked responses in M/EEG Rosalyn Moran.
Dynamic Causal Modelling for ERP/ERFs
DCM for Time-Frequency
The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? K Friston
Dynamic Causal Modelling for M/EEG
Dynamic Causal Modelling
Bayesian Methods in Brain Imaging
CRIS Workshop: Computational Neuroscience and Bayesian Modelling
Visual Cortex Extrastriate Body-Selective Area Activation in Congenitally Blind People “Seeing” by Using Sounds  Ella Striem-Amit, Amir Amedi  Current.
Effective Connectivity
M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization
Dynamic Causal Modelling for evoked responses
Vahe Poghosyan, Andreas A. Ioannides  Neuron 
Bayesian Model Selection and Averaging
Group DCM analysis for cognitive & clinical studies
EEG and MEG dynamics give clues as to the role of macrodynamics (producing EEG and MEG records) in brain function. Here, a cluster of lateral occipital.
Presentation transcript:

DCM Demo – Model Specification, Inversion and 2nd Level Inference Richard Rosch and Tim West

What questions can I ask with DCM? What is the best model with the dynamics suited to cause my data? Does model A explain my data better than model B? What parameters of a model are important in explaining an effect between experimental conditions? How can I make inference from parameters inferred at the group level? DCM in essence is a way to ask what is the best Assess performance of one model over another What parameter? – connections? Intrinsic or extrinsic?

Start with the experimental data: For this demonstration we will be using a dataset that has been made openly available on the web Multimodal data-set (MEG/EEG) and we investigate event related potentials 16 Subjects, 3 conditions Multimodal data set Select MEG –event relate potentials Collapse famous and scrambled faces into one analysis

Generative Model Hierarchical network including the fusiform face area (FFA), occipital face area(OFA), and superior temporal sulcus (STS) Linked by forwards, backwards and lateral connections What is the importance of backward and forwards connections in the cognitive processing of faces? We can compare performance of the initial full model with subsets of reduced models in order to determine which properties can best explain the data Hierichical model of cortical regions, Fusiform face area Occipital face area Superior temporal sulcus What are the significance of forwards and backwards projections

1 Load or Save DCM, specify DCM model types or load new data Specify experimental data and design- ERP time widow, trial conditions as well as data reduction 2 Specify electromagnetic “observer” model, as well as simulation of ERP parameters 3 Specify the connectivity of the underlying neuronal model. 4 Additional constraints on dipole fitting. 5 6 Inspect the outcomes of model inversion

Specifying the Electromagnetic Model Computing the Head Model mapping from source space to sensor space Here we use the template model which specifies a “normal” cortical mesh Coregister using Nasion as well as LPA and RPA fiducial points Use 3-Shell head sphere for EEG head model and single shell for the MEG head model.

A Matrix- Connection strengths If I want to specify a link from rOFA to rFFA – this is a forward connection From the 1st column to the 3rd row TO FROM a b c d A Matrix- Connection strengths B Matrix- Between condition modulations of connection Strengths C Matrix- Input connections (modelling sensory input)

Iterative fitting scheme – “Variational Bayes” Find parameters that minimize the free energy of the model fit After several iterations the model should converge.

Condition dependent modulation of connections (B Matrix) Visually inspect the actual (data) ERPs and those predicted from model Condition dependent modulation of connections (B Matrix)

Reduction and Averaging Inversion Reduction Selection / Comparison Averaging participants 2nd level inversion models Family-wise selection fixed effects random effects [exhaustive search] Bayesian parameter average Classical statistics (t-tests) Reduction and Averaging Model selection

Specify Electromagnetic model

Specify Neuronal Model

Specify your hypothesis in a generative model Invert (fit) the model to your data Make an inference! Conduct an experiment to collect data that can answer your hypothesis

Bayesian Model Comparison MODEL A DATA MODEL B MODEL C Bayesian Model Comparison