IMS Infrasound Station Observations of the Recent Explosive Eruptions of Okmok and Kasatochi Volcanoes, Alaska J. V. Olson, K. Arnoult, C. A. L. Szuberla,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volcanic Ash Advisory Support for the U.S. DoD Charles Holliday Air Force Weather Agency Offutt AFB, Nebraska.
Advertisements

Earth’s Dynamic Crust and Interior: small scale crustal changes  Movements of the crust is based on the concept of original horizontality. This concept.
THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Infrasound Technology Workshop, November 2007, Tokyo, Japan OPTIMUM ARRAY DESIGN FOR THE DETECTION OF DISTANT.
Evaluation of the ASHE Project, Ecuador M. Garcés 1, D. Fee 1, and A. Steffke 1 D. McCormack 2 and R. Servranckx 3 H. Bass 4 and C. Hetzer 4 M. Hedlin.
Infrasonic Observation near Active Volcanoes and its Results in Japan Hitoshi YAMASATO*, Takayuki SAKAI* and Yoshiaki FUJIWARA** *Meteorological Research.
Infrasound Signals Observed at I53US and I55US John V. Olson, Charles R. Wilson, C. A Szuberla and D. Osborne Infrasound Group, University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Multi-parameter investigations at Fuego and Santiaguito volcanoes
Audiovisual Test in Progress. Milton Garcés 1, Claus Hetzer 1, Douglas Drob 2, Robert Woodward 3, Henry Bass 4, David McCormack 5, Läslo Evers 6, Michael.
Seismo-Acoustic data analysis at I34MN Mongolia - Songino Seismo-Acoustic data analysis at I34MN Mongolia - Songino RESEARCH CENTRE OF ASTRONOMY AND GEOPHYSICS.
Characterization of explosion signals from Tungurahua Volcano, Ecuador David Fee and Milton Garces Infrasound Laboratory Univ. of Hawaii, Manoa
Observations and Modeling of Infrasound Produced by Ocean Waves By Mark Willis Masters Student/Dept of Meteorology Acknowledgements: Milton Garces (HIGP/ISLA),
The Temporal Morphology of Infrasound Propagation Douglas P. Drob 1, Milton Garces 2, Michael Hedlin 3, and Nicolas Brachet 4 1)Space Science Division,
Approaches to the infrasound signal denoising by using AR method N. Arai, T. Murayama, and M. Iwakuni (Research Dept., Japan Weather Association) 2008.
Reconstructing the Emission Height of Volcanic SO2 from Back Trajectories: Comparison of Explosive and Effusive Eruptions Modeling trace gas transport.
Near-Field Modeling of the 1964 Alaska Tsunami: A Source Function Study Elena Suleimani, Natalia Ruppert, Dmitry Nicolsky, and Roger Hansen Alaska Earthquake.
THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Infrasound Technology Workshop, 3-7 November 2008, Bermuda WIND NOISE REDUCTION AT IMS INFRASOUND STATIONS Douglas R.
Infrasonic Observations of Some Atmospheric Phenomena Ludwik Liszka Swedish Institute of Space Physics, SE , Umeå, Sweden.
Infrasound Consortium for Applied Research 2002 Infrasound Technology Workshop, Netherlands Milton Garces Infrasound Laboratory, University of Hawaii,
Infrasound in the Geosciences Henry E. Bass, Carrick Talmadge, and Kenneth Gilbert, National Center For Physical Acoustics, University of Mississippi Michael.
Chile Sky Background at ESO/la Silla in the Visible and Near IR Leonardo Vanzi -Olivier R. Hainaut European Southern Observatory La Silla - Chile.
Augmentation of IMS Infrasound Arrays for Near- field Clutter Reduction Curt A. L. Szuberla, John V. Olson and Kenneth M. Arnoult, Jr. Wilson Infrasound.
Volcano. Volcano is a mountain with a hole called a crater in the top. Sometimes lava and gases are thrown from the crater. This is a volcanic eruption.
Monitoring of volcanic SO2 and ash emissions from satellite Jos van Geffen, Michel Van Roozendael, Sofie Delanoye, Isabelle De Smedt, Caroline Fayt (BIRA-IASB)
November 2008Infrasound Technology Workshop, BermudaPage 1 Presented to: Infrasound Technology Workshop Bermuda PTS Portable Infrasound Array John Coyne,
Modeling of Infrasound from the Space Shuttle Columbia Reentry Robert Gibson and David Norris BBN Technologies Arlington, Virginia, USA Infrasound Technology.
Infrasound Workshop De Bilt, Netherlands October 2002 Current Status of Infrasound Processing at the IDC Nicolas Brachet International Data Centre/Waveform.
Detection, Propagation, and Modeling Infrasound Technology Workshop Bermuda, 2008.
ITW2008: P. Campus, R. Oldfield Bermuda, 3-7 November 2008 The recently installed IMS Infrasound Station IS51, Bermuda Paola Campus Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban.
THE ANALYSIS OF THE INFRASOUND SIGNALS FROM MAY 12 EARTHQUAKE WENCHUAN CHINA Wang Xiaohang Signal Processing Department North China Institute of Computing.
ITW2007: P. Campus Tokyo, November 2007 The IMS Infrasound Network: detection of a large variety of events, including volcanic eruptions Dr. Paola.
Chaparral Physics Research
Changes in the Performance of the IMS Infrasound Network due to Seasonal Propagation Effects David Norris and Robert Gibson BBN Technologies 1300 N. 17.
Recent Applications of the Time-Domain Parabolic Equation (TDPE) Model to Ground Truth Events Robert Gibson and David Norris BBN Technologies Arlington,
Acoustic-gravity wave monitoring for global atmospheric studies Elisabeth Blanc 1 Alexis Le Pichon 1 Lars Ceranna 2 Thomas Farges 1 2- BGR / B3.11, Hannover,
Infrasound Workshop San Diego, USA October 2003 Infrasound Processing at the IDC and its Near-term Development P. Firbas, N. Brachet International.
Infrasound Technical Workshop 2008 Session 1 Summary – Sensors and Calibration.
Systems Check. Milton Garces and Claus Hetzer Infrasound Laboratory, University of Hawaii, Manoa PMCC analyses of signals from the North American and.
1 Location and Characterization of Infrasonic Events Roger Bowman 1, Greg Beall 1, Doug Drob 2, Milton Garces 3, Claus Hetzer 3, Michael O’Brien 1, Gordon.
Infrasound from lightning Jelle Assink and Läslo Evers Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute Seismology Division ITW 2007, Tokyo, Japan.
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Linear Speed.
KHz SLR Station Graz Graz kHz LIDAR Georg Kirchner, Franz Koidl, Daniel Kucharski Institute for Space Research SLR Station Graz / Austria Poznan, Oct.
Relative Teleseismic Surface Wave Attenuation using Transportable Array Data Team QDP ON Austin Holland, Joshua Richardson, Weisen Shen, Paul Ogwari.
1 Description and Analysis of Infrasound Signals Recorded from the North Pacific Event of February 22, 2003 Joydeep Bhattacharyya 1, Claus Hetzer 2,Milton.
A Study on Characteristics of Seasonally Dependent Infrasound Propagation Based on the Ground-Truth Events from a Long- Term Experiment at a Quarry mine.
Analysis of regional infrasound signals at IMS infrasound array in Mongolia a RCAG/MAS P.O.B-152, Ulaanbaatar-51Mongolia b CEA/DASE BP12, Bruyeres-le-Chatel,
November, 2008 Bermuda ITW Numerical Simulation of Infrasound Propagation, including Wind, Attenuation, Gravity and Non-linearity Catherine de Groot-Hedlin.
Real-time infrasound localization on active Italian volcanoes E. Marchetti, M. Ripepe, G.Ulivieri and G. Lacanna Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università.
Estimates of a relative delay time of signals through analysis of their forms Sergey Kulichkov, Aleksey Chulichkov Dmitrii Demin A.M.Oboukhov Institute.
Session 2 Summary Infrasound from Anthropogenic Sources S. Kulichkov & C. Szuberla Infrasound Technology Workshop Hamilton Parish, Bermuda 3 November 2008.
Milton Garces, Claus Hetzer, and Mark Willis University of Hawaii, Manoa Source modeling of microbarom signals generated by nonlinear ocean surface wave.
The Seismic Spectrum Jonathan Berger Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego.
3D Array Processing Sept 8, 2016, DUGL telecon
Introduction to Seismology
K.R. Kore, S.R. McNutt, and D.H. Christensen
Kinematic Modeling of the Denali Earthquake
Bias and Uncertainty in Parameter Estimation in Infrasound Arrays
Charles R. Wilson, John V. Olson and Daniel L
USING GOES-R TO HELP MONITOR UPPER LEVEL SO2
Brazilian “Strong-Motion” Data Stéphane Drouet, ON, Rio de Janeiro Marlon Pirchiner, IAG/USP, São Paulo Marcelo Assumpção, IAG/USP, São Paulo Luis Carlos.
Outline Brief overview of tectonic setting
Infrasound Technology Workshop, Bermuda Section 6
Refinement of Bolide Characteristics from Infrasound measurements
An Optical Fiber Infrasound Sensor
Enceladus Plume Simulations
by Asaf Inbal, Jean Paul Ampuero, and Robert W. Clayton
Preliminary Results of Localization and Characterization of Steady Infrasound Source as Detected by I31KZ A. Smirnov1, V. Kunakov1, A. Le Pichon2, J.
Summary of 2003 Infrasound Technology Workshop
Infrasonic observations of chemical explosions
Infrasound Case Studies
Presentation transcript:

IMS Infrasound Station Observations of the Recent Explosive Eruptions of Okmok and Kasatochi Volcanoes, Alaska J. V. Olson, K. Arnoult, C. A. L. Szuberla, C. Wilson Wilson Infrasound Observatory, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, M. Garces ISLA, University of Hawaii, M. Hedlin, L2A, IGPP, University of California, San Diego S. McNutt Alaska Volcano Observatory, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks Presented at the 2008 International Technical Workshop, Bermuda

The Pacific Basin I53US Kasatochi Okmok I56US I57US I59US Kasatochi volcano 52.169N, 175.51W Eruption times: five major explosive eruptions beginning ~22:00 UT, 7 Aug ending ~04:35 UT, 8 Aug ash emissions became continuous after these events reaching altitudes > 35,000 ft asl I53US Kasatochi Okmok I56US I57US Okmok volcano 53.397N, 168.166W Eruption time: Explosion: 12 July 08, 19:43 UT with continuing ash emissions ash cloud top 30-35,000 ft asl I59US ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Eruption Details at at www.avo.alaska.edu Expl’n Date Start Duration # (UTH) (min) 1 7 Aug 22:01 69 2 8 Aug 01:50 27 3 8 Aug 04:35 35 4 8 Aug 07:12 46 5 8 Aug 12:06 26 Kasatochi Great circle distances to US IMS stations Kasatochi Expected Travel Time @ 0.3km/sec I53US: 2104km @ 241o ~1.95 hrs I56US: 4060km @ 299o ~3.76 hrs I57US: 5067km @ 313o ~4.69 hrs I59US: 4002km @ 340o ~3.71 hrs Kasatochi, 17:00 UT, 8 Aug 08 Photo by JT Ford ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

IMS Sites Near the Pole Seventeen IMS infrasound sites are located within about 10,000 km of the volcanic events. The sites labeled with green stars are either under construction or the data was not available to us at this time. The sites labeled with blue stars, I10, I18, I30, I53, I56, I57, I59 will be the subject of this review. I31 I37 I51 I18 I46 I34 I10 I53 I15 I56 I45 I57 I44 K O I30 I58 I60 I59 ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Kasatochi – IMS Arrays (within ~6000 km) Azimuth (o) GC Dist (km) I53 241.2 2104 I30 47.6 3931 I59 339.5 4002 I56 298.7 4060 I18 299.9 4750 I57 312.6 5067 I10 304.8 5252 I18 I10 I53 I56 I57 K I30 I59 ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Kasatochi Waveforms & Spectra I53US Infrasound amplitudes for the Kasatochi eruptions reached ~ 1 Pa at I53US and I56US ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Signal Detection Infrasound array data, signal detection Compute MCCM on sliding window Lease-Squares azimuth/velocity estimation Pure-State filter (www.inframatics.org, Sept 04) Re-compute least-squares azimuth/velocity Pure-State filtering increases the signal-to-noise level and enables detection over longer periods of time Detection: Raw Data Detection: Pure-State filtered data ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Kasatochi: I53 Detections Pure-State Data The MCCM detector along with the least-squares estimates of azimuth, velocity and the residuals (στ) are computed using a sliding window 500 sec long, updated every 50 sec I53 Azimuth: 244o Trace velocity: 358 m/sec ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Kasatochi: Detections (1) Pure-State Data Azimuth: 304.8o Trace velocity: m/sec I18 Azimuth: 299.9o Trace velocity: m/sec ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Kasatochi: Detections (2) Pure-State Data Azimuth: 244o Trace velocity: 358 m/sec I56 Azimuth: 300o Trace velocity: 374 m/sec ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Kasatochi: Detections (3) Pure-State Data No signal found I59 Azimuth: 336o Trace velocity: 312 m/sec ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Kasatochi: Detections (4) Pure-State Data Azimuth: 47.8o Trace velocity: 370 m/sec ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Kasatochi Simple Back Azimuth Location Simple back-azimuth projections along the great-circle between IMS stations results in an average location that is approximately 200 km Southwest of Kasatochi and encompasses a region several hundred km wide. ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Okmok – IMS Arrays (within ~6000 km) Azimuth (o) GC Dist (km) I53 241.38 1706 I30 46.6 4439 I59 347.3 3903 I56 298.8 3548 I18 294.1 4464 I57 314.8 4583 I10 303.3 4754 I34 49.7 5688 I18 I34 I10 I53 I56 I57 O I30 I59 ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Okmok Waveforms (1) I53, I56 ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Okmok Waveforms (2) I57, I59 ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Okmok: Detections (1) Pure-State Data No signal found I53 Azimuth: 236o Trace velocity: 360 m/sec ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Okmok: Detections (2) Pure-State Data No signal found ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Summary Both eruptions were strong, exposive eruptions lasting several hours and producing extensive ash plumes Kasatochi: Amplitudes ~1Pa observed at distances to 4000 km Simple great-circle back-azimuths give a location ~200 km Southwest of the source Okmok: Observed only at I53US, amplitudes ~0.01 – 0.1 Pa We are collecting atmospheric data: Effects of wind Estimate signal paths through time delays ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

END ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Eruption Details at at www.avo.alaska.edu Okmok Okmok, 20:00 UT, 3 Aug 08 Photo by Mees, Burke ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Kasatochi Waveforms (2) I57, I59 ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Kasatochi Waveforms (2) I10, I30 ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Kasatochi Spectra ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008

Kasatochi Spectra ITW Workshop, Bermuda 2008