Volume 17, Issue 17, Pages (September 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carly I. Dix, Jordan W. Raff  Current Biology 
Advertisements

Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages (September 2006)
Two Phases of Astral Microtubule Activity during Cytokinesis in C
CENP-C Is a Structural Platform for Kinetochore Assembly
The Cilium Secretes Bioactive Ectosomes
Loss of Function of MULTICOPY SUPPRESSOR OF IRA 1 Produces Nonviable Parthenogenetic Embryos in Arabidopsis  Anne-Elisabeth Guitton, Frédéric Berger 
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Centrosome Amplification Can Initiate Tumorigenesis in Flies
CEP120 and SPICE1 Cooperate with CPAP in Centriole Elongation
Centriole Remodeling during Spermiogenesis in Drosophila
Volume 21, Issue 15, Pages (August 2011)
Meiosis: Organizing Microtubule Organizers
Asterless Reduction during Spermiogenesis Is Regulated by Plk4 and Is Essential for Zygote Development in Drosophila  Atul Khire, Alberto A. Vizuet, Enrique.
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Spindle Pole Regulation by a Discrete Eg5-Interacting Domain in TPX2
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages R1156-R1158 (December 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 24, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Naomi R. Stevens, Hélio Roque, Jordan W. Raff  Developmental Cell 
Human Cep192 Is Required for Mitotic Centrosome and Spindle Assembly
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Number of Nuclear Divisions in the Drosophila Blastoderm Controlled by Onset of Zygotic Transcription  Hung-wei Sung, Saskia Spangenberg, Nina Vogt, Jörg.
Yuki Nakazawa, Madoka Hiraki, Ritsu Kamiya, Masafumi Hirono 
Volume 24, Issue 22, Pages (November 2014)
Renzhi Yang, Jessica L. Feldman  Current Biology 
Sequential Protein Recruitment in C. elegans Centriole Formation
Flies without Centrioles
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Overexpressing Centriole-Replication Proteins In Vivo Induces Centriole Overduplication and De Novo Formation  Nina Peel, Naomi R. Stevens, Renata Basto,
Zhang-Yi Liang, Mark Andrew Hallen, Sharyn Anne Endow  Current Biology 
Integrin Signaling Regulates Spindle Orientation in Drosophila to Preserve the Follicular- Epithelium Monolayer  Ana Fernández-Miñán, María D. Martín-Bermudo,
Spindle Pole Regulation by a Discrete Eg5-Interacting Domain in TPX2
Dominant-negative mutant dynein allows spontaneous centrosome assembly, uncouples chromosome and centrosome cycles  István Belecz, Cayetano Gonzalez,
From Stem Cell to Embryo without Centrioles
Naoyuki Fuse, Kanako Hisata, Alisa L. Katzen, Fumio Matsuzaki 
Luis Alberto Baena-López, Antonio Baonza, Antonio García-Bellido 
EB3 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics at the Cell Cortex and Is Required for Myoblast Elongation and Fusion  Anne Straube, Andreas Merdes  Current Biology 
CENP-C Is a Structural Platform for Kinetochore Assembly
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Leah Vardy, Terry L. Orr-Weaver  Developmental Cell 
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Sebastian Leidel, Pierre Gönczy  Developmental Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 21, Pages (November 2005)
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
Volume 17, Issue 20, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
S. Chodagam, A. Royou, W. Whitfield, R. Karess, J.W. Raff 
Control of Centriole Length by CPAP and CP110
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Kari Barlan, Wen Lu, Vladimir I. Gelfand  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 17, Pages (September 2006)
Nicole M. Mahoney, Gohta Goshima, Adam D. Douglass, Ronald D. Vale 
Jessica L. Feldman, James R. Priess  Current Biology 
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
HURP Is Part of a Ran-Dependent Complex Involved in Spindle Formation
Mi Hye Song, L. Aravind, Thomas Müller-Reichert, Kevin F. O'Connell 
David Vanneste, Masatoshi Takagi, Naoko Imamoto, Isabelle Vernos 
Volume 20, Issue 22, Pages (November 2010)
The Origin of Centrosomes in Parthenogenetic Hymenopteran Insects
Cnn Dynamics Drive Centrosome Size Asymmetry to Ensure Daughter Centriole Retention in Drosophila Neuroblasts  Paul T. Conduit, Jordan W. Raff  Current.
Centriole Reduplication during Prolonged Interphase Requires Procentriole Maturation Governed by Plk1  Jadranka Lončarek, Polla Hergert, Alexey Khodjakov 
The Kinesin-8 Kif18A Dampens Microtubule Plus-End Dynamics
TAC-1, a Regulator of Microtubule Length in the C. elegans Embryo
Salvador-Warts-Hippo Signaling Promotes Drosophila Posterior Follicle Cell Maturation Downstream of Notch  Cédric Polesello, Nicolas Tapon  Current Biology 
The Class I PITP Giotto Is Required for Drosophila Cytokinesis
Volume 18, Issue 18, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 17, Issue 17, Pages 1465-1472 (September 2007) DSAS-6 Organizes a Tube-like Centriole Precursor, and Its Absence Suggests Modularity in Centriole Assembly  Ana Rodrigues-Martins, Mónica Bettencourt-Dias, Maria Riparbelli, Cláudia Ferreira, Inês Ferreira, Giuliano Callaini, David M. Glover  Current Biology  Volume 17, Issue 17, Pages 1465-1472 (September 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.034 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 DSAS-6 Is Involved in Centriole Assembly and Elongation in Drosophila Testes See Figure S4 for description of Drosophila spermatogenesis. (A and B) Reduced centriole number in DSAS-6 mutant. The number of centrioles per cell in G2 16-cell cysts was counted (n = 160 cells in wild-type; n = 208 in DSAS-6 mutants). GFP-PACT was used as a centriole marker [8, 9, 26, 27]. Mature cysts of wild-type and DSAS-6 primary spermatocytes always contained 16 cells, of the same size, indicating four rounds of successful premeiotic mitosis. Note that no more than 4 centrioles were observed. Insets in (B) show GFP-PACT (2×, arrows at low power). Asterisk indicates a cell without visible centrioles. α-tubulin (red), GFP-PACT (green), DNA (blue). Scale bar represents 50 μm. (C) DSAS-6 mutants often showed absent (∗) and small (arrows, 2× in insets showing GFP-PACT) centrioles. α-tubulin (red), GFP-PACT (green), DNA (blue). Scale bar represents 10 μm. (D) Centriole elongation defects in DSAS-6 mutant cells. See Supplemental Experimental Procedures for assignment of categories. Note that centrioles elongate significantly with developmental time (Wilcoxon; p < 0.05) in the wild-type but not in DSAS-6 mutants. (E and F) Structural abnormalities in centrioles from DSAS-6 mutant primary spermatocytes (TEM). Asterisk indicates absence of triplets. Arrowhead indicates inversion of microtubule/PCM localization (electron-dense material on the inside and microtubules on the outside). Scale bar as indicated. Insets are 4×. (G) DSAS-6 mutants show abnormal centriole/basal body structure. Arrows indicate incomplete structure. Scale bar as indicated. Current Biology 2007 17, 1465-1472DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.034) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 DSAS-6 Is Required for Centriole Engagement (A and B) The majority of DSAS-6 mutant primary spermatocytes show disengaged centrioles (n = 160 cells in wild-type; n = 208 in DSAS-6 mutants). Note that in the wild-type, all primary spermatocytes show two centrosomes, each composed by two centrioles in a V-shape. (B) The insets show GFP-PACT (2× magnification). α-tubulin (red), GFP-PACT (green), DNA (blue). Scale bar represents 10 μm. (C) DSAS-6 localizes to the centriole and is enriched at both proximal and distal parts as shown by: (i) comparison of the localization of GFP-DSAS-6 fusion protein with Drosophila SPD-2 ([7], see Figure S7 for validation of DSPD-2 as a centriole marker), SPD-2 (red), GFP-DSAS-6 (green); (ii) comparison of the localization of endogenous DSAS-6 with another centriole marker, GFP-PACT [8, 9, 26, 27], DSAS-6 (red), GFP-PACT (green). Scale bar represents 2.5 μm. Current Biology 2007 17, 1465-1472DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.034) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Absence of DSAS-6 Leads to the Formation of Structurally Abnormal Axonemes Structural abnormalities in the axonemes in DSAS-6 mutant spermatids observed by TEM. (A) Note that whereas in the wild-type the spermatid axoneme is composed of 9 doublets of microtubules plus a central pair, in DSAS-6 mutants some of the axoneme doublets are missing (a) or are in extra number (b). (B and C) Arrows indicate missing doublets; asterisks indicate absence of central pair; arrowheads indicate open centrioles. Scale bar as indicated. (D) Quantification of axoneme structure in DSAS-6 mutants. (E) Enlarged examples of structurally abnormal centrioles. Note that (a) shows less doublets, whereas (b) shows an extra doublet. Scale bar as indicated. Current Biology 2007 17, 1465-1472DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.034) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 DSAS-6 Overexpression Leads to Formation of Tube-like Structures in Fertilized Eggs and to Their De Novo Formation in Unfertilized Eggs (A) GFP-DSAS-6 overexpression leads to the appearance of free asters at the end of second mitosis in Drosophila embryos. (i) Wild-type embryos. (i′) Magnification of (i). (ii, iii, and iv) GFP-DSAS-6 overexpression. (ii) Arrows indicate free asters formed far away from the spindle, which is indicative of de novo formation. (ii′) Note that GFP-DSAS-6 aggregates exist and are spread all over the cytoplasm, but only some show asters. (iii′) Abnormal mitotic spindles are observed. α-tubulin (red), GFP-DSAS-6 (green), DNA (blue). Scale bar represents 50 μm (top) and 10 μm (bottom). Insets are 2.5× magnification of the green channel (GFP-DSAS-6) in region marked with an asterisk. (B) (a) Arrowhead indicates centriole in wild-type embryo. GFP-DSAS-6 overexpression leads to the formation of tube-like structures in unfertilized eggs (b, c) and embryos (d–h). Arrows in e′ point to microtubules doublets within electron-dense material (PCM). Panels (f) and (g) correspond to sequential serial sections of 40–50 nm each. Shown in (h) is a longitudinal section of a tube after DSAS-6 overexpression. Note that tubes formed were on average 2.2× bigger in diameter as compared to wild-type centrioles and many are not perfect circles. Some seemed to result from binding of open circles in the wrong orientation (arrowheads in [e]). Scale bars as indicated. Current Biology 2007 17, 1465-1472DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.034) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions