KDPI mapping vs. SCD, ECD, DCD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OPTN Regional Meetings Data Update Spring OPTN 2007 Donor, Transplant, and Waiting List Numbers.
Advertisements

The Transplant Waiting List and Organ Allocation Process
Ken Andreoni, MD Chair UNOS Kidney Comm The Ohio State University
The New Kidney Allocation System: What Referring Physicians Need to Know The OPTN presents: The New Kidney Allocation System: What Referring Physicians.
Kidney Transplantation Committee Update John J. Friedewald, MD Committee Chair Meetings.
Kidney Transplantation Committee Spring Waiting time calculation - pre-registration dialysis time added 2.Candidate classification - Estimated.
HEART-LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Overall 2014 JHLT Oct; 33(10):
The Impact of the Kidney Allocation System Marlene Abe, Transplant Coordinator UCI Medical Center – Orange, California Jim Trisch, Manager – Clinical Services.
The Deceased Donor Kidney Allocation System
Liver Transplant Data for Regional Meetings Spring 2015.
Proposal to Substantially Revise the National Kidney Allocation System
Anne L. Lally, MD Surgical Director of the Kidney Transplant Program Hartford Hospital.
The Impact of the new Kidney Allocation System on Donation and Transplantation in Region 5.
Kidney Transplantation Committee Spring  Implemented Dec. 4, 2014  6 month data will be shared at Aug-Oct regional meetings  Monitoring community.
Kidney Transplantation Committee Spring Waiting time calculation - pre-registration dialysis time added 2.Candidate classification - Estimated.
The New Kidney Allocation System Gautham Mogilishetty, MD Associate Professor of Medicine Division of Nephrology and Transplantation University of Cincinnati.
2013 Data.  Overall waiting list additions increased for second year in a row  Most significant growth for kidney waiting list since “flattening” began.
Adult National Offering Scheme for Adult Deceased Donors to Adult Recipients DBDDCD Super Urgent Hepatoblastoma Multi-organ (Liver +Small bowel) Suitable.
Expanding HLA Typing Requirements (Resolution 10) Histocompatibility Committee Dolly Tyan, PhD Chair.
1 Proposal to Revise Facilitated Pancreas Allocation Policy Pancreas Transplantation Committee Fall 2015.
Kidney Allocation Scenario: – 20 y.o. female, type I diabetic, anoxic head injury – Normal kidney lab values, KDPI 25% – Kidney Allocation for Donors with.
OPTN Minority Affairs Committee Update March 13, 2012 Meeting Chicago O’Hare Hilton.
1 Kidney Transplantation Committee Spring Recent Public Comment Proposals  OPTN Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) Priority Points  Changes apply.
The Impact of the Kidney Allocation System Sara Bowen, Organ Recovery Coordinator Intermountain Donor Services Aaron Cohen, Manager of Donor Referral and.
Kidney Transplantation Committee Spring Waiting time calculation - pre-registration dialysis time added 2.Candidate classification - Estimated.
Liver State of the Union Aaron Cohen Manager of Donor Referral and Allocation.
United States Organ Transplantation SRTR & OPTN Annual Data Report, 2011 Kidney.
Living Donor Transplants
Improving Allocation of En Bloc Kidneys Public Comment Proposal
Liver Transplant Data for Regional Meetings
The Recipient Experience
Kidney Committee Fall 2016.
John P. Dickerson, Tuomas Sandholm In AAAI, 2015
Improving Dual Kidney Allocation
OneLegacy Status 1A cases
OPO Committee Spring 2018.
OPTN/UNOS Kidney Transplantation Committee
Improving Dual Kidney Allocation
OPTN/UNOS Kidney Transplantation Committee
Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee Spring 2014
System Optimizations Work Group Update
ODT Hub Programme Update National Organ Donation Committee Feb 2018 Jacki Newby Head of Referral and Offering 1.
Liver Transplant Data for Regional Meetings
Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee Spring 2019
Removal of DSA and Region from Kidney and Pancreas Distribution
Liver and Intestinal Organ Transplantation Committee
Liver and Intestinal Organ Transplantation Committee
Liver and Intestinal Transplantation Committee
System Optimizations Work Group Update
Region 8: What is Possible? Topic : Systems Optimization
OPTN Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) Histocompatibility Testing Policies
Living Donation & Transplantation
Kidney Transplantation Committee
Kidney Transplantation Committee
Introduction to Kidney Donor Risk Index (DRI)
Living Donor Transplants
Liver and Intestine Committee
Minority Affairs Committee Update
Liver and Intestinal Organ Transplantation Committee
Kidney Transplantation Committee
Pancreas Transplantation Committee
Kidney and Kidney/Pancreas Transplantation in a Year
Kidney Transplantation Committee
Pediatric Transplantation Committee Fall 2014
Histocompatibility Committee
Liver Transplant Data for Regional Meetings
MPSC Transplant Program Performance Measures (Outcome Measures)
Histocompatibility Committee
Living Donor Transplants
Allocation of the Highest Quality Kidneys and Transplant Outcomes Under the New Kidney Allocation System  Supreet Sethi, Reiad Najjar, Alice Peng, James.
Presentation transcript:

KDPI mapping vs. SCD, ECD, DCD Aaron Cohen Manager of Donor Referral and Allocation

Total Organ Donors KDPI distribution

Match System – Sequences A-D Sequence A KDPI ≤ 20% Sequence B KDPI > 20% - 34% Sequence C KDPI 35% - 85% Sequence D KDPI 86% - 100% Highly Sensitized 0-ABDRmm (top 20% EPTS) Prior Living Donor Local pediatrics Local top 20% EPTS 0-ABDRmm (all) Local (all) Regional pediatrics Regional (top 20% EPTS) Regional (all) National pediatrics National (top 20% EPTS) National (all) 0-ABDRmm Local adults Regional adults National Pediatrics National Adults Local Regional National Local + Regional *all categories in Sequence D are limited to adult candidates

All Donors Sequence A KDPI distribution KDPI Score Range  1-20 % 1-20 Total Donors Highly Sensitized 0-ABDRmm (top 20% EPTS) Prior Living Donor Local pediatrics Local top 20% EPTS 0-ABDRmm (all) Local (all) Regional pediatrics Regional (top 20% EPTS) Regional (all) National pediatrics National (top 20% EPTS) National (all) SCD 51 22% 231 ECD 0% 58 DCD 5 10% 49 Total 56 17% 338

All Donors Sequence B KDPI distribution KDPI Score Range  21-34 % 21-34 Total Donors Highly Sensitized 0-ABDRmm Prior Living Donor Local pediatrics Local adults Regional pediatrics Regional adults National Pediatrics National Adults SCD 47 20% 231 ECD 0% 58 DCD 7 14% 49 Total 54 16% 338

All Donors Sequence C KDPI distribution KDPI Score Range  35-85 % 35-85 Total Donors Highly Sensitized 0-ABDRmm Prior Living Donor Local Regional National SCD 128 55% 231 ECD 17 29% 58 DCD 33 67% 49 Total 178 53% 338

All Donors Sequence D KDPI distribution KDPI Score Range  86-100 % 86-100 Total Donors Highly Sensitized 0-ABDRmm Local + Regional National *all categories in Sequence D are limited to adult candidates SCD 5 2% 231 ECD 41 71% 58 DCD 4 8% 49 Total 50 15% 338

Txp Kidney Donor KDPI Distribution

Txp Kidney Donors Sequence A KDPI distribution KDPI Score Range  1-20 % 1-20 Total Donors Highly Sensitized 0-ABDRmm (top 20% EPTS) Prior Living Donor Local pediatrics Local top 20% EPTS 0-ABDRmm (all) Local (all) Regional pediatrics Regional (top 20% EPTS) Regional (all) National pediatrics National (top 20% EPTS) National (all) SCD 49 25% 231 ECD 0% 58 DCD 4 10% Total 53 20% 338

Txp Kidney Donors Sequence B KDPI distribution KDPI Score Range  21-34 %21-34 Total Donors Highly Sensitized 0-ABDRmm Prior Living Donor Local pediatrics Local adults Regional pediatrics Regional adults National Pediatrics National Adults SCD 44 22% 231 ECD 0% 58 DCD 7 18% 49 Total 51 19% 338

Txp Kidney Donors Sequence C KDPI distribution KDPI Score Range  35-85 % 35-85 Total Donors Highly Sensitized 0-ABDRmm Prior Living Donor Local Regional National SCD 105 53% 231 ECD 10 37% 58 DCD 26 67% 49 Total 141 338

Txp Kidney Donors Sequence D KDPI distribution KDPI Score Range  86-100 % 86-100 Total Donors Highly Sensitized 0-ABDRmm Local + Regional National *all categories in Sequence D are limited to adult candidates SCD 2 1% 231 ECD 17 63% 58 DCD 5% 49 Total 21 8% 338

Declined Kidney Donor KDPI Distribution

Donors with declined Kidneys Sequence A KDPI distribution KDPI Score Range  1-20 % 1-20 Total Donors Highly Sensitized 0-ABDRmm (top 20% EPTS) Prior Living Donor Local pediatrics Local top 20% EPTS 0-ABDRmm (all) Local (all) Regional pediatrics Regional (top 20% EPTS) Regional (all) National pediatrics National (top 20% EPTS) National (all) SCD 2 9% 231 ECD 0% 58 DCD 1 11% 49 Total 3 5% 338

Donors with declined Kidneys Sequence B KDPI distribution KDPI Score Range  21-34 %21-34 Total Donors Highly Sensitized 0-ABDRmm Prior Living Donor Local pediatrics Local adults Regional pediatrics Regional adults National Pediatrics National Adults SCD 1 4% 231 ECD 0% 58 DCD 49 Total 2% 338

Donors with declined Kidneys Sequence C KDPI distribution KDPI Score Range  35-85 % 35-85 Total Donors Highly Sensitized 0-ABDRmm Prior Living Donor Local Regional National SCD 19 83% 231 ECD 7 24% 58 DCD 6 67% 49 Total 32 52% 338

Donors with declined Kidneys Sequence D KDPI distribution KDPI Score Range  86-100 % 86-100 Total Donors Highly Sensitized 0-ABDRmm Local + Regional National *all categories in Sequence D are limited to adult candidates SCD 1 4% 231 ECD 22 76% 58 DCD 2 22% 49 Total 25 41% 338

Averages 2014 Average OL donor KDPI Score: 53% Average Txp Kidney KDPI score: 46% Average Rejected Kidney KDPI score: 74%

Averages 2015 Average OL donor KDPI Score: 56% 52% on donors where Kidney offers made Average Txp Kidney KDPI score: 42% Average Rejected Kidney KDPI score: 79%

Future plans OL to monitor acceptance behavior after implementation of KAS During scheduled Organ Offer reviews, KDPI will be emphasized. Local vs. Regional to be reviewed

Update for 2015 Began looking at center specific acceptance/declines based on KDPI. Mapped out acceptance behavior with local centers and provide information to all centers.

Acceptance Behavior Mapping KDPI Distribution 12-4-14 to 2-28-15 Center Offered Accepted Declined Transplanted Total offers Center 1 15% 12% 16% 11% 22 Center 2 50% 37% 63% 45% 96 Center 3 48% 42% 58% 69 Center 4 39% 57% 30% 73 Center 5 55% 44% 68% 56% 91 Center 6 53% 62% 14% 50 Center 7 36% 52 Center 8 40% 65% 35% 82 Center 9 52% 69% 43% 113 Center 10 49% 67% 33%

Future plans Partnering with Tx centers to review acceptance behavior. Utilize the data for long term decision making???