Contract Staff Training Contract Management 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTERNAL CONTROLS.
Advertisements

1 AUDIT AND AUDIT RESOLUTION Peg Rosenberry, Director of Grants Management Claire Moreno, Audit Liaison, Office of Grants Management 9/18/2009 AMERICORPS.
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Fiscal Monitoring: Ensuring Accountability of Your Sub-Grantees
Project Estimates There are two types of estimates 1Partial Payment Estimate 2Final Payment Estimate.
CMAA Site Review (Audit File) Training. Frequency: On site reviews conducted at least once every four years Technical Assistance reviews conducted every.
Lessons Learned from Financial Management Reviews May 15, 2008 Bruce Robinson FTA Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Federal and State Monitoring Title I Directors Conference September
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
Subrecipient Monitoring CCIA Spring Conference Sheena Tran, Rancho Santiago CCD Tania Walden, Los Rios CCD Tracy Young, Coast CCD May 2013.
1 To conduct annual fact-based program and fiscal audits on each delegate agency and partner. An exception to this policy may be granted in certain cases.
Dionysios Karamalikis November 9,  Award Identification—At the time of the award, identifying to the sub-recipient the federal award information.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program SSVF Grantee Uniform Monitoring.
Administrative Review Requirements September 17, 2014.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires states to have a system in place for reviewing approved CDBG projects Each state’s.
“The mission of the Sub-recipient Monitoring Section is to monitor, assess, and assist Sub-recipients to successfully implement and complete Grant Program.
MODULE FIVE Monitoring/Reviews/Record Keeping/Forms and Documents School and Community Nutrition 2013.
Grant Management Webinar Presenters – Karla Freeman – Beth Romero – Chris Epoca.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Prepared by. As stewards of a chapter’s money the chapter officers are responsible for the careful handling and dissemination of funds.
Enhanced Assessment Grant1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Enhanced Assessment Grants (Updated June 2012)
1 | Weatherization Assistance Programeere.energy.gov Eric Bell 1 Federal/State Monitoring 2010 Orientation for State WAP Directors and Staff.
Office of Field Services Fiscal Review Process Becky Pennington Susan Szymas February 7, 2013.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
PREPARING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MONITORING PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
Erica Cummings Grant Coordinator 1.  The New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) is responsible for:  Monitoring.
Monitoring & Oversight Adult Education and Literacy (AEL) Programs Brenda B. Williams Project Manager Texas Workforce Commission Regulatory Integrity Division.
“Establishing Internal Financial Controls” Presented by: Fred Thomas, Bureau Chief of Administration.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
USDOL REGION 3 FISCAL FORUM Introduction to Grants ManagementApril 26 – 29, 2005.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
Homeland Security Grant Program Reimbursement Workshop May 28, 2009.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
The Lifecycle of Grants: Grant Agreement and Fair Housing November 7, 2012.
Internal Control 7. Management Issues Related to Internal Control OBJECTIVE 1: Identify the management issues related to internal control.
Gulana Hajiyeva Environmental Specialist World Bank Moscow Safeguards Training, May 30 – June 1, 2012.
MARCH 9, 2006 Boating Safety and Enforcement Grant Program Regulations Stakeholder Workshop Proposed Conceptual Regulations Department of Boating and Waterways.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Reimbursement Statements What you need to know. Let’s Take a Closer Look… …at invoicing, cost ledgers, SB and budget revisions.
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT EDUCATION & PARENTAL CHOICE Budget and Finance 2009 CSP Grant OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT EDUCATION & PARENTAL CHOICE Budget and Finance.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program Small City and County Grant Kick-Off Meeting California.
Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) Administrative Review Requirements.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Child Support Director’s Association 2007 Training Conference Administrative Audits Presentation #107 September 18, 2007.
Sponsored Project Administration Fall 2012 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Sponsored Project Lifecycle Introduction Overview Creating a Project Budget Compliance.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Subgrantee Compliance February 27, 2013 Preparing TPPS Subgrantees for Monitoring Shelby County Grants Office presents:
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
SD DOE Federal Education Programs Monitoring Office of Grants Management Rob Huffman, Administrator Tacy Kennison, Program Specialist Danna Sanders, Program.
Department of Child Support Services OFFICE OF AUDITS AND COMPLIANCE.
USING FEDERAL FUNDS FOR CITY PROJECTS. INTRODUCTION PHB’s federal funds come primarily from the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD).
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Adult Education and Literacy Monitoring FY17
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
NCJA’s National Forum on Financial Management Training
Lessons Learned from Financial Management Reviews
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Adult Education and Literacy Monitoring FY17
Subrecipient Monitoring
Managing Federal grants
Zora Cobb USDA Food and Nutrition Service
Presentation transcript:

Contract Staff Training Contract Management 2007

Introduction n Recipients of federal funds are responsible for ensuring that the funds are used in accordance with all program requirements. n Recipients are also responsible for determining the adequacy of performance of subrecipient agreement and procurement contracts and for taking appropriate action when performance problems arise.

n Federal regulations identify the allowable and expected corrective and remedial actions which should be taken when subrecipients do not comply with program requirements and/or meet performance standards. [e.g. 24 CFR for CDBG].

n Subrecipients are required to comply with all specific fund requirements, cross-cutting federal regulations, and applicable OMB Circulars. n The contract manager is responsible to oversee the work of subrecipients to assure that they are performing up to standard and are comply with all applicable regulations and requirements.

n Specific fund requirements are located in the federal regulations for that fund source. n Cross-cutting federal regulations are those which apply to any and all federally-funded activities. Examples include: – National Environmental Policy Act. – Prevailing Wage Laws… – Separation of Church and State. – Non-discrimination.

n OMB Circulars cover financial and administrative requirements..... Examples include: – Eligible costs. – Conflict of Interest. – Financial recordkeeping standards.

Progress Reports n All subrecipients are required to submit written progress reports. Most commonly these are submitted monthly or quarterly, depending on the project.

n The contract manager must review progress reports when they are received to assure that the project is progressing as expected, carrying out activities identified in the contract and serving the intended clients. n If the report indicates any problems, it is the responsibility of the contract manager to contact the subrecipient and resolve any issues.

n The contract manager must review the reports to make sure that the subrecipient is reporting the required data in the proper format. This will assure that information can be input into IDIS at the end of the year.

Requests for Payment n Federal funds are distributed on a reimbursement basis; therefore, subrecipients should submit Requests for Payment. Most commonly these are submitted monthly or quarterly. n The contract manager is responsible to review the Request for accuracy, to verify that all costs are eligible for reimbursement and that all required documentation is attached.

n Costs that are not eligible for reimbursement include: – Costs incurred before the start date or after the termination date of the contract. – Costs that are specifically prohibited by federal regulation and/or OMB Circular. – Costs that do not come under any of the categories identified in the contract. – Costs that do not appear necessary or reasonable to carry out the project.

n The contract manager must check the math on the billing, turn it in for processing. n Contract Number n Fiscal Year (FY) n Contracted Budget n Invoice Amount n Balance n Approved By n Date

n Requests for Payment should not be approved if subrecipients are significantly behind in submitting progress reports.

Risk Assessment n Prior to executing a contract or shortly thereafter, the contract manager should complete the Risk Assessment Checklist. This Risk Assessment is one of the criteria used to determine if a subrecipient should receive an on-site monitoring visit. n The Risk Assessment Checklist identifies some of the most common situations that could indicate problems within an agency.

n The Risk Assessment Checklist includes the following questions: n Is this the first time the agency has contracted with the City? n Is this a new activity for the agency? Has the agency successfully completed this activity in prior years? n Does the agency have any unresolved audit findings? Has the agency corrected any issues or findings from previous monitoring visits?

n Has the agency experienced recent turnover in staff responsible for conducting the City funded activity? n Has the agency consistently met performance goals in prior years activities? What is the amount of the contract? n Are reports and billings submitted in a timely manner? n Is there evidence that the agency is experiencing cash flow problems (e.g. requesting expedited reimbursements)?

n Is there other information available which may indicate a need for more frequent monitoring of the activity? If yes, explain. n Date of last comprehensive monitoring of this contract. n Record on the Monitoring Schedule that the Risk Assessment Checklist has been completed. [ i:Monitoring/Monitoring Schedule Excel document].

Desk Monitoring n As soon as is practicable (when at least one progress report and one request for reimbursement have been received), the contract manager should complete the Desk Monitoring Checklist. This Desk Monitoring also helps identify compliance problems and/or the need for an on-site monitoring visit.

n The Desk Monitoring Checklist identifies some of the most common situations that could indicate problems within an agency. The Desk Monitoring Checklist includes the following questions: – Progress Reports. n Are progress reports submitted in a timely manner and at the frequency specified in the contract?

n Do progress reports include all information required by the contract. n Does the information provided in the progress reports demonstrate that the project is being carried out within the Scope of Services of the contract? n Does it appear that the project will be completed on time? What % of project is complete? What percent of year has passed? n If income/demographic information on clients is required, does the information demonstrate that the program is serving the intended clientele?

n If performance measure reporting is required, does the information demonstrate that the program is meeting its performance objectives? – Draw Down Requests. n Are draw down requests submitted in a timely manner? n Are draw down requests complete (do they include all required documentation and is the math correct)? n Are any budget line items over expended? If yes, has the agency requested an adjustment to the budget line items?

n Do any draw down requests include any ineligible costs or costs which were not included in the contract budget? n Has the agency indicated any cash flow problems (e.g. requesting expedited payment)? – Other. n Are there any other federal or local regulations with which the project is required to comply? If yes, specify. Is documentation, demonstrating compliance, in the project file? n Have any potential problems been identified? If yes, specify. What steps will be taken to resolve these issues?

n Do any draw down requests include any ineligible costs or costs which were not included in the contract budget? n Has the agency indicated any cash flow problems (e.g. requesting expedited payment)? – Other. n Are there any other federal or local regulations with which the project is required to comply? If yes, specify. Is documentation, demonstrating compliance, in the project file?

n Have any potential problems been identified? If yes, specify. What steps will be taken to resolve these issues? n Record on the Monitoring Schedule that the Desk Monitoring Checklist has been completed. [ i:Monitoring/Monitoring Schedule Excel document].

Site Monitoring n A minimum of 10% of your contracts must receive an on-site monitoring each year. n There are many types of records/activities that could be included in an on-site monitoring. Examples include: – Documentation of income eligibility and demographic information on clients. – Documentation of tracking of identified performance measures.

– Maintenance of equipment purchased with City funds. – Operation of the funded activity and, possibly, interviews with clients. – Financial records and documentation. – Compliance with applicable cross-cutting regulations (environmental reviews, lead-based paint documentation, tenant notification requirements, etc.).

n On-site monitoring must be documented and recorded. This means either completing the available checklists or writing a narrative report, which covers all appropriate items. n BHCD has prepared a series of On Site Monitoring Checklists which may be used in documenting monitoring visits.

– General Checklist. This form should be used for all BHCD contracts, regardless of fund source. It covers general issues that are applicable to all contracts. n Are the activities being undertaken by the agency consistent within the scope of work per the contract? n Is the scope of work being carried out in a timely manner (consistent with the timeline of the contract)?

n Is the agency tracking information on performance indicators identified in the contract? Are they meeting their performance goals? n Is the agency maintaining adequate records for the project, as required by the contract? n Are written progress reports submitted as required by the contract? n Do the project files include documentation of procurement procedures used to purchase goods and services and/or hire consultants?

n Did the agency purchase any non-disposable equipment with City funds? If yes, is it on site and in working order? Is it cared for in such a way as to adequately protect it from damage or theft? Are inventory records maintained documenting necessary information on the equipment? – Fund Source Checklist. There are Checklists for CDBG, HOME and HOPWA. – The CDBG Fund Checklist covers specific regulations associated with that fund source.

n Does the project, as implemented, meet the National Objective identified? If the National Objective is limited clientele, housing, or job creation and retention activities, are records maintained confirming that clients are income eligible? n Do records confirm that clients are income eligible and are they consistent with information provided in progress reports? Is required client demographic information being collected? Is information in files consistent with that provided in progress reports?

n Is the project, as implemented, carrying out an eligible activity? n Is the agency maintaining records for four years after completion of the contract, as required? n Is other required regulatory documentation maintained in the files? Which files were reviewed? n Are there applicable cross-cutting regulations? Which were reviewed? What were the results? n If equipment was purchased with CDBG funds, is it only being used for CDBG eligible activities? How was this determined?

n In addition to monitoring the program, a review of fiscal records and procedures is also needed. n For very large contracts (over $100,000), fiscal staff will conduct monitorings and contract managers should make arrangements for those reviews. n For smaller contracts, contract managers can conduct basic fiscal monitorings.

n There is a Small Contract Fiscal Monitoring Checklist. – Is the project operating within the contract budget? Are any budget line items over expended? – Are time records maintained for staff which distinguish between funded and non-funded programs?

– Are all time records signed by the staff person and authorized by a different person? – Has the most recently payment of payroll taxes been made? – Are files of all requests for payment, including back-up documentation and proof of payment, maintained? – Are accounting records maintained to distinguish between funded and non-funded programs and the various funding sources within funded programs?

– Are bank statements reconciled regularly? – Does the agency maintain a general ledger or journal? If not, how are records maintained? – If agency received an advance or receives program income, are records maintained to account for all funds. – Does the agency have adequate procedures for receipt and expenditure of funds to protect from loss or theft? – Does the agency maintain a written Conflict of Interest policy?

n Any on-site monitoring that includes a review of files and records should be followed up with a letter to the contractor. This letter should include: – When the visit took place and which agency staff participated. – What records and files were reviewed. – General results of the review.

– Statement of whether the project was found to be operating within the contract and applicable regulations (based on what was reviewed). – Identification of any Findings or Concerns and required follow-up actions. A time frame for the response should also be given.

n If any Findings or Concerns are identified, it is the responsibility of the contract manager to make sure that the subrecipient responds to the items and completes the required actions within the time allotted. n Once the subrecipient has completed all required actions, a letter should be sent to them advising that the items are closed.

n Record on the Monitoring Schedule that the On Site Monitoring has been completed, whether there were Findings and when they were closed. [ i:Monitoring/Monitoring Schedule Excel document].

Contract Amendments n Substantive/substantial changes to a contract must be made by amendment. These include such things as: – Changing the start and/or end dates of a contract. – Changing the dollar amount of the contract. – Making substantial changes to the scope of work, including number and/or types of clients served. – Changing the types of costs that could be covered by the contract.

n Minor changes to a contract may be made on the authority of the contract manager. These types of changes would include: – Shifting line item dollar amounts if they do not involve changing the total dollar amount or changing the types of costs covered by the contract. – Adjustments to the timeline that do not involve changing the completion date. – Minor changes to the projects activities or the number of clients served.

n Contract amendments are processed the same as contracts and must be entered into the Database. n Minor changes, not requiring an amendment, should be documented in writing in the project file ( s are fine).

IDIS Close-Out n At the end of each fiscal year, all projects must be entered in the database by the contract manager. – If the project is complete, it is Closed Out. In order to close out a project, the final report and billing must have been received and processed. Final information on clients and performance measures must be entered.

– If the project is not complete, it is Continued. This is a status report on the project as of the end of the fiscal year (June 30). The project may continue and will be Closed Out when it is completed. n Information input into the Close Out must be consistent with that entered into the Set Up (e.g. type of accomplishment, National Objective, Eligible Activity). If youre not sure, go back and look at the set-up. If the set- up is wrong, correct it.