Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Advertisements

Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Ping Zhang, Jieying Wu, Divino Deoliveira, Nelson J. Chao, Benny J
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Feedback Regulation of Pathogen-Specific T Cell Priming
Initial T Cell Receptor Transgenic Cell Precursor Frequency Dictates Critical Aspects of the CD8+ T Cell Response to Infection  Vladimir P. Badovinac,
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Sequential Polarization and Imprinting of Type 1 T Helper Lymphocytes by Interferon-γ and Interleukin-12  Edda G. Schulz, Luca Mariani, Andreas Radbruch,
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Lung Airway-Surveilling CXCR3hi Memory CD8+ T Cells Are Critical for Protection against Influenza A Virus  Bram Slütter, Lecia L. Pewe, Susan M. Kaech,
Masanori Isogawa, Yoshihiro Furuichi, Francis V. Chisari  Immunity 
Dynamic Interplay among Monocyte-Derived, Dermal, and Resident Lymph Node Dendritic Cells during the Generation of Vaccine Immunity to Fungi  Karen Ersland,
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
B-1a and B-1b Cells Exhibit Distinct Developmental Requirements and Have Unique Functional Roles in Innate and Adaptive Immunity to S. pneumoniae  Karen.
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
Protective Capacity of Memory CD8+ T Cells Is Dictated by Antigen Exposure History and Nature of the Infection  Jeffrey C. Nolz, John T. Harty  Immunity 
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Blimp-1 Transcription Factor Is Required for the Differentiation of Effector CD8+ T Cells and Memory Responses  Axel Kallies, Annie Xin, Gabrielle T.
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Francis Coffey, Boris Alabyev, Tim Manser  Immunity 
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
One Bug or Another: Promiscuous T Cells Form Lifelong Memory
Inflaming the CD8+ T Cell Response
CD44 Regulates Survival and Memory Development in Th1 Cells
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Susan M. Kaech, Scott Hemby, Ellen Kersh, Rafi Ahmed  Cell 
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (April 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 451-462 (June 2011) Superior Antimalarial Immunity after Vaccination with Late Liver Stage-Arresting Genetically Attenuated Parasites  Noah S. Butler, Nathan W. Schmidt, Ashley M. Vaughan, Ahmed S. Aly, Stefan H.I. Kappe, John T. Harty  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 451-462 (June 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.05.008 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 P. yoelii Late Liver Stage-Arresting fabb/f- GAP Vaccination of Outbred Swiss Webster mice Generates a Larger and Less Variable CD8 T Cell Response than Early Liver Stage-Arresting yoelii RAS or P. yoelii sap1- GAP Vaccination (A) Representative plots showing the percent of circulating CD8 T cells that exhibit the antigen-experienced CD8αloCD11ahi phenotype before and after immunization with 2 × 104 RAS, sap1-, or fabb/f- sporozoites. Mice were given a homologous boost of 2 × 104 sporozoites on day 91. (B) Cumulative data showing the percent of circulating CD8 T cells that are CD8αloCD11ahi. Data (mean ± SEM) are from 40–52 mice/group from two independent experiments. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (†p < 0.01; ¶p < 0.001). (C) The fraction of circulating CD8 T cells that exhibit the CD8αloCD11ahi phenotype from individual mice at the peak of the primary or secondary response. Symbols represent each individual mouse examined daily on days 5–9 after primary or booster immunization. The absolute peak CD8 T cell response for each individual mouse (which may have occurred on a different day because of genetic variability in outbred mice) was plotted. Numbers to the right indicate the fold difference between the highest and lowest responses within each group. See also Figure S1. Cell Host & Microbe 2011 9, 451-462DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2011.05.008) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Late Liver Stage-Arresting P. yoelii GAP-Vaccinated C57BL/6 Mice Have a Larger CD8 T Cell Response that Exhibits a More Effector Memory-like Phenotype Compared to RAS or Early Liver Stage-Arresting GAP Vaccination C57BL/6 mice were vaccinated with 2 × 104 RAS, sap1-, or fabb/f- sporozoites and were given a homologous boost (2 × 104 sporozoites) on day 111. (A) Fraction of mice that exhibited complete sterilizing immunity after single (1° memory) or prime-boost (2° memory) vaccination. Mice were challenged with 1000 virulent Py sporozoites and protection was evaluated as described in Experimental Procedures. Numbers refer to the number of mice protected/number of mice challenged in each group. Data are cumulative results from two challenges (RAS and fabb/f-) or a single challenge (sap1-). Results were analyzed by Fisher's exact test. p < 0.0001 for 2° memory RAS versus fabb/f-. p < 0.0001 for 2° memory sap1- versus fabb/f-. n.d., not determined. (B) Cumulative data showing the percent of circulating CD8 T cells that are CD8αloCD11ahi. Data (mean ± SEM) are from 10–40 mice/group from three independent experiments analyzed by one-way ANOVA (†p < 0.01; ¶p < 0.001). (C) Frequency of CD8αloCD11ahi T cells expressing CD27, CD43glyco, CD62L, or CD127. Data (mean ± SEM) are from three to nine pooled samples from two independent experiments analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test. n.s., not significant. (D) Frequency of CD8αloCD11ahi secondary memory T cells positive for the indicated marker. Data (mean ± SEM) are from three to six pooled samples from two independent experiments analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test. See also Figure S2. Cell Host & Microbe 2011 9, 451-462DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2011.05.008) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Vaccination with P. yoelii fabb/f- Sporozoites Diversifies the CD8 T Cell Response Compared to P. yoelii RAS Vaccination (A) One thousand Thy1.1+ CS280 TCR Tg CD8 T cells were transferred to naive Thy1.2+ BALB/c mice 1 day before vaccination with 2 × 104 RAS or fabb/f- sporozoites. Representative plots show the fraction of CD8 T cells that are CD8αloCD11ahi and the fraction of those that are Thy1.1+ CS280 TCR Tg CD8 T cells on day 6 after vaccination. (B and C) Cumulative data showing the number of CD8αloCD11ahi T cells (B) or Thy1.1+ CS280 TCR Tg CD8 T cells (C) per spleen. Data (mean ± SD) in (B) and (C) are from three mice per group analyzed by unpaired Student's t test. Data are representative of two independent experiments. (D) RAS- or fabb/f--specific memory CD8 T cells (Thy1.2+) or naive (Thy1.2+) CS280 TCR Tg CD8 T cells were CFSE labeled and transferred into separate naive Thy1.1+ BALB/c mice. Recipient mice were immunized with 2 × 104 RAS or fabb/f- sporozoites. Seven days later naive or memory CD8 T cells were assayed for dilution of CFSE. (E) Representative plots show the gating strategy. Numbers in histograms are the percent of RAS, fabb/f-, or CS280 TCR Tg CD8 T cells that remained undivided (CFSEhi) after vaccination with RAS or fabb/f- sporozoites. (F) Cumulative results showing percent of RAS-specific (left bars), fabb/f--specific memory CD8 T cells (middle bars), or CS280 TCR Tg CD8 T cells (right bars) that remained undivided (CFSEhi) after vaccination with RAS or fabb/f- sporozoites. Data (mean ± SD) are from three mice per group analyzed by unpaired Student's t test. Data are representative of three independent experiments. See also Figure S3. Cell Host & Microbe 2011 9, 451-462DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2011.05.008) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Vaccination of Mice with Late Liver Stage-Arresting fabb/f- Sporozoites Protects against Challenge with Blood-Stage Parasites (A and B) BALB/c mice were immunized with 1 × 105 fabb/f- sporozoites on three occasions at 2 week intervals. Naive and immunized mice were challenged 1 month later with 100 Py XNL (nonlethal, A) or 100 Py YM (lethal, B) blood-stage parasites. Parasitemia was measured daily. Mice in (B) were euthanized on day 8 when parasitemia reached >60%. Data (mean ± SD) in (A) and (B) are from five mice per group. See also Figure S4. Cell Host & Microbe 2011 9, 451-462DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2011.05.008) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Model for Enhanced Protective Immunity and Diversification of Antigenic Targets by Parasite-Specific CD8 T Cells Induced after Late Liver Stage-Arresting GAP Vaccination (A) Schematic depiction of liver-stage developmental progression by early (RAS or sap1-)- and late (fabb/f-)-arresting attenuated parasites in rodent malaria models. Early-arresting RAS and sap1- parasites fail to undergo extensive schizogony, exhibit smaller liver-stage forms (small parasite biomass), and have limited replication as indicated by few parasite nuclei relative to late liver stage-arresting fabb/f- parasites. Colors shown within early and late-arresting liver-stage forms depict both overlapping and nonoverlapping expression of parasite-derived antigenic targets. (B) Schematic depiction of changes in parasite gene expression as a function of liver-stage developmental progression. Yellow, blue, and red colors indicate expression of developmental stage-specific, parasite-derived antigenic targets, whereas gradients of green and violet colors represent putative antigens that are coordinately expressed during multiple developmental stages or the transition between stages. (C) Relative number and altered antigenic specificity of parasite-specific CD8 T cells induced after vaccination with early (RAS or sap1-)- versus late (fabb/f-)-arresting attenuated sporozoites. Colors in (C) correspond to the developmental stages in (B) and represent the relative breadth of antigens targeted by parasite-specific CD8 T cells after vaccination with early versus late liver stage-arresting sporozoites. Vaccination with late-arresting fabb/f- sporozoites induces a larger population of CD8 T cells whose antigenic specificity is only partially overlapping with CD8 T cells that arise in response to vaccination with early-arresting sporozoites. Cell Host & Microbe 2011 9, 451-462DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2011.05.008) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions