Risk-Based Prioritization for Investigating Illicit Discharges Along TxDOT ROW Prepared by: G.O.A.T. – Geographers of Austin Texas INTRODUCTION MAPS METHODS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SW101 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)
Advertisements

Stuck in the SWMP Storm Water Management Programs: New challenges for the Transportation Community.
Implementing Committee Meeting May 15 th, 2014 New Braunfels MS4 program and the HCP 1.
MS4 Stormwater Permit Program and Great Bay. Brief Overview – EPA’s Stormwater Management Program Clean Water Act – NPDES Stormwater amendments.
RIPDES Storm Water Program: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)
Upper Providence Township Stormwater Management MS4 Program.
What Does MS4 Mean to You? A study of sewer and storm drain cross contamination Presented by Bryn Evans.
Environmental Harm Urban stormwater frequently contains litter, oil, chemicals, toxic metals, bacteria, and excess nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorous.
Austin Peay State University Stormwater Program Kristen Spicer, Ph.D.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
Evacuation Safety Planners * Jason HaycockRobert Broussard Colleen Grentz Project Manager Analyst & Webmaster Analyst & Project Designer.
{Your District Name Here} District Small MS4/Municipal Storm Water Update {Date Here}
Abstract The operation of today’s wastewater systems requires ongoing planning, maintenance, and management. Planning of these systems involves a thorough.
ASSESSING THE LOCAL EARTHQUAKE RISK Justin Czarka, Lehman College, CUNY – May 2013 Agung Swastika/AFP/Getty Images.
By Sacha Mkheidze & Aaron Hebert
Location Analysis for Outdoor Recycling Bin Placement Prepared for:
Fact : Storm water is an important natural resource that should be used to replenish our Groundwater.
BaCon Makes Everything Better!. Ekaterina Troudonochina Julian Montejano Mark Hiler Veronica Gentile Team Manager Webmaster, GIS Analyst GIS Analyst Pwpt.
Determining Flow Systems Using Chemical Data and GIS in Cuatro Cienegas, Coahuila, Mexico Shanna Evans December 2, 2004.
{ Mapping & Analysis of Wastewater Spills in the Barton Springs and Southern Segments of the Edwards Aquifer Project Manager: Katie Tritsch GIS Analyst:
January 6,  INTRODUCTION  BACKGROUND  SUMMARY  QUESTIONS  SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ◦ PROPOSED BUDGETS, LEVIES AND CIRCUIT BREAKER 2.
AUSTIN, TX AN ANALYSIS OF GROWTH AND DRIVING FACTORS.
1 Stormwater Phase II Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems and Act 167 Doug Brennan PA DEP September, 2002.
WOOLPERT Managing NPDES Phase II Requirements on a County-Wide Basis Jared Livingston.
Using ArcView to Create a Transit Need Index John Babcock GRG394 Final Presentation.
San Marcos Municipal Airport Airspace Planning Project Prepared for: Texas Department of Transportation.
Introduction to MS4 Stormwater Requirements (2009)
Evacuation Safety Planners * Jason HaycockRobert Broussard Colleen Grentz Project Manager Analyst & Webmaster Analyst & Project Designer.
Flood Risk Management in Hat Yai, Thailand
Stormwater Management for Colleges and Universities Phase II for Colleges and Universities State Stormwater Programs Industrial Facilities.
Part Two, Issue 3 Coastal Population Growth: Bangladesh.
Phase II National Storm Water Regulations What’s in it for you?
Unit 1 Lesson 3 Surface Water and Groundwater
Krystal Zwinggi Project Manager John McClintock GIS Analyst Lance English Webmaster Michael Stanley GIS Analyst.
An Overview of our Community’s Stormwater Management Program
A Traditional vs. Ecosystem Services Approach to Surface Water Management September 16, 2010 PRESENTED BY Carol Murdock, Clackamas County WES Mark Anderson,
Effects of Highway Capacity Increases on Urban Development Patterns Land Use and Growth Impacts from Highway Capacity IncreasesLand Use and Growth Impacts.
Storm Sewer Map Development Presented by: Kurt Whited.
Water Management Options Analysis Sonoma Valley Model Results Sonoma Valley Technical Work Group October 8, /08/2007.
By Will Holoman. University of North Carolina – Wilmington - B.A. in Environmental Science – Marine Science Emphasis University of Utah - B.S. in Civil.
STORM WATER SOLUTIONS FOR EXISTING URBAN AREAS: IDENTIFYING SITES TO MAXIMIZE RESULTS Jared Bartley, Cuyahoga SWCD September 8, 2011.
A method to map flooding-prone areas in Iran using Landsat satellite images and GIS Ali Bozorgi, Iran Water Resources Management Company,
International Airport Site Evaluation St. George, Utah TYREL EDWARDS - JOSH GATHRO - MATTHEW HALES - PLOY SAMRANJIT 25 APRIL 2016 CEE 5190 – GIS FOR CIVIL.
June 6, 2012 Brian Reis, PE.  RPS Espey’s role in the planning process  Key state and federal requirements  Our unique water quantity and water quality.
Why the Need for Increased Stormwater Funding? Citizens expect a higher level of protection from flooding Increased development.
Unit 1 Lesson 3 Surface Water and Groundwater
Regulation and Development in the Edwards Aquifer Zone
Unit 1 Lesson 3 Surface Water and Groundwater
MS4 On-site evaluations & common findings
Analyzing Inlets, Outfalls, and Land Cover Using Spatial and Network Analysis Within the San Antonio Sewershed Aspen Navarro, Project Manager, GIS Analyst.
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 2
City of New Braunfels Watershed Management Programs
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Estimation of Runoff & nonpoint source pollution using GIS techniques
An– Najah National University
Summit County MS4.
Stormwater Management Program
Type of presentation/visualisation
Human Activity and Ground Water
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Elizabeth Waite GIS Water Resources 29 November 2012
Human Activity and Ground Water
Human Activity and Ground Water
Matthew J. Johnson & Jennifer A
MS4 OVERVIEW 2015.
Research Question Study Area = Twin Cities 7 County Metro
Getting Your Feet Wet Where on Earth is fresh water found?
MS4 = Municipal Separated Storm Sewer System
10.3 Ground water supply.
Risk-Based Prioritization for Investigating Illicit Discharges
Presentation transcript:

Risk-Based Prioritization for Investigating Illicit Discharges Along TxDOT ROW Prepared by: G.O.A.T. – Geographers of Austin Texas INTRODUCTION MAPS METHODS This study has analyzed the flow of illicit discharges into the Right Of Way (ROW) and Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4’s) in San Marcos (shown in the figure below). The San Marcos MS4 is a conveyance system owned by the state of Texas to control pollution discharges. Priority locations include areas with the highest susceptibility to pollution from the expansion and maintenances of the city, like the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone and Spring Lake. After researching similar projects conducted in other states we have made two assumptions: high population density and industrial areas increase the probability of illicit discharge (Schaftlein, 2015;Brown, Caraco, 2004;Johnson, 1998). To calculate the potential threat of illicit discharge, we had to find variables that showed a higher probability for a possible pollutant to occur. We took into consideration a number of different factors such as neighborhoods, flood plains, water bodies, and slope. The two that had the most impact on our findings were the buildings that surrounded the outfalls, and the city zone that the outfalls were located in. Certain businesses; such as gas stations and car washes, have a higher probability for illicit discharge than any other variable. After assigning a threat level to each zone and building in the urbanized area, we were then able to create an outfall layer that combined those threat levels, generating a final map showing the outfalls with highest probability for illicit discharge. Outfalls and their potential risk levels overlaid on the Edwards Aquifer. Zoomed in map of categorized building threat levels. Zoning threat levels by using threat levels of each building and their concentrations. CONCLUSION We highlighted the importance of information over outfall locations in San Marcos, Texas as to reduce the illicit discharges’ along the ROW. This is important to the city as to reduce pollution to the surrounding environment which includes endangered species and sensitive water locations. It is difficult to determine all pollution discharges without doing field work. This acts as a pre-plan to determine illicit discharges along the ROW in Texas, so further projects can include testing the water of the outfall sites as well as the outfall sources to connect common chemicals. This project is aimed to assist all ROWs in all DOT systems, and it attempts to create a methodology that can be implemented across the United States. DATA The bulk of data was collected, downloaded, and loaded into the ArcGIS software from the San Marcos website. Other data was required from the Program Manager of TxDOT, and the North American Datum 1983 (NAD 1983) was also used. No projection changes between maps were necessary, and no field data was collected. Flow direction of discharge according to the San Marcos contour lines and potential risk levels of each outfall. Final map showing potential risk levels of illicit discharge to each outfall. Created by: Elizabeth Garcia, Jacqueline Lara, Austin Holman, Max Higgins, George Sanchez