Standards of Performance Scorecard

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Getting the most out of your contracts Gary Traynor 11 th July 2013 Performance Monitoring Contractor.
Advertisements

SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS The Technical Contract Within the Master Agreement.
Network Design and Implementation
©2015 EarthLink. All rights reserved. Managed Network.
Experiencethe difference STRATEGY ▪ CONSULTING ▪ SUPPORT Experience STRATEGY ▪ CONSULTING ▪ SUPPORT the difference STRATEGY ▪ CONSULTING ▪ SUPPORT Experience.
Date: 03/05/2007 Vendor Management and Metrics. 2 A.T. Kearney X/mm.yyyy/00000 AT Kearney’s IT/Telecom Vendor Facts IT/Telecom service, software and equipment.
Best Practices – Overview
Copyright 2003 to present. School of Government. University of North Carolina Chapel Hill Performance Metrics For IT.
NYCDOE Division of Instructional and Information Technology Personal Computing Solutions With Dan Moy Senior Director, DIIT June 2010.
IT Peer to Peer Program Review April 9, What is PrintSmart? New contract includes use of equipment, maintenance & supplies (except paper) Program.
3 rd Party Registration & Account Management SMT Update To AMWG March 25, 2015.
Module CC3002 Post Implementation Issues Lecture for Week 5 AY 2013 Spring.
1. Tracking and oversight 2. Costing and Charging Assessment & Improvement of IT Services / IT Service Management Nynke de Vries.
Data obtained from COO’s Balanced Scorecard and MMRs Utilization % of Successful Completions.
3 rd Party Registration & Account Management SMT Update To AMWG January 20, 2015.
Statement Analysis: Comparative Statements FLASHCARDS.
Meter Reads-Optimum Calling Process Project Number Black Belt Rob Zinsky Northeast region.
April 2008 Texas Nodal Program Nodal Quality Assurance Overview Gary Macomber.
APPLICATIONS What’s New in MPPM? March 2013 APPLICATIONS01 March 2013| 1 Quality Function.
1 Compliance Update May Control Performance Highlights  NERC CPS1 Performance April Performance  April performance comparison April 2007:
Service Level Agreement Considerations
New Clients Completed Service Contract Forms Data Obtained from MMRs (**Please Note: Last CPR did not include data from Keene) An Average of 23.3 Completed.
Personal Financial Management
Lenovo Services DCG Lifecycle Solutions
Service Design – purpose and processes
BIZGAZE-BASIC WORK FLOWS
VENDOR ON-BOARDING PROCESS
Statements of Work: Holding Vendors More Accountable
Responsible Borrowing Initiatives (RBI) Bob Collins Vice President, Financial Aid national Summit on Solutions for student debt Boston, MA November 2016.
Status Update of AMWG Change Requests As of February 15, 2016
Section 13-2 Consumer Credit.
15S Maintenance.
Achieving excellence through Optimised Planning
Voice of Customer to Critical to Quality
Vessel On-time Performance Summary
Chapter 11 Network Management.
Danny Brashear Jonathan Holloran
Quality Measures Incentives Program
Standards of Performance Scorecard
Fulfillment Channel Services
Student Portal Exam Booking
ISO-9001 Quality Management System
Standards of Performance Scorecard
8th Grade IB Community Projects
Performance in Initiating and Delivering Clinical Research
Standards of Performance Scorecard
Learn to use: Salesfloor Reporting.
Comprehensive Program Review April , 2011
Preparing for Campus Testing
Manage Service Requests and Incidents
Standards of Performance Scorecard
Agenda History Performance Graphs in Oliver Provider Score
Standards of Performance Scorecard
GPW ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN 2018/19
SERVICE-DELIVERY REVIEW CANVAS
Government Printing Works
Studio day : Friday (page 1 of 2)
Standards of Performance Scorecard
Standards of Performance Scorecard
ANNUAL TARGET REPORT AGM 12TH SEPTEMBER 2018.
Finance & Administrative Sub-Committee & Treasurer’s Report
Setting up your answering machine
Production Allocations
FitSM Self-Study Workbook
MOD 565 Standards of Service
Reducing Damaged and Returned Inventory at MDS Logistics
How to Place an Order on the UVa Marketplace
ISDS Service Support Performance – May 2019
ANNUAL TARGET REPORT AGM 18TH SEPTEMBER 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Standards of Performance Scorecard Criteria Standards of Performance Current Trend Key Messages / Action Taken Average Break/Fix Response Time 4 hours The average amount of time between the client initiated call and the arrival of the service technician on site. 83.4% Avg response time 6.02 hrs 96 out of 115 service incidents responded within 4 hours Equipment Uptime 98% The three month rolling percentage that the equipment is available for use within the contracted period of coverage. 98.3% 115 -break/fix incidents 73.2% reactive First Time Fix 85% The average number of times a device was successfully repaired during the initial call. 87.8% 101 out of 115 service incidents resolved on first call. Device recommendation 5 business days 92% 14 new device recommendations in March Average response 3 days Device Delivery 10 business days for standard configuration, 20 business days for non-standard configuration 100% 10 approved requests in March Average time to deliver 9 days Device relocation / Pick up 5 relocation requests in March 2 relocated, 3 pending move date per client Device reporting 98% reporting, minus stored, unconnected and situations beyond Zeno’s control Pending April reporting No Yellow – We are either achieving SLA’s or Not Share SLA’s with Associates Hints & Tips: Customize these according to contracted Standards Of Performance (SOP) / Service Level Agreements (SLA) not Statement of Work (SOW) Consider discussing the differences in Standards of Performance / Statements of Work / Service Level Agreements Note that these metrics are reflective of calls to the Xerox system only.