Sensory feedback and perception.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Demonstrations I, II, and III.

Advertisements

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

Comparing previous simulation work with current study.

TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

TPAD training protocol.

Multilayered e-dermis design and characterization.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16.

Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Soft, bistable valve acting as a pneumatic switch.

The foldable robotic arm with seven modules assembled in series.

Innocuous (mechanoreception) and noxious (nociception) prosthesis sensing and discrimination in an amputee. Innocuous (mechanoreception) and noxious (nociception)

Prosthesis grasping and control.

A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

Fig. 1 Movement percepts for all participants.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Prosthesis system diagram.

Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.

Block diagram for our controller that modulates stimulation parameters to keep perceived sensation intensity constant. Block diagram for our controller.

Variability in sensation intensity due to changes in impedance during electrotactile stimulation. Variability in sensation intensity due to changes in.

Uncanny valley of haptics.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Schematic representation of MT sorting under a given electric field.

Fig. 5 Conservation of m6A in mammals.

Exp. 3A real-time results from two participants (TR1 and TR2) with below-elbow amputations peeling and reapplying electrodes during stimulation. Exp. 3A.

Fluorescence response of actuator.

Experimental setup. Experimental setup. (A) Chair with a human-like robotic arm on its side. (B) Ball-balancing board containing color-shape markers. (C)

Histograms showing the distribution of people with respect to their performances for the single task and multitask conditions. Histograms showing the distribution.

The ACES architecture for large arrays with single-wire transmission capability. The ACES architecture for large arrays with single-wire transmission capability.

The two modalities for the multitask condition.

Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

In vitro cell-release experiments on a glass substrate.

RAD sampler design. RAD sampler design. (A) One arm of the RAD sampler with revolute joints shown as dotted lines. A fold is initiated by rotating the.

Fig. 2 2D QWs of different propagation lengths.

Motions of the biohybrid robot powered by the antagonistic pair of skeletal muscle tissues. Motions of the biohybrid robot powered by the antagonistic.

Object manipulations performed by our biohybrid robots.

Overhead snapshots. Overhead snapshots. (A to E) Mark I3, robot experiments (movie S1). (F) Mark I3, simulation (movie S2, side by side with a run on the.

Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.

Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Overview of the experimental setup and visual stimulus.

Exp. 3B real-time results from two participants (TR1 and TR2) with below-elbow amputations using a prosthesis with electrotactile touch feedback during.

Examples of organic sensing in robotics.

Fig. 1 Average contribution (million metric tons) of seafood-producing sectors, 2009–2014. Average contribution (million metric tons) of seafood-producing.

Response of the actuator to different stimulations.

Discrimination accuracy across conditions.

Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.

Characterization and optimization of the device.

The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.

Fig. 4 Mapping of abundance of the most dominant bacterial and archaeal phyla across France. Mapping of abundance of the most dominant bacterial and archaeal.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic skins. Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic.

Robot-assisted intervention system.

Robot-initiated joint attention.

Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison with human trackers. Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison.

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.

Presentation transcript:

Sensory feedback and perception. Sensory feedback and perception. (A) Median and ulnar nerve sites on the amputee’s residual limb and the corresponding regions of activation in the phantom hand due to TENS. Psychophysical experiments quantified the perception of the nerve stimulation including (B) detection and (C) discrete frequency discrimination thresholds. In both cases, the stimulation amplitude was held at 1.4 mA. (D) The perception of the nerve stimulation was largely a tactile pressure on the activated sites of the phantom hand, although sensations of electrical tingling also occurred. (E) The quantification of pain from nerve stimulation shows that the most noxious sensation is perceived at higher stimulation pulse widths with frequencies in the range of 10 to 20 Hz. (F) Contralateral somatosensory cortex activation during nerve stimulation shows relevant cortical representation of sensory perception in the amputee participant (movie S1). Luke E. Osborn et al. Sci. Robotics 2018;3:eaat3818 Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works