Bioelectric impedance vector distribution in peritoneal dialysis patients with different hydration status  Antonio Piccoli, for the Italian CAPD-BIA Study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Susan R. Mendley, Nancy L. Majkowski, Dale A. Schoeller 
Advertisements

Urea and nitrogen excretion in pediatric peritoneal dialysis patients
Acid-base profile in patients on PD
A skeptical view of assisted home peritoneal dialysis
Michael Allon, Michelle L. Robbin  Kidney International 
A.M. Thompson, T.G. Pickering  Kidney International 
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Nutrition and chronic kidney disease
Use of hemodialysis and hemoperfusion in poisoned patients
Acid-base profile in patients on PD
End-stage renal disease in developing countries
Role of diuretics in the preservation of residual renal function in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis  James F. Medcalf, Kevin P.G.
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Hydration in Advanced Cancer: Can Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Improve the Evidence Base? A Systematic Review of the Literature  Amara Callistus Nwosu,
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 64, Pages S3-S12 (December 2003)
The risk of hospitalization and modality failure with home dialysis
Vascular access surveillance: an ongoing controversy
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Fluid overload and residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis: the proof of the pudding is in the eating  Wim Van Biesen, Achim Jörres  Kidney International 
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages (June 1999)
Hydration in Advanced Cancer: Can Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Improve the Evidence Base? A Systematic Review of the Literature  Amara Callistus Nwosu,
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
The progression of chronic kidney disease: A 10-year population-based study of the effects of gender and age  B.O. Eriksen, O.C. Ingebretsen  Kidney International 
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Prediction of hypertension in chronic hemodialysis patients
Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
The online measurement of hemodialysis dose (Kt): Clinical outcome as a function of body surface area  Edmund G. Lowrie, Zhensheng Li, Norma Ofsthun,
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (April 1998)
Susan R. Mendley, Nancy L. Majkowski, Dale A. Schoeller 
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Achieving blood pressure targets during dialysis improves control but increases intradialytic hypotension  A. Davenport, C. Cox, R. Thuraisingham  Kidney.
Kt/V underestimates the hemodialysis dose in women and small men
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 84, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Blood pressure targets in hemodialysis patients
The role of bioimpedance and biomarkers in helping to aid clinical decision-making of volume assessments in dialysis patients  Simon J. Davies, Andrew.
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 60, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Alternate-day dialysis may be needed for hemodialysis patients
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Volume 73, Issue 8, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
A skeptical view of assisted home peritoneal dialysis
Volume 70, Issue 3, Pages (August 2006)
Dialysis dose and gender: A different hypothesis
Urea and nitrogen excretion in pediatric peritoneal dialysis patients
Blood pressure and long-term mortality in United States hemodialysis patients: USRDS Waves 3 and 4 Study1  Robert N. Foley, Charles A. Herzog, Allan J.
Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Thresholds of iron markers for iron deficiency erythropoiesis—finding of the Japanese nationwide dialysis registry  Takayuki Hamano, Naohiko Fujii, Terumasa.
Chi-Yuan Hsu, M.D., M.Sc., Glenn M. Chertow, Gary C. Curhan 
Review of clinical trial experience with icodextrin
Antonio Piccoli, Marta Codognotto  Kidney International 
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
The International Pediatric Peritonitis Registry: Starting to walk
Survival of propensity matched incident peritoneal and hemodialysis patients in a United States health care system  Victoria A. Kumar, Margo A. Sidell,
E.F. Vonesh, J.J. Snyder, R.N. Foley, A.J. Collins 
Presentation transcript:

Bioelectric impedance vector distribution in peritoneal dialysis patients with different hydration status  Antonio Piccoli, for the Italian CAPD-BIA Study Group  Kidney International  Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 1050-1063 (March 2004) DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00467.x Copyright © 2004 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Two versions of hydration. Top, Hydration is expressed as a relative difference (%) of total body water (TBW) between edema and nonedema groups, that is, as 100 × (TBW edema - TBW nonedema)/TBW nonedema. TBW estimates are from four anthropometry formulas, Watson, Watson, and Batts [5], Hume and Weyers [6], Chertow et al [7], and Johansson et al [8], and four convention bioelectric impedance analyis (BIA) equations, a [23], b [24], c [25], and d [26]. Bottom, hydration is expressed as a relative difference (%) of the two impedance vector components, that is, as 100 × (Z/H edema - Z/H nonedema)/Z/H nonedema (with the minus sign accounting for the inverse relationship between impedance and dehydration. Solid and open points indicate males and females, respectively. Abbreviations are: H, height; R, resistance; Xc, reactance; Z, impedance. Kidney International 2004 65, 1050-1063DOI: (10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00467.x) Copyright © 2004 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 RXc mean graph by gender. Males (A) and females (B), with mean vectors (arrows) and the 95% confidence ellipses from three continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) groups: low-glucose (LG), high-glucose (HG), and edema (net-hatched ellipse) group. Abbreviations are: R, resistance; Xc, reactance; H, height. Kidney International 2004 65, 1050-1063DOI: (10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00467.x) Copyright © 2004 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 RXc mean graph by gender. Males (A) and females (B), with mean vectors and the 95% confidence ellipses from edema and nonedema continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) groups, compared with the reference, healthy population (normal) [16], asymptomatic hemodialysis (HD) population, pre- and posthemodialysis session [33], and edematous patients with the nephritic syndrome (NS) [17]. Abbreviations are: R, resistance; Xc, reactance; H, height. Kidney International 2004 65, 1050-1063DOI: (10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00467.x) Copyright © 2004 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Dotted ellipses represent the distribution of 50% of impedance vectors from individual continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients without edema, plotted on the reference, gender-specific (A) males and (B) females, 50%, 75%, and 95% tolerance ellipses of the healthy population [16]. Two big arrows indicate mean vectors of CAPD groups (edema and no edema). Double-headed arrows represent the mean vector of hemodialysis patients before (lower arrowhead) and after a hemodialysis (upper arrowhead) [33]. Abbreviations are: R, resistance; Xc, reactance; H, height. Kidney International 2004 65, 1050-1063DOI: (10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00467.x) Copyright © 2004 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Interpretation of tissue impedance based on interstitial pressure-volume curve (on the floor) and interstitial volume-blood volume curve (on the wall) following Guyton's theory [2]. In the normal subject [40L total body water (TBW)], the interstitial fluid volume is 15L in a gel form and with a negative interstitial pressure of -2mm Hg, the blood volume is 5L, and tissue impedance is normal (Z vector in the center of the 75% tolerance ellipse). When the interstitial fluid pressure rises above zero, most of the extra fluid is free fluid, allowing the appearance of pitting edema and bringing the impedance vector out of the lower pole of the 75% tolerance ellipse (established threshold for apparent edema). Fluid overload also increases the blood volume up to a plateau of 7L. Vector migration from the lower to the upper pole of the 75% tolerance ellipse indicates a progressive loss of interstitial fluid from the gel meshwork and a progressive decrease in interstitial pressure, which lowers the blood volume. Vector migration along the major axis of 75% tolerance ellipse detects changes in tissue hydration before the appearance of clinical sings of fluid overload (edema, lower pole) or dehydration (hypovolemia, upper pole). Kidney International 2004 65, 1050-1063DOI: (10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00467.x) Copyright © 2004 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions