Background. Long-Term B/F/TAF Switch Efficacy in Patients with Archived Pre-Existing Resistance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Switch to EVG/c/FTC/TDF  STRATEGY-PI Study  STRATEGY-NNRTI Study.
Advertisements

Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
Switch to ATV/r + RAL  HARNESS Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + TDF/FTC N = 37 N = 72 ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + RAL 400 mg bid  Design Randomisation 2: 1 Open-label.
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Switch PI/R to ETR  Etraswitch. Etraswitch Study: Switch PI/r to ETR Continuation of current PI/R + 2 NRTI N = 21 N = 22 ETR 400 mg QD* + 2 NRTI  Design.
Statistical Comments on Retrospective Analysis Girish Aras, Ph.D. Jonathan Ma, Ph.D. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy  ATARITMO  Swedish Study  ACTG A5201  OREY  MODAt Study.
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
Treatment-Naïve Adults
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine as Maintenance Dual Therapy SWORD-1 and SWORD- 2: Design
Switch to PI/r + 3TC vs PI/r monotherapy
Figure 1 Inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, and criteria for virologic failure. CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; ddC, zalcitabine;
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-2 (TMC125-C216)
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Switch to RPV-TDF-FTC from Ritonavir-boosted PI Regimen SPIRIT STUDY
ARV-trial.com Switch to LPV/r + RAL KITE Study 1.
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-1 (TMC125-C206)
Switching the NRTI Backbone to Tenofovir DF-Emtricitabine TOTEM
Switch to DTG + 3TC ASPIRE Study.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to D/C/F/TAF EMERALD Study.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Figure 11-1.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
ARV-trial.com Switch to DRV/r + RPV PROBE Study 1.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Figure Overview.
Figure Overview.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + RAL HARNESS Study 1.
ARV-trial.com Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC STRIIVING NEAT
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of NRTI combinations
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Keeping the Pressure on Archived NRTI Resistance: Switching to Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (B/F/TAF) Triple Therapy in Study 4030 Rima.
Differential Detection of M184V/I Between Plasma Historical HIV Genotypes and Proviral DNA from PBMCs N Margot, R Ram, IR McNicholl, R Haubrich, C Callebaut.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Presentation transcript:

Long-Term B/F/TAF Switch Efficacy in Patients with Archived Pre-Existing Resistance

Background

Methods: Figure 1. Overview of B/F/TAF Switch Studies

Methods

Methods (cont’d)

Methods (cont’d)

Table 1. HIV-1 Drug Resistance Substitutions

Efficacy Analyses

Results: Table 2. Virologic Outcomes for the Pooled B/F/TAF Group

Table 3. Resistance Development through Current Analysis

Table 4. Baseline Genotypic Data Sources

Table 5. Frequencies of Pre-existing NRTI, NNRTI, and PI Resistance Associated Substitutions at Baseline

Table 6. Frequencies of Pre-existing INSTI Resistance Associated Substitutions at Baseline

Figure 2. Long-term Virologic Outcomes Stratified by Pre-existing Resistance at Baseline

Table 7. Long-term Virologic Outcomes by Baseline Resistance Category

Table 8. Baseline Characteristics Stratified by M184V/I Detection

Table 9. Association of M184V/I with Other Primary Resistance Substitutions

Figure 3. Virologic Profiles of Participants with Archived M184V/I and HIV-1 RNA ≥50 c/mL (n=2)

Conclusions

References

Acknowledgments