Is Copernicus benefitting from INSPIRE?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INSPIRE Drafting Team „Data Specifications“
Advertisements

EDC and MDIAK model MKDIA Data QC and acceptance Data maintenance and data integration Analysis and synthesis Assimilation in to users framework Stocks.
National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, Denmark GIS Guidance update.
INSPIRE educational requirements: Challenges for the vocational training community VESTA-GIS Workshop 1 July 2008, Salzburg Danny Vandenbroucke SADL/K.U.Leuven.
1 Adaptive Management Portal April
Update on INSPIRE: INSPIRE maintenance and implementation and INSPIRE related EEA activities on biodiversity CDDA/European protected areas technical meeting.
EXPECTATIONS OF TURKISH ENVIRONMENTAL SECTOR FROM INSPIRE Ministry of Environment and Forestry June, 2010 Özlem ESENGİN Ahmet ÇİVİ Tuncay DEMİR.
Spatially enabling Northern Ireland Dr Suzanne McLaughlin DFP Land & Property Services GIS Ireland Conference 11 th October 2012.
STANDARDS AND INTEROPERABILITY; RIGHTS ISSUES Status and summary 1.
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
Save time. Reduce costs. Find and reuse interoperability solutions on Joinup for developing European public services Nikolaos Loutas
1 Interoperability of Spatial Data Sets and Services Data quality and Metadata: what is needed, what is feasible, next steps Interoperability of Spatial.
Information Management, Standards and Data Quality Brian Green ePSIplus Analyst funded by eContentPlus.
XIth International Congress for Mathematical Geology - September 3-8, 2006 – Liège, Belgium Contribution of GeoScienceML to the INSPIRE data harmonisation.
1 SDS Implementation. 2 Discovery service View service Download service The services can be accessed on Internet, a few extra metadata elements is added.
ESPON Seminar Luxembourg, 8-9 December Cohesion-and-Urban-Policy-_26-27-November-2015_-Luxembourg-City_/index.php.
Sum-up of common issues from pilots Different types of exercises when joining statutory reporting & INSPIRE implementation: 1-To explain ‘INSPIRE fitting.
Making the CDDA data model INSPIRE compliant Project information and status 2015 Eionet Biodiversity Ecosystems, Indicators and Assessments NRC Workshop.
Darja Lihteneger, November 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark INSPIRE Data Modelling for Reporting Data Flows – CDDA conceptual data model and INSPIRE Eionet.
19-20 October 2010 IT Directors’ Group meeting 1 Item 6 of the agenda ISA programme Pascal JACQUES Unit B2 - Methodology/Research Local Informatics Security.
Scoping the Framework Guidelines on Interoperability Rules for European Gas Transmission Geert Van Hauwermeiren 20 th Madrid Forum, 26 Sept 2011.
A harmonized approach towards National Access Points for Information Services in Europe Paper co-authored by: . Ronald Jorna, Mobycon, NL Louis.
eHealth Standards and Profiles in Action for Europe and Beyond
European Monitoring Platform for Mapping of QoS and QoE
Components People Technology Policies Standards Spatial Data.
Geert Van Hauwermeiren Workshop, Ljubljana, 13 Sept 2011
List of priority spatial data sets
ROBERT LOWSON EEA COORDINATOR GMES BUREAU.
Report on Member State progress in implementing the Directive
- Progress and planning- European Commission
Geospatial Knowledge Base (GKB) Training Platform
Christian Ansorge Arona, 09/04/2014
14th MEETING OF WORKING GROUP F ON FLOODS Thursday 17 October 2013
Validation & conformity testing
INSPIRE Implementing Rules
Sophia Lafferty-hess | research data manager
List of priority spatial data sets
4th meeting of the MIG permanent policy sub-group (MIG-P)
Martin Tuchyňa Towards an INSPIREd e-reporting & INSPIRE priority datasets in Slovakia INSPIRE conference ,
14th MEETING OF WORKING GROUP F ON FLOODS Thursday 17 October 2013
MIWP new actions MIWP Drafting of “Master Guidelines” for the INSPIRE Directive MIG Technical subgroup meeting 31th October 2017, Ispra (IT) DG.
11. The future of SDMX Introducing the SDMX Roadmap 2020
Validation in INSPIRE Webinar on a new Test Registry & Repository 26/05/2015 Robin S. Smith & Michael Lutz.
Geospatial Data Use and sharing Concepts
[draft] Conclusions, actions & next steps
MIWP Action ”Priority List of E-Reporting Datasets”
MIG-T meeting, 19th April 2016, Ispra End-user applications
INSPIRE fitness for purpose – Analysis
9. Quality and Experimental data
Jordi Escriu - facilitator
Priority geospatial datasets for the European Commission
Vanda Nunes de Lima 18th June 2009
CDDA & INSPIRE work of EEA - preliminary lessons learnt
Nicholas Martyn DG Regional Policy
IMPROVING PUBLIC INFORMATION
Jisc Research Data Shared Service (RDSS)
Cluster Knowledge Integration and Dissemination
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
- Progress and planning- European Commission
Requestion access to spatial data
[draft] Conclusions, actions & next steps
FrAmework for Multi-agency Environments
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
M. Henrard, B5 N. Buysse and H. Linden, B6 Eurostat
The single digital gateway
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
… Two-step approach Conceptual Framework Annex I Annex II Annex III
SDI from a technological perspective: Standards
SDMX Roadmap 2020: Achievements, status and future outlook
WISE and INSPIRE By Albrecht Wirthmann, GISCO, Eurostat
Presentation transcript:

Is Copernicus benefitting from INSPIRE? Henrik Steen Andersen, EEA

A simple question Is Copernicus benefitting from INSPIRE, e.g. regarding spatial data discovery, accessibility, and usability? Yes, of course, but …

Copernicus & INSPIRE The Copernicus programme and its users consider the timely implementation of INSPIRE to be important as a key source of in situ data. With the implementation of INSPIRE, the number of available data sets and services relevant for the Copernicus services is expected to increase, and discovery and access operations will be made considerably easier.

Some project objectives Identify currently published INSPIRE data sets that meet Copernicus in-situ data needs (CEMS, CLMS); Identify possible gaps and assess if these gaps are expected to be closed in pace with the continued implementation of INSPIRE; Collect information concerning the implementation of harmonized INSPIRE data.

Some project objectives The project will result in a clarification of the current usability of INSPIRE resources for Copernicus implementation, allowing to better manage risks and to avoid duplicate development; The project can highlight focus areas where it already makes sense to build on INSPIRE infrastructures. We want to clarify and document the interface between INSPIRE and Copernicus, and in particular Copernicus’ current and future use of INSPIRE and its dependency on the timely implementation of INSPIRE.

EEA’s main cross-cutting activities Maintain an overview of the Copernicus in situ component Improve access to selected in situ data Raise awareness about the Copernicus in situ component The EEA links data and requirements to Copernicus products and thus to end user needs

CORDA is still moving forward Since last workshop: More that 1000 additional datasets; Links to open LPIS data included; Focus on CEMS specific agreements; New explore tool; Usage monitoring. Improve access to selected in situ data

Copernicus needs pan-European coverage

Copernicus needs pan-European coverage Harmonisation of datasets allows them to be combined and used as one dataset; in the context of geospatial information, harmonisation entails removing mismatches in geometry and semantics of the data. Compliance indicates conformance to regulations, standards and other requirements, laid down by the INSPIRE Directive. Interoperability enables systems to work together on a technical basis, by implementing common protocols, formats and other mechanisms.

INSPIRE compliant datasets in CORDA 17% 8.7% 2.1% 23 datasets contained GML files, all of them were compliant* to the 1089/2010 regulation. *based on dataset’s own declared conformity

Metadata discovery issues During each step, we had to account for numerous problems, such as multi-language keywords, spelling errors, encoding errors (e.g. for dashes), incomplete information and incomplete URLs. If we had strictly applied our interpretation of the INSPIRE Implementing Rules and Technical guidance, the analysis would have been based on less than 1% of the registered data sets.

Selected results In addition to issues with the metadata, another issue is that a large number of registered services don’t seem to be available. Even if we assume that all exceptions are due to errors in the requests we generate, less than 30% of all download services that are listed in the metadata were accessible.

Important trends Fit-for-purpose analysis and simplification: The objective is to realign Implementing Rules (IRs) and Technical Guidelines to today’s technical and policy requirements, and to shed unnecessary complexity in the TG; Focus on key use cases: Copernicus can benefit from this development through quicker, more complete access to specific themes. Copernicus to also inform these discussions with their data set priorities; Value beyond INSPIRE: Ensure that national or regional policy and procedures also benefit from the INSPIRE infrastructure by building on top of INSPIRE or by using compatible systems. This can help Copernicus by enriching INSPIRE infrastructure and can at least punctually help to cover requirements that are otherwise not covered;

Important trends More efficient implementation: Using cloud technologies and less individual solutions will also help the speed and efficiency of implementation a lot. Copernicus can benefit from improved interoperability, faster availability and better adherence to the INSPIRE Quality of Service requirements; Alignment with Open Data Initiatives and Principles: An increased number of INSPIRE instances on a national and regional level becomes part of Open Data initiatives, or in some cases, Smart City initiatives. This is encouraging as it provides both resources to the implementation (technical and financial) and a permissive licensing framework that typically allows data to be used freely. A more permissive licensing framework means that Copernicus can easily use data in different environments and scenarios. Growing number of resources: Quantitative trends show that the number of data sets and services still rise quickly. Between April 2017 and September 2017, more than 15.000 resources were added to the central INSPIRE catalogue.

A few concluding remarks INSPIRE and Copernicus share key requirements. They both use spatial data harmonised across borders to be able to use and exchange spatial data seamlessly; Implementing INSPIRE takes more than 10 years. It is expected to be ready for most of the data in 2020 – Annex 1 already now. Usable data will only become available stepwise, especially interoperable data, since data harmonization is one of the last steps to implement INSPIRE. Because currently not all data are harmonised yet, added value for Copernicus might still be lacking; A key issue is alignment of providers and users of harmonised data. The providers are responsible to reach interoperability through harmonisation. This could be enforced by joint efforts (tooling and Apps), which also enable easier use; Content and geometry need to be harmonized and connected. Semantic alignment is relatively easily supported by tooling (ETL tools) and well addressed by INSPIRE. Aligning geometry is less easily automated. Eurogeographics’ European Location Service is building on INSPIRE to achieve this.

Copernicus in situ website The new Copernicus in situ website was launched in April 2017. News and events; Reports and fact sheets; General information about the Copernicus In Situ Component;

In situ data newsletters Two newsletters were issued in January and July 2017. The next is planned for December. Please reuse these whenever relevant. 220 subscribers. Subscribe at: insitu.copernicus.eu Joint operational communication plan

Thank you for your attention