Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Severe Weather.
Advertisements

WMO International Cloud Modeling Workshop, July 2004 A two-moment microphysical scheme for mesoscale and microscale cloud resolving models Axel Seifert.
Forecasting convective outbreaks using thermodynamic diagrams. Anthony R. Lupo Atms 4310 / 7310 Lab 10.
Predicting lightning density in Mediterranean storms based on the WRF model dynamic and microphysical fields Yoav Yair 1, Barry Lynn 1, Colin Price 2,
Types of Thunderstorms 1.Airmass or Ordinary Cell Thunderstorms 2.Supercell / Severe Thunderstorms Limited wind shear Often form along shallow boundaries.
Atmospheric Electricity. Dalibard’s Experiment The Earth’s Electric Field.
Lightning and Storm Electricity Research Don MacGorman February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma.
Thunderstorms Conditions required: 1. Conditional instability 2. Trigger Mechanism (eg. front, sea-breeze front, mountains, localized zones of excess surface.
In this work we present results of cloud electrification obtained with the RAMS model that includes the process of charge separation between ice particles.
Simulating Supercell Thunderstorms in a Horizontally-Heterogeneous Convective Boundary Layer Christopher Nowotarski, Paul Markowski, Yvette Richardson.
Lecture 2a Severe Thunderstorm Primer Synoptic Laboratory II – Mesoscale Professor Tripoli.
A preliminary experiment on the simulation of thunderstorm electrification through GRAPES Yijun Zhang Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing,
WMO workshop, Hamburg, July, 2004 Some aspects of the STERAO case study simulated by Méso-NH by Jean-Pierre PINTY, Céline MARI Christelle BARTHE and Jean-Pierre.
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
High resolution simulations of microphysics and electrification in a hurricane-like vortex and a TOGA COARE oceanic squall line Alexandre Fierro School.
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis.
Edward Mansell National Severe Storms Laboratory Donald MacGorman and Conrad Ziegler National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, OK Funding sources in the.
Possible Aerosol Effects on Lightning Activity and Structure of Hurricanes Khain, A., N. Cohen, B. Lynn, and A. Pokrovsky, 2008: Possible aerosol effects.
Towards parametrized GEC current sources for the CESM model FESD project meeting February 2014 Wiebke Deierling, Andreas Baumgaertner, Tina Kalb.
Tropical Severe Local Storms Nicole Hartford. How do thunderstorms form?  Thunderstorms result from moist warm air that rises due to being less dense.
Field Mill. Charging by induction Initially neutral Introduce a charge, creating an electric field E.
Lawrence Carey 1, William Koshak 2, Harold Peterson 3, Retha Matthee 1 and A. Lamont Bain 1 1 Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Alabama.
Toward a new parameterization of nitrogen oxides produced by lightning flashes in the WRF-AqChem model Christelle Barthe NCAR/ACD Previously at Laboratoire.
High-Resolution Simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998). Part II: Water Budget SCOTT A. BRAUN J. Atmos. Sci., 63,
Lightning Mapping Technology & NWS Warning Decision Making Don MacGorman, NOAA/NSSL.
Case 5: Tracer Transport in Deep Convection STERAO-1996 From Dye et al. (2000)
Impact of Cloud Microphysics on the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes.
Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Field Program.
Influences of Particle Bulk Density of Snow and Graupel in Microphysics-Consistent Microwave Brightness Temperature Simulations Research Group Meeting.
Parameterization of Cloud Microphysics Based on the Prediction of Bulk Ice Particle Properties. Part II: Case Study Comparisons with Observations and Other.
Hugh Morrison & Jason A. Milbrandt JAS (2015), p
Paper Review Jennie Bukowski ATS APR-2017
Lightning Flashes in Alabama Tornadic Supercells on 27 April 2011
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis Ooohhhh!!!!!!!!!!! Aaaahhhhhhhh!!!!!! Look at the pretty picture!
By SANDRA E. YUTER and ROBERT A. HOUZE JR
and NM Tech team & many HyMeX participants
Water Budget of Typhoon Nari(2001)
The DYMECS project A statistical approach for the evaluation of convective storms in high-resolution models Thorwald Stein, Robin Hogan, John Nicol, Robert.
Life Cycle Classification Location Severe Thunderstorms Hazards
Inna M. Gubenko and Konstantin G
Weather Weather is the interaction of air, water, and the sun.
Sensitivity of WRF microphysics to aerosol concentration
Storm charge structure
Forecast parameters, Tornadogensis, maintenance and decay
Precipitation 18.3 Brain Pop: Snowflakes Brain Pop: Rainbows.
Concurrent Sensitivities of an Idealized Deep Convective Storm to Parameterization of Microphysics, Horizontal Grid Resolution, and Environmental Static.
Bell Ringer Two types of isopleths are isobars and isotherms. Isobars show areas of equal __________ and isotherms show areas of equal ______________.
Guy Dagan, Ilan Koren, Orit Altaratz, Yoav Lehahn  iScience 
Tong Zhu and Da-Lin Zhang 2006:J. Atmos. Sci.,63,
Review of Roesenfeld et al
Dual-Aircraft Investigation of the Inner Core of Hurricane Nobert
Braun, S. A., 2006: High-Resolution Simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998). Part II: Water Budget. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, Gamache, J. F., R. A. Houze.
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Storm charge structure
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Chapter 26 Problems Solving
Supercell tornado environments
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Presentation transcript:

Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR) Lightning Potential Index (LPI) is a measure of the potential charge separation that leads to lightning flashes in convective TSs. It is calculated from model simulated updraft and microphysical fields within the charge separation region of clouds between (0 o C and - 20 o C), where the non inductive mechanism involving collisions of ice and graupel particles in the presence of supercooled water is most effective (Saunders, 2008). So, the LPI is defined as the volume integral of the total mass flux of ice and liquid water within the “charging zone” in a developing thundercloud. The LPI (J kg-1) and is defined as, Where V is the volume of air in the layer between 0oC and -20oC, w is the vertical wind component (m s-1), and qs, qi and qg are the model-computed mass mixing ratios for snow, cloud ice, and graupel respectively (in kg kg-1).€ is a dimensionless number that has a value between 0 and 1 and is defined by, Where Ql is the total liquid water mass mixing ratio (kg kg-1 )and Qi is the ice fractional mixing ratio (kg kg-1 ) defined by, In essence, € is a scaling factor for the cloud updraft and attains a maximal value when the mixing ratios of supercooled liquid water and of the combined ice species (the total of cloud ice, graupel, and snow) are equal., calculation of the LPI from the cloud-resolving atmospheric model output fields can provide maps of the microphysics based potential for electrical activity and lightning flashes.

IC:2019051500 Day1

IC:2019051500 Day1

IC:2019051500 Day1

IC: 2019051500 Day1 Hourly evolution of IMD: WRF (3km) Derived :Lightning Potential Index (J/kg)

IC: 2019051500 Day1 Hourly evolution of IMD: WRF (3km) Derived :Threat of Lightning Potential Index (J/kg) Threat Level : LOW: LPI < 0.001 and >0.0005 Threat Level : Moderate: LPI :< 0.01 and > 0.001 Threat Level : High : LPI > 0.01

Moderate: 5 < SCP < 7 High : SCP > 7 IC: 2019051500 Day1 Hourly evolution of IMD: WRF (3km) Derived : Supercell Composite Parameter SCP = (CAPE/1000 J kg–1) × (SRH/50 m–2 s–2) × (BWD/20 m s–1) Where -- CAPE 0–180-hPa-layer “most unstable” 0-3km SRH Storm Relative Helicity between 0-3km BWD Bulk shear is computed from the u and υ winds between the model’s 0–30-hPa-above-ground layer and 500 hPa. SCP >= 1 are associated with environments conducive to thunderstorm updraft persistence and rotation. ( Ref: Carbin et al. 2015 BAMS Threat Level : LOW: 3 < SCP < 5 Moderate: 5 < SCP < 7 High : SCP > 7

IC: 2019051500 Day1 Hourly evolution of IMD: WRF (3km) Derived :Layer Mean Relative Humidity LAYRH= Layer mean Relative Humidity Between 1000hPa and 100hPa( Ref: Rajeevan et al. 2012 J. Earth Sys. Sci) Threat Level : LOW: 20 < LAYRH < 40 Moderate: 40 < LAYRH < 60 High : LAYRH > 60