Nameplate Adjustments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Source Review NSR Reforms Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality Council Presented by Matt Paque, Attorney, ODEQ - AQD April 20,
Advertisements

Diesel Engine Major Monitors l Fuel System l Misfire l EGR System l Boost Pressure Control System California Environmental Protection Agency AIR RESOURCES.
Prospective new EPA rules on existing source greenhouse gas emissions National Lieutenant Governors Association Oklahoma City, OK July 19, 2013 Eugene.
The quantification test results indicate that St. Stephen produces an average of 31 ft 3 or 96lb. of target recoverable waste per week. Most of the waste.
Vance County Water District Overview and Update Jordan McMillen Director Vance County Planning and Development Department 156 Church St. Suite 3 Henderson,
Reducing Costly Phantom SF6 Emissions Through Tracking Ted Atwood (President & Owner), Polar Technology LLC
Effective Energy Management. Keys Save energy Lower utility operating costs Maintain or improve operations Support corporate goals.
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
Public Workshop Proposed Modifications to the Clean Fuels Regulations Regarding Clean Fuel Outlets March 18, 1999 California Environmental Protection Agency.
Thomas K. Fidler Deputy Secretary for Waste, Air and Radiation Management Department of Environmental Protection Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Proposed.
ACTION PROPOSAL FOR FLYWHEEL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY Enhance future grid reliability, interoperability, & extreme event protection In 20 years, the flywheel.
American Legislative Exchange Council America’s Clean Air Success Story and the Implications of Overregulation November 28, 2012 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E.,
WWLC Standard Operating Procedures Presented by Frank Hall, Laboratory Certification Coordinator.
Second Conference on Legal Challenges and Opportunities of Mexico’s Increased Global Interaction American Bar Association Los Cabos, Mexico, November 2013.
Methodology for Energy Savings claim for Incentive Programs and Codes & Standards(C&S) accounting Presented by: Armen Saiyan P.E. For the California Technical.
The Outdoor Power Equipment Institute 341 South Patrick Street Alexandria, VA FAX Outdoor Power Equipment.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Performance Targets for the Customer Interconnection Process January, 2008.
MERCURY POLICIES: A VIEW FROM THE ELECTRIC POWER SECTOR Michael T. Rossler Indiana Energy Conference September 16, 2004.
Sustainability Issues
California Air Resources Board Workshop November 3, th Street, Room 202 1:30 - 3:30 p.m. Aboveground Storage Tank Enhanced Vapor Recovery.
Proposed Amendments to Enhanced Vapor Recovery Regulations November 18, 2004 Monitoring and Laboratory Division Air Resources Board California Environmental.
The Annual Analysis of Tax Bill Changes. Prepared by the Bedford Board of Assessors December 30, 2013.
Inspection Directions: An EMS Approach to Inspecting for Section 608 and 609 Compliance.
EPA’s Proposed Clean Power Plan House Committee on Natural Resources and Environment February 12, 2015 Tegan B. Treadaway Assistant Secretary Office of.
Environmental Solutions for a Greener Planet Master Distributor for IHS.
MassDEP Underground Storage Tank Program Program Requirements for Owners and Operators Winter 2015 Workshops 1.
American Public Power Association Pre-Rally Workshop February 28, 2006 Washington, D.C. Climate Change: Making Community-Based Decisions in a Carbon Constrained.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
Indiana Energy Conference EPA Clean Power Plan—111(d) November 13, 2014 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, Commissioner IN Department of Environmental Management.
Evaluation of Wood Smoke Quantification and Attribution RTF PAC October 17, 2014.
Environmental Protection Agency 1 The High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) Demonstration and Status National Environmental Partnership Summit.
Emission source sampling and monitoring Topic 6 Ms Sherina Kamal May
Regulatory Platforms for CO2 trading regulation Last Week Discussion of Agencies, Purpose and How Operate that may be in charge of Carbon Trading at the.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
POSITIVE ENERGY TOGETHER ® Industry Trends Discussion MEC Conference San Antonio Texas, October 19 th, 2009 Jesse B. Langston.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Nonattainment New Source Review (NA NSR) Program Raj Rao US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards ,
1 Draft Landfill Methane Control Measure California Air Resources Board April 22, 2008.
1 Proposed Regulation for Reducing Sulfur Hexafluoride Emissions from Gas Insulated Switchgear California Air Resources Board February 25, 2010.
Public Workshop: California Regulations and Test Procedures for Sand Cars October 24, 2006 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency.
Final Omitted Rulemakings Repeals: Employer Trip Reduction; Portable Fuel Container Requirements; and St. Joe Resources Company Emission Limits Environmental.
Multi-Use Application Use Case #3: Optimized Pricing and Resource Allocation (OPRA) Project. May 3, 2016.
Regional Implications of the Clean Power Plan Lanny Nickell Midwest Energy Policy Conference October 6 th,
SMECO Demand Response filing
Idaho Transportation Department (ITD)
The Florida Energy and Climate Commission (FECC)
Capital Budgeting 2 2.
EPA Residential Wood Smoke Programs
Natural Gas: Market Trends in Supply and Consumption
NSPS Rulemakings for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
EPA’S New Source Performance Standard (NSPS)
C h a p t e r 3 EXTERNALITIES AND GOVERNMENT POLICY
Update on the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program: Electrical Transmission and Distribution Equipment Stephanie N. Bogle, PhD U.S. Environmental Protection.
Insulating Gas Management Program
Nameplate Adjustments
NSPS Rulemakings for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
DILO Company Inc. Zero Emissions. No Substitutes. Corey Ratza Cell#:
Monitoring, Reporting, and Reducing SF6 Emissions from the U. S
SF6 Management Challenges Version 2016 & Beyond
Methane Emission Standards for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities
Do’s and Don'ts of SF6Gas Handling
Field Technical SERVICES
Best Practices for SF6 Leak Reduction At Consolidated Edison Co. Of NY
Outsourcing development
SF6 Reporting Challenges
Voluntary SF6 Emission Reduction Partnership: Recent Achievements and Planned Activities Volha Roshchanka 14 November, 2018.
Canada’s Regulatory Framework for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Voluntary SF6 Emission Reduction Partnership: Program Update
g3 Alternative Gas Solutions
Presentation transcript:

Nameplate Adjustments SF6 Emission Reporting Challenges Nameplate Backgound State and Federal Regulations Reporting Challenges Solution - Nameplate Adjustment November 15, 2017 Jonathan Stewart Electric Transmission and Distribution SF6 Coalition National Electrical Manufacturers Association

Who We Are Electric Transmission and Distribution SF6 Coalition OEMs, Gas Producers and Distributors, Gas Management Firms Regulator Participation Open for Electric Utilities to Join National Electrical Manfuacturers Association 350 Members; American Manufacturers in the Electrical Sector Standards Development Organization Efficiency, Safety, Interoperability, Environmental Awareness and Market Enhancement Chapter Title

Nameplate Background Primarily Logistical Purpose (not safety) HISTORY AND CONTEXT Primarily Logistical Purpose (not safety) Approximate mass once filled to proper density Calculated by OEM: Volume (ft3) / Density = Mass (lbs) Accurate Enough for Logistics is Not Precise Enough for Emissions Tracking/Reporting Chaptier Title

Regulations US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Owners And Operators Of Electric Power Transmission and Distribution Equipment With a Total Nameplate Capacity Exceeding 17,820 lbs Any Equipment Insulated with SF6 Emissions = (Decrease in SF6 Inventory) + (Acquisitions of SF6) – (Disbursements of SF6) – (Net Increase in the Nameplate Capacity of Equipment) CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD Same Threshold and Calculation Requires Reporting of Emissions in Relation to Total Nameplate Capacity Under Management (Emission Rate) Reduction Target = 1% Emission Rate by 2020 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Same Calculation Threshold: Emission Rate or lbs of SF6 Emitted Requires Reporting of Emissions in Relation to Total Nameplate Capacity Under Management (Emission Rate) Reduction Target = 1% Emission Rate by 2020 Chaptier Title

Reporting Challenges DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN NAMEPLATE AND ACTUAL MASS GIE Filled to Improper Density Intentional overfill Other field errors GIE Filled to Proper Density Imprecise nameplates Chapter Title

Reporting Challenges WHY ARE NAMEPLATES OFTEN IMPRECISE? Changes in Equipment Design Acceptable Manufacturing Tolerances Density = mass/volume GIE Series A, Model 1: 0.38 lbs./ft3 = 526.3 lbs/200 ft3 GIE Series A, Model 2: 0.38 lbs./ft3 = 513 lbs/195 ft3 Frequency: Informal Data Suggests Approx. 80% Regulators are Aware “It will all come out in the wash“ Enforcement Discretion Chaptier Title

Reporting Challenges Installation Decommissioning Change in Inventory WHEN ARE REPORTING ENTITIES IMPACTED? Installation Decommissioning Change in Inventory When Gas is Distributed Chaptier Title

EXPOSURE – NET INCREASE IN NAMEPLATE CAPACITY Solution – Nameplate Adjustment EXPOSURE – NET INCREASE IN NAMEPLATE CAPACITY NEW GIE New Equipment NC 500 Acquisition Disbursement Fill to Proper Density 510 Inventory Decrease 10 (10) + (500) – (0) – (500) = 10 RETIRED GIE Retired Equipment NC 500 Acquisition Disbursement 490 Fill to Proper Density Inventory Decrease (0) + (0) – (490) – (-500) = 10 Emissions = (Decrease in SF6 Inventory) + (Acquisitions of SF6) – (Disbursements of SF6) – (Net Increase in the Nameplate Capacity of Equipment) Chapter Title

Solution – Nameplate Adjustment EXPOSURE – INVENTORY AND DISTRIBUTION Status January 1 Status December 31 GIE: Nameplate 100 lbs (charge 100 lbs) (Assumption: improper density) GIE: Nameplate 100 lbs (charge 105 lbs) (Assumption: proper density) Cylinder A: Empty Cylinder A: 100 lbs Cylinder B: 105 lbs Cylinder B: Empty Current Emission Calculation Method: (5) + (0) – (0) – (0) = 5 lbs Emissions = (Decrease in SF6 Inventory) + (Acquisitions of SF6) – (Disbursements of SF6) – (Net Increase in the Nameplate Capacity of Equipment) Chapter Title

Solution – Nameplate Adjustment PROCESS TO IDENTIFY PRECISE NAMEPLATE Ascertain Level of Gas Purity Record Initial System Pressure If Necessary, Bring Equipment to Proper Density Recover SF6 to blank-off of <3.5 Torr (5-min Hold) Mass of SF6 Removed = Precise Nameplate Adjust for Level of Purity Chapter Title

Solution – Nameplate Adjustment UTILITIES SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO ADJUST THE NAMEPLATE TO THE PRECISE FIGURE NEW GIE New Equipment NC 500 Acquisition Disbursement Fill to Proper Density 510 Inventory Decrease 10 (10) + (500) – (0) – (500) = 10 (10) + (500) – (0) – (510) = 0 RETIRED GIE Retired Equipment NC 500 Acquisition Disbursement 490 Fill to Proper Density Inventory Decrease (0) + (0) – (490) – (-500) = 10 (0) + (0) – (490) – (-490) = 0 Emissions = (Decrease in SF6 Inventory) + (Acquisitions of SF6) – (Disbursements of SF6) – (Net Increase in the [adjusted] Nameplate Capacity of Equipment) Chapter Title

Solution – Nameplate Adjustment UTILITIES SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO ADJUST THE NAMEPLATE TO THE PRECISE FIGURE Status January 1 Status December 31 GIE: Nameplate 100 lbs (charge 100 lbs) (Assumption: improper density) GIE: Nameplate 100 lbs (charge 105 lbs) (Assumption: proper density) Cylinder A: Empty Cylinder A: 100 lbs Cylinder B: 105 lbs Cylinder B: Empty Current Emission Calculation Method: (5) + (0) – (0) – (0) = 5 lbs Proposed Emission Calculation Method: (5) + (0) – (0) – (5) = 0 lbs Emissions = (Decrease in SF6 Inventory) + (Acquisitions of SF6) – (Disbursements of SF6) – (Net Increase in the Nameplate Capacity of Equipment) Chapter Title

Solution – Nameplate Adjustment REGULATORY RELIEF – UNIFIED SOLUTION California: Rule Change Retroactive reports Specified time period Credit/offset for alternatives Phase-out Massachusetts: ?? US EPA: Open to Discussion Chapter Title

Solution – Nameplate Adjustment POTENTIAL DOWNSIDE Hidden Emissions: Imprecise Nameplate and Real Emission, but the Emission is Less than the Mass-Nameplate Delta Negative Emissions: Nameplate is Lower than Actual Mass Even Though Equipment is Filled to Proper Density Can We Play Both Sides of the Ball? Chaptier Title

Summary Nameplate Value Never Intended to be Used for Emissions Reporting Nameplates Are Accurate for Logistics but Not Precise for Reporting Utilites Can Empirically Demonstrate What the Precise Nameplate Value is Utilites Should be Able to Use the Precise Figure for Reporting Chaptier Title

Nameplate Adjustments SF6 Emissions Reporting Challenges Presentation By: Jonathan Stewart Created On: October 25, 2017 National Electrical Manufacturers Association Electric Transmission & Distribution SF6 Coalition http://www.nema.org/Products/Pages/The-Electric-Transmission-and-Distribution-SF6- Coalition.aspx 1300 N 17th St Suite 900 Rosslyn, VA 22209 Contact information: jonathan.stewart@nema.org (703-841-3245)