Segregated Fee Information Allocable vs. Non-allocable

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

U.T. System Administration Delegation of Authority to Sign Contracts Dana Hollingsworth, Attorney The University of Texas System Office of General Counsel.

Advertisements

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Special Education Self-

W HAT IS M UTUAL AGREEMENT AND P ARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE ? Dr. Eric Oifer Randy Lawson August 26, 2010.

University Support Programs Click mouse or use right arrow to advance slide. University Enterprises, Inc. Sponsored Programs Administration.

Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.

1 Tuition Policy Advisory Committee September 16, 2004.

Peralta Community College Budget Allocation Model BAM November 17, 2014.

University of South Carolina FY Preliminary Budget Board of Trustees Executive Committee June 8, 2007.

University of South Carolina FY Budget Board of Trustees June 28, 2007.

CSU Operating Fund Revenue Legal Basis Reporting Workshop March 19, 2008.

An Educational Computer Based Training Program CBTCBT.

Financial Overview of Center and Institute Q&A Session Kathleen Bradley-LockhartKathleen Bradley-Lockhart.

Students with Disabilities Parentally Placed in Nonpublic Elementary or Secondary Schools VESID Special Education Services New York State Education Department.

2014 – 2017 Student Funds Financial Manager 1. History of Position In 1994, the S&A Committee, University Administrators, and the Board of Trustees recognized.

Academic Senate for California Community Colleges The Basis for Faculty Power: Title 5 Regulations and Education Code Mark Lieu, Vice President Jane Patton,

Adapted from a presentation by Mark Lieu Academic Senate for California Community Colleges - Leadership Institute 2006 Academic Senate for California Community.

SUFAC Training. “ The students of each institution or campus subject to the responsibilities and powers of the board, the president, the chancellor and.

CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.

UNIVERSITY GOVERNANCE: Where We’ve Been Where We Are Where We Need To Be.

FY12 Spending Plan Process Finance and Administration Advisory Group January 18, 2012.

1 Effective Senates: The Key Ingredients of Collegial Consultation Angelica Bangle, Chris Hill, Wheeler North, Beverly Reilly, Cheryl Stewart.

Bases for Academic Senates: What Are We And What Are Our Roles? Craig Rutan, Area D Representative Cynthia Rico, South Representative.

2 UTSA has developed a process to systematically review all fees to: 1. 1.Analyze expenditures and transfers to ensure appropriate use consistent with.

Student Involvement in Decision-Making. Policy 2.3 Part 1: To promote appropriate levels of student participation... Part 1:... students shall have the.

Cost Sharing on Contracts and Grants October 16, 2001.

Duke Ellington “A problem is a chance for you to do your best.”

10/16/2015 Roles and Responsibilities of Principal Investigators/ Program Directors/ Project Directors.

LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT ©PACER Center, Inc., 2005.

Jane Patton, President, ASCCC Lisa Legohn, LA Trade Tech.

TUITION & FEE PROCESS GUIDELINE Draft Policy Review Draft Policy Review Financial Area Representatives April 21, 2008 Draft Policy Review Draft Policy.

Spring 2012 Budget Update March/April 2012 Robert Cramer -Assistant Chancellor Cathy Riedl-Farrey - Director, Financial Services.

Academic Senate for California Community Colleges – Leadership Institute 2008 Basics for Effective Senates Shaaron Vogel Wheeler North Academic Senate.

Presentation to the Chancellor’s Cabinet October 14, 2013 Inspiration. Innovation. Graduation. Presented by Mr. Roy Stutzman, RvStutzman Consulting.

Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 The Basics of Grants Administration.

Research Protections Office University of Vermont Change to Procedures for Committee Review of Resubmissions of Grant Applications.

ACCOUNTING FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS Financial Policies and Procedures for the Capital Project Delivery Process Office of the CFO.

1 Service Center FY2006 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation.

1 Budget Overview Budget Information Committee February 26, 2007.

36.09 (5) Here we go… (5) states… 36.09(5) STUDENTS. The students of each institution or campus subject to the responsibilities and powers of the.

Contract Compliance Training. Department Personnel Office of the General Counsel (OGC) Mario K. Castillo General Counsel John Guest Deputy General Counsel.

U.T. System Administration Delegation of Authority to Sign Contracts Dana Hollingsworth, Attorney The University of Texas System Office of General Counsel.

Chancellor and Board of Regents AUTHORITY 1. Overview Ohio Revised Code (“ORC”) Section creates a Board of Regents to oversee statewide higher.

Open Budget Meeting April 21, Budget Calendar & Timeline CSU’s Internal Budget Process Governor’s Proposal January General Assembly Winter Finalized.

The Role of Students in Participatory Governance Richael Young, College of San Mateo Barbara Illowsky, De Anza College.

ANNUAL TITLE IA PARENT MEETING

Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74

Managing student activity fees Training

FY2007 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation (Part I)

The NEW Distance Education Guidelines

PARENT AND FAMILY ENGAGEMENT PROGRAM

Overview Background UPS Operational Policy TC 4

Campus Wide Open Forum Budget Update.

ANNUAL TITLE IA PARENT MEETING

PRESENTATION TITLE Report on the Associated Students Fee

Sponsored Programs at Penn

Navigating the Charter Renewal Process: Start to Finish

Chapter 340: Employee Absences Faculty Leave

College Senate February 10, Broad-Based Fees January to March 2017

10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences

Navigating the Charter Renewal Process: Start to Finish

Building Relations: Local Senates and Unions Roles and challenges

WARREN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FY19 BUDGET PROPOSAL

Board of Regents Policies Administrative Policies

Special Course Fees.

10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences

2018 Faculty Leadership Institute

Managing student activity fees Training

Academic Senate for California Community Colleges

Budget Update 7/13/ Budget Update 7/13/2019.

University of Pittsburgh

Presentation transcript:

Segregated Fee Information Allocable vs. Non-allocable

Segregated Fees Students are assessed a fee, based on number of credits, each semester. The amount for 2016-17 is $1,122/year for a full-time student (12 credits or more). Internally, the fee is broken down into two components: Allocable and Non-allocable.

Allocable vs Non-allocable As stated in UW System Policy Paper: Allocable SUF are those SUF that provide substantial support for campus student activities and services as outlined in Section I.(B)(6)(a) and that are allocated by students, in consultation with the chancellor and subject to the final confirmation of the Board of Regents, in accordance with s. 36.09(5), Wis. Stats. The student group organized at each UW institution for the purpose of engaging in the allocation process under s. 36.09(5), Wis. Stats., is referred to in this policy as the Student University Fee Allocation Committee or “SUFAC.”

Allocable vs Non-allocable As stated in UW System Policy Paper: Non-allocable SUF are those SUF that are used to support long-term commitments for fixed financial obligations, ongoing operating costs of university owned or controlled buildings, and similar commitments for student unions, health centers, child care centers and recreational sports centers. In accordance with s. 36.09(3), Wis. Stats., chancellors, following consultation with students in accordance with Regent Policy 30-5, as amended, are responsible for the development of budgets and expenditures of non-allocable SUF.

Areas funded by Seg. Fees at UWO Allocable: OSA Student Legal Services Intramurals and Sport Clubs Student Organizations (Allocations Committee) Titan Transit and Collegiate Readership Program Green Fund Non-allocable: Intercollegiate Athletics Children’s Learning & Care Center Student Recreation Oshkosh Sports Complex Reeve Union Student Health Center

Breakdown of fees: http://adminservices.uwosh.edu/student-financial-services/tuition-and-fees/segregated-fees/ The current allocable amount is $114.32/year/student.

Allocable => Non-allocable Proposed areas to be moved to Non-allocable: Student Legal Services OSA/SLS/SAC Office Manager’s wages, fringe benefits, and some supplies Titan Transit College Readership program Approximately $200,000

Allocable vs Non-allocable Regent Policy 30-5: Each campus administration shall, in consultation with its student governance groups, develop specific procedures to ensure that there is an opportunity for the Segregated University Fee Advisory Committee (SUFAC) to conduct a timely and meaningful review of the non-allocable segregated fee budget. A copy of these procedures, signed by appropriate campus administrators and student representatives, shall be filed with the UW System President’s designee. The agreed upon procedures shall be consistently followed from one year to the next and any changes to those procedures will be documented and filed with the UW System President’s designee. Consistent with section B.1 of Regent Policy 86-4, “Guidelines for Student Governance,” the President’s designee shall mediate if a campus administration and its student representatives cannot reach agreement upon the procedures to be followed.

Questions?