Beyond Homing: Competition between Intron Endonucleases Confers a Selective Advantage on Flanking Genetic Markers  Heidi Goodrich-Blair, David A Shub 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 1. RT–PCR identification of an abnormal transcript of the PTPN6 gene in normal and leukemic bone marrow cells and cell line. (a) Diagrammatic representation.
Advertisements

Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (March 1997)
Chapter 20: DNA Technology and Genomics
Recombinant DNA Technology
Mark M Metzstein, H.Robert Horvitz  Molecular Cell 
Mobility of Yeast Mitochondrial Group II Introns: Engineering a New Site Specificity and Retrohoming via Full Reverse Splicing  Robert Eskes, Jian Yang,
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 Mismatch Repair Protein Localizes to Recombination Intermediates In Vivo  Elizabeth Evans, Neal Sugawara, James E Haber,
Recombinant DNA Technology
The RNA World of the Nucleolus: Two Major Families of Small RNAs Defined by Different Box Elements with Related Functions  Andrey G Balakin, Laurie Smith,
The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Cotranscriptionally Formed DNA:RNA Hybrids Mediate Transcription Elongation Impairment and Transcription-Associated Recombination  Pablo Huertas, Andrés.
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Levels of Polyadenylation Factor CstF-64 Control IgM Heavy Chain mRNA Accumulation and Other Events Associated with B Cell Differentiation  Yoshio Takagaki,
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
Erik D. Larson, W. Jason Cummings, David W. Bednarski, Nancy Maizels 
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Commitment to Splice Site Pairing Coincides with A Complex Formation
Analysis of Telomerase Processivity
Ben B. Hopkins, Tanya T. Paull  Cell 
The Transmembrane Kinase Ire1p Is a Site-Specific Endonuclease That Initiates mRNA Splicing in the Unfolded Protein Response  Carmela Sidrauski, Peter.
Transcriptional Control of the Mouse Col7a1 Gene in Keratinocytes: Basal and Transforming Growth Factor-β Regulated Expression  Michael Naso, Jouni Uitto,
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (March 1997)
Interaction with PCNA Is Essential for Yeast DNA Polymerase η Function
Tanya T. Paull, Martin Gellert  Molecular Cell 
Identification and differential expression of human collagenase-3 mRNA species derived from internal deletion, alternative splicing, and different polyadenylation.
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
An RNA Sensor for Intracellular Mg2+
Rapid identification of efficient target cleavage sites using a hammerhead ribozyme library in an iterative manner  Wei-Hua Pan, Ping Xin, Vuong Bui,
Hairpin Coding End Opening Is Mediated by RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Marc Spingola, Manuel Ares  Molecular Cell 
NanoRNAs Prime Transcription Initiation In Vivo
Linear Mitochondrial Plasmids of F
Beth Elliott, Christine Richardson, Maria Jasin  Molecular Cell 
Progressive Structural Transitions within Mu Transpositional Complexes
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Melissa S Jurica, Raymond J Monnat, Barry L Stoddard  Molecular Cell 
Coding Joint Formation in a Cell-Free V(D)J Recombination System
Three-Site Synapsis during Mu DNA Transposition: A Critical Intermediate Preceding Engagement of the Active Site  Mark A Watson, George Chaconas  Cell 
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
Regulation of the Expression of Peptidylarginine Deiminase Type II Gene (PADI2) in Human Keratinocytes Involves Sp1 and Sp3 Transcription Factors  Sijun.
Brh2 Promotes a Template-Switching Reaction Enabling Recombinational Bypass of Lesions during DNA Synthesis  Nayef Mazloum, William K. Holloman  Molecular.
Mu Transpositional Recombination: Donor DNA Cleavage and Strand Transfer in trans by the Mu Transposase  Harri Savilahti, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell  Volume.
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Chapter 20: DNA Technology and Genomics
Srabani Mukherjee, Luis G. Brieba, Rui Sousa  Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Scott J Diede, Daniel E Gottschling  Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Importance of a Single Base Pair for Discrimination between Intron-Containing and Intronless Alleles by Endonuclease I-BmoI  David R. Edgell, Matthew.
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Expression of multiple forms of MEL1 gene products.
Vytautas Naktinis, Jennifer Turner, Mike O'Donnell  Cell 
Exon Tethering in Transcription by RNA Polymerase II
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
Generating Crossovers by Resolution of Nicked Holliday Junctions
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Laurel L Lenz, Beverley Dere, Michael J Bevan  Immunity 
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Exon Skipping in IVD RNA Processing in Isovaleric Acidemia Caused by Point Mutations in the Coding Region of the IVD Gene  Jerry Vockley, Peter K. Rogan,
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Presentation transcript:

Beyond Homing: Competition between Intron Endonucleases Confers a Selective Advantage on Flanking Genetic Markers  Heidi Goodrich-Blair, David A Shub  Cell  Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages 211-221 (January 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80976-9

Figure 1 Intron ORF Proteins Bind DNA (A) End-labeled fragments of intron-minus target DNA (SP82ΔI, lanes 1–6, or SPO1ΔI, lanes 7–12) were incubated with proteins synthesized in S30 extracts without added template DNA (lanes 1, 2, 7, and 8), with SPO1 intron ORF DNA (lanes 3, 4, 9, and 10), or with SP82 intron ORF DNA (lanes 5, 6, 11, and 12). Immediately after the addition of protein extracts to target DNAs (0 min), a sample was removed and quenched. The remainder of the reaction was incubated for 30 min at 30°C. Products were separated on a nondenaturing 5% SDS–polyacrylamide gel. (B) SP82 intron ORF–directed S30 extracts (plus) or extracts reacted without added DNA (minus) were incubated for 30 min with 50 ng of SPO1 intron-minus DNA end labeled at the 3′ ends. Samples were separated as in (A). We added 1 μg of nonradiolabeled intron-minus (ΔI) or intron-plus (I) plasmid DNA to reactions in lanes 3 and 4, respectively. Samples in lanes 5 and 6 were extracted with phenol prior to electrophoresis. Cell 1996 84, 211-221DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80976-9)

Figure 2 The Intron ORFs Encode Endonucleases Incubations of protein extracts and end-labeled target DNAs were separated by electrophoresis in a 5% polyacrylamide–8 M urea gel. Arrows indicate the positions of the 304 nt substrate and labeled cleavage products, the sizes of which were estimated from DNA size standards (data not shown). (A) SP82. Portions of the incubations displayed in lanes 5 and 6 of Figure 1B are shown in lanes 1 and 2, respectively. The SPO1 intron-minus target DNA is represented schematically, with stars indicating the labeled 3′ ends. The lengths in base pairs of exon I (E I) and exon II (E II) are given above. Putative cleavage sites on the top or bottom strands are indicated by arrows. (B) SPO1. Protein extracts were isolated from E. coli cells harboring either the vector pAII17 (lanes 1 and 2) or pHETO1 (lanes 3 and 4). Expression of protein from the plasmids was either uninduced (lanes 1 and 3) or induced (lanes 2 and 4) by the addition of 0.4 mM IPTG. We incubated 5′ end–labeled SP82 intron-minus target DNA with the protein extracts for 30 min. SP82 intron-minus target DNA is represented schematically as in (A). Stars represent the labeled 5′ ends. Cell 1996 84, 211-221DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80976-9)

Figure 3 I-HmuI and I-HmuII Cleave the Bottom Strands of Target DNAs Target DNAs (predicted size, 304 bp) were differentially end labeled, as indicated by the closed circles in the schematic representations above each lane. After incubation with endonuclease at 30°C for 15 min, the products were separated on a 5% polyacrylamide–8 M urea gel. Sequencing ladders used as size markers for cleavage products were generated by extension (toward the intron ORF) of an end-labeled oligonucleotide hybridizing to the top strand of target DNA within exon II (data not shown). (A) SPO1 intron-minus target DNA incubated with the SP82 intron endonuclease (I-HmuII). (B) SP82 intron-minus target DNA incubated with the SPO1 intron endonuclease (I-HmuI). Cell 1996 84, 211-221DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80976-9)

Figure 4 The Endonucleases Prefer Heterologous DNA (A) Schematic diagram of labeling strategy. Fragments of SPO1 or SP82 DNA (indicated on the left) were 32P end-labeled by filling in or kinasing (indicated by a star). Sizes of labeled fragments expected after cleavage with either I-HmuI (SPO1) or I-HmuII (SP82) are shown. 3′ splice sites (3′ S.S.), EcoRI (E), HindIII (H), and XbaI (X) are indicated. (B) Endonuclease assay. Individual intron-minus (open triangle) or intron-plus (plus) SPO1 (O1) or SP82 (82) target DNAs were incubated with 0.5 μl of extracts containing either the SPO1 (I-HmuI, lanes 1–4) or SP82 (I-HmuII, lanes 5–8) intron endonuclease at 30°C for 6 min. The four end-labeled DNAs mixed together (lanes 9–13) were not incubated (lane 9) or were incubated with 0.5 μl of I-HmuI (lane 10), 0.5 μl of I-HmuII (lane 11), or 0.5 μl (lane 12) or 1 μl (lane 13) of both endonucleases. An open diamond has been placed over uncleaved DNA (either the top strand or uncleaved bottom strand), and a downward caret has been placed over fragments of the expected size for cleavage products of the respective enzymes. On the right, cleavage products are identified as to the source of DNA (SP82 or SPO1) and the enzyme generating the product (I-HmuI [I] or I-HmuII [II]). Cleavage products that are the result of homologous interactions (e.g., SP82 DNA cleaved by I-HmuII) are labeled with asterisks. The numbers to the left of the figure indicate the sizes in nucleotides of DNA standards (data not shown). Cell 1996 84, 211-221DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80976-9)

Figure 5 Primer Extension Cleavage Analysis on Phage DNA Phage DNAs were isolated 20 min after infections of B. subtilis hosts CB312 (SUP−) or CB313 (SUP+). SPO1-specific oligonucleotide 19 (A and C) and SP82-specific oligonucleotide 11 (B and D) homologous to intron sequences were extended toward the intron endonuclease cut sites with Taq DNA polymerase. Reactions were separated next to a ladder generated from the same kinased primer on DNA asymmetrically amplified from mature phage. Run-off products corresponding to the cleavage positions expected for I-HmuI and I-HmuII are shown with arrows. Shown are single infection of SPO1 or SPO1k4oc (A), single infection of SP82 or SP82k4oc (B), and mixed infection of wild-type SPO1 and SP82 (C and D). Cell 1996 84, 211-221DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80976-9)

Figure 5 Primer Extension Cleavage Analysis on Phage DNA Phage DNAs were isolated 20 min after infections of B. subtilis hosts CB312 (SUP−) or CB313 (SUP+). SPO1-specific oligonucleotide 19 (A and C) and SP82-specific oligonucleotide 11 (B and D) homologous to intron sequences were extended toward the intron endonuclease cut sites with Taq DNA polymerase. Reactions were separated next to a ladder generated from the same kinased primer on DNA asymmetrically amplified from mature phage. Run-off products corresponding to the cleavage positions expected for I-HmuI and I-HmuII are shown with arrows. Shown are single infection of SPO1 or SPO1k4oc (A), single infection of SP82 or SP82k4oc (B), and mixed infection of wild-type SPO1 and SP82 (C and D). Cell 1996 84, 211-221DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80976-9)

Figure 6 Endonuclease Cleavage Sites The sequence of the bottom strand of SP82 DNA is presented. The nucleotide sequence of SPO1 DNA is identical except where indicated (in bold). The 3′ splice site (3′ S.S.) and cleavage positions of the SPO1 intron endonuclease (I-HmuI) and the SP82 intron endonuclease (I-HmuII) are indicated by arrows. Cell 1996 84, 211-221DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80976-9)

Figure 7 Marker Exclusion Mediated by I-HmuII SPO1 sus31-1 was coinfected with SPO1k4oc, SP82k4oc, or wild-type SPO1 or SP82. The percentage (with standard deviations) of SPO1 sus31-1 mutants in the progeny was determined from six separate experiments. Closed bars represent data from mixed infections of Sup− B. subtilis strain CB312. Hatched bars represent data from mixed infections of lysine-inserting ochre suppressor (Sup+) B. subtilis strain CB313. Cell 1996 84, 211-221DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80976-9)

Figure 8 Intron Homing and Marker Exclusion Are Fundamentally Similar Intron homing, exemplified by the group I intron (ω) in yeast mitochondrial large subunit ribosomal RNA (left), and exclusion of SPO1 markers by phage SP82 (right) are schematically outlined. The ω intron harbors an ORF that encodes an endonuclease, I-SceI. This endonuclease recognizes the IIS (vertical line) of its intron-minus (I−) allele (open box), introducing a staggered double-stranded (d.s.) cleavage at this site. Marker exclusion is mediated by I-HmuII, encoded in the ORF of the intron in SP82 gene 31. In contrast with I-SceI, this endonuclease cuts only a single strand (s.s.) in the downstream exon of the homologous intron-plus gene of SPO1. Both processes result in conversion of closely linked recipient (open) alleles to donor (closed) alleles in a gradient decreasing from the cut site. Cell 1996 84, 211-221DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80976-9)