New HR Educator Effectiveness Field Organization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Advertisements

ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Manager Special Populations Unit Maria Silva, EL Consultant Office.
Educator Effectiveness Update and Orientation 2014 CDE and SSSD Updates.
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Virginia Foundation for Educational Leadership Virginia Department of Education Webinar Series 2012 Welcome to Webinar 7.
Division of School Effectiveness Office of Instructional Practices and Evaluations.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Company LOGO Professional Development in the Zone Organizational Meeting January 13, 2005.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”
Teacher Evaluation Process Update March 13, 2015 SCASPA Roundtable.
Maximizing RANDA Reports for Directors and Principals Erin Brophy-Lindo Educator Effectiveness Director HR 2015.
Consortium for Educational Research and Evaluation– North Carolina Building LEA and Regional Professional Development Capacity First Annual Evaluation.
Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated Professional Practices, Measures of Student Learning/ Outcomes- Calculating Scores & Translating SLOs/SOOs.
Can You Enhance Knowledge and Stimulate Excellence One STEM Unit at a Time? AEA – October 16, 2014 Panel: Evaluating STEM Professional Development Interventions.
APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d) NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s.
CS203 Lecture 14. Hashing An object may contain an arbitrary amount of data, and searching a data structure that contains many large objects is expensive.
EDL 505 Week 5 Individual Plan for Professional Development Session To purchase this material click below link
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Staff Interchange Updates
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Data Pipeline: Finance
Professional Growth Plans
Ed Skowneski, Principal Jane Sturgell, School Psychologist
School Community Council Implementation Timeline Checklist
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Technology Plan Overview
Staff Interchange.
Orientation to Revisions in the Colorado State Model Evaluation System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
MD Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity
MD Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #7
Uploading Data in the Staff Interchange
Approved Evaluator Training Provider Application Process
WCSD SLO Process Updates
GRANTS – WORKPLAN AND MONITORING AND EVALUATION (M&E) INSTRUCTIONS
Implementing the Specialized Service Professional State Model Evaluation System for Measures of Student Outcomes.
11/30/2018 Approved Evaluator Training Provider on the Colorado State Model Evaluation System Application Process November 2016.
Perkins IV Secondary Accountability
Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated
Maximizing RANDA Reports for Directors and Principals
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Aspiring Principals Program
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Teacher Student Data Link Webinar
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
18-19 Strategic Plan Overview
EDD/581 Week 1.
Supporting SEACs across the Province:
READ Act Data Collection Spring 2015
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
4/23/2019 Approved Evaluator Training Provider on the State Model Evaluation System Application Process November 2015.
Calera Intermediate School
Colorado Department of Education
SPECIAL EDUCATION DECEMBER COUNT
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Special Education “Huddle”
18-19 SBD ACCESS Student Biographical Data
Student Growth Measures
Shifting Instructional Practices Aligning Instruction with
Professional Development
District Assessment Report
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Staff Interchange Fall 2019.
December Count Data Entry Training
Presentation transcript:

New HR Educator Effectiveness Field Organization This webinar was created to support districts for the 2020-21 school year but is helpful information as districts determine their local evaluation system data collection system needs. Spring 2019

Understanding the “What” Changes will be phased in to the Educator Effectiveness ratings Staff Profile file layout in the HR collection for teachers, principals, and Special Services Providers in 2019-20 and more significant changes in 2020-21. These changes may require modifications to local data collection systems.

Understanding the “Why” By collecting Quality Standard and Overall Effectiveness ratings separately across these three groups, Districts will have the opportunity to report more accurate data, specifically teacher and SSP groups, as it relates to evaluation ratings. CDE will have an opportunity to differentiate these groups for reporting purposes at the state level. CDE will be able to report more accurate ratings in the Educator Effectiveness Metrics, released annually.

Understanding What Has Changed All districts and BOCES must report ratings for teachers, principals, and special service providers (SSPs) on each Quality Standard. Changes to these Standards are reflected in the chart below: Teacher Implemented in Evaluations 2018-19 Collected in HR 2019-20 Principal Implemented in evaluation 2019-20 Collected in HR 2020-21 SSP  Number of Quality Standards Former Revised 6 5 7

Summary of Staff Profile Timeline and Changes Reporting Year HR 2018-19 (this past year, for reference) Teacher and SSP data reported together in 7 fields Principal data reported in 8 fields Reporting Year HR 2019-20 (NO change in the file layout) Teacher and SSP data reported together in 7 fields, BUT QS 5 IS FILLED WITH 00 FOR TEACHERS No changes to SSP reporting No changes to Principal reporting Reporting Year HR 2020-21 (NEW file layout) Teachers and SSPs reported separately 6 fields for Teachers, 6 fields for SSPs Principals reported in 6 fields Original QS 6 for Teachers and original QS 7 for Principals now referred to as Measures of Student Learning (MSL); Original QS 6 for SSPs now referred to as Measures of Student Outcomes (MSO)

Staff Profile Layout Changes and Timeline For evaluations conducted in 2018-2019 and reported in HR 2019-2020, there is no change to the file layout, but the way teacher data are reported is different. For evaluations conducted in 2019-2020 and reported in HR 2020-2021, the file layout changes to reflect the updates to the educator quality standards approved by the state board.

2020-2021 Staff Profile Layout: Teachers Name of Field Field Length Text Start Position Text End Position CSV order Excel Column Examples Remarks Teacher Overall Performance Evaluation Rating* 2 144 145 28 AB2 02 Required for all teachers, librarians, and interventionists (job class codes 201-206, 216, 222 and 223). Teacher Quality Standard 1: Content Expertise* 146 147 29 AC2 Teacher Quality Standard 2: Learning Environment* 148 149 30 AD2 Teacher Quality Standard 3: Facilitate Learning* 150 151 31 AE2 Teacher Quality Standard 4: Professionalism* 152 153 32 AF2 Teacher Measures of Student Learning* 154 155 33 AG2 Fields highlighted in yellow in the staff profile layout are new fields to the collection.

2020-2021 Staff Profile Layout: SSPs Name of Field Field Length Text Start Position Text End Position CSV order Excel Column Examples Remarks Special Services Provider (SSP) Overall Performance Evaluation Rating* 2 156 157 34 AH2 02 Required for all Special Services Provider (SSPs); job class codes (211, 231, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, and 242). Special Services Provider (SSP) Quality Standard 1: Professional Expertise* 158 159 35 AI2 Special Services Provider (SSP) Quality Standard 2: Learning Environment* 160 161 36 AJ2 Special Services Provider (SSP) Quality Standard 3: High Quality Service Delivery* 162 163 37 AK2 Special Services Provider (SSP) Quality Standard 4: Professionalism* 164 165 38 AL2 Special Services Provider (SSP) Measures of Student Outcomes* 166 167 39 AM2

2020-2021 Staff Profile Layout: Principals Name of Field Field Length Text Start Position Text End Position CSV order Excel Column Examples Remarks Principal Overall Performance Evaluation Rating* 2 168 169 40 AN2 02 Required for all principals and asst. principals, job class codes 105 & 106 Principal Quality Standard 1: Strategy* 170 171 41 AO2 Principal Quality Standard 2: Culture* 172 173 42 AP2 Principal Quality Standard 3: Instruction* 174 175 43 AQ2 Principal Quality Standard 4: Professionalism* 176 177 44 AR2 Required for all principals and asst. principals, job class codes 105, 106 Principal Measures of Student Learning* 178 179 45 AS2 02 

Questions? For questions regarding the revised Teacher, Principal, or Special Services Provider Standards, please contact the Educator Effectiveness Office at: Educator_Effectiveness@cde.state.co.us For questions regarding the completion of these revised fields in the HR collection, please contact Carolyn Haug, Molly Gold, or Annette Severson at: Haug_C@cde.state.co.us Gold_M@cde.state.co.us Severson_A@cde.state.co.us