Detailed Design Presentation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sophomore Design Class Automated Highway Simulation Group 2: Jeremy Sletten Patrick Murphy Michael Olson Randa Ibrahim.
Advertisements

Structural Qualification Testing of the WindSat Payload Using Sine Bursts Near Structural Resonance Jim Pontius Donald Barnes.
Chandima Perera Jeremy Brown Xiangyu Sun Brianne Luff.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 3/16/2012OVSA Preliminary Design Review.
P10511: Miniaturization of Xerography Derek Meinke (ME, PM) Matthew Liff (ME) Tony Zhang (EE) Zaw Htoo (ISE)
1. P09203 – 1kg Robotic Motor Module Gen 2 Platform This project is Sponsored by the Kate Gleason Foundation.  Team Members:  Lauren Farnsworth → Team.
MSD-I Project Review Modular Motion Tracking Sensors 1.
LFTB Proprietary Information 1 Fuser test bed ™ R I T MSD1 Project Review February 22, 2007 Fuser Test Bed P07501 IE TEAM Justin McMillan – Project Lead.
Lucky Charms Marbit Separation Critical Design Review May 16, 2003 Gregory Dickman Roy Mitchell Karen Palumbo George Simmonds Scott Walker Andy Wang.
Lecture 7 Model Development and Model Verification.
Optical Stage Redesign Team 4025 Senior Design II – Spring
The objective of this project was to design a dynamic similarity test rig to replicate the operating conditions of the main crank bearing in the Dresser-Rand.
Engineering Design Process
LSU 10/09/2007System Design1 Project Management Unit #2.
MSD P15280 RIT HOT WHEELZ TEST BENCH. AGENDA ❖ Detailed Design Review ➢ Competition Benchmarking ➢ Mechanical ●Motor Mount & Baseplate ●Modular Cart.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Introduction to Computer Technology
Condor Technology Solutions, Inc. Grace RFTS Application Extension Phase.
VALIDATION METHODOLOGY
1 Validation & Verification Chapter VALIDATION & VERIFICATION Very Difficult Very Important Conceptually distinct, but performed simultaneously.
Supplier Overview of Johnson & Johnson MD&D Supplier Quality Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) Supplier Process Control.
This document is proprietary to Project Consulting Group, Inc. and contains confidential information which is solely the property of Project Consulting.
DVA Series Work Flow P. Dewdney Apr 15, SPDO DVP Work Flow 2 DVA-1 CPG.
Chapter 3 Dr. Bahaa Al-Sheikh & Eng. Mohammed Al-Sumady Intoduction to Engineering Introduction to Engineering Design 1.
RBM and Asset Strategy.
Science Fair How To Get Started… (
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer System Level Design Review September 29, 2015.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
P16453 Problem Definition Review Kris Kidder | John Dolan | Shay Stanistreet | Anthony Miuccio.
Ch 7 Shafts.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Preliminary Detailed Design Review November 13, 2015.
SOLUTION What kind of plan do we need? How will we know if the work is on track to be done? How quickly can we get this done? How long will this work take.
P16453 Subsystem Design Loading, Measurement, Control, and Test of a Journal Bearing Test Platform Kris Kidder | John Dolan | Shay Stanistreet | Anthony.
Making Improvements Improve Kaizen Facilitation. Objectives Identify characteristics of a Pilot Test / Run Describe 5 phases for a Pilot Test / Run 
The Implementation of BPR Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
Software Project Management Iterative Model & Spiral Model.
1 Next Steps to Reduce the RTM Settlement Timeline COPS Workshop August 29, 2013 Mandy Bauld ERCOT Director, Settlement & Retail Operations (512)
P /24/14 Meeting. What we did well ●Depth and thoroughness of work ●Documentation of work ●Team Work ●Others?
P16452: Active Reciprocating Compressor Valve Assembly Week 9: Subsystem Design Review.
Preliminary Detailed Design Review Group P16228: Mike, Zach, Joe, Elijah & Bernie.
SYSTEM LEVEL DESIGN REVIEW P16318 Gaseous Mass Flow Rate Controller Luke McKean, Lianna Dicke, Selden Porter, Schuyler Witschi ?
TEAM RAMROD MAE 3 FALL 2006 Chris Bachman Joseph Holmstrom Andrew Lee.
What has been accomplished at the end of MSD 1 & 2?
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
The System Development Life Cycle
MNS - Mission need statement
DESIGN OF STEERING SYSTEM OF SELU MINI BAJA CAR
Project Reports: Written and Oral
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Sixth Edition
OVERVIEW Impact of Modelling and simulation in Mechatronics system
P07203 Dynamometry Laboratory Infrastructure
Systems Analysis and Design
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Detailed Design
Multidisciplinary Capstone Design:
P08002-Automated Parallel Bars
Detailed Design Review
Kris Kidder | John Dolan | Shay Stanistreet | Anthony Miuccio
Systems Design Review : Heart Pump and Circulatory System
MSD P15280 RIT HOT WHEELZ TEST BENCH
Introduction to Systems Analysis and Design
Multidisciplinary Capstone Design:
Engineering Analysis: Detailed Design Phase
Project Reports: Written and Oral
PSS verification and validation
M. Kezunovic (P.I.) S. S. Luo D. Ristanovic Texas A&M University
Project Management Unit #2
Detailed Design Review Solar Thermal Water Heater
Preliminary Detailed Design Review: P18001
Presentation transcript:

Detailed Design Presentation Loading, Measurement, Control, and Test of a Journal Bearing Test Platform Kris Kidder | John Dolan | Shay Stanistreet | Anthony Miuccio

Agenda Team Vision Preliminary MSD II Timeline Load Cell Parameters (as discussed prior) Detailed Design Components Bill of Materials Feasibility Analysis Oil Flow Characteristics Test Plans Updated Risk Assessment Plans to round out MSD I

Team Vision A concept for the pre-loaded spring assembly and loading subsystem will be modelled and simulated under operating conditions. Necessary parts will be identified and a preliminary bill of materials will display expected cost of the systems to be built. If time allows, parts will be purchased and the subsystems will be implemented, with the expectation that preliminary tests will be run to get a feel for real-world results and feasibility.

Timeline

Current Load Cell Parameters Potential problems can arise from load cell not taking data quickly enough to be used for analysis (slower than 25 Hz) Load cell measurement rate is not available in any website/manual Leads us to believe that the actual trouble is in the DPM-3 Signal Monitors, not the load cell. Signal Monitors refresh at 3 times per second according to the documentation 60 Hz is a possibility, will take more time to fully understand signal monitors Other Relevant Parameters Max Load: 2000 lbs. Calibration: Leveled out to exactly 0.00 when weight was added and then removed, shows little to no signs of fluctuation. Further tests will be completed to show higher levels of accuracy in calibration.

Detailed Design - EMA Arm Redesign

Detailed Design - EMA Arm

Detailed Design - Load Cell Plate

Detailed Design - Anti-backlash System

Detailed Design - Sliding Plate

Detailed Design - Sliding Plate

Detailed Design - Cont.

Detailed Design - Backing Plate

Current Bill of Materials

Lead Screw Feasibility Calculations done in MATLAB to remove human error and allow for iterative solution making Equations used to determine torque required to turn a preloaded spring system like this one. Found very reasonable torques, on the order of under 10 ft-lbs. About 5.5 ft-lbs to raise lead screw (analytical) Constructed quick experiment to verify findings, findings correlated to expectations

Spring Fatigue Capability Calculations done in MATLAB to remove human error and allow for iterative solution making Answers provided match online calculator website for reinforcement Used soderberg because it outputs the most conservative estimate With 5 Factors of Safety, our spring will show very minimal fatigue signs.

Oil Flow 2 new journals ¼” Step reduction ~0.6 - 1.3 gallons/minute How much is too much clearance? Bending of a thinner shaft due to heavy load Excessive eccentricity leads to instability

Test Plans - Fabrication Fabrication of Related Parts for Testing Journal Bearings Already have journal bearings with similar characteristics Will be making modifications to flow hole and groove width to observe oil flow changes Journals Will be designing and procuring two additional shafts to be used in oil flow testing Due to necessary tolerancing, will likely need to be outsourced 3 total shafts will allow us to check linearity Clearance measurement is most critical to oil flow, so that’ll be the prime concern

Test Plans - Procedure Run current setup with full sensing capability to collect pertinent data Collected data will include vibrations, oil flow, housing displacement, and oil temperature. Remove current journal, replace with first fabricated journal, run same profile and obtain similar data. Journal Shaft Change SOP currently in progress and on EDGE Remove second journal, replace with third, collect similar data. Remove bearing, replace with modified bearing. (Repeat steps 3, 4, and 5 until all data has been collected & logged. Utilize data overlays to see the effects of changing the clearance, maximizing displacements, etc. Provide an analytical comparison to see how well our data matches our current expectations.

Risk Assessment

Risk Assessment Cont.

Plans for Next Phase Finalize Detailed Design Plan Begin purchasing of components Finalize Journal Shaft Change SOP Finalize MSD II Timeline

Any Questions?