Current Education Legislation Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April 15, Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.
Advertisements

Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP. This presentation is a product of the Maryland State Department of Education 03/03/10 American Recovery and Reinvestment.
2011 Bridge to Excellence Master Plan Annual Update Review Division of Student, Family, and School Support Office of Finance Division of Academic Reform.
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Common Core State Standards Initiative An Initiative of the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governors Association Center for Best.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
Key questions around the Common Core and revised Standards.
Illinois P-20 Council January 27, ISBE MISSION STATEMENT The Illinois State Board of Education will provide leadership, assistance, resources.
Brandywine School District Race to the Top Scope of Work Overview Presentation.
Analysis and Next Steps. Summary Nevada’s final score of ranks 24 out of the 36 states that applied Among the ten grant recipients,
Nebraska Department of Education Focus on Effective Instruction and Student Learning Revised Standards and NeSA Nebraska’s P-16 Effort Federal Agenda Fiscal.
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
1 Race to the Top: Louisiana’s Blueprint for Education Reform … More Than an Application 1 …BECAUSE OUR CHILDREN CAN’T WAIT.
1 Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) Update Holiday Inn Albany, New York October 15, 2010.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
The Common Core: Moving Ohio Forward Stan W. Heffner Superintendent of Public Instruction February 15, 2012.
Leveraging Race to the Top to Maximize the Use of Data To Ensure College & Career Readiness Aimee R. Guidera Achieve ADP September 10, 2009.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
FY RACE TO THE TOP
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evolving Oregon Educational Policy Courtesy of Pat Burk, Ph.D. Department of Educational.
The Hoosier State – Leading the Nation’s Comprehensive Education Reform Movement Indiana’s Success Story.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Race to the Top Scope of Work Broward County Public Schools.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
Slide 1 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
March 12, Common Core Standards  K-12  Feedback by April 2, 2010, and finalized early spring.  Professional.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
  “The Common Core State Standards are an example of states recognizing a problem, then working together, sharing what works and what doesn’t.” - Former.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
RACE TO THE TOP. What is Race to the Top Funds? It is the largest education initiative in President Obama’s economic stimulus package It will provide.
SAM REDDING ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING CENTER ON SCHOOL TURNAROUND BUILDING STATE CAPACITY AND PRODUCTIVITY CENTER.
What Washington Teachers Think About “Race to the Top” Issues Highlights From a Statewide Survey December 2009.
College Access Summit REGIONAL STRATEGY SESSION ON ACCESS TO POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION COMMUNITY COLLEGE PARTNERS Race to the Top Update.
Melissa Cropper Teacher and President Georgetown Federation of Teachers Deborah S. Delisle Superintendent of Public Instruction Ohio Department of Education.
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
Race to the Top Application State Board of Education Meeting January 6, 2010 January 6, 2010.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION State Policies: Orchestrating the Common Core Mathematics Classroom Ilene W. Straus, Vice President California State.
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
An Affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Primer on NCLB Reauthorization Implications from Federal Stimulus Programs September 20, 2010.
Excellence for Each Student Utah State Board of Education Strategic Plan.
Annual Professional Performance Review and YOU! Is the road to hell paved with good intentions?
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Annual Title I Parent Orientation Meeting
Common Core State Standards: Myths vs. Facts
Common Core for Parents/Families
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program
World’s Best Workforce (WBWF)
Annual Title I Parent Orientation Meeting
Common Core State Standards
Maryland’s Race to the Top Application
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
Race to the Top: What was Accomplished?
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
Starting Community Conversations
Michigan School Testing Conference
Draft Proposal Summary
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Annual Title I Parent Orientation Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Current Education Legislation Update RTTT and Michigan

RTTT and Michigan Legislation What the heck happened? Why the rush? Recession - Major economic downturn in 2008 – present Standardized test scores comparing our students with the rest of the world have fallen significantly Yikes!

NCES International Comparisons Mean Scores in Mathematics – we placed in the 400s 15 year olds in the United States tested Reading – middle third Mathematics – bottom quarter Science – bottom third National Center for Education Statistics – reported in 2009 from 2006. Mistake from the Reading so they report scores from 2000-2003 – but we know from more current research that Reading scores are down across the United States in all demographics.

How do we turn this around? Education Among other things. . .

Role of Government Local Values Hiring/Firing Purchases Community Responsiveness The Daily Details Fewer dollars – fiscal manager State Content Standards Standardize Professional Development Data Collection (SLDS) Support for Struggling Schools BIG MONEY Federal Ensuring Equal Access to a free and appropriate education Innovation and Influence NCLB Competition – RTTT Fewer dollars 5

So here’s what happened: States hold the legal responsibility to educate our country’s citizens Therefore, in order for the federal government to have some influence and spur education innovation – they came up with Race to the Top State’s would compete for money by instituting change and reform through legislation

RTTT: What were the goals of the Federal Government? Adopting internationally benchmarked standards and assessments that prepare students for success in college and the workplace; Recruiting, developing, rewarding, and retaining effective teachers and principals; Building data systems that measure student success and inform teachers and principals how they can improve their practices; and Turning around our lowest- performing schools

Michigan’s Response: Accelerate Michigan Stunning in its ambitions! Legislation signed into law on January 4th, 2010.

Standards and Assessments Common Core College and Career Readiness Standards and Common Core K-12 Standards in ELA and Math – a.k.a Common Core Standards (CCS) – adopted June 15, 2010 Common Summative Assessments in ELA and Math Support for Implementation Professional Development

Data Systems Implement two Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems – SLDS Track students Access for all

Effective Teachers and Leaders Alternative Certification (currently being challenged) Teacher and Administrator Evaluation Based on data of student growth Classroom observations Portfolio assessments Student work samples Other determined by district

Effective Teachers and Leaders Continued: Three-tier Certification and Licensure System Equitable Distribution of Teachers and Leaders Evaluation of Teacher Prep Programs Teacher evaluation system (state law MCL 380.1249) requires that the school board must adopt rigorous, transparent, and fair performance evaluation systems. They will be working with unions on this count.

LEAs can use data to inform decision-making: Professional Development Compensation, promotion and retention Tenure and full certification Removal – only after opportunities to improve

Support for Struggling Schools and Districts Identification –lowest achieving 5% Intervention State Reform/Redesign Officer Intervention includes one of the four RTTT models: turnaround, restart, closure or transformation.

But, we didn’t win…

Nonetheless… "It would have been helpful to get a Race to the Top grant, but we have a lot of work to do here to implement our new reform laws and we are moving forward." Superintendent Flanagan July 27, 2010

What does this mean for us? BIG CHANGES

But, nothing we can’t handle...we must Stay engaged and informed so that we can remain part of the discussion – knowledge is power Be patient and have fortitude Trust that we are capable and competent professional educators Not forget why we are here in the first place

We have a vision of a brighter future for all We can keep our flame burning bright.

Sources www.2ed.gov www.michigan.gov/mde www.corestandards.org www.nces.ed.gov