NCATE Standard Five Jim Summerlin Maggie Blair Stephen Emmons

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
What’s new in the accreditation standards for TSPC programs.
Your Career at Queen’s The annual review process for QUFA faculty Brenda Brouwer Vice-Provost and Dean School of Graduate Studies.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education February 2006 image files formats.
1 NCATE Standards. 2  Candidate Performance  Candidate Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions  Assessment System and Unit Evaluation  Unit Capacity Field.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
11 Reporting Outcomes Results and Improvements II Produced by Non-Instructional Subcommittee of Assessment Committee.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
College of Liberal Arts Tenure and Promotion workshop: Dossier Preparation 21 March 2014.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Writing Your Program’s SPA Report(s) Cynthia Conn, Ph.D., Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment Chris Geanious, Project Director, College of.
Faculty Tenure and Promotion Policies, Procedures and Standards Faculty 101 Faculty Tenure and Promotion Committee 3 December 2009.
The Electronic Packet and the On-line Review Process The Electronic Packet and the On-line Review Process April
General Faculty Meeting August 23,  For PHHP, maximum = 7 years  For COM, maximum = 10 years (under certain circumstances)  Faculty in the Departments.
COE Outstanding Faculty Application and Award Process Call for Applications Submission Period Application Review ReviewDecision Department Chairs encourage.
Practicing Meaningful Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA Department of Crop and Soil Sciences August 10, 2015 Dr. Leslie Gordon Associate Director for.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Assessment and Continuous Improvement in Teacher Education.
Reviewer Training Welcome & Introductions Co-Chairs.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
College of Education & Human Development Fall 2010 Be sure you have signed in and picked up handouts Welcome ULM Student Teachers.
Preparing Your ELCC Assessments for NCATE Accreditation Missouri Professors of Educational Administration Conference October 10, 2008.
Reviewer Training 5/18/2012. Welcome & Introductions Co-Chairs: NHDOE Representative:Bob McLaughlin.
Phoenix Campus Faculty Refresher Training. This workshop will provide faculty with updated knowledge and tools necessary to be effective in the classroom.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #3 June 17, 2014  CV and Summary Statements (feedback)  Review Teaching Statement of Endeavors and Supporting.
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
Next Accreditation System (NAS) Primer Cuc Mai IM Residency Program Director Annual PD Workshop 2015.
325D: PREPARATION OF LEADERSHIP PERSONNEL Webinar on Project Objective and Performance Measures for the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding.
Careers in law and justice and Employability Skills.
Performance-Based Accreditation
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Tenure and Recontracting August 29, 2017
Developing a Personal Professional Development Plan
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Academic Year UNC Asheville
Lia Lowrie, MD Professor of Pediatrics
Angelo State University College of Education August 17, 2011
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Update – January 2016
Your Career at Queen’s: Merit Review and Renewal, Tenure, & Promotion New Faculty Orientation August 24, 2017 Teri Shearer Deputy Provost (Academic.
Failed to Meet Standard 6
Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE April 2008
Reporting the Course level RWR Assessment data
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
RTP For new faculty A brief introduction.
Central / Mother Lode Regional Consortium Planning Conference
CMGT 445 MASTER Perfect Education/ cmgt445master.com.
Design and Implementation of a Course Review Process
Professor Salary Incentive Program
Tenure and Recontracting February 7, 2018
Tenure and Recontracting February 6, 2018
Site Supervisor Quick Start Guide:
Promotion/Tenure Portfolio
Tenure and Recontracting October 6, 2017
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Psychology Learner Quick Start Guide:
Faculty Workshop on Promotion and Tenure
Bull Run Middle School Advisory Meeting, October 27, 2016.
Association of Teacher Educators Jacsksonville, FL. February 18, 2003
Completing your Program Review
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Tenure and Recontracting February 26, 2019
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
Workload Calculation.
Presentation transcript:

NCATE Standard Five Jim Summerlin Maggie Blair Stephen Emmons Ken Heineman Marva Solomon

5.1 Effective Preparation Unit ensures the faculty effectively prepares educators thru: Scholarship Service Teaching Collaboration Assessment of faculty performance Zero % complete! It will be a brief explanation of how we accomplish our mission. The focus is on how we utilize our faculty’s professional development to effectively train educators. I will write it last.

5.2 Continuous Improvement Summarize unit activities in support of mission that have lead to continuous improvement in the program. Demonstrate changes we have made Document curriculum meetings Discuss improvement in candidate performance Discuss improvement of program quality Discuss plans for continuous improvement We use Educator Preparation Advisory Counsel, etc. We use Taskstream for assessment Monitoring Surveys Zero % Complete A written explanation; maximum three –pages. Haven’t started.

5.3 Exhibits Table on Professional Education Faculty Qualifications Data Table on Clinical Faculty Qualifications Final Draft tables are finished. At 95%. Policies and Practices of Clinical Faculty Will utilize existing Supervisors Handbook, etc. We are at 95% Samples of Faculty Scholarly Activities Use previous data and add anything new. We are at 75% Summary of faculty service and collaborative activities. 0% Policies for Faculty Evaluations with summary. 95% Policy and practices for professional development. Zero % New item! Faculty will submit their development plans (annually)

Standard Five Summary We are progressing well were we are currently focused. We know what to do in the other areas (we just haven’t done it yet) May need some specific data from individual faculty members You will be contacted only if it is necessary. We already have much of the data that we will need.

Faculty Development New Concept (old concept revisited) Each faculty member will create a development plan Format will be distributed next week via email Focus on three objectives or less Must be aligned with your faculty assignment Discuss your plan with your Department Head Turn in completed form NLT October 1, 2011 How will your annual evaluation committee evaluate your success?