Trigger operation during 2007 run

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design and First Results of a Cosmic Ray Telescope For Use In Testing a Focusing DIRC M. P. Belhorn University of Cincinnati The BELLE group at the University.
Advertisements

Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
Preliminary Design of Calorimeter Electronics Shudi Gu June 2002.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Malte HildebrandtMEG Review Meeting, 14th February 2007 Report of Run Coordinator Run 2006 Summary Malte Hildebrandt MEG Review Meeting, 14th February.
Lecce - 23 Sep The Trigger System of the MEG Experiment Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa On behalf of D. Nicolò F. Morsani S. Galeotti M. Grassi.
Satoshi Mihara ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo Feb MEG Review Meeting 1 CEX beam test at piE1 Satoshi Mihara.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
MEG positron spectrometer Oleg Kiselev, PSI on behalf of MEG collaboration.
DAQ+trigger operation during 2008 run D. Nicolò University of Pisa & INFN, Pisa.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Pions for SoLID May 7 th 2013 SoLID EC meeting A. Camsonne.
Prediction W. Buchmueller (DESY) arXiv:hep-ph/ (1999)
Start Counter Collaboration Meeting September 2004 W. Boeglin FIU.
MEG 2009 現状と展望 東京大学素粒子物理国際研究センター 岩本敏幸 他 MEG コラボレーション 日本物理学会 2009 年秋季大会 甲南大学岡本キャンパス.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
PSI - Jul. 18th, Status of the electronics and DAQ systems of the MEG experiment.
PSI - 11 Feb The Trigger System of the MEG Experiment Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa On behalf of D. Nicolò F. Morsani S. Galeotti.
1 DAQ Update MEG Review Meeting, Feb. 17 th 2010.
A. Meneguzzo Padova University & INFN Validation and Performance of the CMS Barrel Muon Drift Chambers with Cosmic Rays A. Meneguzzo Padova University.
1 NaI calibrationneutron observation NaI calibration and neutron observation during the charge exchange experiment 1.Improving the NaI energy resolution.
FIT (Fast Interaction Trigger) detector development for ALICE experiment at LHC (CREN) Institute for Nuclear Research (INR RAS) National Research Nuclear.
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
TYPE1 BOARD Type1 boards are compliant with 6U VME standard. Each board receives 16 analog signals from experimental devices. These signals are digitized.
Ted Liu, July 5,00, idea on Ztrigger L1 Trigger Strategy L1 Trigger Requirements and Trigger Lines L1 Trigger performance Background Study Improving Performance:
(s)T3B Update – Calibration and Temperature Corrections AHCAL meeting– December 13 th 2011 – Hamburg Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
1 Electronics Status Trigger and DAQ run successfully in RUN2006 for the first time Trigger communication to DRS boards via trigger bus Trigger firmware.
Pisa - Apr. 28th, The Trigger System Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa.
RD51 GEM Telescope: results from June 2010 test beam and work in progress Matteo Alfonsi on behalf of CERN GDD group and Siena/PISA INFN group.
MEG 実験 2009 液体キセノン検出器の性能 II 西村康宏, 他 MEG コラボレーション 東京大学素粒子物理国際研究セン ター 第 65 回年次大会 岡山大学.
A Brand new neutrino detector 「 SciBar 」 (2) Y. Takubo (Osaka) - Readout Electronics - Introduction Readout electronics Cosmic ray trigger modules Conclusion.
Upgrade of the MEG liquid xenon calorimeter with VUV-light sensitive large area SiPMs Kei Ieki for the MEG-II collaboration 1 II.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Trigger for MEG2: status and plans Donato Nicolo` Pisa (on behalf of the Trigger Group) Lepton Flavor Physics with Most Intense DC Muon Beam Fukuoka, 22.
A. Calcaterra, R. de Sangro, G. Felici, G. Finocchiaro, P. Patteri, M. Piccolo INFN LNF XIII SuperB General Meeting DCH-I parallel session Elba, 30 May.
9 Feb, MEG Software Status -for the coming review committee- Question from A.Blondel Our answer Schedule and Man power MEG Software Group.
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
g beam test of the Liquid Xe calorimeter for the MEG experiment
MEG Experiment Data Analysis: a status report
Trigger report from Run2009
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
小川真治、 他MEG 第72回年次大会 MEG II 実験液体キセノンガンマ線検出器における取得データサイズ削減手法の開発 Development of the data size reduction method for MEG II liquid.
High rate capability of gas ionization chamber with flash ADC
The Electromagnetic calorimeter of the MEG Experiment
Liquid Xenon Detector for the MEG Experiment
PCAL Cosmic Ray Tests Progress Report C. Smith μ U V W MODULE 2
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
On behalf of the GECAM group
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Sergey Abrahamyan Yerevan Physics Institute APEX collaboration
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
BESIII EMC electronics
Status of Neutron flux Analysis in KIMS experiment
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
Timing Counter analysis
The Trigger System Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa
August 19th 2013 Alexandre Camsonne
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
西村美紀(東大) 他 MEGIIコラボレーション 日本物理学会 第73回年次大会(2018年) 東京理科大学(野田キャンパス)
Presentation transcript:

Trigger operation during 2007 run D. Nicolò University of Pisa & INFN, Pisa (on behalf of Trigger group)

Outlook System overview m->eg trigger and related Hardware Firmware DAQ m->eg trigger and related Selection criteria Rates & efficiencies Statistics FADC linearity Calibration triggers a (p,g) p0 What next July 19, 2019

System overview Tree structrure made of LXe TC DC NaI+pre-shower Type 1 boards (100 MHz sampling) 216 channels from Inner PMTs fanin 1x1 160 Lateral and Outer PMTs 4x1 60 channels from TC bar PMTs 1x1 64 TC fiber APDs 8x1 32 channels from DC inner wires 8x1 32 outer wires 8x1 9+4 channels 1x1 ~ 600 channels, 40 boards Type 2 5 intermediate-layer boards 1 top-level board (master) Ancillary 5 boards for control signal (CLK, SYNC, START, STOP) distribution Type 3 (auxiliary digitizers) 640 channels (20 boards) for digitization of 1x1 output from LXe PMTs System completed and fully operating during 2007 run (all channels working!) LXe TC DC NaI+pre-shower July 19, 2019

Final trigger list trig.# name conditions 0 MEG QLXe > QTH && D < DN && |T| < TWN 1 MEG-Q QLXe > QTL && D < DN && |T| < TWN 2 MEG-D QLXe > QTH && D < DW && |T| < TWN 3 MEG-T QLXe > QTH && D < DN && |T| < TWW 4 RD-narrow QLXe > QTL && |T| < TWN 5 RD-wide QLXe > QTL && |T| < TWW 6 p0 QLXe > QTH && QNaI>QN && |T| < TWN 7 p0-pre-shower QLXe > QTH && QNaI>QN 8 NaI QNaI > QN 9 LXe-high QLXe > QTH 10 LXe-low QLXe > QTL 11 CW QTL < QLXe < QTH && |T| < TWW July 19, 2019

meg trigger and related Operated from 15 to 17/12 (run 9201-9516, ~ 25 h live time) Collected ~ 1.1x106 events (1/4 of which with trigger 0) Prescaling adjusted in order to have almost equal event sharing Rates in agreement with expectations Trigger 0 ~ 4 Hz (@ 40 MeV threshold) 1 ~ 6 Hz (@ 35 MeV ) 2 ~ 20 Hz (only up/down e+-g correlation) 3 ~ 10 Hz (DT = 20 ns) 4 ~ 40 Hz (no e+-g correlation, DT = 20 ns) 5 ~ 70 Hz (no e+-g correlation, DT = 40 ns) July 19, 2019

g-energy efficiency Rg ~ 7x103 s-1 @ Eg > 45 MeV Obtained from ratio of triggered/unbiased off-line spectra Rg ~ 7x103 s-1 @ Eg > 45 MeV July 19, 2019

Almost fully efficient (e > 0.9 @ 90% CL) at the end-point g-energy efficiency Low threshold High threshold Almost fully efficient (e > 0.9 @ 90% CL) at the end-point July 19, 2019

Timing coincidence efficiency Obtained from Radiative Decay B(p,g)C Cosmic Rays Trigger on LXe alone Ethr  30 MeV T-reconstruction in 2.5 ns ticks Rm = 5 x 106 s-1 July 19, 2019

LXe-TC timing 1 = 10 ns CR B(p,g)C (background free!) DT 4.4 MeV 11.7 MeV Fluctuation sources: algorithm ~5 ns (each) tof spread ~3 ns (e+), 1 ns (g)  DT (FWHM) ~ 18 ns  e (20 ns) = (80  5)% Dt (10 ns) July 19, 2019

Direction match zT (cm) zT (cm) log(Q1/Q2) log(Q1/Q2) no DC-info used at trigger-level (latency too long) LUT to associate (Xg, pe+ )  e+-hit on TC based on MC so far  DC-tracking needed to evaluate efficiency g-position by max PMT in LXe e+-position by charge asymmetry in TC PMTs 6-bit resolution for Q Off-line On-line zT (cm) zT (cm) zT obtained by DRS timing info log(Q1/Q2) log(Q1/Q2) July 19, 2019

Trigger for LXe calibrations gs from CW reactions B(p,g)C (used for both energy and timing) Li(p,g)Be (see G. Signorelli’s talk) a-events from wire sources Based on patch enabling capability Wire identification PSD not available for 2007 run (a,g) pulses not separated by off-line analysis Scintillation (excitation) decay time longer than expected  worse separation also by DRS Used to be better in the Large Prototype Possible hint at ionization quenching? p0 from CEX reaction July 19, 2019

a/g separation in the LP TRG waveforms recorded during 2003 test-beam at pE1 July 19, 2019

Dependence on purification? now 2003 run in LP a-run p0-run Run 9001 Run 7260 Q/A g-peak is lower with larger absorption a/g separation is poorer Final ratio is <Q/A>|g/ <Q/A>|a = 1.25  0.02 (used to be 1.93  0.02) July 19, 2019

CEX calibration Started from 18/12 to 21/12 (runs 9541-9927, 40 h live time) Collected ~ 1.3x106 events (~ 2x105 with preshower) Max PMT to obtain g-direction to LXe define collimation on a 2x3 PMT window Back-to-back correlation with NaI in 4 positions Data taken in different beam conditions LXe single rate from 1 MHz to 100 kHz @ E>30 MeV Pb collimator July 19, 2019

online reconstruction CEX spectrum in LXe LXe alone, high intensity LXe && NaI, medium intensity LXe && NaI, low intensity online reconstruction July 19, 2019

Towards 2008 run Hardware construction over Analysis of 2007 data in progress Trigger rates in agreement with expectations Trigger efficiency evaluated for Eg close to 100% DT around 80% (to be improved by better timing reconstruction) Direction (in progress) Pending questions (a,g) separation and a-trigger Good performance as a digitizer system for off-line analysis linearity guaranteed up to 130 MeV  good for energy reconstruction timing resolution at level of 1 ns Firmware upgrades Readout speed-up Data compression Q,T algorithm refinements July 19, 2019