Audit of Demand Management Strategies in York

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Whats wrong with a piece of paper? The Electronic Transfer of Care Princess of Wales Hospital Rowena Lewis.
Advertisements

1 Developments and progress Dr Martin Freeman GP Clinical Lead for Dementia Services.
ICGP Professional Competence System How to complete the cycle.
Clinical Audit How to make it work Clinical Audit Department Last revised July 2009.
Background The 2 week wait referral system was designed to expedite the referral of patients, suspected to have cancer, from Primary to Secondary care.
Saleah Micci/Satya Bobba IT & SYSTEMS IUCD/IUS & CONTRACEPTIVE IMPLANT LCS 2015/16.
Qualifications Portal Guide Personal Development and Employability Qualification.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
TITLE OF AUDIT Author Date of presentation. Background  Why did you do the audit? eg. high risk / high cost / frequent procedure? Concern that best practice.
Monitoring Process for Pregnancy Category D or X Medications in Women of Childbearing Age Jody L. Lounsbery, PharmD, BCPS, Barbara Leone, MD University.
Support for Medicines Optimisation. Medicines Optimisation Importance of Medicines Optimisation Potential benefits of optimising medicines Existing investments.
Baseline The baseline at July Previously there was a lack of consistency for: Pathways into specialist clinics; Policies, procedures and guidelines.
Private and confidential Community Pharmacy Future Four-or-more medicines support service Update on progress and next steps Approved18 th June 2012 This.
Dr N Mudondo (FY2) Mr C Chatzdimitriou (SpR Breast Surgery) Mr M Haider (SpR Breast Surgery)
TITLE OF AUDIT Author Date of presentation. Background Why did you do the audit? e.g. high risk / high cost / frequent procedure? Concern that best practice.
KY Employee Benefits Module
COMMUNITY PHARMACY WORKBOOK PUBLIC HEALTH DORSET
Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success
The optimisation of rosters to meet public demand
FIT Programme (Faecal Immunohistochemical Test)
Data Quality Lyndsay Pendegrass IST Peter Hyland
Refer to Beds & Herts Breast Cancer Family History Screening service
2015/16 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey
Fracture Liaison Service Database
Contraception in the over 40’s
Core LIMS Training: Project Management
How did the audit come about?
Project Management: Messages
Welcome! To the ETS – Create Client Account & Maintenance
Choice – 6 Steps, 6 Actions, 6 Weeks
Please review these important Webinar Etiquette guidelines
Literature review Methods
Methotrexate in Psoriasis Shared Care Guidelines
HOW TO ENTER BASELINE DATA
Patient Access Forgotten user ID
DATABASE SEARCH & REVIEW GETTING STARTED GUIDE FOR EMIS WEB USERS
Medicines Optimisation Update
Nursing Home Dietetics Service update
Module 4: Role Playing and Case Discussions
Evaluating and improving a clinical practice guideline in the Western Cape, South Africa AIM STATEMENT: To design and use an appropriate evaluation tool.
Contraception in the over 40’s
Jeffrey A. Kuller, MD; Sean C. Blackwell, MD
E-Referral Service Paper switch off communication toolkit Version 1
Reading Research Papers-A Basic Guide to Critical Analysis
Colin Sloane - Quality Improvement Lead Yorkshire and the Humber
Gynaecology Primary Care Pathways
BOWEL CANCER SCREENING 11/7/18
PPG Open Meeting 4th June 2018.
Refer to Beds & Herts Breast Cancer Family History Screening service
HOW TO ENTER BASELINE DATA
Neuro Oncology Therapy Update
GP Education Meeting September 2018
eRD- The Bigger Picture
E-Referral Service Paper switch off communication toolkit Version 1
Recruitment Video Storyboard Template
Participant Retention
Using the Software ProtoMED Practice Management and Electronic Medical Records software enables users to … View schedules View patient information View.
Surrey Medical Centre PHO and Facilitator: Procare Waiana Collier
Managing Multi-source Feedback
Quality Improvement Projects
COMMUNITY PHARMACY WORKBOOK 2019 PUBLIC HEALTH DORSET
The National Cervical Screening Programme
Introduce myself & around table
An Audit of Nutritional Trace Element Requesting Within York Teaching Hospitals Roger Bramley.
Consultant Clinical Biochemist
PPG Meeting on general practice is changing
Squamous cell carcinoma pathway update
Principal recommendations
Presentation transcript:

Audit of Demand Management Strategies in York FSH requesting and NG 23 Audit of Demand Management Strategies in York

Introduction NICE Guideline 23 on Menopause: Diagnosis and Management was published in 2015 Clear recommendations were made about when to use FSH to assist in diagnosis of menopause. FSH should not be used in patients >45 years FSH should not be used in patient on high dose progesterone or combined oestrogen and progesterone contraception Elevated FSH on two samples 4-6 weeks apart in patients <40yrs may be suggestive of premature ovarian failure Stopping the use of FSH hormone testing in patients >45yrs was recognised as a challenge in implementing the guidelines It was also recognised as a potential cost saving NICE made some recommendations for what labs and CCG should do

The NICE recommendations included: GP education: GP/Laboratory liaison group, newsletter Electronic requesting prompt to discourage requesting Refer GPs to NICE Clinical Knowledge Summary on Menopause Costing template to estimate savings that can be made Clinical audit to monitor and improve

NICE Clinical Knowledge Summary

Local audit project in York 3 months of FSH requests were extracted from the LIMS system Assessed against criteria derived from the NICE guideline Changes implemented: (GP education leaflet, comments on reports, ICE requesting prompt) Re-audit at 6 months and 12 months post change: Has there been an improvement Is it continuous and/or sustained Are further changes/developments required

Baseline data – summary of 3 months FSH requests  Patient age Number of requests Percentage <45yrs 1092 57% >45yrs 815 43% 50 (5%) of FSH requests in patients >45yrs mentioned contraceptive use 8/18 (44%) women with results suggestive of POF had FSH repeat 22% 25% 17% 36%

GP information sheet GP information leaflet was produced Re-stated the NICE guidelines but with a focus on FSH. Added to Laboratory Medicine website Passed to local CCG communication team to distribute

Interpretative coded comment on reports New coded interpretative comments were created for reports. Added automatically to all FSH results in patients over the age of 45yrs “Women aged >45yrs should not have FSH requested to diagnose menopause, NICE guideline NG23” Added by Duty Biochemist when appropriate during clinical authorisation “FSH measurement should not be used to diagnose menopause in patients on hormone contraception, NICE guideline NG23” “Results may suggest premature ovarian failure consider repeat in 4-6 weeks to confirm”

Electronic requesting prompt in ICE Order Comms Locally we use ICE for GP order comms requesting Rule in ICE can be very simple or complicated…….. Converting tests to a “picklist” relating to reason for order is possible We went for the simplest option of a “Help” rule This was just a “pop-up” box that appeared every time an order for FSH was place which stated: “Please note FSH testing is not recommended in patients >45yrs to diagnose menopause (See NICE Guideline NG23)”

Re-audit data at 6 months and 12 months Requests in patients <45yrs have fallen slightly (1092 to 921) Requests in patients >45yrs fell initially (815 to 539) Then stabilised at 12 months post change (491 – 35% of total FSH) 6/9 (67%) women with results suggestive of POF had FSH repeat (12 months post) 50 (11%) of requests in patients >45yrs mentioned contraceptive (12 months post)

Conclusions A combination of education (coded comments, GP leaflet) and electronic requesting prompts can lead to more appropriate FSH testing However this benefit was not ongoing – plateau effect! Demand optimisation becoming more important (Aligned Incentive Contracts) Are all GPs convinced by the guidelines? Reassurance (false) of having FSH results in patients >45yrs? Continuous improvement to the processes and sustained educational efforts may be required in order to see further benefit Do we now need to take a targeted approach aimed at certain GPs and GP surgeries?

Next steps…… Make a new version of the GP information sheet (Improve clarity and highlight the main messages) Re-work the electronic prompt on ICE to improve/refine (see next slide) Things we haven’t done yet: Cost implications (£6.40 per test x 328 x 4 = ~£8500 saving in 1 year). Potential for further savings of similar magnitude? Hyperlink to NICE Clinical Knowledge Summary (on ICE, on reports) GP/Pathology user group. We haven’t got one and are jealous of others who have this kind of forum!

Second version of GP information sheet We are now adding a hyperlink to the Laboratory Medicine website to FSH results in patients over the age of 45yrs May try to target this leaflet at certain GPs or GP surgeries in future…….

Updated ICE prompt – more selective Now using a “Question” rule in ICE which only triggers when a request for FSH is made in a female patient >45yrs old. The question asks: “Is this a request to aid in diagnosis of menopause in a patient >45yrs old?” If they say “Yes” – the request is cancelled and they get the following message: “Test not required see NICE Guideline NG23” If they say “No” the request proceeds……

Latest data…… 3 months immediately after last round of changes 843 requests in patients <45yrs (67%) 403 requests in patients >45yrs (32%) This represents a further (very slight) fall in FSH requests in patients >45years. Still plenty of room for improvement……..

The End Contact details: Daniel Turnock (daniel.turnock@york.nhs.uk) 01904 721847 / 01904 726366