Jean-Michel Pawlotsky  Gastroenterology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gastroenterology Volume 142, Issue 4, April 2012, Pages 790–795 Tom W. Chu.
Advertisements

How to avoid a resistance issue with the first generation protease inhibitors ? O. Lada PHD Service d’Hépatologie et INSERM CRB3, AP-HP Hopital Beaujon,
Date of download: 7/10/2016 From: Four-Week Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimens in Noncirrhotic Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection: An Open-Label,
Diagnostics in hepatitis C: The end of response-guided therapy?
Jean-Michel Pawlotsky  Gastroenterology 
Resistance to Direct Acting Antiviral Therapy
Hepatitis C Virus NS5A Protein–A Master Regulator?
Coinfection With HIV-1 and HCV—A One-Two Punch
Chronic Hepatitis C Therapy: Changing the Rules of Duration
Les Lang  Gastroenterology  Volume 133, Issue 1, (July 2007)
Virologic, Clinical, and Immune Response Outcomes of Patients With Hepatitis C Virus– Associated Cryoglobulinemia Treated With Direct-Acting Antivirals 
Les Lang  Gastroenterology  Volume 133, Issue 1, (July 2007)
NS5A inhibitors in the treatment of hepatitis C
Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
New Hepatitis C Therapies: The Toolbox, Strategies, and Challenges
Diagnostics in hepatitis C: The end of response-guided therapy?
Genetics and Genomics in the Practice of Medicine
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Lost in Inflammation: The Functional Conversion of Regulatory T Cells in Acute Hepatitis A Virus Infection  Tobias Boettler, Robert Thimme  Gastroenterology 
Hepatitis C Virus NS5A Protein–A Master Regulator?
Volume 128, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Ira J. Fox, Stephen C. Strom  Gastroenterology 
A Sustained Viral Response Is Associated With Reduced Liver-Related Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus  Amit G. Singal, Michael.
Hepatitis B Virus Resistance to Nucleos(t)ide Analogues
Michael Biermer, Thomas Berg  Gastroenterology 
Volume 134, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Jordan J. Feld, Graham R. Foster  Journal of Hepatology 
Hepatitis C Virus Replicons Volume 3 and 4
Volume 154, Issue 4, Pages (March 2018)
Efficacy of Serologic Marker Screening in Identifying Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Organ, Tissue, and Cell Donors  Dominique Challine, Stéphane Chevaliez,
Yasuhiko Sugawara, Masatoshi Makuuchi 
Volume 155, Issue 5, Pages e2 (November 2018)
Jean-Michel Pawlotsky  Gastroenterology 
Volume 141, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells: An Antiviral “Defendothelium”
Volume 132, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 143, Issue 5, Pages e6 (November 2012)
Volume 136, Issue 7, Pages (June 2009)
Jean–Michel Pawlotsky, Stéphane Chevaliez, John G. McHutchison 
A. Sidney Barritt, Michael W. Fried  Gastroenterology 
Update on the Use of Vonoprazan: A Competitive Acid Blocker
Why We Should Be Willing to Pay for Hepatitis C Treatment
Volume 144, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 131, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Christoph Sarrazin, Stefan Zeuzem  Gastroenterology 
Volume 142, Issue 6, Pages (May 2012)
Direct-Acting Antivirals Cure Innate Immunity in Chronic Hepatitis C
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2010)
Rafael Esteban, Maria Buti  Gastroenterology 
Interferon-Free Treatment Regimens for Hepatitis C: Are We There Yet?
Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
Coinfection With HIV-1 and HCV—A One-Two Punch
Volume 136, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Chronic Hepatitis C Therapy: Changing the Rules of Duration
Volume 132, Issue 1, Pages 5-6 (January 2007)
Immune Quiescence and Hepatitis B Virus: Tolerance Has Its Limits
Double Trouble: HIV Latency and CTL Escape
Genetic Factors and Hepatitis C Virus Infection
Volume 139, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
The Dawning of a New Editorial Board for Gastroenterology
Alessio Aghemo, Maria Francesca Donato  Gastroenterology 
This Month in Gastroenterology
Volume 139, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 139, Issue 6, Pages e1 (December 2010)
Detection of HCV RNA in Sustained Virologic Response to Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents: Occult or Science Fiction?  Masaru Enomoto, Yoshiki Murakami,
Kathleen E. Corey, Andrew S
Controversies in Liver Transplantation for Hepatitis C
The Results of Phase III Clinical Trials With Telaprevir and Boceprevir Presented at the Liver Meeting 2010: A New Standard of Care for Hepatitis C Virus.
Fasiha Kanwal, Tuyen Hoang, Timothy Chrusciel, Jennifer R
Presentation transcript:

Hepatitis C Virus Resistance to Direct-Acting Antiviral Drugs in Interferon-Free Regimens  Jean-Michel Pawlotsky  Gastroenterology  Volume 151, Issue 1, Pages 70-86 (July 2016) DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.04.003 Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Definitions in HCV resistance. Viral variants are individual full-length viruses that constitute the HCV quasispecies in a patient. They are organized as viral populations, made of identical variants that are different from the variants in other populations. The sequence of sensitive variant genomes does not contain amino acids that confer reduced susceptibility to the antiviral action of an HCV DAA. Compared with the sequence of sensitive variants, the sequence of resistant variants contains one or several RASs, which are single amino acid changes that reduce susceptibility to a DAA or a class of DAAs. The sequence of resistant variants sometimes also contains one or several fitness-associated substitution(s), which are single amino acid changes that do not alter DAA susceptibility but increase the fitness of the resistant variants, giving them a replication advantage over other resistant variants. Fitness-associated substitution(s) can also be present in the sequence of sensitive variants, improving their replication capacity or having no effect in the absence of the RAS(s). The populations of viral variants coexist within each patient’s viral quasispecies, under the pressure of Darwinian selection forces. In the absence of DAA treatment, sensitive viruses are generally (but not always) the fittest. When DAAs are administered, resistant variants (variants carrying RASs) are selected. Their outgrowth depends on their fitness in the presence of the drug more than on the level of resistance conferred by the RASs. When treatment is stopped, the outcome of competition between the variants also depends on their respective fitness. Gastroenterology 2016 151, 70-86DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2016.04.003) Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Schematic representation of the individual kinetics of different viral variant populations present in the quasispecies of an HCV-infected patient treated with an IFN-free, DAA-based regimen. In this example, the patient is infected at baseline with highly fit sensitive (wild-type) viral variants (green), less fit resistant variants with moderately reduced susceptibility to the DAA (yellow), and unfit resistant variants with profoundly reduced susceptibility to the DAA (red). Treatment administration efficiently blocks the replication of sensitive variants, inducing their biphasic decay and rapid clearance. The modest antiviral effect on resistant variants with moderately reduced susceptibility also induces their biphasic decay, although with a much slower second-phase slope, ultimately leading to their elimination because treatment duration is sufficient. In contrast, antiviral treatment has virtually no effect on the resistant variants with profoundly reduced susceptibility that keep replicating at the same low level during the full course of therapy. When treatment is stopped, their fitness acquisition through mutation causes the relapse with RAS-carrying resistant variants. If treatment were shorter, both resistant variants with moderately and profoundly reduced susceptibility would still replicate in the liver at withdrawal. The variants would then compete, causing relapse with the fittest RAS-carrying resistant variants. If treatment was much shorter, sensitive variants would still be present in the liver at withdrawal, causing relapse with wild-type variants. These HCV variant kinetics can be influenced by pharmacologic parameters that promote drug exposure and by host factors that modify the second-phase decay slope. LLOD, lower limit of detection; SVR12, SVR 12 weeks after treatment. Gastroenterology 2016 151, 70-86DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2016.04.003) Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions