Michael O. Gonsalves, LTJG/NOAA Dean J. Battilana, LEUT/RAN

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rune Hagelund, WesternGeco Stewart A. Levin, Halliburton
Advertisements

Patch Testing HYPACK 2013.
Wavelets Fast Multiresolution Image Querying Jacobs et.al. SIGGRAPH95.
Verification of specifications and aptitude for short-range applications of the Kinect v2 depth sensor Cecilia Chen, Cornell University Lewis’ Educational.
HYSWEEP® SURVEY HYPACK 2013.
NVC0901 Maritime Alliance Symposium San Diego, August 2011 By: Michael Broadbent Fugro Pelagos Inc. Seafloor Mapping Technologies.
Abstract We quantified turbulent dissipation in the Raritan river using both conventional methods and a novel technique, the structure function method.
Instrumentation - Introduction 10/9/2013Ohio University - Dr. Cyders1 Engineering measurements are usually taken by some form of transducer. A transducer.
Bathymetric Data Management Sujan Dahal Anni Karhunen Christian Koski Laura Leponiemi Sanna Makkonen Lucky Ogege Teemu Saloriutta Woong Shin Huang Ye.
Edge Detection CSE P 576 Larry Zitnick
Oliver Milton, Annie Steinberg, Jeff Wilson. Project Overview Addressing the challenges of climate change in Long Island –specifically sea level rise.
Sonar Chapter 9. History Sound Navigation And Ranging (SONAR) developed during WW II –Sound pulses emitted reflected off metal objects with characteristic.
How to do high quality research on middleware? Frank Eliassen professor University of Oslo and Simula Research Laboratory Oslo, Norway.
HYPACK® Multibeam Training Seminar
Cohort plc company SWATHplus Interferometric Sonar Co-registered Bathymetric Mapping and Seafloor Imaging 26 th May 2009.
Do now: These cuboids are all made from 1 cm cubes
8/9/2015 Frequency Domain Methods. Time domain worldFrequency domain worldFourier Transform: F Inverse Fourier Transform: F --1 Oscilloscope Spectrum.
Fractions, Decimals, & Percents. I. How to convert fractions to decimals There is only 1 step in these types of problems:  Take the top number of your.
Bathymetry What lies beneath?.
Data-assimilation in flood forecasting for the river Rhine between Andernach and Düsseldorf COR-JAN VERMEULEN.
Multibeam echosounders: error modeling evolution Multibeam sonar workshop, 3-4 April 2005 St. Andrews, NB Rob Hare, P. Eng., C.L.S. Canadian Hydrographic.
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
Performance Testing What can you achieve with your MB System?
Expanding Our Global Opportunities Techniques for Mapping In-River Geomorphology, Sediment Transport and River Bank Structures Robert Feldpausch,
30 July 2004USM 2004 Upper Pearl Survey1 Vertical Uncertainty Total Propagated Error –Error budget using Excel spreadsheets created for NAVOCEANO by Rob.
Experimental Results ■ Observations:  Overall detection accuracy increases as the length of observation window increases.  An observation window of 100.
HYPACK Multibeam Training Seminar
1 Detection of Cellular Activity Within A Defined Space Undergraduate Project – Final Presentation Spring 2008 Doron BrotEyal Cimet Supervisor:Yossi Hipsh.
The 18th Meeting on Image Recognition and Understanding 2015/7/29 Depth Image Enhancement Using Local Tangent Plane Approximations Kiyoshi MatsuoYoshimitsu.
The Navigation Surface A New Approach to Multiple Product Creation from Hydrographic Surveys LT Shepard M. Smith, NOAA University of New Hampshire CCOM/JHC.
Interferometric Sounder
I-Precision: Refers to how close a series of
The Benefits of a Hands-on Approach to S-100
August 19, 2015 Port Bienville Rail EIS Scoping Meeting Presented by: Rhea Vincent Mike McGuire.
SIDE SCAN Theory and Operation
HYSWEEP® SURVEY.
Uncertainty Management Workshop Fredericton, New Brunswick – Canada Heeswijk – The Netherlands Ellicott City, Maryland – United States May 2004.
30 July 2004USM 2004 Upper Pearl Survey1 Preparation: Line Building (Skiff) Outermost line: As close to the river bank as possible.
Patch Testing. HYSWEEP ® Calibration of a Multibeam System Patch Testing Single and Dual Head Multibeam Systems. Patch Testing Single and Dual Head Multibeam.
Using a MATLAB/Photoshop Interface to Enhance Image Processing in the Interpretation of Radar Imagery.
SIDE SCAN Theory and Operation
Best Practice T-Scan5 Version T-Scan 5 vs. TS50-A PropertiesTS50-AT-Scan 5 Range51 – 119mm (stand- off 80mm / total 68mm) 94 – 194mm (stand-off.
14.0 Math Review 14.1 Using a Calculator Calculator
Patch Testing. HYSWEEP ® Calibration of a Multibeam System Patch Testing Single and Dual Head Multibeam Systems. Patch Testing Single and Dual Head Multibeam.
RESEARCH TRAINING VESSEL OF GDYNIA MARITIME UNIVERSITY
Woods Hole Science Center
Acoustic mapping technology
J. Beaudoin Ocean Mapping Group University of New Brunswick
Results of an Airborne LiDAR survey between Teignmouth and Sidmouth
Portsmouth, Shallow Survey 2008, oct , 2008, F. Jean
25 Math Review Part 1 Using a Calculator
MB System MB svpselect MBIO MB Process MB makeplatform MBset
Evaluating High-Density Swath Bathymetry Sonars Against IHO-S44 Specifications: Ping DSP 3D Sidescan, a case study David Dodd, IIC Technologies and University.
Complete the missing numbers using the inverse.
Use of Kongsberg Extra Detections to Support Pipeline Inspection Surveys Bart-Jan Tijmes Hydro November 2017.
Scale-Space Representation for Matching of 3D Models
Experiences from the post processing of typical Finnish bathymetric data Jarmo Ahonen Shallow Survey 2008 Portsmouth, NH.
OCEANS.
Fiji Hydrographic Services
Fleet Survey Team, NAVOCEANO
A New Approach for Applying Bathymetry to Nautical Charts
Pennsylvania State University MGIS Program Advisor: Karen Schuckman
IHO-MSDIWG10 Busan, Republic of Korea (4-5 March 2019)
Variable Resolution Operational Implementation for 2018 Field Season
BSIP: Backscatter Software Intercomparison Project
Video Imaged Spatial Positioning Project
Applications of Machine Learning in Hydrographic Data Processing
Mosaic artifacts reduction in SIPS Backscatter
Real-time Uncertainty Output for MBES Systems
NS4960 Summer Term 2019 Natural Gas Processing
Presentation transcript:

Michael O. Gonsalves, LTJG/NOAA Dean J. Battilana, LEUT/RAN A study in the implementation of a tilted multibeam transducer in an ultra-shallow riverine environment Shallow Survey 2008, Portsmouth NH Token commento Michael O. Gonsalves, LTJG/NOAA Dean J. Battilana, LEUT/RAN University of Southern Mississippi – Summer Survey 2008

o o o o o o o O o o N o O

Presentation Overview Survey Background… Tilted Mount – Increased swath width… Tilted Mount – Data further inshore… Total Propogated Uncertainty… CUBE Filtering Regime… Conclusions…

University of Southern Miss. Survey Area Pearl River, LA/MS Port Bienville Industrial Complex University of Southern Miss. Ultra Shallow…

Available Platforms Open Skiff Draft – 0.30m Knudson SBES LeMoyne Imagenex DeltaT

An opportunity for improvement…

Usable Swath Width vs. Depth

Swath Width vs. Spot Spacing Anticipated Survey Conditions

Percent Gains vs. Traditional Mount Can survey to 12m without loss

Tilted mount facilitating inshore acquisition TD = 1.0m α = 5-deg DS = 11.4m

Tilted mount facilitating inshore acquisition SB Draft – 0.3m MB Draft – 1.0m

Tilted mount facilitating inshore acquisition (cultural features vs Tilted mount facilitating inshore acquisition (cultural features vs. sloping beach)

An increased swath…

Total Propogated Uncertainty *beep* *boop*

Total Propogated Uncertainty

Outerbeam Noise Noisy outerbeams resulting from a truncated receive time… …where outer-fluff is at a constant range…

Total Propogated Uncertainty

Processing Pipeline I CARIS HIPS FLEDERMAUS PFM Direct Convert Data Apply Tide & SV Calculate TPU PFM Direct Create CUBE surface Build PFM from HDCS

Total Propogated Uncertainty & CUBE

Processing Pipeline II CARIS HIPS FLEDERMAUS Convert Data Apply Tide & SV Calculate TPU PFM Direct Create CUBE surface Build PFM from HDCS Edit Hypotheses Filter Soundings

Hypotheses Editing Paradigm

Hypotheses Editing Paradigm

Processing Pipeline III CARIS HIPS FLEDERMAUS Convert Data Apply Tide & SV Calculate TPU PFM Direct Create CUBE surface Edit Hypotheses Build PFM from HDCS Apply edits to HDCS Quality Control Final Cleaning Filter Soundings

Final Cleaned Data & Surfaces…

Final Cleaned Data & Surfaces…

Crossline Check – IHO Order

Questions? Conclusions With proper planning a high-accuracy survey can be conducted with a tilted mount by quantifying: Depth Ranges Desired Resolution Desired Distance from shore Increased outerbeam noise can be handled with a proper filtering scheme Questions?