Future intensive field periods Recommendations

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Task Force on Modelling and measurement activity : synergies with FAIRMODE Laurence Rouïl (INERIS) Co-chair of the TFMM.
Advertisements

CLRTP PMEG Third meeting, 13 & 14 March 2006, Dessau.
Using field campaigns results to reduce uncertainties in inventories Wenche Aas, Knut Breivik and Karl Espen Yttri And material from: Eiko Nemitz (CEH,
Intensive measurements and modelling of size segregated chemical composition of aerosols in June 2006 and Jan 2007 Wenche Aas, Rami Alfarra, Elke Bieber,
Developments in EMEP monitoring strategy and recommendations from AirMonTech Kjetil Tørseth, NILU/EMEP-CCC.
Cooperation of EMEP/CCC and EEA on near real-time air quality data. Presented by Wenche Aas Though most of the work is done by: Tim Haigh, Bernt Rondell,
EMEP INTENSIVE MEASUREMENT PERIODS IN CLOSE PARTNERSSHIP WITH EU PROJECTS Wenche Aas, Andres Alastuey, Francesco Canonaco, Fabrizia Cavalli, Franco Lucarelli,
Relevant activities in EMEP Wenche Aas EMEP/CCC (NILU) EMEP Monitoring programme Expansion to the EECCA region, HTAP QA/QC.
Uncertainties in atmospheric observations Wenche Aas EMEP/CCC.
CLRTP particulate matter expert group Welcome to Defra and London.
Wish-list to the Emission community.  TFMM annual meeting held in Zagreb on the 6-8 May 2013  Main issues :  Review of the implementation of the EMEP.
Adaptation Baselines Through V&A Assessments Prof. Helmy Eid Climate Change Experts (SWERI) ARC Egypt Material for : Montreal Workshop 2001.
Synergies between EMEP and EUSAAR Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)
EMEP Monitoring programme Wenche Aas EMEP/CCC (NILU)
HNMS contribution to CONSENS Petroula Louka & Flora Gofa Hellenic National Meteorological Service
EMEP Monitoring Strategy Status and challenges, with main focus on the EECCA region Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)
ENEON first workshop Observing Europe: Networking the Earth Observation Networks in Europe September, Paris [EMEP,ACTRIS,HELCOM,CAMP and more/NILU]
Laurence ROUÏL Chair of the EMEP Steering Body (CLRTAP)
Joint TFEIP/TFMM workshop October 22, Dublin Understanding discrepancies between atmospheric model results and measurements given uncertainties in emission.
Krzysztof OLENDRZYŃSKI Secretariat of the LRTAP Convention UNECE CONVENTION ON LONG-RANGE TRANSBOUNDARY AIR POLLUTION (LRTAP) UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION.
EMEP Steering Body, Geneva, 2011 Co-operation between EMEP/MSC-E and WGE Oleg Travnikov, Ilia Ilyin Meteorological Synthesizing Centre East of EMEP (EMEP/MSC-E)
Ice-Based Observatories network in the Arctic Ocean Andrey Proshutinsky, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution NOAA Arctic Science Priorities Workshop,
29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM TRENDS OF ATMOSPHERIC HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN THE EMEP COUNTRIES.
Assessment of POP pollution in EMEP region
Evaluating the Impact of Soil and Groundwater Contamination on the Indoor Environment Greg Zarus ATSDR Atmospheric Scientist.
Extended Bureaux EMEP & WGE, Geneva March 21th 2017
ICP Integrated Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Ecosystems -
Thirtieth meeting of the Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling
Hazard and Vulnerability Assessment
Complete Today’s Science Warmup (See Your Daily Warmup Sheet)
Scientific Method.
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
STEPS OF THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
Model assessment of heavy metal pollution from global to local scales
Siân Curtis, PhD OVC Evaluation Dissemination Meeting,
Criteria for prioritizing health-related problems for research
STEPS OF THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD.
Observations - Utlimate goal is an integrated (virtual) data center containing an adequate set of observations with known quality and representativity.
Guidebook and “MIP” Actions
Wenche Aas and Karl Espen Yttri (EMEP/CCC)
News from the Convention
John Munthe and Ingvar Wängberg
10th TFMM meeting, June, 2009, France, Paris
EMEP Monitoring Strategy
MSC-E: Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulykh
Status of data from EMEP intensive period 2008/2009
Monitoring strategy, technical issues
District discipline lead spring meeting agenda
Jan Eiof Jonson, Peter Wind EMEP/MSC-W
EMEP intensive measurements, June 2006
Uncertainties in atmospheric observations
EMEP/ACTRIS/COLOSSAL intensive measurement period Des 2017 – March 2018 Wenche Aas, EMEP/CCC.
Progress and problems of POP modelling
PM Trends PM10, PM2.5, PM10-PM2.5 (not possible in 90s)
H. Fagerli, TFMM Bordeux, april 2008
Wenche Aas, Kjetil Tørseth, Cathrine Lund Myhre
Lessons learnt from the EMEP intensive measurements
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
Welcome in Ispra ! 2010 Fall TFMM workshop.
EMEP new monitoring strategy in France Nathalie Poisson - ADEME
Emissions What are the most sensitive parameters in emissions to improve model results (chemical species, spatio-temporal resolution, spatial distribution,
Report on the EEA workshop dedicated to the use of GMES data for emission inventories John Van Aardenne (EEA), Justin Goodwin (Aether), Peter de Smet.
Wenche Aas Status of EMEP measurements today Field intercomparison
Welcome TFMM workshop on the implementation of the EMEP monitoring strategy Introduction to the monitoring strategy QA/QC activities of EMEP organisation.
Model assessment of HM and POP pollution of the EECCA region
Integration of the work between EMEP and WGE
EMEP intensive measurement periods
TFMM Workplan & Mandate Augustin Colette & Oksana Tarasova
EMEP/MSC-W How can EMEP Intensive measurement periods help to improve modelling of acidification, eutrophication, O3 and PM? Views from MSC-W H. Fagerli.
Summary of discussion (1)
Presentation transcript:

Future intensive field periods Recommendations Wenche Aas (EMEP/CCC)

Things to consider Scientific pressures Coverage Practical problems Where are the main uncertainties and lack of knowledge What to priority Coverage Need better spatial coverage in east of Europe (i.e. EECCA) for most components. Vertical profiles to be better explored and coordinated Practical problems Cost Need coordination with ongoing research projects

Scientific pressures (1) Flux Not typically EMEP work and dependent on research project NitroEurope do N and C flux at several sites, but these are not usually EMEP sites, which often are not suited for this Nitrogen partitioning (fine/course and gas/particle) We did already include this in previous campaigns, but not with a high spatial resolution It is expressed from several Parties a wish to evaluate the data we have before new campaigns on this topic Photochemistry – VOC (biogenic especially) It has been a focus on EC/OC, but not on the precursors Previous intensive been in fall, winter and spring. A need for a summer campaign

Scientific pressures (2) POPs: exchange between compartments (Soil, Sea, Air) Need to include other measurement communities Sites for the effect groups not necessarily collocated with EMEP ICP IM sites may be an option Expensive and demanding POPs: spatial resolution –source identification POP passive in EMEP 2006 being evaluated and new POP MONET/RECETOX being conducted (2009) Active sampler needed –too difficult (cost & competence) Heavy metal intensive for source identification Daily and or hourly data needed Cost issue

Recommendations Intensive periods are important to support the EMEP program, and for capacity building A need/wish for EU projects to get enough momentum (especially on flux, VOC, and POPs) Need to evaluate the intensive periods we have accomplished before starting a similar The most feasible things to include are maybe: Heavy metals BVOC –summer campaign Summer 2010 the earliest. May wait until 2011 to ensure we have enough energy and interest in the community