Target Station Facility Safety ASPECTs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Neutrinos from Stored Muons STORM Target Station Conceptual Design 15-April-2013 Kris Anderson Fermilab/Accelerator Division/Mechanical Support Department.
Advertisements

1 Activation problems S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN.
Target station and optimization studies for ESS Super Beam E. Baussan, M. Dracos, N. Vassilopoulos IPHC/CNRS.
Status of T2K Target 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High-Power Target Workshop 6-7 th November 2008 Mike Fitton RAL.
May 17-19, 2000 Catalina Island, CA Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting 1 Target Support Facility for a Solid Target Neutrino Production.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.
Nikolas Vassilopoulos, IPHC/CNRS, Strasbourg. Talk layout  Target Studies  Horn shape & SuperBeam Geometrical Optimization  Horn Thermo-mechanical.
NBI March 2002 The MiniBooNE Horn Ioanis Kourbanis For The MiniBooNE Collaboration.
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
Michael P. Andrews NuMI Shutdown & Facility Coordinator LBNE Project ESH Manager AD ESH Special Projects Coordinator.
1 JASMIN Activation Experiments (T-972/993/994) Yoshimi Kasugai on behalf of JASMIN Activation team JASMIN Activation team Y. Kasugai, K. Oishi, H. Matsumura,
Horn design for the CERN to Fréjus neutrino Super Beam Nikolas Vassilopoulos IPHC/CNRS.
EUROnu Target and Horn Studies Nikolaos Vassilopoulos/IPHC-CNRS on behalf of WP2 1ECFA Review PanelDarensbury, 02/05/2011.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
General RP guidelines for CENF CENF secondary beam study group H. Vincke07/05/
Safety issues for WP2 E. Baussan on behalf of WP2.
PSB dump: proposal of a new design EN – STI technical meeting on Booster dumps Friday 11 May 2012 BE Auditorium Prevessin Alba SARRIÓ MARTÍNEZ.
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.
EUROn Safety 13/06/2012M. Dracos1. Safety workshop 13/06/2012M. Dracos2 A first two days safety workshop has been organized at CERN last May (
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.
The CNGS Target Station By L.Bruno, S.Péraire, P.Sala SL/BT Targets & Dumps Section.
First radiological estimates for the HIRADMAT project H. Vincke and N. Conan 1.
Radiation Protection aspects for SHIP Doris Forkel-Wirth, Stefan Roesler, Helmut Vincke, Heinz Vincke CERN Radiation Protection Group 1 st SHIP workshop,
Nuclear Facilities Decommissioning & Design An introduction to SENAC activities JM. Dumas CEA Saclay, DSM/DAPNIA/SENAC, F Gif-sur-Yvette,
Estimates of Radiation Levels in the Main Linac Tunnel and Beam Dump Caverns for the CLIC Design Study Sophie Mallows, Thomas Otto SATIF 10, S.
Secondary beam production facility layout discussions SBLNF meeting 5 th Dec M. Calviani, A. Ferrari, R. Losito (EN/STI) H. Vincke (DGS/RP)
Considerations for an SPL-Beamdump Thomas Otto CERN in collaboration with Elias Lebbos, Vasilis Vlachoudis (CERN) and Ekaterina Kozlova (GSI) Partly supported.
NToF - Radiation Protection M. Brugger, P. Cennini, A. Ferrari, E. Lebbos, V. Vlachoudis CERN AB/ATB/EET.
WP2 progress on safety E. Baussan EUROnu CB Meeting Monday 10th & Tuesday 11th June 2011 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
Characterization of the nTOF Radioactive Waste M. Brugger, P. Cennini, A. Ferrari, V. Vlachoudis CERN AB/ATB/EET.
1 July 2004 Radiation Protection Issues 1 M.Brugger, D.Forkel-Wirth, S.Roesler, H.Vincke SC/RP Review of the LHC Collimation Project 30 June – 2 July 2004.
Target/Horn Station for ESS ν SB Nikolaos Vassilopoulos IPHC/CNRS.
Target/Horn Station for ESS ν SB Nikolaos Vassilopoulos IPHC/CNRS.
Ma zhongjian Ding yadong Wang qingbin Wu qingbiao Radiation Protection Group/IHEP.
Engineering studies for CN2PY secondary beam. LAGUNA-LBNO General Helsinki, 26/08/20141 F. Sanchez Galan (CERN) on behalf of the CERN Secondary.
Engineering studies for the Conceptual design of the LBNO Facility 1 F. Sanchez Galan (CERN) on behalf of the CERN Secondary Beam Working Group, With contributions.
COOLING & VENTILATION PLANTS M. Nonis – CERN EN Department / CV Group Annual Meeting of the FCC study – Rome 14 th April 2016.
1 Building Design Progress Dan Wilcox March 2012.
EURISOL DS Task meeting Orsay, 07 Janvier Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
CENF target station and secondary beam design M. Calviani (CERN) on behalf of the CENF Secondary Beam Working Group ICFA Neutrino European Meeting – 8-10.
CENF target station and secondary beam design M. Calviani (CERN) on behalf of the CENF Secondary Beam Working Group CENF/LBNE meeting – 5 th February.
Design for a 2 MW graphite target for a neutrino beam Jim Hylen Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop for Project X November 12-13, 2007.
HPT & M/D I WG DISCUSSION SLIDES PASI 2012 Hurh et al.
High Energy Dump of the Super Proton Synchrotron at CERN – Present and Future designs A. Perillo-Marcone (EN-STI) Contributions from several colleagues.
The target handling concept of the pbar- separator at FAIR M. Helmecke, V. Gostishchev, R. Hettinger, K. Knie 6th High Power Targetry Workshop Oxford.
Status of the FAIR pbar target: Target handling study (M. Helmecke)
Neutron double differential distributions, dose rates and specific activities from accelerator components irradiated by 50 – 400 MeV protons F. Cerutti.
LBNE Remote Handling Layout Options Adam Carroll Van Graves Tom Burgess FNAL/ORNL Videoconference March 11, 2010.
LBNE 2.4MW Absorber NBI 2014 Presented by Brian Hartsell Contributions by: Kris Anderson, Yury Eidelman, Jim Hylen, Nikolai Mokhov, Igor Rakhno, Salman.
EURISOL, TASK#5, Bucuresti, November 1 Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
The ESS Target Station Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
V. Raginel, D. Kleiven, D. Wollmann CERN TE-MPE 2HiRadMat Technical Board - 30 March 2016.
Irradiated T2K Ti alloy materials test plans
J. Bauer, V. Bharadwaj, H. Brogonia, A. Fasso, M. Kerimbaev, J. Liu, S
Heating and radiological
S. Roesler (on behalf of DGS-RP)
Tungsten Powder Test at HiRadMat Scientific Motivation
Studies on Energy Deposition and Radiation for the 4horn system
News and brief overview of Beamline plans for the next few months
M. Calviani, A. Ferrari (EN/STI), P. Sala (INFN)
First thermal calculations on the target made of aluminium
STUDIES TOWARDS TARGET-HORN INTEGRATION Institute of Applied Mechanics
Beam Dump outline work plan (UK perspective)
EUROnu Beam Window Studies Stress and Cooling Analysis
Superbeam Horn-Target Integration
Preliminary Study – Radiation induced activity in a SB Target
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
Preliminary Hazard Analysis of Bunker
RSFs & categorisation 20 May, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Target Station Facility Safety ASPECTs E. Baussan 12/06/2019

TARGET Station Facility - Global Working Plans Target Station Facility Features* *Inspired from ESS Target Station Report Efficiency Safety Reliability Target Station Facility Sub-Systems Target Station Target + integration Horn Four Horn Support Proton Beam extraction Power Supply System Target Station Power Supply Unit Cooling System Stripline Connection Fluid System Closed cooling Fluid (Helium gas, Water) Radioactive Effluents Confinement System Handling and Logistic Active Cell Casks Remote Handling E. Baussan 12/06/2019

TARGET Station Facility - Global Working Plans Target Station Facility Features* *Inspired from ESS Target Station Report Efficiency Safety Reliability Target Station Facility Sub-Systems Target Station Target + integration Horn Four Horn Support Proton Beam extraction Power Supply System Target Station Power Supply Unit Cooling System Stripline Connection Fluid System Closed cooling Fluid (Helium gas, Water) Radioactive Effluents Confinement System Handling and Logistic Active Cell Casks Remote Handling E. Baussan 12/06/2019

E. Baussan 12/06/2019

TARGET Station Facility - Global Working Plans ALARA Approach: Anticipate and reduce individual and collective exposition to radiations. Beam Direction Horn Power Supplies Concrete Shield Iron Shield External Shield Blocks Vessel Lid Dosimetry Objectives ALARA Approach Analyse Performances Building “rooms” Open Top geometry for the Target Station Room, Decay Tunnel, Beam Dump Hot Cell (Repair Target Station elements) Morgue (Store radioactive wastes) Horn Power Supply Room , Power supply outside of the main building ? => Energy Deposition and Dose Rate Estimation with FLUKA Simulation Feedback from previous experiments is crucial E. Baussan 12/06/2019

Safety : Preparation Phase  Design Study Non-radiological risks Electrical risk, cooling system, maintenance operation…. Earthquake Radiological risks Determine the radiological risks (external or internal contamination) for each part of the facility. Investigate biological protections with respect to the prompt dose and residual dose Environmental impact studies (Tritium, 22Na,..) E. Baussan 12/06/2019

Target Station Facility Building Structure: Proton Driver line Experimental Hall MW Target Station Decay Tunnel Beam Dump Maintenance Room Service Gallery Power supply Cooling system Air-Ventilation system Waste Area E. Baussan 12/06/2019

Target Station Facility MW Target Station : Focusing System Crane System Automated robot Mechanical structure for the for horn Dose Rate Monitoring System Residual Dose Rate Plateform Operation under helium Atmosphere flushing with air filter to measure radioactive pollution (dust, tritium …) Investigation of other radionucleides transport (environmental constraint) … E. Baussan 12/06/2019

Non Radiological Risks E. Baussan 12/06/2019

Target Station Four horns station: Solid Static target (Titanium) Use multiple 4 targets+ horns Beam frequency 56 Hz Cooling Power distribution due to Joule losses & secondary particles Energy balance, to maintain working temperature Flow rate Jet distribution along the outer conductor h correlation for jets’ geometry E. Baussan 12/06/2019

TARGET Station : Feed Back from other experiments Recommandations from others facilities: Cracks in welds Use flexible pipes to reduce stress and fatigue Water leaks due to galvanic corrosion => avoid trapped water and choose material carefully Use semi flexible conductor because of important magnetic force between stripline => can break cable Heat dissipation of the stripline Remote design for repairing/exchange Need Spares … Striplines plate with soft transition E. Baussan 12/06/2019

HORN INVESTIGATION FAILURES Causes Consequences Solution Action/Safety Cracks, weld junction Material faults In the weld junction Water leaks Current discontinuity Check quality of weld junctions Electrical shutdown Water flow shutdown Cracks in the aluminium all, pipes connections Peak stress too high Large displacement Crack growth Horn destruction Stress analysis of the pipes connections; Of the details connections wall High cyclic stress Fatigue cracks R&D studies Striplines/horn connection cracks Localised high cyclic Stress Corrosion Electrical discontinuity Change in the magnetic field R&D studies in the stripline horn/connection Striplines/connections Cracks initiation Stress corrosion Electric resistance increase E. Baussan 12/06/2019

Energy Deposition : Cooling Power (5MW/4MW) Beam dump : Graphite = 950/778 kW Iron = 195/229 kW Surr. concrete = 4/4 kW P tot = 4.2 / 3.4 MW Horns/Target gallery Iron = 613/437 kW Horn = 50/ 32 kW Target = 168/ 85 kW Decay tunnel Iron vessel = 424/390 kW Upstream iron = 670/610 kW Surr. concrete = 467/485 kW IPAC’17 Proceedings: E. Bouquerel et al, “Energy deposition and activation studies of the ESSnuSB Horn Station”, MOPIK029 E. Baussan 12/06/2019

Power Supply Width 16m length 20m PSU room This is a first estimation:  Length of strip-lines limited to 34,3M  Cost of PSU: X2,23 Euronu  Consumption of 580KWRMS power on 380VAC  335KW refreshed by water cooling, 136KW by air cooling (study chargers refreshed on water cooling) Dimensions 20X12M, hight of 3,2m, could be decrease to 2,7m Need a crane of 3 tons Width 16m PSU room length 20m E. Baussan 12/06/2019

Radiological Risks E. Baussan 12/06/2019

Target Station Facility Chemical composition of Material*: Target => Ti(100%) Horn => Anticorodal 110 alloy Al (95.5%), Si(1,3%), Mg(1,2%), Cr(0.2%), Mn(1%), Fe (0.5%), Zn(0.2%), Cu(0.1%) Decay Pipe => Steel P355NH Fe(96.8%), Mn(1.65%), Si(0.5%), Cr(0.3%), Ni(0.3%), C(0.2%) Tunnel => Concrete O(52.9%), Si(33.7%), Ca(4.4%), Al(3,49%), Na(1,6%), Fe(1.4%), K(1,3%), H(1%), Mn(0.2%), C(0.01%) Surrounding Environment => Molasse O(49%), Si(20%), Ca,(9.7%), Al(6.4%), C(5%), Fe(3.9%), Mg(3.2%), K(1%), Na(0.5%), Mn(0.1%) Four horn station layout *TO BE UPDATE FOR ESSNUSB E. Baussan 12/06/2019

RADIATION SIMULATION (FROM EURONU) Evolution of the target activity with cooling time: (Titanium density 66%) E. Baussan 12/06/2019

RADIATION SIMULATION (FROM EURONU) Evolution of the horn activity with cooling time: Radionucleides after 1 day (Z,A) Radioactivity after 1 day (Bq.cm-3) E. Baussan 12/06/2019

Radiation LAyout Simulation Parameters : Beam Power : 4MW Irradiation Times : 200 days One Horn : Geometry Updated Cooling times : 1d,1w,1m, 6m,1y, 10y Chemical composition of Material: Target => Titanium Horn => Anticorodal 110 alloy Al (95.5%), Si(1,3%), Mg(1,2%), Cr(0.2%), Mn(1%), Fe (0.5%), Zn(0.2%), Cu(0.1%) Decay Pipe => Steel P355NH Fe(96.8%), Mn(1.65%), Si(0.5%), Cr(0.3%), Ni(0.3%), C(0.2%) Tunnel => Concrete O(52.9%), Si(33.7%), Ca(4.4%), Al(3,49%), Na(1,6%), Fe(1.4%), K(1,3%), H(1%), Mn(0.2%), C(0.01%) Scoring Region : [-200,200]x[-200,200] [-500,500], cell dimension 20cm*20cm*20cm Radiation layout E. Baussan 12/06/2019

Dose Equivalent Rate (All Layout) After 1day After 1 week After 6m After 1y E. Baussan 12/06/2019

Dose Equivalent Rate contribution (cooling time 1d) Target Contribution Horn Contribution Vessel Contribution Tunnel Contribution E. Baussan 12/06/2019

Nuclear WASTE MANAGEMENT IAEA Waste Classification: HLW High Level Wastes Highly Radioactive liquid Heat Generating (>2kw/m3) LILW Low and Intermediate Wastes LL Long Lived, ‘Half-life > 30 years Long lived alpha emitters >400Bq/g average >4000Bq/g individual package SL Short Lived Half-life <30 years EW Exempted Wastes Clearance Levels: Clearance Index : Classification of Radioactive Waste – Safety Series No 111-G-1.1 E. Baussan 12/06/2019

concrete concrete Environmental impact Activation in molasse molasse @ CERN concrete concrete of all the radionuclide's created 22 Na and tritium could represent a hazard by contaminating the ground water. Limits in activity after 1y=200days of beam: E. Baussan 12/06/2019

Outline Adapt Study with ESSnSB Parameters on going Feedback from other experiments crucial !!! Regular meetings with ESS people in charge of the safety is necessary Safety Meeting between Safety people has been organized at CERN during EUROnu and should be renewed E. Baussan 12/06/2019