ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + RAL HARNESS Study 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Switch to ATV + r-containing regimen - SWAN - SLOAT.
Advertisements

Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
Switch to ATV/r + RAL  HARNESS Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + TDF/FTC N = 37 N = 72 ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + RAL 400 mg bid  Design Randomisation 2: 1 Open-label.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TC MONARK  LPV/r QD vs BID M M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2.
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy  ATARITMO  Swedish Study  ACTG A5201  OREY  MODAt Study.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
NRTI-sparing  SPARTAN  PROGRESS  NEAT001/ANRS 143  MODERN.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy  ATARITMO  Swedish Study  ACTG A5201  OREY  MODAt Study.
Switch to low dose ATV/r  LASA Study.  Design  Endpoints –Primary: proportion of patients with HIV RNA < 200 c/mL at W48 (ITT-E) ; non-inferiority.
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
PHOTON-2 Study: SOF + RBV in HCV-HIV co-infection
Comparison of INSTI vs PI
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Switch to PI/r + 3TC vs PI/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + 3TC ATLAS-M Study.
ARV-trial.com Switch to D/C/F/TAF EMERALD Study 1.
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
ARV-trial.com Switch to LPV/r + RAL KITE Study 1.
Intensification with INSTI
ARV-trial.com Switch to MVC MARCH Study 1.
Switch to DTG + 3TC ASPIRE Study.
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Switch to DRV/r + 3TC DUAL Study.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to D/C/F/TAF EMERALD Study.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch ABC/3TC to TDF/FTC
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
ARV-trial.com Switch to DRV/r + RPV PROBE Study 1.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC STRIIVING NEAT
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Presentation transcript:

ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + RAL HARNESS Study 1

HARNESS Study: switch to ATV/r + RAL Design Randomisation 2 : 1 Open-label W24 W48 Adults Stable 2 NRTI + 3rd drug regimen No previous treatment failure HIV RNA < 40 c/mL > 3 months Switch for safety and/or tolerability issues No resistance to study medications HBs Ag negative ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + TDF/FTC N = 37 ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + RAL 400 mg bid N = 72 Objective Primary Endpoint: proportion with treatment success at W24 (HIV-1 RNA < 40 c/mL) No power calculation Descriptive analysis HARNESS Van Lunzen J. JAIDS 2016;71:538-43

Baseline characteristics and disposition HARNESS Study: switch to ATV/r + RAL Baseline characteristics and disposition ATV/r + TDF/FTC N = 37 ATV/r + RAL N = 72 Median age, years 44 Female 16% 19% Baseline CD4/mm3, mean 631 588 ARV regimens prior to switch PI/r + 2 NRTI NNRTI + 2 NRTI Other ARV regimens 54% 38% 8% 44% 51% 4% Discontinuation at W48, N Adverse event Lack of efficacy 5 1 16 4 3 HARNESS Van Lunzen J. JAIDS 2016;71:538-43

HARNESS Study: switch to ATV/r + RAL Efficacy and Safety results HIV RNA < 40 c/mL (ITT) Confirmed virologic rebound at W48, N ATV/r + TDF/FTC ATV/r + RAL N 1 9 Tested isolates 5 PI resistance 1* L10V, G16Q, L33F, P39Q, M46L, G48V, Q58E, I62V, L63I/T, I64L, A71V, I72V, V77I, V82A, T91S, I93L INI resistance 2* F21Y Y143C + N155H ATV/r + RAL ATV/r + TDF/FTC 100 94.6 80.6 20 40 60 80 % W24 (primary endpoint) W48 86.5 69.4 * 1 patient with both PI and INSTI mutations Virologic rebound 2 consecutive on-treatment HIV RNA > 40 c/mL Last on-treatment HIV RNA > 40 c/mL followed by discontinuation HARNESS Van Lunzen J. IAC 2014, Melbourne, Abs. LBPE19, Van Lunzen J. JAIDS 2016;71:538-43

Kaplan-Meier estimate HARNESS Study: switch to ATV/r + RAL Time to treatment failure (discontinuation of study therapy before W48 or virologic rebound before or at W48) Kaplan-Meier estimate % ATV/r + RAL ATV/r + TDF/FTC B/L 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 60 80 100 72 37 68 67 35 64 57 54 34 39 25 Number of patients at risk Week HARNESS Van Lunzen J. JAIDS 2016;71:538-43

HARNESS Study: switch to ATV/r + RAL Safety at W48, N ATV/r + TDF/FTC N = 37 ATV/r + RAL N = 72 Grade 3-4 AEs 5 13 Grade 2-4 drug-related AEs Grade 3-4 total bilirubin 8 3 12 Renal toxicity 6 1 Discontinuation due to AE 4 ATV and RAL geometric mean Ctrough values, available for most patients, were within therapeutic ranges over the study course HARNESS Van Lunzen J. JAIDS 2016;71:538-43

HARNESS Study: switch to ATV/r + RAL Conclusion In virologically suppressed patients on a triple-drug antiretroviral regimen, switching to ATV/r + RAL resulted in a lower maintenance of virologic suppression and a higher incidence of virologic rebound than in the ATV/r + TDF/FTC group at Week 24 and Week 48 In addition, tolerability issues and treatment discontinuation occurred more frequently and adherence was lower with ATV/r + RAL This pilot study did not support switching to ATV/r + RAL for safety/tolerability reasons in treatment-experienced patients with virological suppression HARNESS Van Lunzen J. JAIDS 2016;71:538-43