American Simmental Association

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

DNA Testing and Marker Assisted Selection R. Mark Thallman U.S. Meat Animal Research Center Clay Center, NE.

Advertisements

Phenotypes for training and validation of genome wide selection methods K G DoddsAgResearch, Invermay B AuvrayAgResearch, Invermay P R AmerAbacusBio, Dunedin.

Understanding Conventional and Genomic EPDs

Professor N. Nelson Blue Mtn. Agriculture College.

Coming soon to a genetics lab near you! NBCEC Beef Genetic Workshop Clay Center, NE March 27, 2004 Marker adjusted EPDs.

West Virginia University Extension Service Genetics in Beef Cattle Wayne R. Wagner.

Matt Spangler University of Nebraska- Lincoln DEVELOPMENT OF GENOMIC EPD: EXPANDING TO MULTIPLE BREEDS IN MULTIPLE WAYS.

Multiple Breed Evaluation Can MBE enhance crossbreeding? John Pollak Cornell University Director, NBCEC.

John Genho NBCEC Brown Bagger Series

Develop 50K prediction equation suitable for estimation of Molecular Breeding Values (MBV) for Limousin and LimFlex (hybrid) animals Use 50K imputed genotypes.

Carcass EPD: Where are we, and where are we going? Dan W. Moser Dept. of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University.

BEEF GENETICS NEXT What color are Shorthorns? n A. White n B. Red n C. Roan n D. All the above A B C D NEXT.

Training, Validation, and Target Populations Training, Validation, and Target Populations Mark Thallman, Kristina Weber, Larry Kuehn, Warren Snelling,

Beef Relationships using 50K Chip Information L.A. Kuehn, J.W. Keele, G.L. Bennett, T.G. McDaneld, T.P.L. Smith, W.M. Snelling, T.S. Sonstegard, and R.M.

Breeds of Beef Cattle Developed by:

Matt Spangler Beef Genetics Specialist University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Van Eenennaam 11/17/2010 Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology.

F25 Breeds of Beef Cattle Some of the pictures and text contained in this material have copyright restrictions limiting their use. Use of this information.

Designing Genetics and Selection for Seedstock Breeders, Commercial Cattlemen and Show Ring Enthusiasts ASA Fall Focus 2015: Confidence Builds Success.

WHAT ARE EPD’S?. What is an EPD? E-xpected P-rogeny D-ifference A measure of the degree of difference between the progeny of the bull and the progeny.

Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How Do I Decide What Traits are Important? Carcass/Ultrasound EPDs Bob Weaber GRA-Cornell.

Animal Genetics. Natural Selection n an organisms ability to SURVIVE and pass on its GENETIC information to its offspring.

1 Multi-Breed Evaluation For Growth Traits J. Keith Bertrand University of Georgia, Athens.

MBE, Update John Pollak Cornell University. Objectives Build a national pedigree file and database To achieve a unified national evaluation To migrate.

Multi-breed Evaluation J. Keith Bertrand University of Georgia, Athens.

Genomics. Finding True Genetic Merit 2 Dam EPD Sire EPD Pedigree Estimate EPD TRUE Progeny Difference Mendelian Sampling Effect Adapted from Dr. Bob Weaber.

NBCEC BROWN BAGGER OCTOBER 8, 2014 Jack Ward AHA, Director of Breed Improvement.

The Many Measures of Accuracy: How Are They Related? Matt Spangler, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

ACROSS BREED EPD TABLES FOR THE YEAR 2006 ADJUSTED TO THE BIRTH YEAR OF 2004 L. Dale Van Vleck and Larry V. Cundiff MARC-ARS-USDA Lincoln and Clay Center,

Selection of Breeding Program An S 426 Fall 2007.

Bob Weaber, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Cow-Calf Extension Specialist Kansas State University

Genetic Evaluation of Carcass Data Using Age, Weight, Fat, or Marbling Endpoints 2003 BIF Selection Decisions Committee May 29, 2003 Janice M. Rumph Montana.

Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.

Nuts and Bolts of Genetic Improvement Genetic Model Predicting Genetic Levels Increase Commercial Profitability Lauren Hyde Jackie Atkins Wade Shafer Fall.

Session 4 – Part 1 Status update on genomically enhanced genetic evaluation by breeds Dr. Matt Spangler, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

NBCEC Brown Bagger: Economic Selection Index Wade Shafer American Simmental Association.

How Does Additional Information Impact Accuracy? Dan W. Moser Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan

Multibreed Genomic Evaluation Using Purebred Dairy Cattle K. M. Olson* 1 and P. M. VanRaden 2 1 Department of Dairy Science Virginia Polytechnic and State.

Feed Efficiency Genetic Projects. Terms Gain/Feed = Feed Efficiency FE Feed/Gain = Feed Conversion FC: -FE Residual Feed Intake RFI Net Feed Intake NFI:-RFI.

Whole genome selection and the 2000 bull project at USMARC Larry Kuehn Research Geneticist.

Jack Ward American Hereford Association October 31, 2012.

Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal 1. 2 Expected Progeny Differences Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal Unit 7 – Lesson 7.2 Predicting.

Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle Dr. Fred Rayfield Livestock Specialist Georgia Agricultural Education To accompany lesson.

Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.

Across Breed EPD and multi-breed genetic evaluation developments

AAA Reproductive Database

Genetics – Part 2 Quantitative Traits Individual Performance BW

Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle

Using EPDs in Selection

A Stroll Down Genetic Improvement Lane…

Beef Breed Identification

DNA Technology.

Keith Vander Velde UW Extension

Update on Multi-Breed Genetic Evaluation

WHAT ARE EPD’s?.

Have Phenotypic Trends for Carcass Traits Followed Genetic Trends?

Breeds of Beef Cattle and Dairy Cattle Country of Origin Special thanks to Oklahoma State University Animal Science Dept. For more information visit:

Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement

American Simmental Association’s Economic Selection Indexes

Beef Breeds Agriculture Science I Mrs. Jedlicka 12/8/2018.

Livestock Breeds.

Using EPDs in Selection

Teat and Udder Score EPDs

Common Beef Cattle Breeds

Update on Structure EPD Development R. L. Weaber, J. Bormann, N

Breeds of Beef.

Expected Progeny Difference EPD

Breeding & Genetics.

Wading through the confusion of EPDs and genomics

Presentation transcript:

American Simmental Association Genomic Update Wade Shafer American Simmental Association

Initial ASA training… 2800 Genotypes Trait Corr Progeny CE .45 BW .65 WW .52 YW Mlk .35 MCE .32 Stay .58 Sh Force .53 Mrb .63 REA .59 BF .28 Progeny 5 6 4 3 9 1 2800 Genotypes U Mrb U REA U BF 10 8 1

Using the information. . . MVB Pedigrees Phenotypes Implemented Spring 2012 MVB Pedigrees Phenotypes Multi-breed International Cattle Evaluation EPD Acc

Multi Breed International Cattle Evaluation. . . 15,000,000+ animals 350,000+ / year

Results of Collaboration . . . Correlations Phenotypes/Pedigrees: 15,000,000+ animals Trait ASA Old ASA Coll CE .45 BW .65 .67 WW .52 .63 YW .64 Mlk .35 .47 MCE .32 Stay .58 .77 Sh Force .53 Mrb .74 REA .59 BF .28 .27 >= Genotypes: Source Genotypes ASA 5240 NBCEC (AN) 2164 RAAA 1604 AGA 999 AMAA 571 CGA 85

Results of Collaboration . . . Progeny Equivalents Phenotypes/Pedigrees: 15,000,000+ animals Trait ASA Old ASA Coll CE 5 BW 6 7 WW 4 8 YW 3 9 Mlk MCE Stay 28 Sh Force Mrb REA BF 1 >= Genotypes: Source Genotypes ASA 5240 NBCEC (AN) 2164 RAAA 1604 AGA 999 AMAA 571 CGA 85 U Mrb 10 18 U REA 4 U BF 1

Results of Collaboration . . . Progeny Equivalents Phenotypes/Pedigrees: 15,000,000+ animals Trait ASA Only ASA Coll CE 5 BW 6 7 WW 8 YW 9 Mlk MCE 3 Stay 28 Sh Force Mrb 4 REA BF 1 >= Genotypes: Source Genotypes ASA 5240 NBCEC (AN) 2164 RAAA 1604 AGA 999 AMAA 571 CGA 85 U Mrb 12 18 U REA 4 U BF 1

Collaboration. . . Breed Genotypes Simmental 24,188 Angus 16,350 Gelbvieh 4,683 Limousin 4,446 Red Angus 4,158 Main Anjou 1,437 Shorthorn 854 Total 56,116

Using the information. . . MVB Pedigrees Phenotypes Implemented Spring 2014 MVB Pedigrees Phenotypes Multi-breed International Cattle Evaluation EPD Acc

Using the information. . . DNA Pedigrees Phenotypes Targeting Spring 2016 Pedigrees Phenotypes Multi-breed International Cattle Evaluation EPD Acc

Using the information. . . Dorian Garrick Bruce Golden Wringing everything possible out of available information… Building the next generation of National Cattle Evaluation software

Using the information. . . Existing NCE Software: Not well suited for DNA incorporation Can produce dubious accuracy estimates Not written to optimize modern hardware configurations