Delphine Icard-Arcizet, Olivier Cardoso, Alain Richert, Sylvie Hénon 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Creep Function of a Single Living Cell Nicolas Desprat, Alain Richert, Jacqueline Simeon, Atef Asnacios Biophysical Journal Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages
Advertisements

Nanoparticles as Fluorescence Labels: Is Size All that Matters?
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
From: Mechanics of Cell Mechanosensing on Patterned Substrate
Neutrophil-Bead Collision Assay: Pharmacologically Induced Changes in Membrane Mechanics Regulate the PSGL-1/P-Selectin Adhesion Lifetime  K.E. Edmondson,
Multi-Image Colocalization and Its Statistical Significance
Goran Žagar, Patrick R. Onck, Erik van der Giessen  Biophysical Journal 
Computer Simulation of Small Molecule Permeation across a Lipid Bilayer: Dependence on Bilayer Properties and Solute Volume, Size, and Cross-Sectional.
Measurement of Single Macromolecule Orientation by Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Polarization Microscopy  Joseph N. Forkey, Margot E. Quinlan,
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Substrate Viscosity Enhances Correlation in Epithelial Sheet Movement
Shijie He, Chenglin Liu, Xiaojun Li, Shaopeng Ma, Bo Huo, Baohua Ji 
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Ariel Lubelski, Joseph Klafter  Biophysical Journal 
Physical Properties of Escherichia coli Spheroplast Membranes
A.M. Stadler, I. Digel, G.M. Artmann, J.P. Embs, G. Zaccai, G. Büldt 
Micro Magnetic Tweezers for Nanomanipulation Inside Live Cells
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
MunJu Kim, Katarzyna A. Rejniak  Biophysical Journal 
Microviscoelasticity of the Apical Cell Surface of Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells (HUVEC) within Confluent Monolayers  Wolfgang Feneberg, Martin.
A. Delon, Y. Usson, J. Derouard, T. Biben, C. Souchier 
Unitary Conductance Variation in Kir2
Mark A. Hallen, Jianghai Ho, Christine D. Yankel, Sharyn A. Endow 
Volume 91, Issue 10, Pages (November 2006)
Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
DNA Translocation Governed by Interactions with Solid-State Nanopores
Creep Function of a Single Living Cell
Mechanics of Fluid-Filled Interstitial Gaps. II
Rainer Kurre, Berenike Maier  Biophysical Journal 
Singular Behavior of Slow Dynamics of Single Excitable Cells
Qiaochu Li, Stephen J. King, Ajay Gopinathan, Jing Xu 
Predicting the Rupture Probabilities of Molecular Bonds in Series
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Intracellular Microrheology of Motile Amoeba proteus
Volume 94, Issue 7, Pages (April 2008)
Direct Visualization of Lipid Domains in Human Skin Stratum Corneum's Lipid Membranes: Effect of pH and Temperature  I. Plasencia, L. Norlén, L.A. Bagatolli 
T. Vehoff, A. Glišović, H. Schollmeyer, A. Zippelius, T. Salditt 
Eavesdropping on the Social Lives of Ca2+ Sparks
Volume 93, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Guidance of Cell Migration by Substrate Dimension
High Sensitivity of Stark-Shift Voltage-Sensing Dyes by One- or Two-Photon Excitation Near the Red Spectral Edge  Bernd Kuhn, Peter Fromherz, Winfried.
Focal Adhesion Kinase Stabilizes the Cytoskeleton
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Satomi Matsuoka, Tatsuo Shibata, Masahiro Ueda  Biophysical Journal 
Aligning Paramecium caudatum with Static Magnetic Fields
Volume 83, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Chien-Jung Lo, Mark C. Leake, Richard M. Berry  Biophysical Journal 
Microscopic Analysis of Bacterial Motility at High Pressure
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Multi-Image Colocalization and Its Statistical Significance
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Hazen P. Babcock, Chen Chen, Xiaowei Zhuang  Biophysical Journal 
Long-Range Nonanomalous Diffusion of Quantum Dot-Labeled Aquaporin-1 Water Channels in the Cell Plasma Membrane  Jonathan M. Crane, A.S. Verkman  Biophysical.
Volume 111, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Christina Ketchum, Heather Miller, Wenxia Song, Arpita Upadhyaya 
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
Bekele Gurmessa, Shea Ricketts, Rae M. Robertson-Anderson 
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 93, Issue 8, Pages (October 2007)
Cell Cytoskeleton and Tether Extraction
Volume 110, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
Viscoplasticity Enables Mechanical Remodeling of Matrix by Cells
Presentation transcript:

Cell Stiffening in Response to External Stress is Correlated to Actin Recruitment  Delphine Icard-Arcizet, Olivier Cardoso, Alain Richert, Sylvie Hénon  Biophysical Journal  Volume 94, Issue 7, Pages 2906-2913 (April 2008) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.118265 Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Mechanical measurements on single cells. (A) Creep function of a single C2C12 cell as a function of force application time, fitted by a power law J(t)=5.9.10−3t0.18Pa−1 (in log-log scale). (B) Successive creep functions on a single A549 cell: a series of step forces is applied. For each step, the creep function is measured. For better readability, J(t) is displayed for only four of the nine-step force applications: number 2, 4, 5, and 7. (C) The corresponding viscoelastic modulus G0 versus time, fitted by a sigmoid with a rising time τG=75s. Mechanical saturation is reached in this example. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 2906-2913DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.118265) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Distribution histograms and cumulative probability functions of the power-law parameters: exponent-α (A) and viscoelastic modulus G0 (B), measured on 39 different C2C12 cells. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 2906-2913DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.118265) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 A C2C12 cell during force application: transmission image with an indication of the force direction (A′); a zoom around the bead (A); fluorescence images of GFP-actin at times t1=420s (B), t3=1080s (C), t5=1440s (D), t7=1920s (E), t9=2400s (F), and t10=2640s (G). Arrowheads in images D and E point at adhesion patches. A circle representing the bead in size and position is superimposed on image D. (Bars: 5μm.) Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 2906-2913DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.118265) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 (A) Graphic of the actin recruited in FA around the bead during one experiment. The arrow gives the force direction. The ellipses are the best fits for the actin patches detected (crosses indicate their centers), and are labeled according to the image number on which they are measured. For patches present on step forces number-8 and more, only the centers are displayed. (B) Distribution of the actin patches orientations. Angles are calculated relatively to the direction of force application, as displayed on the top panel. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 2906-2913DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.118265) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Plot of the actin density δQ′i in successive rings around the bead (of radii δR1=2.5 to δR8=6.0μm), at different step force application times tk, k=2 (open down-triangles), 4 (open up-triangles), 6 (open circles), 8 (shaded down-triangles), 10 (shaded up-triangles), and 12 (solid circles). During force application, the actin quantity increases even far from the bead. An exponential decay fit δQ′(r)=A+B exp(–r/Rc) yields a cutoff radius Rc of ∼3.5μm (1.4, 5.2, 3.25, and 4.55μm, respectively, for t4, t6, t10, and t12). Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 2906-2913DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.118265) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Normalized cell viscoelastic modulus g(t) (shaded dots), actin quantities q(t) (solid diamonds), and q′(t) (open diamonds) versus time, during a series of step-force applications. Fitting this experiment by a sigmoid yields the parameters {q0=1.9.10−4, qf=1.01, τQ=300s}; {q′0=6.2.10−3, q′f=1.03, τ′Q=471s}; and {g0=1.6.10−3, gf=1.2, τG=612s}. Biophysical Journal 2008 94, 2906-2913DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.107.118265) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions