Advanced Protocol for Developing Critical Complexity Lesson Plan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expository Writing Lesson
Advertisements

Teaching Speaking Zhang Lu.
Interviewing Tips. How The Pros Do It Katie Couric's Interview Advice Couric Interviews Sarah Palin Couric Interviews the Royals.
These are the training aims that you will use to deliver the “Who’s Challenging Who?” training session.
Welcome to English! Rules and Expectations By the end of this lesson, I will be equipped with all of the information and equipment that I need for a successful.
Realistic Fiction Critical Thinking Questions. Day 1 In a paragraph, give examples of what makes your book a realistic fiction. Be sure to explain why.
Talking Partners. What is Talking Partners? The NLS promotes “talk for writing”. They recommend the use of “talking partners” during shared work in the.
Constructing Strong Paragraphs
Marking and Feedback CPD Student approach to marking.
MEDIATION. What is your conflict style? How do you resolve conflicts? Are you aggressive (my way of the highway) Compromising (let’s work it out) Appeasing.
Being a Good Listener. QUOTE: “Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak.” (Bible)
How To Work In Small Groups. Your role as the leader To have each child feel as though he/she has contributed something special To follow teacher directive.
Week 7 Agenda Review of last week’s lessons Homework Review
The Collaborative Story
Character Traits CREATED BY: TERRY LEHON.
Identity Pack Session: You Can’t Judge a Book by Its Cover
15/05/16 Symbolism TP: Understand what symbolism is
This Prewriting Stage lesson is about…
What the problem looks like:
Reading Comprehension Strategies for ELLs
Humanism – an alternative moral code?
Types of Essays: End the Confusion
Announcements Please have a copy of “The Outsiders” by Monday, October 16, It is mandatory. Friday (10/13), periods 2, 3, and 4 will have class.
Week 6 Agenda Review of last week’s lessons Homework Review
10 Steps to Interview Success
Communicating Effectively
Elementary Science Leaders Sept
Lesson 8 – Expectations for End of Day
Series of Paragraphs Expressing an Opinion
Year 2: How to help your child
Bell Ringer Open your student workbook and turn to page 49.
Doing Interview Zoran Tesic.
Expectations for a successful discussion
The All Saints’ Way.
Peer mentor training Session 1
Session 4 Creating a safe climate for discussion
Critical Thinking in College
How to direct examine Rules and Technique.
Introducing the Ideas One of Six Traits:
How do you check your understanding after reading an article?
Lesson 12 – Social Skill: Making a Complaint.
Facinghistory.org.
Teacher Guide This lesson is designed to teach kids to ask a critical thinking question that you can’t just put into a search box to solve. To do that,
Ground rules Don't ask personal questions. No one is obliged to disclose personal information. What is said in the room, stays in the room. Listen to.
Tutor Training.
Teaching Styles.
冀教版 九年级 Lesson 41 Jenny’s Good Advice.
How To Work In Small Groups
The Art of a Good Interview
Lesson 16 – Introduction to Problem Solving.
Fishbowl Discussion Directions:
Seek First to Understand then be Understood
Interviewing Zoran Tesic.
Friday, September 8th, 2017 Agenda Do Now Do Now
Mocktail Party Subtitle.
How it Works  STEP ONE: Students each get a note card with a question such as "How did you spend your summer break?" or "What is your favorite memory?"
This Prewriting Stage lesson is about…
The Collaborative Story
Costa’s Levels of Questioning
This Prewriting Stage lesson is about…
(in general… and for this essay)
My Migrant story CAT Year 9 Humanities.
Series of Paragraphs.
Successful Lessons – Expecting the Unexpected
Getting to Know You Notes to Trainer:
The STAR  Approach The interview questions tend to start with a variation of, "Tell me about a time when…" This may sound simple but, in the heat of the.
ELLs in Texas: What Teachers Need to Know
Critical, creative and problem solving skills
The mindful guide to straight talk
This Prewriting Stage lesson is about…
Presentation transcript:

Advanced Protocol for Developing Critical Complexity Lesson Plan

Before Teaching Cards-Write cards for each of the three roles (storyteller, detective, umpire) Write down the rules and duties for each role in each stage. One way to randomly group students would be to mix up the role cards and hand them out as they walk in the room. However, you may want storytellers to be volunteers since they are personal stories, and it may be difficult for some students to share first. Each student should be each role at some point. Groups Minimum 3 people per group Maximum recommended is 7 (1 storyteller, 2 detectives, 2 umpires). The Stories The story should be personal The story should represent real struggle about thinking, practice, or experience. The story should be very detailed; it is supposed to take 7-10 minutes to tell the story. Allowing storytellers to write and use notes during the story might help.

During Teaching Modeling is important with this exercise. The teacher should be the first storyteller, and he/she should get a few (2-3 for each role) student volunteers to act as detective and umpires during modeling. Have students brainstorm memories of times that they have struggled This should be a quick-write, 3-5 minutes of silent individual writing Complete sentences, spelling, etc. shouldn’t matter; this is just about accessing details of stories. Do 2-3 quick-writes, asking the students to write details of different struggle memories, so they can choose the most detailed or most difficult struggle when they are the storyteller. Create groups and assign initial roles.

Stage 1- 10 minutes Storyteller Detective(s) Tells the story. Be specific Be descriptive Include your perspective, feelings, reactions, assumptions. Listen & take notes Identify explicit and implicit assumptions about the storyteller’s viewpoint of the story. Try to imagine themselves inside the heads of other people in the story. Umpire(s) Listen & take notes Identify explicit and implicit assumptions about the storyteller’s viewpoint of the story.

Stage 2 10 minutes Storyteller Detective(s) Answers questions completely and honestly. Storyteller may ask why a detective has asked a question before answering. Ask questions of the storyteller. These questions should be for clarification or gather important information about the events (Can you tell me more about…). Only 1 question at a time. No statements, just questions. Detectives may not give opinions or advice to the storyteller. Umpire(s) only speaks if Detective breaks the rules or asks a judgmental question (Why didn’t you… Didn’t you think to…).

Stage 3 10 minutes Storyteller Detective(s) Listen Write down responses to detectives’ report Don’t be defensive, the point is to reach greater understanding of yourself, not prove yourself right. Report assumptions that the storyteller held in the story. Avoid judgment. State only one assumption at a time. Do not give advice. Umpire(s) Stops detective when they are being judgmental. Stops Storyteller if they try to speak.

Stage 4 10 minutes Storyteller Detective(s) Storyteller should not interrupt as detective retells the story. When the detective is done retelling, the storyteller may add information which is pertinent to detective’s lens Give an alternative version of the story through a different plausible lens. Point out where power or hegemony is at play. These should be descriptive not judgmental. No advice. Umpire(s) Stops detective when they are being judgmental. Stops storyteller if they are being defensive

Stage 5 10 minutes Storyteller Detective(s) Storytellers explains what they have learned Now the detective may give advice. Umpire(s) Umpire gives a summary of the storyteller’s ability to be a respectful listener and talker. Umpire gives a summary of detective’s ability to be a listener and talker. Umpire gives his/her perspective on the story and the alternate story.