SNS PPU Cryomodule Shipping Plans

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
Advertisements

ANL HWR Cryomodule Status Update 27 January 2015 Zachary Conway On behalf of the ANL Linac Development Group Argonne National Laboratory Physics Division.
SRF_BizPlan_31Oct2010_Rev_14 Production Preparations at JLAB JLab SRF Team EDMS – PLM DESY TeamCenter Meeting at SLAC 31 MAR 2014.
Cryomodule Concept for the ODU RF Dipole Crab Cavity Tom Nicol* - Fermilab December 10, 2013 * With lots of help from HyeKyoung, Tom J, Shrikant, Ofelia,
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe MLC external review October 03, 2012.
From Research Prototype to Production
3.9 GHz Cryomodule Transport December 17, 2007 Mike McGee, Chuck Grimm & Warren Schappert 3.9 GHz CM Transport Review.
Date 2007/Oct./25 FNAL-GDE-Meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Report N. Ohuchi KEK 1.Cryomodule & Cryogenics KOM 2.GDE-meeting discussion I.Interface.
Americas Cavity Specification C.M. Ginsburg (Fermilab) On behalf of the Fermilab cavity crew October 20, 2010.
Date 2007/Oct./23 FNAL-GDE-Meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface Definition (FNAL-GDE-Meeting) N. Ohuchi.
Carlo Pagani University of Milano INFN Milano-LASA & GDE ILC and XFEL Cryomodules Preliminary thoughts for convergence ILC EDR Kick-off Meeting DESY,
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe.
MICE RFCC Module Update Steve Virostek Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM27 at RAL, UK July 8, 2010.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
SPL cryomodule specification meeting, CERN 19th October 2010 SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of the meeting SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of.
JLAB Pressure Systems Considerations Ed Daly. Outline Introduction Federal Law - 10CFR851 Compliance JLAB Pressure Systems Program –Complies with 10CFR851,
Adam Carreon July 19, 2012 Technical Division SRF Department Dressed SSR1 Cavities.
C.MADEC - TTC meeting E-XFEL cryomodule assembly : prototyping phase at Saclay.
26 April, 2016 LCLS II Cryomodules and Cryoplant, Joe Preble LCLS-II Overview JLAB Organization for LCLS-II JLAB responsibilities & Schedule and Status.
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
Reliability of SNS Superconducting Linac April 12, 2011 Jeff Saunders SNS/ORNL.
Comments from the SNS Cryostat Design Review February 2010 Tom Peterson, Fermilab 15 February 2010.
Cryomodule Assembly Facility Fermilab Cleanroom: Assembly/Disassembly Tools Tug Arkan 1.
Jefferson Lab Cryomodule Cost and Optimization. Based Jlab energy upgrade Cryomodule design and produced to increase the energy gain of CEBAF to 12 GeV.
Integration and Cold Testing of the CW ERL Cryomodule at Daresbury Shrikant Pattalwar ASTeC, STFC, Daresbury Laboratory (UK) On behalf of ERL Cryomodule.
Spoke section of the ESS linac: - the Spoke cryomodules - the cryogenic distribution system P. DUTHIL (CNRS-IN2P3 IPN Orsay / Division Accélérateurs) on.
Cryomodule Interconnect Installation Issues A Comparison of XFEL to LCLSII Karen Fant 7/29/2015.
Cryomodule Safety Approvals Jay Theilacker LCLS-II Production Cryomodule Final Design Review May 12-14, 2015.
Tests on production cryomodules Bob Kephart Sept 30, 2006.
Inner Triplet Review 1 H. Prin AT/MEL Activities on the triplets at CERN Reception and Acceptance Triplet String Assembly in Building 181 Handling and.
ESS Cryomodule Status Meeting – Introduction | | Christine Darve Introduction to Cryomodules for the ESS 2013 January, 9 th Christine Darve.
Prototype Cryomodule FDR Ken Premo 21 – 22 January 2015 High Power Coupler Design.
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Darryl Orris 21 January 2015 Final Design Review: Instrumentation.
PIP-II SSR1 Cryomodule Technical Issues Leonardo Ristori TTC Meeting
Crab Cavity Technical Coordination meeting:
LCLS-II Technical Requirements
CERN – Zanon discussions
Field Emission Minimization for LCLS-II
T5.2: Harmonization - Material and Component Reference
LCLS-II Cost Details E. Daly / C. Hovater / M. Wiseman with help from Accel Ops and Engineering 03-AUG-2017.
Meeting for S1-Global module design Cryomodule and Cryogenics
Bellows Vibrations in the 3.9 GHz Cryomodule
Fredrik Fors Mechanical Engineering, JLab 09/29/2016
Jiyuan Zhai ( IHEP ) TTC Meeting, JLAB, 6 Nov 2012
High Gradient Cavities: Cost and Operational Considerations
UK RFD Pre-Series cryomodule
IHEP Cryomodule Status
Cryomodule design modifications for C75
SNS PPU Cryomodule Instrumentation
Cryomodule Assembly Plan
Cryomodule ESS FAT & SAT SRF meetinG on 07/11/2017
SNS PPU Helium Vessel Design and Assembly
SNS PPU Cryomodule Thermal Shield
SNS PPU Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel
SNS PPU Cryomodule Space Frame
SNS PPU Cryomodule Magnetic Shields
Cryomodule Shipping at JLab: SNS and LCLS-II
outline Configurations overview (Tom) Detailed designs
Cryomodule transportation strategies
Cryomodule Transportation Preliminary Design
Cryomodule Design for CW Operation 3.9 GHz considerations
SNS Coupler Shipping Plans
SNS PPU Cryomodule Instrumentation
SNS PPU Helium Vessel Design and Assembly
SNS PPU Cryomodule Space Frame
SNS PPU Cryomodule Thermal Shield & MLI
SNS-PPU upgrades the existing accelerator structure
QCM and C50-12 Status Update
SNS PPU Cryomodule Design Overview
SNS PPU CRYOMODULE PDR Cleanroom Assembly Katherine Wilson
Presentation transcript:

SNS PPU Cryomodule Shipping Plans Ed Daly On behalf of the SNS PPU teams at ORNL and Jlab Special Thanks to Naeem Huque, John Mammosser, Jeff Saunders and Matt Howell TTC2019, Vancouver

Introduction SNS MB loaded on Fixture SNS PPU Prototype on tooling (7) SNS PPU Cryomodules will be assembled and shipped from JLab to SNS Cold testing will occur at SNS prior to tunnel installation “Minor” design changes are being implemented Shipping system will be adapted to account for minor design changes Shipping Plan includes component testing and shipping test of first unit SNS MB loaded on Fixture SNS PPU Prototype on tooling

Design Changes (M. Howell) Implies a number of “minor” design changes that are being analyzed as part of the design effort

Hardware Changes (Mammosser, Saunders) No HOM couplers; RRR End groups HV is ASME Code Compliant End cans - ASME Code Compliant FPC Inner Conductor wall is 3.5 mm thicker & 1.5 mm shorter

SNS Shipping System (N. Huque) Shipping Fixture consisted of two frames, separated by 12 helical isolator springs (Aeroflex CB1500-15-C2) 1 inch thick rubber between CM and cradles on the inner frame Fixture is designed to reduce shocks by a factor of 6 Cryomodules held on to the frame by ratchetting straps Shipping assembly was fitted on a drop-trailer with air-ride suspension SNS CMs were designed to withstand: Vertical: +/- 4.0g Beam-Axis: +/- 5.0g Transverse +/- 1.5g

Considerations for Shipping Specifications Current specification is a static-equivalent dynamic loading taken from Barron’s “Cryogenic Systems” Vertical: +/- 4.0g Beam-Axis: +/- 5.0g Transverse +/- 1.5g Could specify derated set of incident shipping loads E.g. reduce allowed loads by 50% Could specify spectrum that define shock and vibration limits separately Enlist help of shipping experts to refine specifications to better define shock and vibration These design loads apply to shipping, handling and installation Axial motion of LCLS-II FPC bellows - vibration and shock are superimposed (Holzbauer et al.)

Example : Truck Response – Shock and Vibration Survey combining data from 7 truck-trailer combinations, both spring and air-ride suspensions Taken from “Shock and Vibration Environments for Large Shipping Containers on Rail Cars and Trucks ”, https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/7305222 Spectra for boat, train and airplane certainly different Vibration and shock are segregated

SNS Production Shipping Experience (N. Huque) After successful road tests, SNS cryomodules shipped to ORNL at a rate of one per month Shocks and vibration data were recorded for all shipments High shock was recorded while loading the CM into the fixture; procedure was modified to be ‘softer’ Highest shocks were found to be at the ORNL gate! One cryomodule, HB01 suffered a beamline vacuum leak during shipment Not initially reported, and CM functioned with field emission and lower energy The Shipping Fixture is to be modified (due to changes in End Can design) to transport 7 SNS-PPU cryomodules to ORNL from JLab in 2021

Approach for Shipping Plan Perform engineering analysis related to design changes (led by Jlab design team) Identify any sensitive components Conduct specific component testing focused on FPC inner conductor (led by SNS PPU staff) In advance of first production shipment Confirms need for shipping restraint on FPC window Possibly use shaker table to evaluate lifetime Develop instrumentation plans based on past experience Loc/qty of accelerometers, beamline vacuum monitoring, temperature monitoring Conduct design verification test on first shipment from JLab to ORNL Consider dummy load tests to verify shipping frame performance

Cryomodule Shipping Lessons (N. Huque) Install maintenance ports on vacuum vessels Tuner access ports on LCLS-II CMs have been used for nearly everything but repairing tuners Conduct shipping road tests prior to starting production shipments Include shock and vibration spectra separately when creating a shipping specification Consider sub-component testing of sensitive items (e.g. couplers, tuners, bellows) Ensure assembly used as testing bed is identical (in sensitive regions at least) to production units Involve industry at an early stage of shipping scheme development In addition to paid consultants, some specialized transportation companies may provide advice as part of bidding process Only employ companies that work with special loads Variables such as route, speed, road conditions and weather cannot be controlled; a shipping system should be able to handle deviations