Flagship Project 2 Comparison between deterministic and probabilistic liquefaction triggering assessment approaches over the Christchurch area V Lacrosse,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessing Uncertainty when Predicting Extreme Flood Processes.
Advertisements

Bayesian Health Technology Assessment: An Industry Statistician's Perspective John Stevens AstraZeneca R&D Charnwood Bayesian Statistics Focus Team Leader.
“International context and response to draft D5b – a conservation agencies view” PROTECT Workshop, Aix en Provence. 14 May 2008.
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
ARUNABHA SAHA Final Exam: Large Instrument Manufacturer, Inc.
Full Monte Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis
9.Monitoring Plan + 10.Implementation Plan + 4. LAs* 5. WLAs* 6. MOS* 7.Seasonal Variation* 8.Reasonable Assurance + TMDL Process 1 Problem Understanding.
Helicopter System Reliability Analysis Statistical Methods for Reliability Engineering Mark Andersen.
Parameterising Bayesian Networks: A Case Study in Ecological Risk Assessment Carmel A. Pollino Water Studies Centre Monash University Owen Woodberry, Ann.
Uncertainty and Climate Change Dealing with uncertainty in climate change impacts Daniel J. Vimont Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Department Center for.
Why need probabilistic approach? Rain probability How does that affect our behaviour? ?
NWS ~ NorthWest River Forecast Center Seasonal Volume Forecasts Using Ensemble Streamflow Prediction for the 2006 Water Year Kevin Berghoff, Hydrologist.
Today Concepts underlying inferential statistics
Water Management Presentations Summary Determine climate and weather extremes that are crucial in resource management and policy making Precipitation extremes.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Decision analysis and Risk Management course in Kuopio
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency US NRC Approach for Seismic Hazard Assessments INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON LESSONS LEARNED FROM STRONG EARTHQUAKES.
Measuring the quality of regional estimates from the ABS Jennie Davies and Daniel Ayoubkhani.
Charge Question 5-1 Comment Summary for HHCB Peer Review Panel Meeting January 9, 2014.
Probability and Statistics Required!. 2 Review Outline  Connection to simulation.  Concepts to review.  Assess your understanding.  Addressing knowledge.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions 1 What is Engineering Risk and Reliability? Why We Use It? Robert C.
EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
Developing of Evaluation Metrics and Indices for Applications Galia Guentchev and the NCPP Core and Tech team.
Page 1 Tanvir Madan M.S. Technology and Policy Program, December 9 th, ESD. 71 Application Portfolio Evaluating flexibility – Grid Scale Solar PV.
Portfolio Management Unit – II Session No. 13 Topic: Introduction to Asset Allocation Unit – II Session No. 13 Topic: Introduction to Asset Allocation.
Industry & Research: Issues, needs and conclusions from the US IMPACT Investigation of Extreme Flood Processes & Uncertainty Workshop at HR Wallingford,
Generation Adequacy Task Force Update to WMS September 14, 2011.
Power System Research, Inc. Review of the PNW Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Forum Technical Committee Meeting October 1, 2010.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Assessment of Energy Production Potential from Ocean Currents along the United.
Emissions Factors Uncertainty Primer August 28, 2007.
Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA)
- 1 - Overall procedure of validation Calibration Validation Figure 12.4 Validation, calibration, and prediction (Oberkampf and Barone, 2004 ). Model accuracy.
Methodology for Risk-Based Flood Damage Assessment David R. Maidment CE 394K.2, Spring 1999.
INCORPORATION OF EARTHQUAKE SOURCE, PROPAGATION PATH AND SITE UNCERTAINTIES INTO ASSESSMENT OF LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL Bob Darragh Nick Gregor Walt Silva.
Latent regression models. Where does the probability come from? Why isn’t the model deterministic. Each item tests something unique – We are interested.
Stochastic Optimization
A bin-free Extended Maximum Likelihood Fit + Feldman-Cousins error analysis Peter Litchfield  A bin free Extended Maximum Likelihood method of fitting.
Regional Technical Forum Recommissioning commercial retail facilities: A whole building approach to energy savings April 7th, 2009 Presented by: Jeremy.
What does it take to produce a good quality and reliable wind resource assessment? What do financiers want? Phil Napier-Moore, Session Moderator Breakout.
1 of 31 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances 60 minutes (15 minute Morning Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
Developing of Evaluation Metrics and Indices for Applications Galia Guentchev and the NCPP Core and Tech team.
Goal of Stochastic Hydrology Develop analytical tools to systematically deal with uncertainty and spatial variability in hydrologic systems Examples of.
Visualising spatial archaeological data The Aboriginal Sites Decision Support Tool (ASDST) Mal Ridges.
Probabilistic Slope Stability Analysis with the
P5 : Advanced Performance Management. B1: External Influences on Organisational Performance B1. Changing business environment B2. Impact of external factors.
Risk Management in Software Development Projects Roberto Torres Ph.D. 11/6/01.
Beach Modelling: Lessons Learnt from Past Scheme Performance Project: SC110004/S Project Summary.
Bayesian analysis of a conceptual transpiration model with a comparison of canopy conductance sub-models Sudeep Samanta Department of Forest Ecology and.
A probabilistic approach for the waves generated by a submarine landslide Patrick J. Lynett Civil Engineering, University of Southern California Arturo.
RELIABILITY-BASED CAPACITY ASSESSMENT OF WATER STORAGE SYSTEM
Lateral spreading in interbedded deposits of sand, silt, and clay
Mapping of lateral spread Displacement hazard, Weber County, Utah
From Economic Activity to Ecosystems Protection in Europe
QuakeCoRE Project Update
doc.: ? March 2017 Concurrent transmission of data and a wake-up signal in ax – Follow-up Date: Authors: Leif Wilhelmsson,
Objectives:   Determine areas where liquefaction has previously occurred and also areas where liquefaction has not occurred in New Zealand from observational.
Elected Member Workshop
Looking for universality...
Probabilistic Methods: Theory and Application to Human Anatomy
Lidar Measurement Accuracy under Complex Wind Flow in Use for Wind Farm Projects Matthieu Boquet, Mehdi Machta, Jean-Marc Thevenoud
From Economic Activity to Ecosystems Protection in Europe
I. Statistical Tests: Why do we use them? What do they involve?
The System of National Accounts and Policy Development
Liquefaction Hazard Mapping
What to look at in fire engineering analysis
A Stochastic Approach to Occupant Pre-Movement in Fires
Inference Concepts 1-Sample Z-Tests.
Probabilistic Surrogate Models
Optimization under Uncertainty
Presentation transcript:

Flagship Project 2 Comparison between deterministic and probabilistic liquefaction triggering assessment approaches over the Christchurch area V Lacrosse, B Bradley, s van ballegooy

Project Outline Deterministic liquefaction assessments commonly undertaken in NZ (as recommended by NZGS, MBIE) Conservatism is compounded, therefore overly conservative predictions Unable to determine likelihood of level of liquefaction consequence being exceeded (because liquefaction consequences considered at discreet levels) Full probabilistic assessment can account for these variables (e.g. uncertainty in triggering, seasonal variations, hazard curves) Understand deterministic v. probabilistic at site-specific and regional scale Address gap in industry knowledge and practice

Methodology Site-specific analysis at 4 sites in Chch with high quality data - using Boulanger & Idriss 2014 - 25yr, 100yr, 500yr return periods - using LSN - focus on sites where triggering is well understood - incorporate triggering uncertainty, GW variations, FC and Ic correlation distributions - understand site-specific variables - output distribution/likelihood instead of absolute LSN value Regional analysis - same parameters as above - identify areas were probabilistic approach is more appropriate 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 LSN

Timeframe FEB MAR APR/MAY JUNE - Meet with Brendon & Sjoerd to discuss methodology - Start computing CPT analyses for site-specific study MAR - Gain better understanding of site-specific results and variables that impact LSN - Calculate probability that LSN > x for a given return period APR/MAY - Complete site-specific study of deterministic v probabilistic analysis - Meet with Brendon to discuss results & improvements JUNE - Start looking into regional analysis

Expected Impact Understand uncertainties that drive liquefaction assessments Understand advantages of the use of probabilistic assessments Use of probabilistic assessment in areas were more appropriate Therefore, make more informed decisions about liquefaction hazard LONGTERM… Possible liaison with MBIE/NZGS about future updates to guidance docs Improve the standard of liquefaction assessments in NZ