US-DPRK NEXT STEPS WORKSHOP January 27, 2003 Washington DC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technical challenges and Opportunities in Future Multilateral Nuclear Disarmament Verification Conference Title:Workshop Meeting, Vienna Name:David Keir.
Advertisements

Iran’s Nuclear Program: Status and Implications Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 19 November, 2013.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency V. Cisar Division of Concepts and Planning Practical Exercises on the Establishment of the SSAC at the State Level.
Verification and Compliance Aspects Trevor Findlay.
History In 1945 after Japan surrendered in WWII Korea split into two parts. The South was Under U.S. control and the North Under Russia North Korea.
Dealing with North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Six Party Talks simulation briefing.
International Safeguards VTC Lecture Series Building a Safeguards Facility Approach David H. Hanks SRNL Program Manager Safeguards Initiatives Global Security.
Session 3.1 Overview of the Additional Protocol
IAEA Sources of Radiation Fuel Cycle - Overview Day 4 – Lecture 5 (1) 1.
Nuclear Power. Source: Uranium-235 Process: – An unstable uranium nucleus is bombarded with a neutron and splits into two smaller nuclei and some neutrons.
GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College Nuclear Deterrence.
Status of Iran’s Nuclear Program and Negotiations David Albright ISIS November 3, 2013 Nuclear Weapon Issues in the 21st Century Sponsored by the American.
Determining the Irreducible Elements of an Interim Agreement with Iran: A Freeze Plus David Albright ISIS November 5, 2013.
Laser Isotope Separation – The Genie is out of the Bottle Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs John F. Kennedy School of Government.
Nuclear Fuel, Uranium Enrichment, Fuel Fabrication, MOX Seminar on Nuclear Science and Technology for Diplomats P. Adelfang (+)Division of Nuclear Fuel.
1 Cindy Boggs Argonne National Laboratory Megatons to Megawatts: An Overview of the U.S. – Russia Highly Enriched Uranium Transparency Program.
North Korea and a “PEACEFUL” Nuclear Program The Six-Nation Talks Resumed.
Nuclear Energy and Australia Presentation by Prof Jim Falk, Australian Centre for Science, Innovation and Society.
Assessment within a quality program Train-the-trainer workshop: Session 2, Conversation
Arguments Against Nuclear Power Development in Iran May, 2003.
The Nuclear Fuel Cycle Mary Lou Dunzik-Gougar, Ph.D. Idaho State University Idaho National Laboratory ANS Teachers’ Workshop at WM 2014 March 2014, Phoenix.
The North Korean Nuclear/Missile Crisis Dr. Clay Moltz Center for Nonproliferation Studies Monterey Institute of International Studies June 2005.
Foreign Obligations and Annual Inventories Jessica Norles Savannah River National Laboratory.
South Africa – Verification Lessons Learned from the Dismantled Nuclear Weapons Programme Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
Nuclear Arsenals. Table 1. Estimated global nuclear weapons inventories, Hans M. Kristensen, and Robert S. Norris Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
IB Physics 12 Nuclear Physics 6 Mr. Jean. The plan: Video clip of the day –Example of fission energies –Example of fusion energies –Recap of nuclear physics.
Hazardous Waste Training SQGs are required to perform training for all employees who are involved with hazardous waste. Involvement includes: Handling.
Environmental Report – Are they Creating Transparency on Environmental impacts/costs? By Dr Chris Anastasi Member of EURELECTRIC Working Group Environmental.
Nuclear Arsenals. Status of World Nuclear Forces, 2015.
Nuclear Power Plants. History of nuclear power 1938– Scientists study Uranium nucleus 1941 – Manhattan Project begins 1942 – Controlled nuclear chain.
California Secretary of State Voting Systems Testing Summit November 28 & 29, 2005, Sacramento, California Remarks by Kim Alexander, President, California.
US-DPRK NEXT STEPS WORKSHOP January 27, 2003 Washington DC Session 4 – Access & Information in the DPRK, What Works, What Fails Energy Projects David Von.
Comparing Electricity Technologies ‘98 US Electrical Consumption ‘98 US Electrical Consumption 3.6 million Gwh e 35% of US Primary Energy.
Assessment of Iran’s Nuclear Program Press Event Tuesday, September 14, 2004 Dr. Charles D. Ferguson Science and Technology Fellow.
Malé Declaration 2 nd emissions inventory workshop AIT, Bangkok, 26 th – 28 th February 2007 Session 5 – Quality assurance and Quality control (QA/QC)
Nuclear Fuel Cycle.  According to World Nuclear Association:  The nuclear fuel cycle is the series of industrial processes which involve the production.
GCSE Science A Physics 1 Generation of Electricity Learning Outcomes Use data to estimate the power output of power stations and micro generators e.g.
4/2003 Rev 2 I.4.9j – slide 1 of 18 Session I.4.9j Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 4Sources of Radiation Session 9jFuel Cycle – High Level Waste Disposal.
The Nuclear Fuel Cycle Mary Lou Dunzik-Gougar, PhD ANS Teachers’ Workshop 2014.
Physics 12 Mr. Jean January 18 th, The plan: Video clip of the day Chapter 18 & 19 – MC.
Physics 12 Nuclear Physics 7 – Fission Mr. Jean The plan: Video clip of the day Nuclear Physics.
Technical summary of DPRK nuclear program Siegfried S. Hecker Stanford University Center for International Security and Cooperation 2005 Carnegie International.
North Korea. Directions Create a fresh page titled North Korea Intro Clip 1. Explain how the North Korean government uses the media. 2. How would you.
Welcome Participants! to the DPRK Energy Expert Study Group Meeting Four Seasons Hotel East Palo Alto, California, USA June 26 – June 27, 2006.
US-DPRK Next Steps Workshop January 27, 2003Washington, D.C. Yongbyon Spent Fuel Experience Presented by Mark Mohr
The Nuclear Fuel industry The nuclear fuel cycle.
US-DPRK Next Steps Workshop January 27, 2003Washington, D.C. DPRK Strategic Intentions and US Policy Goals Presented by John Steinbruner.
Nuclear Power  Period 1  Benny Situ  Paolo Tolentino  David Liang.
Nuclear Safety & Security in the DPRK Sharon Squassoni Senior Fellow & Director Proliferation Prevention Program Asan Institute “The 2012 US-North Korea.
OUTLINE Why is MC&A Important? Purpose of MC&A: To provide assurance that nuclear materials are accounted for properly. To detect theft or diversion.
Statistics for Projects Statistics for Managers. The sample frame should closely agree with the target population……. Sampling error - the difference between.
THE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE. The Nuclear Fuel Cycle consists of sequence of steps in which U ore is mined, milled, enriched, and fabricated into nuclear fuel.
Availability Enough current known resources to last 80 yrs (use is currently 68,000 tonnes/yr)*world nuclear.org As the price of uranium increases so.
Iran Nuclear Deal In 200 Words © Copyright Showeet.com.
A Fissile Materials Cut-off Treaty: french views
Upper Snake Reservoir Operations October 13, 2015
Translation Error Rate Metric
What does it take for the DPRK to be a nuclear threat?
Nuclear Energy.
Mary Lou Dunzik-Gougar, PhD ANS Teachers’ Workshop 2013
Moving Companies in VA Moving Companies in Washington DC.
International Partnership for Nuclear Disarmament Verification
International Partnership for Nuclear Disarmament Verification
UNFCCC – NAI SOFTWARE Sector: Waste Practical Aspects and Exercises
The Nuclear Weapons Convention
Institute for Science and International Security
Integration Modeling to Decipher a Fuel Cycle
THE WAY AHEAD – KEY LESSONS LEARNED AND UNRESOLVED ISSUES
North Korean Missile Training Exercises
UN General Assembly May 24, 2012
Presentation transcript:

US-DPRK NEXT STEPS WORKSHOP January 27, 2003 Washington DC Session 2 – Dismantlement and Cessation of DPRK Nuclear Capacities Living with Uncertainty   Elwood Gift

LIVING WITH UNCERTAINTY After we have a North Korean Declaration on their uranium enrichment program

Should we be content? What does the Declaration consist of? Enrichment facilities only? Mining, conversion, and uranium storage facilities included? Centrifuge and component facilities included? Nuclear material produced? Do we have access? Inventory in Declaration? Can its completeness be verified? Production records? Records of imports and their disposition?

Can the Declaration be confirmed? What are the inspectors rights of access? How often? With or without prior notice? How many persons? How intrusive can they be? Sampling and analysis rights? Is the Declaration complete enough for meaningful production analysis?

What are the goals? A nuclear weapons free North Korea? A nuclear (uranium) production free North Korea? Probably not a nuclear free North Korea? Is facility dismantlement a goal? How much confidence do we need?

Can we find an undeclared gas centrifuge enrichment facility? What is its production capacity? Possibly 25 kg HEU/year What are the observables? Power requirement: < 200 Kw Natural uranium requirement: About 5500 KgU/year, about 4 30B UF6 cylinders per year Size of building: < a Safeway grocery store Is it underground?: Probably Emissions: Virtually none