© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

before and after rehabilitation

Percentage of Polyethylene

Test (Haemodialysis patients) Controls (health care workers)

Hospital live Deliveries

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Table 4. Filter Sand Sieve Analysis

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Result of intention to use

Table 3. Number of MS patients/ Year of diagnosis / Current Residence

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 4, doi: /ajnr-5-4-6

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

Table 3. Comparison of NS1 Antigen Assay and Platelet Counts

Total Energy Consumed (%)

intervals from six months to one year

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

Variables Coefficient Prob.

Table 4. Percentage of post-harvest waste reported by the farmers

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

During hospitalization

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Rating of Water Quality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Rice yield in MT (Source-USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Diagnostic methods for systemic fungal infection (n=70)

Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®

Table 7. Status of CF in Nepal as of 2009

Table 5. Pvalues of ttests for direction a

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 5. Comparison of Outcome of 138 patients

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

Simulation Frequency(Hz)

Number of questionnaires sent out

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. Pvalues of ttests for direction b

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Table 2. Regression statistics for direction a

Table 3. Regression statistics for direction b

Table 2. Demographic characteristics of the study subjects

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. SUMMARIZED OBSERVATIONS FROM MODEL ANALYSIS

Source of variation Degrees of freedom Sum of squares Mean square

Cumulative Percentage

Cumulative Percentage

Table 3. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Supervisory level

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Comparison of time-window by emergency gastroscopy

S. No. Product Name yield content

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Average Execution Time in seconds

Sum of Square df Mean Square F Sig Health Between Groups

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Education, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, doi: /wjce-4-1-4

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2013. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 3. DNA damage in cirrhotic by number of cells in healthy adults, compensated & Decompensated Cirrhotic Patients Without Damage Cells with DNA Damage 1-5 cells 6 and more cells Total Control 76/90(84%) 14/90(16%) 0/90(0%) 90/90(100%) Compensated liver cirrhosis 10/35(29%) 18/35(51%) 7/35(20%) 35/35(100%) Decompensated liver cirrhosis 9/50(18%) 13/50(26%) 28/50(56%) 50/50 (100%) Percentage of subjects and number of cells with DNA damage Chi-square test, six and more cells: control vs. compensated and decompensated cirrhotic patients Neelesh Deshpande et al. Effect of Alcohol Consumption and Oxidative Stress and Its Role in DNA Damage. American Journal of Biomedical Research, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 1, 7-10. doi:10.12691/ajbr-2-1-2 © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Science and Education Publishing.