QUALITY ASSURANCE OF EDUCATION AND

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Advertisements

MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
Standards Definition of standards Types of standards Purposes of standards Characteristics of standards How to write a standard Alexandria University Faculty.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
The quality assurance system in Sweden Håkan Hult Linköping University Gdansk March 13, 2009.
Developing appropriate quality assurance: Policies and tools Quality Assurance and Evaluation.
© American Bar Association Effective Strategic Planning Henry F. White, Jr. Executive Director & Chief Operating Officer American Bar Association 10 th.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Developing an accessibility strategy. In this talk we will discuss an accessibility strategy an accessibility policy getting started - steps to consultation.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Lecture #9 Project Quality Management Quality Processes- Quality Assurance and Quality Control Ghazala Amin.
Vaal University of Technology (formerly Vaal Triangle Technikon ) Ms A.J. GOZO Senior Director: Library and Information Services.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
© 2011 Partners Harvard Medical International Strategic Plan for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Program Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center Strategic.
SMS Planning.  Safety management addresses all of the operational activities of the entire organization.  The four (4) components of an SMS are: 1)
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Assessment & Program Review President’s Retreat 2008 College of Micronesia - FSM May 13 – 15, 2008 FSM China Friendship Sports Center.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Quality assurance in Danish VET Ljubljana 19th November 2015 Hans Joergen Knudsen, NCE.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
The Flemish Education Council A Counselor and Partner in Flemish Education Improved policy making through consultation Mia Douterlungne general administrator.
Review visit Heli Mattisen Visit to one HEI – 1-3 days Committee has a working room where, among others, pre-requested documents/materials.
Strong leadership and whole school engagement – How does this happen? Rationale: Whole school change occurs when the leadership team has a common vision,
Team Member Briefing The Middle States Association Commissions on Elementary and Secondary Schools.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Framework Policy on Continuing Care in First Nations Communities of Quebec Conference on clients with decreasing independence May 10, 2017.
Promoting Educational Organisation Through PEOPLE
Roles & Responsibilities of an Impressive Program Governance Plan
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
6th May 2013 CDR Volodymyr Khilkevych, UKR N
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Accreditation of Comprehensive Suicide Prevention Programs
ISO/IEC
J. Sterling Morton High Schools
Programme Review Directorate of Quality Promotion QP_DN.
Orientation for New Site Visitors
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
CARF Canada Performance Measurement Outcomes
External Quality Assurance 2017 – New Approach and New Opportunities
Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian ENIC/NARI Baku, 2017
Clinical Engineering Lecture (3).
Towards More Sustainable Programming for Global Health Missions
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
School Self-Evaluation 
Welcome to the CSBM workshop: Managing office services
A Framework for Control
Eurostat Quality Management (in the ESS context)
European TRAINING FOUNDATION
11/17/2018.
My Performance Journey
Institutul Bancar Român ROMANIAN BANKING INSTITUTE
Using the EFQM Excellence Model to support the role of a trustee
ASSISTANCE DOGS INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION PROCEDURES 2018
PORTERVILLE COLLEGE ACCREDITATION OVERVIEW Fall 2017
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
Accreditation Service for International Colleges and University
European Style Pilot Evaluations in Azerbaijan Higher Education Baku 20 June 2017 Helka Kekäläinen, PhD Project Leader.
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
To achieve improvement through: Self assessment Benchmarking
ETBI Annual Conference for Principals and Deputy Principals
UNDP Asia Pacific Regional Centre August 2010
London Youth Introduction to the Quality Mark.
BILC ANNUAL CONFERENCE 2019 Tartu, Estonia
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Quality Matters Overview
2019/2020 Staff Performance Evaluation Cycle Goals – Employee Presentation Tony Yardley, Human Resources.
Presentation transcript:

QUALITY ASSURANCE OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN THE SWEDISH ARMED FORCES SWEDISH ARMED FORCES HEADQUARTERS DIRECTOR OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES MARIAMMA MARTIN

DEFINITION OF QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) Quality assurance has been defined as a program for the systematic monitoring and evaluation of the various aspects of a project, service or facility to ensure that standards of quality are being met - Merriam Webster

QA - SWEDISH ARMED FORCES (SwAF) The standards for quality assurance in education and training is based on core values adapted from the Swedish Institute for Quality (SIQ) and from NATO Systems Approach to Training (SAT)

SWEDISH INSTITUTE FOR QUALITY (SIQ) National center for quality and business excellence in Sweden Non-profit organization SIQ mission statement To promote quality development by creating, gathering and spreading knowledge within the field of quality and excellence How does SIQ promote quality management Run several activities focused on education, research and development SIQ international partners EFQM - European Foundation for Quality Management GBN - Global Benchmarking Network ASQ - American Society for Quality

SIQ CORE VALUES ADAPTED BY THE SWEDISH ARMED FORCES DEDICATED LEADERSHIP FACT BASED DECISION MAKING PROCESS BASED PARTCIPATION BY ALL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT LONG TERM PLANNING COOPERATION PREVENTIVE MEASURES LEARNING FROM OTHERS CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

SWEDISH ARMED FORCES REGULATIONS FOR EDUCATION AND TRAINING According to chapter 6 in the Swedish Armed Forces Regulations for Education and Training, “Inspections are executed by the Military Command for the Directorate of Education and Training. The purpose of the inspection is to safeguard the standards and to ensure quality assurance in education and training. It should be instructive and useful for all parties. Inspections should therefore be based on the internal quality assurance policies and procedures that are part of an on going process”. .

QUALITY ASSURANCE – QA?

WHO? WHAT? WHEN? WHERE? WHY? AND HOW? IN THE SWEDISH ARMED FORCES Who will ensure QA? Military Command for the Directorate of Education and Training together with quality assurance experts What will be the focus? Education and training When will it be done? In a given time slot Where will it be done? At the school or centre for education and training Why will it be done? To safeguard the standards and to ensure quality assurance in education and training within the Swedish Armed Forces How will it be done? Using inspection as the method

INSPECTION AS THE METHOD FOR QA To safeguard the standards and to ensure quality assurance in education and training Quality assurance is not a static process but a dynamic one and it is continuous Inspection cycle is clearly defined in the HQ directive and is a three year cycle Structured follow up with the purpose of warranting that identified areas for improvement are dealt with and further enhancement takes place Inspection is carried out in close coperation between the inspected and Headquarters

INSPECTION PROCESS COMMUNICATION WITH SCHOOL INSPECTION DIRECTIVE COMMUNICATION AND ACTIVE PARTCIPATION INSPECTION PROG. FINALISED INITIAL SITE VISIT PROG. FINALISED INITIAL VTC COMMUNICATION WITH SCHOOL MEETING 2 via VTC MEETING 3 via VTC INSPECTION SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT BY SCHOOL/CENTER FIRST IMPRESSIONS (FIR) ON SITE INITIAL SITE VISIT BY INSPECTION GROUP REPORT SENT TO THE SCHOOL STAKEHOLDERS INPUT FOLLOW UP FINAL INSPECTION REPORT WITH ANALYSIS OF FINDINGS

PARTICIPANTS IN THE INSPECTION SCHOOL/CENTER TO BE INSPECTED Management HEADQUARTERS Military Command for the Directorate of Education and Training Chief of Staff for: Army Navy Airforce Logistics Home Guard Head of the Department of Education Quality Assurance section STAKEHOLDERS OTHERS Representatives for Officer training with specific competence (engineers, medical personnel & meterolorogist) Representatives for specific areas of competence Swedish Defence University

STAKEHOLDERS Head of Non-Commissioned Officer Training Head of Officer program (AF domain) Head of Leadership and Pedagogics Head of Physical Training and Development Representatives from Education & Training section Process Leader Director of Foreign Languages

SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Management board Quality assurance procedures Knowledge management Teacher competence and professional devlopment International perspective Student partcipation Evaluation Documentation Infra structure and IT resources Generic questions from the stakeholders

Quality assurance procedures International perspective Teacher competence and Professional development Management board Knowledge management Documentation Infrastructure and IT resources Evaluation Student participation

FOCUS AREAS 2019 Possibilities for growth and ways to increase numbers Work towards improving gender equality Student satisfaction Development of pedagogics and new methods/technology for learning The role of the school in readiness

COLLOBORATIVE WORKSPACE ON INTRANET Self assessment report Input from the stakeholders Questions Program for the initial visit and the inspection Time schedules

THE INSPECTION JOURNEY DEPT. OF EDUCATION: LEADS VTC 1 Preliminary plan Tentative dates and timings for visits Questions, focus areas Tasks for the school/center: Self assessment report Stakeholders questions DEPT. OF EDUCATION: LEADS VTC 2 Review the documents that have come in Work with the agenda for the initial site visit and the inspection Develop focus areas I=INSPECTION DEPT. OF EDUCATION: Self assessment report Focus areas Meet students Visit to the school/center Discuss the details for the up coming insp. DEPT. OF EDUCATION: Inspection report approved by Mil. Command for the Directorate of Edu. and Training and sent to the school/center School/Center: Acknowledge the tasks Check if the dates and timings work Before VTC 2 School/Center: Send in the requested documents School/Center: Presents the prog. for the initial site visit Answer the questions that were posed DEPT. OF EDUCATION/INSPECTED: Decide the prog. for the insp. Decide on the questions to be addressed & focus areas Prel. Report Mil. Command for the Directorate of Edu. and Training + Insp.com. inspect school/center INSPECTION INITIAL SITE VISIT I-3w VTC 1 I-10w VTC 2 I-4w VTC 3 I-1w I-8w I+8w

INITIAL SITE VISIT A two day visit by the Inspection Committee Discussion in groups addressing relevant questions Meeting with the students/course partcipants Visit of the school/center Questions for the inspection will be identified along with the focus areas The latter part of the second day will be used to plan the upcoming inspection Discussion between the Inspection Committee and the school/centre regarding outcomes and the execution of the visit The Inspection Committee will share their reflections and points of view

INSPECTION DAY Guard of Honour and welcome ceremony Short speech about the Inspection by Mil. Command for the Directorate of Education and Training and introduction of the Inspection Committee The Head of the School/Centre welcomes the Mil. Command for the Directorate of Education and Training and the Inspection Committee and gives a presentation of the school/centre Introduction of the staff The head of the Inspection Committee presents the agenda for the inspection Work in groups with different agenda points Meeting with the students/course partcipants Visit of the school/center The Inspection Committee will come togther, share their reflections and write a First Impressions Report (FIR) The Inspection Committee will deliver the report to the school/center

PERSPECTIVES ON QUALITY ASSURANCE