[Name and affiliation of presenter(s)]

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moving the process forward Sálvano Briceño UN/ISDR.
Advertisements

The UN-REDD Programme 1 st Policy Board Meeting 9-10 March 2009.
Lessons Learned on Co-benefits and Safeguards in the UN-REDD Programme Timothy Boyle, UN-REDD Regional Coordinator, UNDP Regional Centre for Asia/Pacific,
Basic Considerations  outlines the process by which the Government of Kenya will develop its national strategy for participating in an evolving international.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE Project PILaR – Private Investment in Landscape Restoration Advancing REDD+: Mobilising private investment.
KEY ISSUES AND CONCERNS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN REDD+ AND FCPF Joan Carling, AIPP.
Participatory Governance Assessment for REDD+: The pilot process in Nigeria Oslo Governance Forum 3-5 October, 2011 By Salisu Dahiru National Coordinator.
1 Metagora: Current Progress and the Way Forward PARIS21 Steering Committee Paris, 13 November 2007.
Support to Capacity Development for REDD Readiness Yemi Katerere, Head, UN-REDD Programme Secretariat.
PRESENTED BY: RAHIMA NJAIDI MJUMITA 3 RD APRIL 2012.
ITUC Human and Trade Union Rights Report of the PERC HTUR Network Meeting PERC HTUR Network PERC Summer School, Bratislava September
Dialogue Workshop on Knowledge for the 21st Century: Indigenous knowledge, Traditional knowledge, Science and connecting diverse knowledge systems Usdub,
Why do corruption risks need to be addressed now? What are corruption risks in REDD+? What are risk mitigation actions? What are the tools? Who can prevent.
Financing Natura 2000 WORKSHOPS 2nd meeting of the Steering Group, 2 March 2006.
UNDP Support to Implementation of Article 8.(j) 5 February 2002 Montreal. Canada.
REDD+ Social & Environmental Standards: supporting countries to develop safeguards information systems Brief overview presentation Oslo, 28 th October.
Safeguards and Co-benefits in a REDD+ Mechanism Garanties et co-bénéfices liés au mécanisme REDD+ With support from the Norwegian Development Agency.
National & Regional Ecotourism Strategy & Action Plan for Bulgaria World Tourism Organization – Tourism Policy Forum October 20, 2004 Working Group Sessions.
5. Presentación general de la iniciativa REDD+ SES 5. Presentation of the REDD+ SES Initiative.
Bosque Patagónico Bosque Chaqueño YungasYungas REDD+ REDD+ ARGENTINA ARGENTINA REDD+ REDD+ ARGENTINA ARGENTINA Selva Misionera Bosque Patagónico.
4. Enfoque de salvaguardas para REDD+ a nivel país y mecanismos de salvaguardas 4. Country safeguards approach and safeguards mechanisms.
The UN-REDD Programme: Capacity development for REDD+ readiness through partnerships Yemi Katerere, Head UN-REDD Programme Secretariat Briefing to Missions.
Presented by Bridget Nkor CRSFC. What is communication Exchange of information between people, o By means of speaking, o Writing, o Using a common system.
Expert Workshop on UN-REDD FPIC Guidelines Charles McNeill, UNDP 10 February 2012, Geneva.
Social, Tenure and Rights Dimensions of REDD Plus REDD and Rural Livelihoods event, Forest Day 3, Copenhagen, December 13, 2009 Ashish Aggarwal The Energy.
Why do corruption risks need to be addressed now? What are corruption risks in REDD+? What are risk mitigation actions? What are the tools? Who can prevent.
Participatory Governance Assessments for REDD+ (PGAs): the approach, its benefits and current status Calabar, Feb Danae Issa
Briefing to the Permanent Missions to the United Nations in Geneva May 9th 2011 Andreas Tveteraas - Senior Adviser - Norway´s support to REDD+
Pre-planning Planning to plan (and adapt) Implementation starts Here!
The Project Outputs and Activities.
REDD+ Methodology: Issues Coming Out from Country Presentations
Objectives and Plan of Action
Introduction to Malawi REDD+ Process and Outlook
Presentation “Preparation for piloting REDD+ payment at commune level”
Country needs assessment Madagascar: Progress and next steps
Regional preparatory process for Rio+20
Welcome and Opening of the Expert Meeting on Statistics for SDGs
Civil Society Network for Education Reforms (E-Net Philippines)
REDD+: A Benefit for Biodiversity?
Regional Training Capacity-Building Workshop for the African Region on Community Protocols, Indicators on Traditional Knowledge and Customary Sustainable.
REDD+ ZONAL STAKEHOLDERS AWARENESS CREATION WORKSHOP
REDD+ FOR THE GUIANA SHIELD Technical Cooperation Project
The Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management (BIOPAMA) Programme
Regional experiences, case of the Mediterranean Sea
The Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process in its strategic context
Establishing an APEC MV&E Network
Ecological Gap Analysis Status: 6
Selected Project Covenants (1)
Securing tenure rights for forest landscape-dependent communities: Overview Esther Mwangi CIFOR Annual Meeting 17th October, 2017 Bogor, Indonesia.
The Regional Dimension of the implementation of the 2030 Agenda
Regions for Sustainable Change Project
Making the case for a Green Development Mechanism (GDM)
Building Knowledge about ESD Indicators
GFOI Plenary Breakout Groups: GFOI priorities
Poverty Alleviation Initiatives in ASEAN
Lena Bergström, Project Coordinator
First draft of ALiSEA charter: clarification and approbation
References to Economic Instruments in Selected MEAs
Safeguards and Co-benefits in a REDD+ Mechanism Garanties et co-bénéfices liés au mécanisme REDD+ With support from the Norwegian Development Agency.
Peer Consultation Workgroups
Towards a Work Programme for the Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Water Directors Meeting 28 November.
HELCOM WORK Submitted by the Contracting Parties in HELCOM that are also EU member states Name Surname.
Ðì SA Effective Monitoring and Evaluation of Progress on the SDGs Monitoring SDGs : the perspective of Armstat Learning Conference: Implementing.
Evelyne Nkeng Peh Department of Social Affairs
IUCN’s Global Priorities supporting BIOPAMA Trevor Sandwith
Main recommendations & conclusions (1)
[Name and affiliation of presenter(s)]
UNEP / Division of Early Warning and Assessment (DEWA)
[Name and affiliation of presenter(s)]
Assessment scales and aggregation
Presentation transcript:

[Name and affiliation of presenter(s)] [Country and agency/organization] Combined safeguards and sub-regional capacity building workshop on REDD-plus, Singapore, 15-18 March 2011 [Name and affiliation of presenter(s)]

National experience with REDD-plus Key questions: What is the national structure for REDD-plus planning? What is the status of REDD-plus preparations? How are biodiversity experts involved (including holders of traditional knowledge)? How are indigenous and local communities involved? Are there experiences from the voluntary carbon market that you are drawing from?

National experience with biodiversity safeguards Key questions: Level of political support and capacity for including biodiversity safeguards? Which are the main obstacles for including biodiversity safeguards? What are concrete capacity building needs regarding biodiversity safeguards (if any), and at which level (government, civil society/IPs, local communities)? What are main lessons learned so far regarding biodiversity safeguards?

National experience with safeguards for indigenous and local communities Key questions: What is the structure of civil society organizations representing indigenous and local community views? Are their views well coordinated? What are the mechanisms through which the views of indigenous and local communities are considered? How are concerns related to CBD Articles 8j (respect for traditional knowledge) and 10c (support customary use of biodiversity) reflected in REDD-plus planning and design?

National experience with assessing/ monitoring impacts of REDD-plus Key questions: Are you planning tools to assess/monitor the impacts of REDD-plus on biodiversity and indigenous and local livelihoods? If so, how? E.g. have you identified or designed any criteria and indicators for REDD-plus impacts on biodiversity? Has your country completed the National Ecological Gap analysis under the CBD (for explanation, click here)? Are the national gap analyses considered in REDD planning? Are you applying or developing multiple benefit tools at national level, e.g. mapping of biodiversity and carbon overlays (such as www.carbon-biodiversity.net/OtherScales)?

Regional collaboration regarding safeguards and impact assessment Key questions: Do you participate in regional and international exchanges of REDD-plus pilot experiences regarding multiple benefits? What is their value? What is the level of regional collaboration on REDD-plus e.g. through regional organizations such as ASEAN? What regional and international support (in addition to support provided by UN-REDD/FCPF/ITTO, etc.) would be useful?

[your contact details] thank you! merci! ¡gracias! [your contact details]