Means ± SE (Control, Fungicide, Thiamethoxam, Imidacloprid) F-value

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Multiple Comparisons in Factorial Experiments

Advertisements

Latin Square Designs (§15.4)

1 Chapter 4 Experiments with Blocking Factors The Randomized Complete Block Design Nuisance factor: a design factor that probably has an effect.

Chapter 4 Randomized Blocks, Latin Squares, and Related Designs

Experiments with both nested and “crossed” or factorial factors

Experiences with PSNT in North Carolina David H. Hardy Soil Testing Section Agronomic Division- NCDA&CS.

Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Immediate and Residual Effects of Urea and Pelleted Poultry Manure on Corn and Soil in.

Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs

1 Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs Basic Definitions and Principles Study the effects of two or more factors. Factorial designs Crossed:

Analysis of variance (2) Lecture 10. Normality Check Frequency histogram (Skewness & Kurtosis) Probability plot, K-S test Normality Check Frequency histogram.

Outline Single-factor ANOVA Two-factor ANOVA Three-factor ANOVA

22-1 Factorial Treatments (§ 14.3, 14.4, 15.4) Completely randomized designs - One treatment factor at t levels. Randomized block design - One treatment.

Prepared by Hanadi. An p ×p Latin Square has p rows and p columns and entries from the first p letters such that each letter appears in every row and.

5-1 Introduction 5-2 Inference on the Means of Two Populations, Variances Known Assumptions.

Copyright © 2013, 2010 and 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Comparing Three or More Means 13.

Range, Variance, and Standard Deviation in SPSS. Get the Frequency first! Step 1. Frequency Distribution  After reviewing the data  Start with the “Analyze”

Analysis of Variance (Two Factors). Two Factor Analysis of Variance Main effect The effect of a single factor when any other factor is ignored. Example.

The Randomized Complete Block Design

Use of Salt to Control Annual Bluegrass in Seashore Paspalum. Lewayne White, Paul Raymer, and Patrick E. McCullough Introduction  Annual bluegrass (Poa.

1 Experimental Design. 2  Single Factor - One treatment with several levels.  Multiple Factors - More than one treatment with several levels each. 

1 A nuisance factor is a factor that probably has some effect on the response, but it’s of no interest to the experimenter…however, the variability it.

1 Nested (Hierarchical) Designs In certain experiments the levels of one factor (eg. Factor B) are similar but not identical for different levels of another.

1 Every achievement originates from the seed of determination.

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.

Exercise 1 You have a clinical study in which 10 patients will either get the standard treatment or a new treatment Randomize which 5 of the 10 get the.

1 Always be contented, be grateful, be understanding and be compassionate.

Latin Square Designs KNNL – Sections Description Experiment with r treatments, and 2 blocking factors: rows (r levels) and columns (r levels)

Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture 18 Random Effects.

Two-Factor Studies with Equal Replication KNNL – Chapter 19.

Three or More Factors: Latin Squares

Chapter 9 More Complicated Experimental Designs. Randomized Block Design (RBD) t > 2 Treatments (groups) to be compared b Blocks of homogeneous units.

ANOVA Overview of Major Designs. Between or Within Subjects Between-subjects (completely randomized) designs –Subjects are nested within treatment conditions.

Joyful mood is a meritorious deed that cheers up people around you like the showering of cool spring breeze.

Designs for Experiments with More Than One Factor When the experimenter is interested in the effect of multiple factors on a response a factorial design.

1 Statistical Analysis Professor Lynne Stokes Department of Statistical Science Lecture #10 Testing the Statistical Significance of Factor Effects.

TWO WAY ANOVA WITHOUT REPLICATION

Factorial Experiments

Randomized Block Design

Two-way ANOVA problems

Comparing Three or More Means

Chapter 10: Analysis of Variance: Comparing More Than Two Means

Randomized Block Design

Thought Questions.

Post Hoc Tests on One-Way ANOVA

Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs

ANalysis Of VAriance (ANOVA)

More Complicated Experimental Designs

Two-Factor Studies with Equal Replication

Multiple Comparisons: Example

An overview of the design and analysis of experiments

PARAMETRIC TESTS t-tests (parametric, interval and ratio data)

Relations in Categorical Data

More Complicated Experimental Designs

Nested Designs and Repeated Measures with Treatment and Time Effects

Two-Factor Studies with Equal Replication

Nested Designs and Repeated Measures with Treatment and Time Effects

More Complicated Experimental Designs

Latin Square Designs KNNL – Sections

ચાલો માટી વિશે જાણીએ All About Soil.

해조류의 처리 Wet milling of the seaweed is essential in order for the enzyme to get in contact with the substrate (seaweed). The ratio of seaweed and water.

Ch10 Analysis of Variance.

The Randomized Complete Block Design

Joyful mood is a meritorious deed that cheers up people around you

A Bestiary of ANOVA tables

Factorial Designs Factorial design: a research design that includes two or more factors (Independent Variables) A two-factor design has two IVs. Example:

Chlorophyll concentration (conc

Fig. 2. Soluble sugar and organic acid levels with different K fertilization during fruit development. Soluble sugar and organic acid levels with different.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

STATISTICS INFORMED DECISIONS USING DATA

Two-way ANOVA problems

Presentation transcript:

Means ± SE (Control, Fungicide, Thiamethoxam, Imidacloprid) F-value Table 1. This table shows the differences between soil health parameters measured at the end of the study for the four treatments, analyzed through analysis of variance. Data from both sites were combined, with treatment as a fixed factor, and site, row and column as random blocking factors, with row and column nested within site. Statistically significant (P<0.05) differences were compared using means comparisons with Tukey’s adjustment. The table shows the F- and P-values for the treatment effect; letters following means represent significant differences between those treatments. Parameter Means ± SE (Control, Fungicide, Thiamethoxam, Imidacloprid) F-value P-value Active carbon (mg C/kg soil) 372.9±14.6, 375.8±11.9, 369.3±21.8, 367.6±18.7 0.104 0.957 Wet aggregate stability (%) 48.98±1.59 (ab), 46.18±0.91 (b), 54.68±3.17 (a), 46.3±2.39 (b) 3.726 0.026 Soluble salt conc. (mmhos/cm) 0.068±0.004, 0.066±0.005, 0.074±0.005, 0.072±0.004 0.987 0.416 pH 6.14±0.1, 6.27±0.09, 5.91±0.12, 6.07±0.07 2.397 0.094 NH3 conc. (mg/kg) 6.44±0.41, 5.93±0.36, 6.65±0.55, 6.46±0.48 0.605 0.619 NH4 conc. (mg/kg) 5.19±0.23, 5.0±0.24, 5.13±0.28, 4.7±0.17 0.795 0.509 % C 1.25±0.13, 1.26±0.08, 1.23±0.11, 1.28±0.09 0.078 0.971 % H 0.3±0.01, 0.31±0.01, 0.32±0.01, 0.33±0.02 0.845 0.484 % N 0.1±0.01, 0.11±0.01, 0.1±0.01, 0.11±0.01 1.149 0.351