Karin Kühnel, Stefan Veltel, Ilme Schlichting, Alfred Wittinghofer 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
A Naturally Occurring Repeat Protein with High Internal Sequence Identity Defines a New Class of TPR-like Proteins  Jacob D. Marold, Jennifer M. Kavran,
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Structure of the Rab7:REP-1 Complex
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Crystal Structure of Activated HutP
Callum Smits, Peter E. Czabotar, Mark G. Hinds, Catherine L. Day 
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Yiqun Deng, Jie Liu, Qi Zheng, Wei Yong, Min Lu  Structure 
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
Suvendu Lomash, Sagar Chittori, Patrick Brown, Mark L. Mayer  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Crystal Structure of a Phosphoinositide Phosphatase, MTMR2
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (November 2007)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Tianjun Zhou, Liguang Sun, John Humphreys, Elizabeth J. Goldsmith 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
The Active Conformation of the PAK1 Kinase Domain
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Domain of Sialoadhesin in Complex with 3′ Sialyllactose at 1.85 Å Resolution  A.P. May, R.C. Robinson, M. Vinson,
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Clemens C. Heikaus, Jayvardhan Pandit, Rachel E. Klevit  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
A Plug Release Mechanism for Membrane Permeation by MLKL
Yiqun Deng, Jie Liu, Qi Zheng, Wei Yong, Min Lu  Structure 
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (August 2006)
Presentation transcript:

Crystal Structure of the Human Retinitis Pigmentosa 2 Protein and Its Interaction with Arl3  Karin Kühnel, Stefan Veltel, Ilme Schlichting, Alfred Wittinghofer  Structure  Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 367-378 (February 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2005.11.008 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure of RP2 (A) Ribbon diagram of RP2, with green β strands, red α helices, and gray loop regions. In the N-terminal β helix domain, strands a, b, and c form the parallel β sheets PB1, PB1a, and PB2. The C-terminal α/β domain has a ferredoxin-like fold. The model includes residues 34–347. (B) Cα chain traces of the superimposed β helix domains from RP2 (red) and C-CAP (blue). (C) Details of the β helix fold. A horizontal cross-section of RP2 around coil 3 shows a rectangular shape of the β helix; hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions stabilize the fold. Asp85 and Asn88 both adopt a left-handed α-helical conformation. The final 2Fo − Fc electron density is shown (contour level σ = 1.0). (D) Vertical (along the helical axis) cross-section of the β helix domain, showing strands b and c and the corresponding sheets PB1a and PB2, respectively. Side chains inside the core and residues pointing toward the solvent are stacked in a ladder-like fashion. Structure 2006 14, 367-378DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.11.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Sequence Conservation between the N-Terminal β Helix Domain of RP2 and the C-Terminal Domain of Cofactor C (A) Alignment of amino acid sequences of human RP2 (O75695, Swiss-Prot), mouse RP2 (Q9EPK2, TrEMBL), rat RP2 (XM_346266, NCBI), Xenopus RP2 (BC04122, NCBI), and cofactor C of human (Q15814, Swiss-Prot), chimpanzee (XM_518477, NCBI), dog (XM_538923, NCBI), and chicken (XM_426123, NCBI) are shown. Conserved residues are highlighted, with the degree of conservation decreasing from dark green to yellow. Sequence alignment was done with ClustalW (Higgins et al., 1996), and analysis of the degree of conservation was done with AMAS (Livingstone and Barton, 1993). Missense mutations identified in retinitis pigmentosa patients are marked with an asterisk. The catalytically important residue Arg118 is labeled in red. (B) Surface representation of the β helix domain with surface residues of the β helix domain color coded according to their degree of conservation as in (A); the front side is on the left, and the less-conserved back side is on the right. The position of Arg118 is marked with a red asterisk. The backbone of the C-terminal domain is shown in blue. Structure 2006 14, 367-378DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.11.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Comparison between the C-Terminal RP2 Domain and NDP Kinase (A) Superimposition of Cα chain traces of the C-terminal RP2 domain (red, residues 229–347) and Dictyostelium NDP kinase (blue, residues 6–155, PDB code: 1hiy) with bound 3′deoxy-3′amino-ADP (black) is shown. The transiently phosphorylated His122 in NDP kinase is replaced by Phe325 in RP2; the side chain of Asp287 of RP2 would clash with the sugar moiety of ADP. (B) Structure-based sequence alignment between the C-terminal RP2 domain and NDP kinase. The catalytically important residue His122 of NDP kinase is labeled with a red asterisk. Secondary structure elements of both structures are shown, and identical residues are marked. Superimposition and sequence alignment were done with DaliLite (Holm and Park, 2000). Structure 2006 14, 367-378DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.11.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Patient Mutations in RP2 (A) Stereoview of the Cα backbone of RP2; every tenth Cα atom is labeled. Side chains of residues mutated in RP patients and corresponding missense mutations are included. (B) Localization and interaction of Arg118, a residue essential for the GAP activity of the tubulin cofactor C, and RP2, which is frequently mutated in RP. Hydrogen bonds between the arginine side chain and nearby waters are shown. The second lower occupied conformation of Arg118 is shown in light blue and forms a salt bridge with Glu138, which is also mutated in RP. Structure 2006 14, 367-378DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.11.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Arl3 Binds to the N-Terminal Domain of RP2 (A) RP2 is specific for Arl3. A total of 200 μM nucleotide-free Arl2 (black) or Arl3 (red) was added to 1 μM mGppNHp to saturate the nucleotide with protein. After equilibration, 10 μM RP2 was added, which yields an additional increase in polarization for Arl3, but not for Arl2. (B) Binding of Arl3 to the N terminus of RP2. A total of 200 μM nucleotide-free Arl3-His protein was added to 1 μM mGppNHp in several steps to reach saturation. As indicated, 10 μM full-length RP2, N-terminal domain, or C-terminal domain as GST fusion constructs were added. An increase of polarization could only be observed for the full-length protein or the N-terminal domain. Structure 2006 14, 367-378DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.11.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Equilibrium Binding Measurements of the RP2-Arl3 Interaction (A and B) A total of 1 μM (A) Arl3-mGppNHp or (B) Arl3-mGDP was titrated with increasing amounts of RP2, and the increase in polarization was plotted against the RP2 concentration. Data were fitted to a quadratic equation to determine the equilibrium dissociation constants. (C) Inhibition of the nucleotide dissociation from Arl3 protein by the interaction with RP2. The observed dissociation rates of mGppNHp from Arl3 were plotted against the RP2 concentrations used in the GDI assay. The concentration of Arl3-mGppNHp was 500 nM. The curve was fitted with a single exponential equation to determine the equilibrium dissociation constant. Structure 2006 14, 367-378DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.11.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 N-Terminal Deletion and RP Patient Mutations Affect the RP2-Arl3 Interaction (A) Affinities of the RP2 mutants R118H, E138G, R282W, or RP2Δ34 to Arl3 were measured by fluorescence polarization as described for wild-type in Figure 6A. The measured Kd values for each mutant are shown. (B) CD spectra of 2.5 μM wild-type and mutant RP2 in 5 mM K2HPO4/KH2PO4 (pH 7.4) at 20°C. Structure 2006 14, 367-378DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.11.008) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions