Shadow Enhancers Foster Robustness of Drosophila Gastrulation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Robust Network of Double-Strand Break Repair Pathways Governs Genome Integrity during C. elegans Development  Daphne B. Pontier, Marcel Tijsterman 
Advertisements

Carly I. Dix, Jordan W. Raff  Current Biology 
Visualization of trans-Homolog Enhancer-Promoter Interactions at the Abd-B Hox Locus in the Drosophila Embryo  Matthew Ronshaugen, Mike Levine  Developmental.
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
Takaki Komiyama, Liqun Luo  Current Biology 
Leslie Dunipace, Abbie Saunders, Hilary L. Ashe, Angelike Stathopoulos 
Transcriptional Timers Regulating Mitosis in Early Drosophila Embryos
Marios Agelopoulos, Daniel J. McKay, Richard S. Mann  Cell Reports 
Volume 19, Issue 23, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 15, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 25, Issue 20, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (September 2015)
Transcriptional Pre-patterning of Drosophila Gastrulation
Transcriptional Memory in the Drosophila Embryo
A Genetic Basis for Altered Sexual Behavior in Mutant Female Mice
Vivek S. Chopra, Joung-Woo Hong, Michael Levine  Current Biology 
Rapid Rates of Pol II Elongation in the Drosophila Embryo
Transvection Current Biology
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 
Volume 19, Issue 19, Pages (October 2009)
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
Roberta L. Hannibal, Julie C. Baker  Current Biology 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Precision of Hunchback Expression in the Drosophila Embryo
Helen Strutt, Mary Ann Price, David Strutt  Current Biology 
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages (April 2001)
Muscles in the Drosophila second thoracic segment are patterned independently of autonomous homeotic gene function  Sudipto Roy, L.S. Shashidhara, K VijayRaghavan 
Dynamics of Inductive ERK Signaling in the Drosophila Embryo
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 16, Pages (August 2009)
A Broadly Conserved Pathway Generates 3′UTR-Directed Primary piRNAs
Quantitative Imaging of Transcription in Living Drosophila Embryos Links Polymerase Activity to Patterning  Hernan G. Garcia, Mikhail Tikhonov, Albert.
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
The BMP Signaling Gradient Patterns Dorsoventral Tissues in a Temporally Progressive Manner along the Anteroposterior Axis  Jennifer A. Tucker, Keith.
Pipe-Dependent Ventral Processing of Easter by Snake Is the Defining Step in Drosophila Embryo DV Axis Formation  Yong Suk Cho, Leslie M. Stevens, David.
The Chemokine SDF1a Coordinates Tissue Migration through the Spatially Restricted Activation of Cxcr7 and Cxcr4b  Guillaume Valentin, Petra Haas, Darren.
Volume 25, Issue 20, Pages (October 2015)
Nuclear Trapping Shapes the Terminal Gradient in the Drosophila Embryo
Mark Van Doren, Anne L. Williamson, Ruth Lehmann  Current Biology 
Carlos Sánchez-Higueras, Sol Sotillos, James Castelli-Gair Hombría 
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Drosophila JAK/STAT Pathway Reveals Distinct Initiation and Reinforcement Steps in Early Transcription of Sxl  Frank W. Avila, James W. Erickson  Current.
Transcriptional Pre-patterning of Drosophila Gastrulation
S. Chodagam, A. Royou, W. Whitfield, R. Karess, J.W. Raff 
Volume 18, Issue 23, Pages (December 2008)
Drosophila atonal Fully Rescues the Phenotype of Math1 Null Mice
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Stefano De Renzis, J. Yu, R. Zinzen, Eric Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
Yu-Chiun Wang, Zia Khan, Eric F. Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Genomic Analysis of Gastrulation and Organogenesis in the Mouse
Zhenyu Zhang, Leslie M. Stevens, David Stein  Current Biology 
A Genetic Link between Morphogenesis and Cell Division during Formation of the Ventral Furrow in Drosophila  Jörg Großhans, Eric Wieschaus  Cell  Volume.
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
Jacques P. Bothma, Joe Magliocco, Michael Levine  Current Biology 
Variation in the Dorsal Gradient Distribution Is a Source for Modified Scaling of Germ Layers in Drosophila  Juan Sebastian Chahda, Rui Sousa-Neves, Claudia Mieko.
Drosophila embryonic hemocytes
Lefty-Dependent Inhibition of Nodal- and Wnt-Responsive Organizer Gene Expression Is Essential for Normal Gastrulation  William W. Branford, H.Joseph.
Marie P. Suver, Akira Mamiya, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (August 1996)
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages (December 2011)
Marelle Acts Downstream of the Drosophila HOP/JAK Kinase and Encodes a Protein Similar to the Mammalian STATs  Xianyu Steven Hou, Michael B Melnick, Norbert.
Enhancer Control of Transcriptional Bursting
Axis Formation: Squint Comes into Focus
Drosophila Gastrulation: Identification of a Missing Link
Presentation transcript:

Shadow Enhancers Foster Robustness of Drosophila Gastrulation Michael W. Perry, Alistair N. Boettiger, Jacques P. Bothma, Michael Levine  Current Biology  Volume 20, Issue 17, Pages 1562-1567 (September 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.043 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Identification of a snail Shadow Enhancer The snail gene is expressed in the presumptive mesoderm (top left, red). An intronic region in neighboring Tim17b2 was shown to be bound by transcription factors that regulate snail [12] and is shown here to drive expression of a lacZ fusion gene in the mesoderm in a pattern qualitatively similar to the endogenous gene (top right). Bottom: schematic representations of the bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) constructs used in subsequent experiments are aligned to the gene model. In all figures, anterior is to the left and dorsal is at the top, unless otherwise indicated. Current Biology 2010 20, 1562-1567DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The snail Shadow Enhancer Rescues Gastrulation (A) The rescue BAC construct in a sna mutant background drives sna expression (red) uniformly throughout the mesoderm in cycle 14 embryos. (B) The pattern driven by the BAC with the primary enhancer deleted is qualitatively similar. (C) During gastrulation, all sna-expressing cells migrate into the interior of the embryo. A single row of cells flanking the sna domain express sim, shown in yellow. (D) sna driven without the primary enhancer is sufficient to induce normal gastrulation and normal sim expression when these embryos are raised at 22°C. (E) In embryos lacking the snail BAC rescue construct, no sna is expressed. Instead, sim is expressed throughout the ventral region. Without sna, there is no mesodermal invagination. Lateral view. (F) Embryo as in (E), ventral view. Current Biology 2010 20, 1562-1567DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Multiple Enhancers Ensure Robust Gene Expression under Different Thermal Conditions (A) Visualization of expression of the yellow reporter gene from the BAC containing the sna locus, stained for the yellow intron. Cells actively transcribing the reporter are shown in yellow. Intronic probes show a single bright point of transcription inside actively transcribing nuclei (inset); all embryos are heterozygous and have one copy of the reporter. Nuclei that express the endogenous gene but not the reporter are outlined in red. A schematic representation of the BAC is shown below the embryo. (B) At 22°C, a similar degree of uniform expression is exhibited by embryos carrying a yellow BAC lacking the primary enhancer. (C) At 30°C, embryos with both enhancers still show straight boundaries and a small percent of inactive nuclei. (D) Embryos lacking the primary enhancer at 30°C show substantially more ragged boundaries of expression and a greater percent of inactive cells in the mesoderm. (E) Embryos lacking the shadow enhancer are similar to those lacking the primary at both temperatures. Bottom left: Frequency distributions of the fraction of cells in the sna-expressing region that lack yellow nascent expression are plotted for each of the six different embryo populations. n indicates the number of embryos in each population sample. Current Biology 2010 20, 1562-1567DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Effect of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Variability (A) Embryos from dorsal heterozygote mothers raised at 25°C show uniform yellow expression when driven with both enhancers. Only a few cells are lacking active expression (inset). (B) Embryos with a single enhancer in this background show substantially greater loss of expression and ragged boundaries. (C) The distribution nuclei that fail to maintain active transcription shifts to the right in the dorsal heterozygote background only for embryos lacking one of the enhancers. (D) All observed embryos raised at 30°C (n = 28) from a population heterozygous for the BAC constructs containing both enhancers gastrulate normally, forming a straight ventral furrow; note stage of development by presence of cephalic furrow. Exonic sim shown in yellow, exonic sna shown in red. (E) Some embryos from a similar population, but with only the single enhancer and raised at 30°C, show various defects in gastrulation (n = 10 of 14). Note embryo stage by presence of cephalic furrow yet lack of significant mesodermal invagination. The number of snail-expressing cells anterior to the cephalic furrow is also reduced. Figure S2 shows a range of defects observed in these embryos; a narrower pattern of anterior expression may result in delays in involution of anterior regions, and some exhibit a more erratic midline. Intronic sim shown in yellow. Current Biology 2010 20, 1562-1567DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.07.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions