RDE Task Force Meeting, 16th December 2013, Brussels

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical evaluation of model uncertainties in Copert III, by I. Kioutsioukis & S. Tarantola (JRC, I)
Advertisements

WLTP Phase 1B Main Open Issues Road and Dyno Load Presentation at WLTP IG Meeting Geneva Open Issues Road and Dyno Load- K. Kolesa Working paper.
The ARTEMIS tools for estimating the transport pollutant emissions Artemis project - EC DG Tren COST346 - Heavy duty vehicles emissions M. André, INRETS,
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Comparison of different European databases with respect to road category and time periods (on peak, off peak, weekend)
RDE Working group Brussels, September 2015 Collection of NO x emissions data - First preliminary results RDE working group 14 September 2015 European Commission.
RDE testing: how to define NTE emission limits?
25 January 2016 European Commission - Joint Research Centre (JRC)
Evaluation of candidate procedures - Status & Reporting - RDE-LDV working group 28 June 2012, Brussels, EU Martin Weiss Pierre Bonnel DG - Joint Research.
DG ENTR, 08 September 2011, Brussels, EC Pierre Bonnel Alessandro Marotta Martin Weiss Joint Research Centre (JRC) IES - Institute for Energy and Transport.
N. Ligterink, R. Cuelenaere
Random Cycle Generator
Evaluation of PEMS tests Veh 01 & Veh 02 with the CLEAR Method
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
Status Januar Verification of test normality
RDE Task Force Meeting, 7th January 2014
Improvement of Family definitions
Development of the Japan’s RDE (Real Driving Emission) procedure
CLEAR Graz Stefan Hausberger, Nikolaus Furian
Analysis of WLTP European utility factor For OVC-HEVs.
RDE-LDV working group Vehicle test plan 2013
RDE Task Force Meeting, 28th November 2013, Brussels
28th of November 2013, Brussels
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
Input on wind tunnel criteria discussions
Pems route and parameters
Validation of the PEMS System on the Chassis Dyno, Why?
Weighting Factors impact on WLTP CO2 emissions
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
absolutely essential first level
LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Drafting of physical PEMS protocol –
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
Input ACEA Boundary Conditions.
LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Released datasets -
Driving Indices and correction of test cycle flexibilities
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update and summary of previous presentations by H. Steven
DATA EVALUATION VEHICLE #5 Diesel EU6
Additional RDE trip indicator(s)
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven
Overview of in-use driving behaviour data from different regions
RDE Discussion of Conformity Factors - JRC views on the ACEA propsal - - August 2015 – RDE Data Evaluation group European Commission - Joint Research Centre.
Emissions testing in the laboratory and on the road: Preliminary results for one Euro 6 diesel vehicle Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss Joint Research Centre.
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
Revision of the Work Plan
Francesco Riccobono, Barouch Giechaskiel, Pierre Bonnel
PN-PEMS Progress update
J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo WLTP 2nd Act May 18th, 2017
LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Released datasets -
RDE testing of hybrid vehicles Contribution to the RDE working group
16th of November 2013, Brussels
Real Driving Emissions IWG Recommendations for Data Collection & EU Dataset
Work plan and next steps – RDE-LDV working group
Meeting of the Steering Group on Simulation (SGS) Back-translation: implementation and accuracy implications Munich - 24 April 2014
Real Driving Emissions
Emissions and Health Unit Institute of Environment and Sustainability
RDE – Assessment of positive elevation gain
LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Assessment criteria and work plan -
Emissions testing with PEMS versus random laboratory driving cycles
Comparing EMROAD and the ACEA RDE Evaluation Tool
Boundary conditions - Status
RDE-LDV working group 13 April 2012 Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss
LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Assessment of RDE data evaluation methods: Set-up of "reference database“ - 16th of September 2013, Brussels Pierre Bonnel.
Informal document GRPE-77-30
RDE-LDV working group 20 November 2012, Brussels, EU Pierre Bonnel
Informal document GRPE-79-20
Comparative study on the threshold speed
Working Group “Real-Driving Emissions of Light-Duty Vehicles” Work Progress – December
Informal document GRPE Rev.1
Comparison of key parameters of EU WLTP database and WLTC version 5
Presentation transcript:

LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Assessment of data evaluation methods for RDE - RDE Task Force Meeting, 16th December 2013, Brussels Theodoros Vlachos, Martin Weiss, Pierre Bonnel - European Commission DG - Joint Research Centre (JRC) - IET - Institute for Energy and Transport

Objectives Proposal of a comparison among data evaluation methods V001 NOx Emissions: U/R/M Emissions Valid trips only. Solid black line is referred to the mean value of emission measured during the trip as it is listed at TEST REPORT worksheet of EMROAD. Dashed black line is like the solid one, but no data exclusions for warm up and DPF RGN were applied on the trips. Blue line is referred to results obtained by EMROAD independently the severity category (all: Soft, Severe and Normal MAW are used for calculations). Red Line is EMROAD results referred to normal MAW only. Green curve is representing weighted emissions computed by CLEAR. All the results are considering all vehicle speed bins: Urban, Rural, Motorway. A description of the emissions during each of the bins is presented at the following slides. CLEAR 1.5 EMROAD v5.7

Outline Assessment Criteria Summary of analysis to be conducted per criterion Results

Outline Assessment Criteria Summary of analysis to be conducted per criterion Results

Assessment criteria (1/1) ROBUSTNESS: Ability to evaluate testing conditions (trip) Data coverage Ability to assess RDE performance Ability to assess RDE performance under specific testing conditions Robustness against uncertainties of data acquisition and data evaluation Technological neutrality PRACTICABILITY: PEMS testing effort Availability and accuracy/reliability of input parameters Simplicity of calculation steps Possibility for independent RDE testing Flexibility to be adapted to future emissions legislation

Outline Assessment Criteria Proposed analysis per assessment criterion Results

Robustness Analysis (1/2) Analysis and results required from the different tools: Assessment Criterion Analysis ROBUSTNESS A. Ability to evaluate testing conditions (trip) Generic trip characteristics (all methods) B. Data coverage Results from indicators (method specific or not) C. Ability to assess RDE performance Total emissions [g/km] with and without data exclusion for all tests: I. Taking into account all driving conditions (normal, severe, soft) II. For normal driving only D. Ability to assess RDE performance under specific testing conditions For normal driving only (for all tests): I. Average emissions [g/km] for U/R/M, separately, with and without data exclusion II. Distance weighted emissions [g/km] with and without data exclusion

Robustness Analysis (2/2) Analysis and results required from the different tools: Assessment Criterion Analysis ROBUSTNESS E. Robustness against uncertainties of data acquisition and data evaluation Case studies Data uncertainties: Sensitivity studies Robustness of data evaluation 1: Performance of the RDE method for specific testing situations Roundtrip clockwise and counterclockwise driving Aggressive versus soft or normal driving style Aggressive driving during part of a test Robustness of data evaluation 2: Sensitivity of the RDE method to their design parameters F. Technology neutrality Description of the principles envisaged to adapt the methods to hybrid powertrains and alternative fuels (Discussion) Implications in terms of testing (Parameters and quality required) (Possibly) case studies with results (as for criteria A, B, C, D)

Outline Assessment Criteria Summary of analysis to be conducted per criterion Results Data coverage Ability to assess RDE performance Ability to assess RDE performance under specific testing conditions

Presentation Results Analysis and results required from the different tools: Assessment Criterion Analysis ROBUSTNESS A. Ability to evaluate testing conditions (trip) Generic trip characteristics (all methods) B. Data coverage Results from indicators (method specific or not) C. Ability to assess RDE performance Total emissions [g/km] with and without data exclusion for all tests: I. Taking into account all driving conditions (normal, severe, soft) II. For normal driving only D. Ability to assess RDE performance under specific testing conditions For normal driving only (for all tests): I. Average emissions [g/km] for U/R/M, separately, with and without data exclusion II. Distance weighted emissions [g/km] with and without data exclusion

Outline Assessment Criteria Summary of analysis to be conducted per criterion Results Data coverage Ability to assess RDE performance Ability to assess RDE performance under specific testing conditions

Data Coverage (EMROAD) (1/1) MAW Share vs. Vehicle Speed (EMROAD): Share of Normal MAW (V001) SCM#1, SCM#2, ROUTE#1-AGG route do not show a sufficient number of MAW (10%) for all speed bins (Urban, Rural and Motorway) => NOT VALID trips => to be COMPLEMENTED EMROAD v5.7

Data Coverage (CLEAR) (1/5) Time Share vs. Power (CLEAR): ROM#2, ROM#3, SCM#1 and SCM#2 routes show a time share vs. power distribution outside of WLTP region for at east one vehicle speed bin (Urban, Rural, Motorway) => NOT VALID trips => to be COMPLEMENTED WLTP region is defined on the basis of WLTP target time share and the Deviation Factor.

Data Coverage (CLEAR) (2/5) Time Share vs. Power (CLEAR) – ROM#2: CLEAR v1.5 Time Share vs. Power: U/R/M (V001) Time Share vs. Power: Urban (V001) Time Share vs. Power: Rural (V001) Time Share vs. Power: Motorway (V001) Time share [%] of power bin P=67.5-84 kW is outside the region (0.000%, minimum WLTP region=0.011%), for Rural driving.

Data Coverage (CLEAR) (3/5) Time Share vs. Power (CLEAR) – ROM#3: CLEAR v1.5 Time Share vs. Power: U/R/M (V001) Time Share vs. Power: Urban (V001) Time Share vs. Power: Rural (V001) Time Share vs. Power: Motorway (V001) Time share [%] of power bins P=51-67.5 kW and P=67.5-84 kW are outside the region for Urban and Rural driving respectively.

Data Coverage (CLEAR) (4/5) Time Share vs. Power (CLEAR) – SCM#1: CLEAR v1.5 Time Share vs. Power: U/R/M (V001) Time Share vs. Power: Urban (V001) Time Share vs. Power: Rural (V001) Time Share vs. Power: Motorway (V001) Time share [%] of power bins P=51-67.5 kW and P=67.5-84 kW are outside the region for Urban and Rural driving respectively. During Motorway driving all power bins are outside the region.

Data Coverage (CLEAR) (5/5) Time Share vs. Power (CLEAR) – SCM#2: CLEAR v1.5 Time Share vs. Power: U/R/M (V001) Time Share vs. Power: Urban (V001) Time Share vs. Power: Rural (V001) Time Share vs. Power: Motorway (V001) Time share [%] of power bins P=35-84 kW are outside the region for Urban and Rural driving respectively. During Motorway driving all power bins are outside the region.

Outline Assessment Criteria Summary of analysis to be conducted per criterion Results Data coverage Ability to assess RDE performance Routes Comparison and driving style comparison Ability to assess RDE performance under specific testing conditions We provide a sereis of presentations with the totality of the results for the three vehicles, but for sake of brevity I will focus on soe of these

Outline Assessment Criteria Summary of analysis to be conducted per criterion Results Data coverage Ability to assess RDE performance Routes Comparison and driving style comparison Ability to assess RDE performance under specific testing conditions We provide a sereis of presentations with the totality of the results for the three vehicles, but for sake of brevity I will focus on soe of these

C.RDE Performance (1/2) NOx Emission results U/R/M (CLEAR and EMROAD): EMROAD v5.7 V001 NOx Emissions: U/R/M Emissions Valid trips only. Solid black line is referred to the mean value of emission measured during the trip as it is listed at TEST REPORT worksheet of EMROAD. Dashed black line is like the solid one, but no data exclusions for warm up and DPF RGN were applied on the trips. Blue line is referred to results obtained by EMROAD independently the severity category (all: Soft, Severe and Normal MAW are used for calculations). Red Line is EMROAD results referred to normal MAW only. Green curve is representing weighted emissions computed by CLEAR. All the results are considering all vehicle speed bins: Urban, Rural, Motorway. A description of the emissions during each of the bins is presented at the following slides. Valid Trips only.

C.RDE Performance (2/2) CO2 Emission results U/R/M (CLEAR and EMROAD): EMROAD v5.7 V001 CO2 Emissions: U/R/M Emissions Valid trips only. Solid black line is referred to the mean value of emission measured during the trip as it is listed at TEST REPORT worksheet of EMROAD. Dashed black line is like the solid one, but no data exclusions for warm up and DPF RGN were applied on the trips. Blue line is referred to results obtained by EMROAD independently the severity category (all: Soft, Severe and Normal MAW are used for calculations). Red Line is EMROAD results referred to normal MAW only. Green curve is representing weighted emissions computed by CLEAR. All the results are considering all vehicle speed bins: Urban, Rural, Motorway. A description of the emissions during each of the bins is presented at the following slides. Valid Trips only.

Outline Assessment Criteria Summary of analysis to be conducted per criterion Results Data coverage Ability to assess RDE performance Ability to assess RDE performance under specific testing conditions Routes Comparison and driving style comparison We provide a sereis of presentations with the totality of the results for the three vehicles, but for sake of brevity I will focus on soe of these

Outline Assessment Criteria Summary of analysis to be conducted per criterion Results Data coverage Ability to assess RDE performance Ability to assess RDE performance under specific testing conditions Routes Comparison and driving style comparison We provide a sereis of presentations with the totality of the results for the three vehicles, but for sake of brevity I will focus on soe of these

D.RDE Performance: Urban (1/2) NOx Emission results Urban Driving (CLEAR and EMROAD): CLEAR 1.5 EMROAD v5.7 V001 NOx Emissions: Urban Emissions Valid trips only. Solid black line is referred to the mean value of emission measured during URBAN portion of the trip (veh. Speed limits: v>=2km/h, v<45km/h). Dashed black line is like the solid one, but no data exclusions for warm up and DPF RGN were applied on the trips. Blue line is referred to results obtained by EMROAD independently the severity category (all: Soft, Severe and Normal MAW are used for calculations) during URBAN driving. Red Line is EMROAD results referred to URBAN normal MAW only. Green curve is representing URBAN weighted emissions computed by CLEAR. Valid Trips only.

D.RDE Performance: Urban (2/2) CO2 Emission results Urban Driving (CLEAR and EMROAD): CLEAR 1.5 EMROAD v5.7 V001 CO2 Emissions: Urban Emissions Valid trips only. Solid black line is referred to the mean value of emission measured during URBAN portion of the trip (veh. Speed limits: v>=2km/h, v<45km/h). Dashed black line is like the solid one, but no data exclusions for warm up and DPF RGN were applied on the trips. Blue line is referred to results obtained by EMROAD independently the severity category (all: Soft, Severe and Normal MAW are used for calculations) during URBAN driving. Red Line is EMROAD results referred to URBAN normal MAW only. Green curve is representing URBAN weighted emissions computed by CLEAR. Valid Trips only.

D.RDE Performance: Rural (1/2) NOx Emission results Rural Driving (CLEAR and EMROAD): CLEAR 1.5 EMROAD v5.7 V001 NOx Emissions: Rural Emissions Valid trips only. Solid black line is referred to the mean value of emission measured during RURAL portion of the trip (veh. Speed limits: v>=45km/h, v<80km/h). Dashed black line is like the solid one, but no data exclusions for warm up and DPF RGN were applied on the trips. Blue line is referred to results obtained by EMROAD independently the severity category (all: Soft, Severe and Normal MAW are used for calculations) during RURAL driving. Red Line is EMROAD results referred to RURAL normal MAW only. Green curve is representing RURAL weighted emissions computed by CLEAR. Valid Trips only.

D.RDE Performance: Rural (2/2) CO2 Emission results Rural Driving (CLEAR and EMROAD): CLEAR 1.5 EMROAD v5.7 V001 CO2 Emissions: Rural Emissions Valid trips only. Solid black line is referred to the mean value of emission measured during RURAL portion of the trip (veh. Speed limits: v>=45km/h, v<80km/h). Dashed black line is like the solid one, but no data exclusions for warm up and DPF RGN were applied on the trips. Blue line is referred to results obtained by EMROAD independently the severity category (all: Soft, Severe and Normal MAW are used for calculations) during RURAL driving. Red Line is EMROAD results referred to RURAL normal MAW only. Green curve is representing RURAL weighted emissions computed by CLEAR. Valid Trips only.

D.RDE Performance: M.way (1/2) NOx Emission results Motorway Driving (CLEAR and EMROAD): CLEAR 1.5 EMROAD v5.7 V001 NOx Emissions: Motorway Emissions Valid trips only. Solid black line is referred to the mean value of emission measured during MOTORWAY portion of the trip (veh. Speed limits: v>=80km/h, v<200km/h). Dashed black line is like the solid one, but no data exclusions for warm up and DPF RGN were applied on the trips. Blue line is referred to results obtained by EMROAD independently the severity category (all: Soft, Severe and Normal MAW are used for calculations) during MOTORWAY driving. Red Line is EMROAD results referred to MOTORWAY normal MAW only. Green curve is representing MOTORWAY weighted emissions computed by CLEAR. Valid Trips only.

D.RDE Performance: M.way (2/2) CO2 Emission results Motorway Driving (CLEAR and EMROAD): CLEAR 1.5 EMROAD v5.7 V001 CO2 Emissions: Motorway Emissions Valid trips only. Solid black line is referred to the mean value of emission measured during MOTORWAY portion of the trip (veh. Speed limits: v>=80km/h, v<200km/h). Dashed black line is like the solid one, but no data exclusions for warm up and DPF RGN were applied on the trips. Blue line is referred to results obtained by EMROAD independently the severity category (all: Soft, Severe and Normal MAW are used for calculations) during MOTORWAY driving. Red Line is EMROAD results referred to MOTORWAY normal MAW only. Green curve is representing MOTORWAY weighted emissions computed by CLEAR. Valid Trips only.

D.RDE Performance:1/3Mix (1/2) NOx Emission results (U+R+M)/3 (CLEAR and EMROAD): CLEAR 1.5 EMROAD v5.7 V001 NOx Emissions: Motorway Emissions Valid trips only. Solid black line is referred to the mean value of emission measured as average of U/R/M driving. Dashed black line is like the solid one, but no data exclusions for warm up and DPF RGN were applied on the trips. Blue line is referred to weighted results obtained by EMROAD independently the severity category (all: Soft, Severe and Normal MAW are used for calculations). Red Line is EMROAD results referred to normal MAW only. Green curve is representing (U+R+M)/3 weighted emissions withCLEAR. Valid Trips only.

D.RDE Performance:1/3Mix(2/2) CO2 Emission results (U+R+M)/3 (CLEAR and EMROAD): CLEAR 1.5 EMROAD v5.7 V001 CO2 Emissions: Motorway Emissions Valid trips only. Solid black line is referred to the mean value of emission measured as average of U/R/M driving. Dashed black line is like the solid one, but no data exclusions for warm up and DPF RGN were applied on the trips. Blue line is referred to weighted results obtained by EMROAD independently the severity category (all: Soft, Severe and Normal MAW are used for calculations). Red Line is EMROAD results referred to normal MAW only. Green curve is representing (U+R+M)/3 weighted emissions withCLEAR. Valid Trips only.

For further information, please contact: Theodoros Vlachos – EC JRC – theodoros.vlachos@jrc.ec.europa.eu Pierre Bonnel – EC JRC – pierre.bonnel@jrc.ec.europa.eu

LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Assessment of data evaluation methods for RDE - RDE Task Force Meeting, 16th December 2013, Brussels Theodoros Vlachos, Martin Weiss, Pierre Bonnel - European Commission DG - Joint Research Centre (JRC) - IET - Institute for Energy and Transport