Fire Emissions and Smoke Management Plans

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Uinta Basin Air Quality Study Kathleen Sgamma. Topics Covered  Background  Purpose  Timelines  Project Details  WRAP Phase III Oil & Gas Emissions.
Advertisements

An Update on the Activities of the Western Regional Air Partnership ‘WRAP v2.0’ Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
Engineering Economic Analysis Canadian Edition
WRAP 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory Inter-RPO Fire and Smoke Technical and Policy Coordination Meeting February 9-10, 2005 – Round Rock, TX Dave Randall.
Premise Three Basic Forms of Uncertainty - Level of Change - Process Impacts - Time and Space 1.
U. Shankar 1, D. McKenzie 2, J. Bowden 1 and L. Ran 1 Assessing the Impacts on Smoke, Fire and Air Quality Due to Changes in Climate, Fuel Loads, and Wildfire.
Has EO found its customers? 1 Space Applications Institute Directorate General Joint Research Centre European Commission Ispra (VA), Italy
Paul Holper, CSIRO Marine & Atmospheric Research, Australia Neil Plummer, Bureau of Meteorology, Australia ACRE Workshop, Zurich, June 2008 CAWCR web portal.
PHASE II PROJECT Day 1 – 3:15p PHASE II PROJECT -- Ag Burning – Integration of QC responses -- NIF Format -- Plume Characteristics Update -- Next Steps.
1 WRAP Fire Tracking Systems Draft Intent of WRAP FTS Policy – Assist states/tribes to address emissions inventory and tracking associated with fire in.
SIMULATING THE IMPACT OF AREA BURNED ON GOALS FOR SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT Jimmie Chew, RMRS Christine Stalling, RMRS Barry Bollenbacher, Region One.
WRAP/FEJF Inter RPO Report WRAP - Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, CA 22 February a – Presentation (c)
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
Engineering Economic Analysis Canadian Edition
February 23-24, 2005Salt Lake City, Utah1 In-house QC Semi-Automated Duplicate Checking, Large Fire Refinement Complex Fire Identification Phase 2 Fire.
WRAP/FEJF Phase III/IV Emissions Inventory Project WRAP - Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting San Diego, CA 22 February a – Presentation (a)
PHASE II PROJECT Day 1 – 1:15p PHASE II PROJECT -- Technical Refinements Large Fires Complex Identification Duplicates -- WF and Rx Fire QC Packets States,
Future climate change drives increases in forest fires and summertime Organic Carbon Aerosol concentrations in the Western U.S. Dominick Spracklen, Jennifer.
Fugitive Dust Project Phase One The WRAP Emissions Forum contracted with a team of contractors lead by ENVIRON to produce regional PM 10 and PM 2.5 emissions.
2005 WRAP Work Plan WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
Fire Effects Tradeoff Model (FETM) Mark D. Schaaf, Air Sciences Inc. Portland, Oregon.
November 2, 2005San Diego, California1 Calculation Tool for Estimating Projected Emissions - Methods Roll Out – (Day 2 – ) Phase III/IV Project.
Dr Mark Cresswell Scenarios of the Future 69EG6517 – Impacts & Models of Climate Change.
September 28, 2005Ph III/IV Project Team1 Phase III/IV Planning EIs Update and Status Report.
Pollutant Emissions from Large Wildfires in the Western United States Shawn P. Urbanski, Matt C. Reeves, W. M. Hao US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research.
Overview of WRAP FEJF Work Products WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 23-24, 2006 Sacramento, CA Darla Potter (WDEQ) & Mark Fitch (USFS)
1/13/20161 FETS: State of the System Providers, Features, Lessons Learned August 31, 2009 FETS Project Meeting Boise, ID.
Wyoming WISE Agricultural Burning EI Development Day 1 – 2:45p Wyoming WISE Agricultural Burning EI Development.
USDA’s Inventory & Improvements Marci Baranski, PhD USDA Office of the Chief Economist Climate Change Program Office.
The West is different August 14, 2013 OAQPS. Aerosols causing Worst Visibility Days – East vs. West 2.
Denver 2004 TGP1 PM2.5 Emissions Inventory Workshop Denver, CO March 2004 Thompson G. Pace USEPA Emissions Estimation for Wildland Fires.
Fire Emissions Joint Forum Technical & Policy Products Overview June 16, 2004 Portland, OR.
Wildfire Emissions Updated Methodology Neva Sotolongo Emission Inventory Branch.
309/308 Technical & Policy Overview Fire Emissions Joint Forum March 10-11, 2004 San Diego, CA.
2005 Progress on Emissions Inventories Attribution of Haze Workgroup Meeting January 24, 2006.
Application of Fuel Characteristic Classification System to Ph II EI (add-on task to Inter RPO project) Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting Spokane, WA.
September 28, 2005Missoula, Montana1 Inter-RPO 2002 National Wildfire Emission Inventory - Results - by Air Sciences Inc. and EC/R, Inc. for the Inter-RPO.
Work Items for §309 SIPs WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002 Tom Moore & Brian Finneran.
April 17, 2012 Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western Governors’ Association WESTAR Council Meeting.
Key Findings from May & July 2008 WRAP Technical Workshops September 30, 2008 Steve Arnold, Colorado DPHE & Bob Kotchenruther, EPA R10 (Co-Chairs, WRAP.
WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, & Dust Emissions of Carbon from Fire Fire Emissions Joint Forum Presented by – Dave Randall, Air Sciences Inc. May 23, 2006.
JOINT FIRE SCIENCE PROGRAM 2015 FUNDING CALL October 9, 2014.
1 Fire Emissions Inventories (almost) Closeout -- Ph IV Projections – Fire Emissions Joint Forum Meeting Spokane, WA Day 1 – 1015a part A Dave Randall.
Jeff Vukovich, USEPA/OAQPS/AQAD Emissions Inventory and Analysis Group
Landscape dynamics in the Southern Atlantic Coastal Plain in response to climate change, sea level rise and urban growth Todd S. Earnhardt, Biology Department,
Demand Response in the 7th Power Plan
Calculation of Background PM 2.5 Values
EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Phase 1 – 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory
Causes of Haze Assessment Brief Overview and Status Report
Western Regional Haze Planning and
Tribal Data WG Fire and Smoke WG Oil and Gas WG
Tribal Data WG Fire and Smoke WG Oil and Gas WG
NOVELTIS/Laboratoire d’Aérologie, Toulouse (France)
Tribal Data WG Fire and Smoke WG Oil and Gas WG
Phase 1 – 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory
July 11, 2006 / 3p Phase IV Projection Emission Inventories
Air Resource Specialists, Inc. July 23, 2004
Phase 2 – 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory
Tribal Data WG Fire and Smoke WG Oil and Gas WG
Inter-RPO 2002 Fire Emissions Inventory
AoH Conference Call September 7, 2004
Tribal Data WG Fire and Smoke WG Oil and Gas WG
Fire Emissions Joint Forum February 9, 2005
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Tribal Data WG Fire and Smoke WG Oil and Gas WG
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Tribal Data WG Fire and Smoke WG Oil and Gas WG
Tribal Data WG Fire and Smoke WG Oil and Gas WG
Presentation transcript:

Fire Emissions and Smoke Management Plans Current Work of the WRAP Fire and Smoke Workgroup (FSWG) and the Representative Baseline and Future Fire Scenarios Workgroup (RBFFS) Workgroup Co-chairs: Sara Strachan, Idaho DEQ Bob Kotchenruther, EPA Region 10 Paul Corrigan, USDA and State of Utah Contractor: Matt Mavko, Air Sciences, Inc.

Summary of Current Work Development of: 5-year representative baseline wildfire emissions inventory for input to regional haze modeling Future fire scenarios wildfire emissions inventory for input to regional haze modeling Map-based informational portal to Smoke Management Plan/Program information for states and tribes

Representative Baseline Fire EI Regional haze modeling requires representative baseline planning emissions that best reflect the current emissions profile for each source potentially impacting Class I Area visibility.

Representative Baseline Fire EI MTBS WF Acres Burned (1984-2016) Total Area (103 Acres) Representative Baseline Fire EI As a source, wildfire has high annual variability in frequency, magnitude, and location.

Representative Baseline Fire EI Annual area burned has been increasing due to climate change and forest management. Using one year (e.g. 2014 base year) is not representative of variability. Existing fire inventories for recent 5-year period are lacking. Reference #99 in USGCRP, 2018: Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II [Reidmiller, D.R., C.W. Avery, D.R. Easterling, K.E. Kunkel, K.L.M. Lewis, T.K. Maycock, and B.C. Stewart (eds.)]. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, 1515 pp.

Representative Baseline Fire EI Decided to build a baseline inventory using a new method based on physical and biological ecoregions. The approach takes into account fire variability in time, space, and size, while addressing the existence of differing fire regimes and their dependence on feedbacks between fire weather, climate, and fuels.

Representative Baseline Fire EI – Wildfire Workflow Seed Data Baseline Acres Growth Seasonality Location 2002 Base Year Round 1 (Phase IV) Current (Proposed) Probability Distributions National Data 2000-2003 Average Acres Randomly add/remove events from seed data, by State, until baseline acres achieved National Data 2013-2017 Average Acres Grow ecoregion datasets by sampling P.D.F.’s until Nat’l baseline acres achieved Base Year Event Actuals Generic curves from PMDETAIL database Distributions of days by size bin [by ecoregion]; allocate growth evenly across days Histograms by ecoregion from MTBS Randomly sample histograms to date fires “burnable area” from FCCS Monte Carlo method to place fires on burnable area within ecoregions - Instead of building baseline inventory from actual fire inventories (which are incomplete), Air Sciences built an inventory based on the frequency of fires within a given area. These area-frequency curves, when calculated for Bailey’s ecoregions of the US, essentially characterize differing fire regimes based on historical fire frequency, vegetation, landscape, fire weather, and climate. From this basis, an activity dataset can be built that allocates fires across burnable area according to physical, seasonal, and historical processes. The method also introduces a measure of stochasticity, by integrating the probablity of a fire of a certain size occurring at a particular time and location to the allocation process.

Representative Baseline Fire EI The resulting activity dataset reflects the variability between ecoregions locates fires across the domain. Baseline emissions will then be calculated from the activity data and submitted to the RH modelers.

Future Fire Scenarios Future fire scenarios that aim to characterize model sensitivity to increased wildfire and Rx fire will be developed using the same methodological basis as the representative baseline inventory just described.

Map-based SMP Info Portal Need: A clearinghouse location for a collection of contacts and materials related to States’ and Tribes’ Smoke Management Plans and Programs. Method: Create a survey to gather information and link collected information to existing map on WRAP website. Results: A clickable, geographically-based clearinghouse to quickly obtain information about SMPs in the WRAP domain.