Relations Between Engineering Fields

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A relation between Structures and Network Flows Through Graph Representation It was found that the same type of representation, a Graph, can be associated.
Advertisements

Function: Domain and Range
ENGR 214 Chapter 16 Plane Motion of Rigid Bodies:
New entity in statics – “Face Force” Developing new engineering concept through graph representations.
The continuum and its coherence Stability analysis of a retaining wall.
Ch. 7: Dynamics.
Formulation of Two-Dimensional Elasticity Problems
Combinatorial Representations for Analysis and Conceptual Design in Engineering Dr. Offer Shai Department of Mechanics, Materials and Systems Faculty of.
The Equivalence between Static (rigid) and Kinematic (flexible, mobile) Systems through the Graph Theoretic Duality Dr. Offer Shai Tel-Aviv University.
The Duality between Planar Kinematics and Statics Dr. Shai, Tel-Aviv, Israel Prof. Pennock, Purdue University.
General view on the duality between statics and kinematics M.Sc student: Portnoy Svetlana Advisor: Dr. Offer Shai.
Systematic conceptual engineering design using graph representations.
Table of Contents Function: Domain and Range A function is a correspondence between two sets governed by some rule(s) such that each member of the first.
Transforming Knowledge to Structures from Other Engineering Fields by Means of Graph Representations. Dr. Offer Shai and Daniel Rubin Department of Mechanics,
Review Conjugate beam method Prepaid by:
G1G1 gigi G2G2 gjgj D Duality between Engineering Systems Since graph representations are mathematical entities, mathematical relations can be established.
Graph pattern matching Graph GGraph Qisomorphism f(a) = 1 f(b) = 6 f(c) = 8 f(d) = 3 f(g) = 5 f(h) = 2 f(i) = 4 f(j) = 7.
10.6 Parametric Equations. Definition of Parametric Equations parametric equation is a method of defining a relation using parameters. A simple kinematic.
RELATIVE MOTION ANALYSIS: VELOCITY
Plane Motion of Rigid Bodies: Forces and Accelerations
ASME DETC Robot Manipulators and Singularities Vijay Kumar.
A New Methodology for Systematic Conceptual Design by means of Generalized Discrete Representations Research group conducted by Dr. Offer Shai Department.
COVERAGE TOPICS 1. AC Fundamentals AC sinusoids AC response (reactance, impedance) Phasors and complex numbers 2. AC Analysis RL, RC, RLC circuit analysis.
10-1 An Introduction to Systems A _______ is a set of sentences joined by the word ____ or by a ________________. Together these sentences describe a ______.
AC SINUSOIDS Lecture 6 (I). SCOPE Explain the difference between AC and DC Express angular measure in both degrees and radians. Compute the peak, peak-peak,
RELATIVE MOTION ANALYSIS: VELOCITY
ROBOTICS 01PEEQW Basilio Bona DAUIN – Politecnico di Torino.
Design of engineering systems by transforming knowledge between fields.
Intelligent Robot Lab Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Lab Chapter 7. Forced Response Errors Pusan National University Intelligent Robot Laboratory.
Control Systems Lect.3 Steady State Error Basil Hamed.
Prepaid by: CLASSIFICATION OF STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROBLEMS.
Dynamics, Fourteenth Edition R.C. Hibbeler Copyright ©2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Today’s Objectives: Students will be able to:
Velocity Propagation Between Robot Links 3/4 Instructor: Jacob Rosen Advanced Robotic - MAE 263D - Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering - UCLA.
MT411 Robotic Engineering
SYLLABUS AC Fundamentals AC Analysis AC power Three phase circuit
RELATIVE MOTION ANALYSIS: VELOCITY (Section 16.5)
Lecture #6 Classification of structural analysis problems. Statical determinacy.
Solving Engineering Design Problems
Lecture10 Equilibrium.
RIGID BODY MOTION: TRANSLATION & ROTATION (Sections )
COVERAGE TOPICS AC Fundamentals AC Analysis AC power
Ch 8 : Rotational Motion .
CLASSIFICATION OF INVERSION INVERSION OF FOUR BAR CHAIN MECHANISM
RELATIVE MOTION ANALYSIS: VELOCITY
A Unified Concept for the Graph Representation of
ME321 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines
Avshalom Sheffer School of Mechanical Engineering Tel Aviv University
ME321 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines
ME 202 Mechanical Engineering for Civil Engineers
RELATIVE MOTION ANALYSIS: VELOCITY
RELATIVE MOTION ANALYSIS: ACCELERATION
RELATIVE MOTION ANALYSIS: ACCELERATION
ME321 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines
G1. G1 g2 g3 g4 g5 g6 g8 g10 g11 g12 g14.
Duality between Engineering Systems
RIGID BODY MOTION: TRANSLATION & ROTATION (Sections )
properties(gk)=T(laws(sj))
Unit 5 Mechanical Principles and Applications
RELATIVE MOTION ANALYSIS: VELOCITY
Analysis of engineering systems through graph representations
UNIT – III FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
If AD = 10, DC =6, and ED = 15, find DB.
Analysis of engineering system by means of graph representation
Graph Representations and their Applications (formal description)
Eng Ship Structures 1 Hull Girder Response Analysis
ME321 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines
properties(gk)=T(laws(sj))
Lesson 4.1: Identifying linear functions
Presentation transcript:

Relations Between Engineering Fields

Duality between engineering systems Since graph representations are mathematical entities, mathematical relations can be established between them, such as duality relations: (giG1)=Tdual(gj G2) G1 G2 Tdual gj gi

Duality between engineering systems Duality between graph representations yield the duality relations between the represented engineering systems. G1 G2 Db Da D T’ gj gi sj T si

Dual Representation Design Technique

Duality between Linkages and Structures Duality between Stewart platforms and Robots Duality between Planetary and Beam Systems

Duality relation between linkages and structures

Consider a kinematical linkage and its graph representation

Consider a kinematical linkage and its graph representation

Now, consider a static structure and its graph representation Kinematical Linkage Static Structure

There exist a mathematical relation between the representations of the two systems Kinematical Linkage Static Structure

Therefore there is the duality relation between the represented engineering systems Kinematical Linkage Static Structure

The relative velocity of each link of the linkage is equal to the internal force in the corresponding rod of the structure Kinematical Linkage Static Structure

The equilibrium of forces in the structure is thus equivalent to compatibility of relative velocities in the linkage Kinematical Linkage Static Structure

Checking system stability through the duality Stable ???? 8 5 9 2 4 7 10 11 1 12 6 3 11 7 3 4 12 2 1 5 8 9 10 6 Due to links 1 and 9 being located on the same line Definitely locked !!!!! 8 12 ’ 2 1 10 6 7 3 5 9 R’ 4 12 ’ 9 10 R’ 11 6 7 8 2 3 5 1 4

Duality relation between Stewart platform and serial robot

Consider a Stewart platform system. 1 2 3 4 5 6 P

BUILDING THE GRAPH REPRESNTATION OF THE STEWART PLATFORM 3 3 2 2 4 4 1 1 5 5 6 6

BUILDING THE DUAL GRAPH REPRESNTATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 P 1 P 2 3 4 6 5 P 3 2 4 1 5 6

BUILDING THE DUAL SPATIAL LINKAGE (SERIAL ROBOT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 P 1 P 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 P

BUILDING THE DUAL SPATIAL LINKAGE (SERIAL ROBOT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 P 1 P 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 P

VERIFYING THE DUALITY RELATION BETWEEN THE TWO SYSTEMS The correspondence in geometric positions of the kinematical pairs of the linkage and the legs of the Stewart platform. P

VERIFYING THE DUALITY RELATION BETWEEN THE TWO SYSTEMS Each force in the Stewart platform leg is directed in the same direction as the relative angular velocity of the corresponding kinematical pair in the dual serial robot. P

Duality relation between planetary and beam systems

Consider a simple two-gear system. B 1 2

BUILDING THE GRAPH REPRESNTATION OF THE GEAR SYSTEM A C B 1 2 2 C rC B 1 rB A rA

VERIFYING THE ISOMORPHISM OF THE REPRESENTATION A C B 1 2 2 C w1/0 rC B rA x w1/0 1 rB A rA

VERIFYING THE ISOMORPHISM OF THE REPRESENTATION A C B 1 2 2 C w1/0+w2/1 rC B rA x w1/0+rB x w2/1 1 rB A rA

VERIFYING THE ISOMORPHISM OF THE REPRESENTATION A C B 1 2 2 C w1/0+w2/1+w0/2=0 rC B rA x w1/0+rB x w2/1+rC x w0/2=0 1 rB A rA

VERIFYING THE ISOMORPHISM OF THE REPRESENTATION A C B 1 2 2 C w1/0+w2/1+w0/2=0 rC B rA x w1/0+rB x w2/1+rC x w0/2=0 1 rB A rA

VERIFYING THE ISOMORPHISM OF THE REPRESENTATION A C B 1 2 2 C w1/0+w2/1+w0/2=0 rC B rA x w1/0+rB x w2/1+rC x w0/2=0 1 rB A rA

DEDUCING BEHAVIORAL EQUATIONS FROM THE GRAPH KNOWLEDGE A C B 1 2 2 C DA+w2/1+w0/2=0 rC B rA x DA+rB x w2/1+rC x w0/2=0 1 rB A rA

DEDUCING BEHAVIORAL EQUATIONS FROM THE GRAPH KNOWLEDGE A C B 1 2 2 C DA+DB+w0/2=0 rC B rA x DA+rB x DB+rC x w0/2=0 1 rB A rA

DEDUCING BEHAVIORAL EQUATIONS FROM THE GRAPH KNOWLEDGE A C B 1 2 2 C DA+DB+DC=0 rC B rA x DA+rB x DB+rC x DC=0 1 rB A rA

DEDUCING BEHAVIORAL EQUATIONS FROM THE GRAPH KNOWLEDGE A A C B I B 1 2 2 C DA+DB+DC=0 rC B rA x DA+rB x DB+rC x DC=0 1 rB A rA

BUILDING THE DUAL GRAPH REPRESENTATION C C I A A A C B B B 1 2 2 C DA+DB+DC=0 rC B rA x DA+rB x DB+rC x DC=0 1 rB A rA

DEDUCING BEHAVIORAL EQUATIONS FROM THE DUAL REPRESENTATION A A C I B B 1 2 2 C FA+DB+DC=0 rC B rA x FA+rB x DB+rC x DC=0 1 rB A rA

DEDUCING BEHAVIORAL EQUATIONS FROM THE DUAL REPRESENTATION A A C I B B 1 2 2 C FA+FB+DC=0 rC B rA x FA+rB x FB+rC x DC=0 1 rB A rA

DEDUCING BEHAVIORAL EQUATIONS FROM THE DUAL REPRESENTATION A A C I B B 1 2 2 C FA+FB+FC=0 rC B rA x FA+rB x FB+rC x FC=0 1 rB A rA

DEDUCING BEHAVIORAL EQUATIONS FROM THE DUAL REPRESENTATION A A C I B B 1 2 2 C FA+FB+FC=0 rC B rA x FA+rB x FB+rC x FC=0 1 rB A rA

BUILDING THE DUAL BEAM SYSTEM C I A A C B B 1 2 2 C C rC FA+FB+FC=0 rC B B rA x FA+rB x FB+rC x FC=0 rB 1 rB A A rA rA

VERIFYING THE DUALITY RELATION BETWEEN THE TWO SYSTEMS C I A A C B B 1 2 2 C C rC PA+FB+FC=0 rC B B rA x PA+rB x FB+rC x FC=0 rB 1 rB A A rA rA

VERIFYING THE DUALITY RELATION BETWEEN THE TWO SYSTEMS C I A A C B B 1 2 2 C C rC PA+RB+FC=0 rC B B rA x PA+rB x RB+rC x FC=0 rB 1 rB A A rA rA

VERIFYING THE DUALITY RELATION BETWEEN THE TWO SYSTEMS C I A A C B B 1 2 2 C C rC PA+RB+RC=0 rC B B rA x PA+rB x RB+rC x RC=0 rB 1 rB A A rA rA

VERIFYING THE DUALITY RELATION BETWEEN THE TWO SYSTEMS C I A A C B B 1 2 2 C C rC PA+RB+RC=0 rC B B rA x PA+rB x RB+rC x RC=0 rB 1 rB A A rA rA