Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sex-Specific Deployment of FGF Signaling in Drosophila Recruits Mesodermal Cells into the Male Genital Imaginal Disc  Shaad M. Ahmad, Bruce S. Baker 
Advertisements

Drosophila Neuroblasts Sequentially Express Transcription Factors which Specify the Temporal Identity of Their Neuronal Progeny  Takako Isshiki, Bret.
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Distinct Mechanisms of Apoptosis-Induced Compensatory Proliferation in Proliferating and Differentiating Tissues in the Drosophila Eye  Yun Fan, Andreas.
The Sex Determination Gene doublesex Regulates the A/P Organizer to Direct Sex- Specific Patterns of Growth in the Drosophila Genital Imaginal Disc  Eric.
Tony DeFalco, Nicole Camara, Stéphanie Le Bras, Mark Van Doren 
Lacy J. Barton, Belinda S. Pinto, Lori L. Wallrath, Pamela K. Geyer 
Seven-up Controls Switching of Transcription Factors that Specify Temporal Identities of Drosophila Neuroblasts  Makoto I. Kanai, Masataka Okabe, Yasushi.
Clone patterns and frequencies produced by lines 168 and 688A.
Monica Boyle, Chihunt Wong, Michael Rocha, D. Leanne Jones 
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Dedifferentiating Spermatogonia Outcompete Somatic Stem Cells for Niche Occupancy in the Drosophila Testis  X. Rebecca Sheng, Crista M. Brawley, Erika.
Phf7 Controls Male Sex Determination in the Drosophila Germline
Volume 9, Issue 15, Pages S1-840 (August 1999)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Victor Hatini, Stephen DiNardo  Molecular Cell 
Integrin Signaling Regulates Spindle Orientation in Drosophila to Preserve the Follicular- Epithelium Monolayer  Ana Fernández-Miñán, María D. Martín-Bermudo,
Jianjun Sun, Wu-Min Deng  Developmental Cell 
POP-1 and Anterior–Posterior Fate Decisions in C. elegans Embryos
Muscles in the Drosophila second thoracic segment are patterned independently of autonomous homeotic gene function  Sudipto Roy, L.S. Shashidhara, K VijayRaghavan 
Decapentaplegic Is Essential for the Maintenance and Division of Germline Stem Cells in the Drosophila Ovary  Ting Xie, Allan C Spradling  Cell  Volume.
Transcription in the Absence of Histone H3.2 and H3K4 Methylation
A Crucial Interaction between Embryonic Red Blood Cell Progenitors and Paraxial Mesoderm Revealed in spadetail Embryos  Laurel A. Rohde, Andrew C. Oates,
From Stem Cell to Embryo without Centrioles
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Boss/Sev Signaling from Germline to Soma Restricts Germline-Stem-Cell-Niche Formation in the Anterior Region of Drosophila Male Gonads  Yu Kitadate, Shuji.
Definitive Hematopoiesis Requires the Mixed-Lineage Leukemia Gene
Jacob Gonzalez, Hongying Qi, Na Liu, Haifan Lin  Cell Reports 
The Drosophila Hindgut Lacks Constitutively Active Adult Stem Cells but Proliferates in Response to Tissue Damage  Donald T. Fox, Allan C. Spradling 
Volume 19, Issue 18, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Temporal and Spatial Control of Germ-Plasm RNAs
Zfh-1 Controls Somatic Stem Cell Self-Renewal in the Drosophila Testis and Nonautonomously Influences Germline Stem Cell Self-Renewal  Judith L. Leatherman,
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Mark Van Doren, Anne L. Williamson, Ruth Lehmann  Current Biology 
Short-Range Cell Interactions and Cell Survival in the Drosophila Wing
A Role of Receptor Notch in Ligand cis-Inhibition in Drosophila
The C. elegans Glycopeptide Hormone Receptor Ortholog, FSHR-1, Regulates Germline Differentiation and Survival  Saeyoull Cho, Katherine W. Rogers, David S.
Whole-Genome Analysis of Muscle Founder Cells Implicates the Chromatin Regulator Sin3A in Muscle Identity  Krista C. Dobi, Marc S. Halfon, Mary K. Baylies 
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Male-specific cell migration into the developing gonad
Recruitment of Ectodermal Attachment Cells via an EGFR-Dependent Mechanism during the Organogenesis of Drosophila Proprioceptors  Adi Inbal, Talila Volk,
Hans Schotman, Leena Karhinen, Catherine Rabouille  Developmental Cell 
Epigenetic Regulation of Stem Cell Maintenance in the Drosophila Testis via the Nucleosome-Remodeling Factor NURF  Christopher M. Cherry, Erika L. Matunis 
The Hippo Pathway Regulates the bantam microRNA to Control Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis in Drosophila  Barry J. Thompson, Stephen M. Cohen  Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Yu-Chiun Wang, Zia Khan, Eric F. Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Novel Functions of nanos in Downregulating Mitosis and Transcription during the Development of the Drosophila Germline  Girish Deshpande, Gretchen Calhoun,
Shree Ram Singh, Wei Liu, Steven X. Hou  Cell Stem Cell 
Autonomous Modes of Behavior in Primordial Germ Cell Migration
Producing Cells Retain and Recycle Wingless in Drosophila Embryos
Volume 105, Issue 5, Pages (June 2001)
Conversion of Quiescent Niche Cells to Somatic Stem Cells Causes Ectopic Niche Formation in the Drosophila Testis  Phylis Hétié, Margaret de Cuevas, Erika.
Paracrine Signaling through the JAK/STAT Pathway Activates Invasive Behavior of Ovarian Epithelial Cells in Drosophila  Debra L. Silver, Denise J. Montell 
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
FGF Signaling Regulates Mesoderm Cell Fate Specification and Morphogenetic Movement at the Primitive Streak  Brian Ciruna, Janet Rossant  Developmental.
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Oocyte polarity is disrupted in the presence of FP41 mutant PFCs
Epigenetic Regulation of Stem Cell Maintenance in the Drosophila Testis via the Nucleosome-Remodeling Factor NURF  Christopher M. Cherry, Erika L. Matunis 
Gene Amplification as a Developmental Strategy
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (August 1996)
Coordination of Growth and Cell Division in the Drosophila Wing
Different Levels of the Homeodomain Protein Cut Regulate Distinct Dendrite Branching Patterns of Drosophila Multidendritic Neurons  Wesley B Grueber,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 205-216 (August 2003) Sex-Specific Apoptosis Regulates Sexual Dimorphism in the Drosophila Embryonic Gonad  Tony J DeFalco, Geraldine Verney, Allison B Jenkins, J.Michael McCaffery, Steven Russell, Mark Van Doren  Developmental Cell  Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 205-216 (August 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00204-1 Copyright © 2003 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Sexual Dimorphism in the Embryonic Gonad Drosophila stage (st.) 15 embryonic female (A, C, E, G, and I) and male (B, D, F, H, and J) gonads. Anterior is to left in all panels. Vasa, Eya, and Sox100B were revealed with immunofluorescence. Wnt-2 was analyzed with fluorescent in situ hybridization. Colors of stainings are as indicated in panels. (A–F) Wild-type faf-lacZ embryos. (F, inset) 68-77 enhancer trap expressing β-galactosidase in the SGPs. (G and H) foi mutant embryos. (I and J) osk mutant agametic embryos. Note increased staining in posterior of male gonads. Magnification in (G) and (H) is 0.75× relative to all other panels. Developmental Cell 2003 5, 205-216DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00204-1) Copyright © 2003 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Male and Female Gonads Are Morphologically Distinct The posterior of the gonad is as indicated (P) in each panel. (A and B) St. 15 female (A) and male (B) gonads expressing CD8-GFP in the mesoderm (UAS-mCD8::GFP x twist-GAL4). Anti-Vasa (red) labels germ cells, and anti-GFP (green) marks the cell surface of somatic mesodermal cells. Outlines of gonads are indicated by dashed lines. (C and D) Sagittal TEM sections of st. 15 female (C) and a male (D) gonads. Dashed lines mark the boundaries of each gonad. Germ cells in (C) and (D) are indicated by asterisks. Developmental Cell 2003 5, 205-216DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00204-1) Copyright © 2003 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Time Course for Establishment of Sexual Dimorphism in the Embryonic Gonad Wild-type female (A, C, E, and G) and male (B, D, F, H, and I) embryos undergoing gonad coalescence. Anterior is to left in all panels. Vasa (blue), Sox100B (red), and Eya (green) were revealed by immunofluorescence. (A and B) St. 12 gonads with Sox100B-immunopositive cell cluster (arrows) posterior to germ cells. (C and D) St. 13 gonads. (E and F) Early st. 14 gonads. (G) St. 15 female gonad. Note that the Sox100B-immunopositive cell cluster is not observed in females at this stage. (H) Late st. 14 male gonad. (I) St. 15 male gonad. Sex of embryos was determined using an X chromosome-linked transgene (P{Dfd-lacZ-HZ2.7}, see Experimental Procedures). Developmental Cell 2003 5, 205-216DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00204-1) Copyright © 2003 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The msSGPs Are Specified Separately from the SGPs Anterior is to left in all panels. All markers were revealed using immunofluorescence. Colors of stainings are as indicated in panels. (A) Wild-type st. 12 embryo. Engrailed staining marks the parasegmental boundaries. Note Sox100B-expressing mesoderm (arrowhead) arising under PS13 En stripe. Sox100B staining is also observed in nongonadal tissues, such as anterior midgut primordium, posterior midgut primordium, and Malpighian tubules, as previously reported (Loh and Russell, 2000). (B) Wild-type st. 13 embryo showing Sox100B/Eya double-positive msSGPs (arrow). (C) tin zfh-1 mutant st. 13 embryo with msSGPs visible (arrow) and PS10-12 SGPs disrupted (outline). (D) abd-A mutant st. 13 embryo with msSGPs visible (arrow) and PS10-12 SGPs disrupted (outline). (E) eya mutant st. 13 embryo. Note presence of msSGPs (arrowhead). Other Sox100B expression is observed in Malpighian tubules and hindgut, as previously described (Loh and Russell, 2000). (F) Sox100B mutant st. 15 male gonad. Sex of the embryo in (F) was determined using an anti-Sxl antibody. Magnification in (F) is 4× relative to all other panels. Developmental Cell 2003 5, 205-216DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00204-1) Copyright © 2003 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Sexual Dimorphism in the Embryonic Gonad Requires tra and dsx (A–J) St. 15 XX (A, C, E, G, and I) and XY (B, D, F, H, and J) embryonic gonads. Vasa (red) and Sox100B (green) were revealed using immunofluorescence. Genotypes of embryos are as indicated in panels. Genotypes were determined by using GFP-labeled balancer chromosomes, and sex of embryos was determined using an anti-Sxl antibody. (K) Quantitation of average Sox100B staining in various mutant backgrounds. A scale of −2 to +2 was created (see Experimental Procedures), with −2 denoting a complete absence of gonadal Sox100B staining at st. 15 (e.g., [A]) and +2 denoting a large cap of bright posterior gonadal Sox100B staining (e.g., [B]). Average values for each genotype are indicated adjacent to bars. Red bars indicate XX embryos and blue bars indicate XY embryos. Error bars denote standard deviations. Genotypes: wt = faf-lacZ, tra = tra1/ tra1, dsx = dsx1/dsx23, dsxD/dsx = dsxD/dsx1. Developmental Cell 2003 5, 205-216DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00204-1) Copyright © 2003 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 msSGPs Undergo Sex-Specific Programmed Cell Death St. 16 embryonic female (A, C, and E) and male (B, D, and F) gonads. Vasa (red) and Sox100B (green) were analyzed with immunofluorescence. (A and B) Gonads in embryos ectopically expressing p35 in the mesoderm (UAS-p35 x twist-GAL4, 24B-GAL4). (C and D) H99 deficiency (DfH99) homozygous mutant gonads. (E and F) hidA206/DfH99 mutant gonads. Developmental Cell 2003 5, 205-216DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00204-1) Copyright © 2003 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Positional Information and Sexual Identity Are Integrated to Create Sexual Dimorphism Model for how msSGPs arise in PS13 and how their behavior is regulated in a sex-specific manner. Parasegment-specific and mesoderm-specific factors are required for msSGP specification, while sexual identity determines whether or not the msSGPs undergo apoptosis. Developmental Cell 2003 5, 205-216DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00204-1) Copyright © 2003 Cell Press Terms and Conditions