Efficacy of a sperm-selection chamber in terms of morphology, aneuploidy and DNA packaging M. Seiringer, M. Maurer, O. Shebl, K. Dreier, G. Tews, S. Ziehr, G. Schappacher-Tilp, E. Petek, T. Ebner Reproductive BioMedicine Online Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 81-88 (July 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.03.013 Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Schematic presentation of the study design. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2013 27, 81-88DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.03.013) Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Correlation between percentage of native spermatozoa showing fast progressive motility (WHO, 1999) with DNA fragmentation and migration time. Migration time: P=0.002. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2013 27, 81-88DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.03.013) Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Efficiency of sperm-selection chamber in eliminating spermatozoa showing poor morphology, defective DNA packaging and abnormal chromosomal constitution (P<0.01). Chromosomal abnormalities evaluated for chromosomes X, Y and 18. Morphologically abnormal spermatozoa were assessed according to WHO (2010). Analysis of vacuolization using IMSI (×6300). Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2013 27, 81-88DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.03.013) Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions