This is the second module of the Collaborative Backward Design series

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differentiated Instruction (DI) Meets Understand by Design (UbD) UB EDUC- 503 October 15, 2012.
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Transdisciplinary Units What is the meaning of Transdisciplinary?
Understanding by Design
Understanding by Design An Overview by Eduardo M. Valerio, Ph.D.
Dr Jim Briggs Masterliness Not got an MSc myself; BA DPhil; been teaching masters students for 18 years.
Curriculum Project Garred Kirk. EARL 1: Civics The student understands and applies knowledge of government, law, politics, and the nation’s fundamental.
1 Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics Based on Understanding by Design By Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
ED 3501: Curriculum and Instruction Section GHI - Fall Understanding by Design Understanding and Creating Effective Instructional Design.
© Curriculum Foundation1 Section 2 The nature of the assessment task Section 2 The nature of the assessment task There are three key questions: What are.
Understanding By Design (UbD) An overview Excerpted in large part from Making the Most of Understanding by Design By John L. Brown.
USING BACKWARD DESIGN FOR UNIT AND LESSON PLANS * Based on the thinking that if everyone has a clear picture of where they are going before they start,
Understanding By Design A Contemporary Approach to Curriculum Design.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Boys’ Literacy Me Read? No Way!. Modules ConsistentFlexible Introductory Module:Module 2: Resources #1 Key MessagesModule 3: Oral Language #5 Barriers.
Using Understanding by Design
The Backward Design Process
Narrowing the Challenge: Revisiting Understanding by Design Cherie McCollough VaNTH-PER Professional Development June 1, 2004.
Crafting Essential Questions Adapted from the work of Traci Blanchard North Cobb High School Source: Understanding by Design by Jay McTighe & Grant Wiggins,
Matthew Birtel EDUC 503 FALL 2012 November 27, 2012.
Understanding By Design
Planning Instructional Units. Planning Vital and basic skill for effective teaching Helps you feel organized and prepared Is only a guide: not carved.
Understanding by Design Developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) A.K.A.
Session One  Backward Design is a process of lesson planning created by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe and introduced in Understanding by Design (1998).
Cohort Curriculum Spring 2010 ESU 6. Goals Participants will develop curriculum products. Participants will design collaboration networks.
Would you agree That the only thing over which we have control is the quality of the work we provide our students?
Courses of instruction are usually divided into learning units as reflected in textbooks, manuals, modules, and other instructional materials that are.
New Tech Network Literacy Series CREATING HIGH QUALITY TASKS Writing High Quality Prompts as Individual Written Assessments of Knowledge and Thinking (IAKTs)
Understanding by Design DESIGNING CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION.
Designing curriculum for “understanding” with the case of upcoming 2015 revised national curriculum in Korea Presenter : J.D. Ohn.
Essential Question How does Understanding by Design provide a framework and a language to help educators promote all students’ understanding? How does.
WELCOME to Implementation Training for:
Information for Parents Key Stage 3 Statutory Assessment Arrangements
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
The Year of Core Instruction
Understanding by Design
Salary discussion and assessment areas
Understanding by Design
What is Backwards Design?
I’m In Activity Reflect on the morning in 1-2 sentences “I’m in”
Grade 6 Outdoor School Program Curriculum Map
Power & Priority Standards
Understanding by Design Ensuring Learning through Lesson Design
Understanding by Design
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Understanding By Design
Revised Higher Course Event
Critically Evaluating an Assessment Task
PGCE PCE Mentoring Training
Selecting Baseline Data and Establishing Targets for Student Achievement Objectives Module Welcome to the Polk County Selecting Baseline Data and.
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Creating-1: Generate and conceptualize artistic ideas and work.
Patchogue-Medford UbD Curriculum Group
Crafting Essential Questions
Crafting Essential Questions
MAIN MENU 1. Introduction 2. Unit Info 3. Unit Overview 4. Subtasks
Crafting Essential Questions
Where do these terms come from?
Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics
Backward Mapping beginning with the end in mind . . .
Individual Identity: Typical Student Team Roles
EDFGC 5807 Theory and Practice of Learning and Teaching
Planning a cross- curricular topic
Instructional Program Alignment
Writing competence based questions
Presentation transcript:

This is the second module of the Collaborative Backward Design series This is the second module of the Collaborative Backward Design series. It will guide participants through the process of using identifying the Enduring Understandings and Essential Skills described in the curriculum document. Based on these choices, participants will then collaborate to determine the high-priority overall expectations that will inform their assessment plans.

Recall, from module 1, our vision of an assessment plan that supports rich learning for all students throughout the course.

Our goal, as defined by Grant Wiggins, is to have students leave with the ability to transfer their skills and understanding in meaningful ways.

Therefore our first steps in the Backward Design process are to define the most important skills and meaningful concepts. We do this by using the curriculum document to identify the Enduring Understandings and Essential Skills of the course. Having a clear vision of the these understandings and skills will then allow us to make informed decisions about the high-priority overall expectations.

To help in this processes, we refer to Understanding by Design by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe. They suggest that we sort the information in the curriculum into three levels of importance: the Enduring Understandings, the things that are important to know and do, and finally the curriculum that is worth being familiar with.

Enduring Understandings represent the essence of the course or discipline. They describe the fundamental concepts that every student needs to have an understanding of by the end of the course. They should help students make sense of their learning throughout the course as well as be meaningful to their lives outside of the course. Essential Skills are those that are needed to support many overall expectations. They generally represent critical thinking skills that are used throughout the course and are transferable to other subjects and to situations outside of school. Due to their transferability and their importance to the entire subject area, the Enduring Understandings and Essential Skills are usually described in the front matter of the curriculum. To help illustrate this idea, examples have been provided from the Canada and World Studies Curriculum; The front matter describes some Fundamental Concepts. One of those concepts is the idea of culture; culture provides a conceptual framework for interpreting the world, and influences the perception of time, place, identity, significance and change. The front matter also describes many important skills required by and developed through the study of history. One particular example is the skill of assessing and evaluating.

To find the things that are important to know and do we look to the curriculum expectations. Important to know and do are typically described in the Overall Expectations along with some key Specific Expectation. Expectations in this level will form the foundation of your summative assessment tasks. Following our Canada and World Studies example into the grade 11 American History course, we find the overall expectation, “assess the influence of key individuals and groups in shaping American arts and culture;” To build the enduring understanding of culture and its impact on our perspective, and to develop the essential skill of assessing, this seems like something that would be important to know and do.

The third level is the curriculum that is worth being familiar with The third level is the curriculum that is worth being familiar with. This is the information that students may find helpful when demonstrating their achievement of the overall expectations, but that in isolation are not particularly important. Students may use some of this body of knowledge and skills during rich summative assessments, but they are not generally assessed specifically on summative tasks. Continuing our American History arts and culture example, students will find it worthwhile to be familiar with the names and contributions of key people that influenced American arts and culture. However, while some of this knowledge is needed to demonstrate the overall expectation, simply recalling the names and accomplishments of specific individuals does not demonstrate any ability to assess their influence.

A summary of these Curriculum Priorities their role in course planning has been attached for future reference.

As we begin the Collaborative Backward Design process, you may also want to refer to the attached guide, “Thinking Backwards – Making Thinking Visible in the CBD Process”

Currently we are looking at the first two stages.

Activity 1: Identifying Enduring Understandings and Essential Skills There are two activities provided to guide participants through the process of identifying the Enduring Understandings and Essential Skills. If you have not spent much time examining the front matter of the curriculum, it is recommended that you use the “Exploring the Curriculum” activity. If you are familiar with the front matter, you can either start at the right hand column of the “Exploring the Curriculum” or You may wish to use the “Identifying EU’s and ES’s” activity.

Now that you have identified the Enduring Understandings and Essential Skills, you have a foundation for prioritizing your curriculum expectations. As you move through the process, you may need to reflect back on your initial thinking and make adjustments to your EU’s and ES’s Activity #2: Identifying High-Priority Overall Expectations, provides a foundation for making choices and collaborating with other teachers.

One of the purposes of backward design is to ensure that developing the enduring understandings and essential skills takes priority in planning. For example… In addition to relevance to the enduring understandings and essential skills, there are many considerations when selecting high-priority expectations: prior experience of students, curriculum structure and organization, opportunities for assessment, complexity of expectation One of the purposes of backward design is to ensure that developing the enduring understandings and essential skills takes priority in planning. For example…

When you feel confident that you have identified the high-priority expectations that are justified by the vision described in the front matter of the curriculum document, record them on the planning template of your choice. At this point in the process, you may feel that you have identified the high-priority expectations and that your choices are supported by the vision described in the front matter of the curriculum document. As previously mentioned, it is not uncommon for teachers to reflect on their initial perceptions of the enduring understandings and essential skills of the course and make some revisions. When you have identified the high-priority expectations, record them on the course planning template of your choice.

We have now completed steps one and two of the process; defining our goal and priorities.

The next stage of the process is to design final assessment tasks that will allow for a valid, reliable assessment of the high-priority overall expectations. For support in this process, refer to section A6: Establishing Final Summative Tasks on page 26 of the LDSB Support Document. When you are ready to begin planning units, proceed to Module 3.