The effects of added prosthetic mass on physiologic responses and stride frequency during multiple speeds of walking in persons with transtibial amputation1 Suh-Jen Lin-Chan, PhD, PT, David H Nielsen, PhD, PT, H.John Yack, PhD, PT, Miao-Ju Hsu, PhD, PT, Donald G Shurr, MA, PT, CPO Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Volume 84, Issue 12, Pages 1865-1871 (December 2003) DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.03.006
Fig 1 Group means and SDs for the effects of prosthetic mass on oxygen consumption according to walking speed (N=8). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003 84, 1865-1871DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2003.03.006)
Fig 2 Group means and SDs for the effect of prosthetic mass on relative exercise intensity (percentage of age-predicted maximal heart rate [% APMHR]) according to walking speed (N=8). ∗Between 100% and 60% conditions (P<.05); †between 100% and 80% conditions (P<.05). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003 84, 1865-1871DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2003.03.006)
Fig 3 Group means and SDs for the effect of prosthetic mass on gait efficiency according to walking speed (N=8). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003 84, 1865-1871DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2003.03.006)
Fig 4 Group means and SDs for the effect of prosthetic mass on stride frequency according to walking speed (N=8). ∗Between 60% and 100% conditions (P<.05); †between 60% and 80% conditions (P<.05). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003 84, 1865-1871DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2003.03.006)