The JHAWC Program Mohave County Probation Department’s

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AB 109 Public Safety Realignment December 5, 2013.
Advertisements

Child Welfare, Education and the Courts Joyce Burrell, M.S. American Institutes for Research #2 presentation on Panel with Dr. Gary Mallon; Sixto Cancel.
MHSA Full Service Partnership (FSP) For YOUTH (Ages 0-15) and TAY (Transition-Age Youth) (Ages 16-25) Santa Clara County Mental Health Board System Planning.
1 Juvenile Drug Court Dependency Drug Court Family Drug Court Juvenile Drug Treatment Court Juvenile Treatment Court.
Mission: Protect the Vulnerable, Promote Strong and Economically Self- Sufficient Families, and Advance Personal and Family Recovery and Resiliency. Charlie.
Core Competencies. OBJECTIVES Recognize key core competencies Identify the relationship between core competencies and best practices.
Multisystemic Therapy (MST)
Drug Courts: Some Answers to Our Burning Questions NADCP May 2008 How Drug Court Practices Impact Recidivism and Costs Shannon Carey, Ph.D. August 2014.
Wraparound – A Team Based Approach. What is Wraparound? Evidence-based model for youth involved in multiple systems Facilitation of child and family teams.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Building a Juvenile Justice System of Care. A Juvenile Justice System of Care—A Comprehensive Approach Definition and recognition of the problem Screening.
EXCELLENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY BUILDING COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS.
FOSTER CARE: MODULE #3 The Foster Care Process. FOSTER PARENTING  They are licensed and receive specialized training.  Work collaboratively as a member.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Slide 1 Using Developmental Evidence and Youth Assets to Design Juvenile Justice Systems: Can it be Done? Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. University.
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota Youth that Crossover between Child Welfare & Juvenile Justice.
It is the mission of Options and Advocacy to enhance and protect the lives of children and adults with disabilities. Options and Advocacy for McHenry County.
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota’s Crossover Youth Implementation of the CYPM April 18, 2012.
Front End Juvenile Justice System Reform Population of Focus Offenders ages 7 through 15 who come into contact with the juvenile justice system through.
Riverside County Department of Mental Health It Takes a Village AND a Family: Substance abuse treatment with the juvenile justice population by combining.
Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.
RECIDIVISM at the JACKSON COUNTY ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
ENHANCING FAMILY GROUP DECISION MAKING WITH FAMILIES EXPERIENCING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE April 8, 2010.
Polk County Family Drug Court The Honorable Karla Fultz Todd Beveridge, M.S.W., M.S.
Review of Judicial Branch Activities in “Raise the Age” Presented by the Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division June 28, 2012.
PREPARING YOUR CASE- MEETING & DEALING WITH PROBATION Rachele M. Guerrero SAFE Unit Supervisor Bexar County Juvenile Probation Department.
Vermont Treatment Court Dockets Compassion & Accountability ~~~~~ Innovative Practices Conference Vermont Law School November 15, 2013.
Questions & Answers about Extending Foster Care to Age 21 THP-Plus Institute November 8, 2010 Oakland, CA.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Evidenced Based Practices In Probation Challenges and Considerations Scott MacDonald Chief Probation Officer Santa Cruz County.
Riverside County Department of Mental Health It Takes a Village AND a Family: Substance abuse treatment with the juvenile justice population by combining.
IOWA PARTNERSHIPS Kara Hudson,CFSR State Coordinator (515) Michelle Muir, Executive Officer (515)
ACCELERATED COMMUNITY ENTRY United States District Court Western District of Michigan Robert Holmes Bell Chief Judge.
Key Moments in NADCP History J UVENILE D RUG C OURT G UIDELINES J UVENILE D RUG C OURT G UIDELINES “A P REVIEW ” T ERRENCE D. W ALTON, MSW, CSAC C HIEF.
MAY 12, 2015 PROPOSED CONTRACT WITH EFFECTIVE SCHOOL SOLUTIONS.
Reentry: A Successful Return Home TDCJ Reentry and Integration Division.
Roles in JDTC Discipline Specific Breakout Session.
Problem Solving Courts Bench Bar Conference Double Tree Hotel April 20, rd Judicial District Court of Common Pleas – Berks County.
Functional Family Therapy Goal Oriented Solutions for families in Bedford-Somerset.
A SH ESE 633 W EEK 6 F INAL P APER Check this A+ tutorial guideline at After completing.
The UCBDD Strategic Plan
Department of Juvenile Justice
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Why Does Housing Matter with the Justice Involved Population?
Mental Health America of San Diego County Programs & Services
Judicial Best Practices in Drug & DUI Court
A Look at Statistics and Trends Based on public information available
Summit County Probation Services
Santa Clara County Probation Department
Panhandle Partnership for Health and Human Services
Youth Advocacy Project
Therapeutic Behavioral Services (TBS)
MORES Mobile Outreach Response Engagement Stabilization Service
Developing an Effective Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program
MHSA Full Service Partnership (FSP) For YOUTH (Ages 0-15) and TAY (Transition-Age Youth) (Ages 16-25) Santa Clara County Mental Health Board System Planning.
SERVICES & OUTCOMES in SCHOOL SOCIAL WORK Data Summary.
Treatment Court Dockets
Evidence-Based Pretrial Programming in Mesa County, Colorado
The UCBDD Strategic Plan
The Success of IPS in Oklahoma
Individual Placement and Support in Oklahoma
Marion County Re-Entry Coalition Presentation to CWF coaches
BY: Honorable Robert S. Anchondo
A Decade of Youthful Offender Supervision
Blue Ridge Behavioral Healthcare
DRUG COURTS IN ILLINOIS
Community Corrections
What works across Intercepts
Presentation transcript:

The JHAWC Program Mohave County Probation Department’s Juvenile Health and Wellness Court The JHAWC Program Arizona Association of Drug Court Professionals Annual Conference • April 18, 2019

Sara Colbert, Erik Larson, Emily Snay, Lynda Williams, Rick Williams The JHAWC Panel Sara Colbert, Erik Larson, Emily Snay, Lynda Williams, Rick Williams

Why JHAWC ? Underserved juvenile population High risk/high needs But not a significant substance use disorder Low Juvenile Drug Court numbers

Research Creating JHAWC Santa Clara County, California Pre vs. Post-Adjudication Guidelines Juvenile Drug Court Model Research

Creating JHAWC Developing Goals Brainstorming Developing a Mission Statement The Final Product Developing Goals

Eligibility/Admission Criteria Creating JHAWC Pre/post adjudication No violence Parental involvement Conditions: more inclusive Eligibility/Admission Criteria

Screening/Referral Process Creating JHAWC Court, probation, provider or family request Screened by Placement Committee Petition and Order taken to Judge Orientation Screening/Referral Process

Creating JHAWC Phase Structure Phase 1: Identification Phase 2: Connection Phase 3: Demonstration Phase 4: Transition Phase Structure

TREATMENT Emphasizes the underlying issues and discusses diagnosis What are the root causes of the client’s behaviors? Family dynamic Peers Discussions of the client’s symptoms and diagnosis

TREATMENT Collaboration with community members improves treatment outcomes Client Family Court Probation Behavioral Health Impacts quality of treatment

TREATMENT Strengths-based perspective and services Praise vs. punish Increasing access to treatment Advocacy for client in court hearings Creating proactive solutions utilizing the client’s strengths and avoiding the client’s weaknesses

TREATMENT Barriers and limitations within treatment School involvement Family involvement Community buy-in

SUPERVISION Specialized caseload Meaningful interactions bi-weekly Collateral contacts Staffing and decisions

HEARINGS Every other week Closed hearings Collaborative environment

CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT Behavior Modification EBP Strength-based approach Removing Barriers PURPOSE

CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT Applause and verbal praise Privileges and supervision reduction Awards/certificates Rocket docket Gift cards and prize box Phase promotion INCENTIVES

CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT Restriction of activities Admonishment Essays Community volunteerism hours Extended phase time Order to Show Cause RESPONSES/SANCTIONS

CASE STUDIES

THE FUTURE OF JHAWC

QUESTIONS OR MATERIALS esnay@courts.az.gov or riwilliams@courts.az.gov